wanting more
by Douglas Messerli
Matthew Baldwin, Thomas Hescott, and Peter
Lawson (screenplay), Thomas Hescott (director)
The Act / 2020
[18 minutes]
The standard description of this British short
film is more than a little misleading:
“In 1965 the eve of decriminalization for acts
of male homosexuality in the U.K. Matthews, a young gay man at odds with the
world, discovers love, sex, and a new family in the backstreets and underground
bars of Soho.”
In
fact, although the bill for decriminalization along the lines of the Wolfenden
Report nine years earlier proposed in the House of Commons by Conservative MP
Humphry Berkeley, it was not voted upon until 1966 and was defeated, with
Berkeley, a well-known homosexual, also losing his seat in the 1966 reelection.
The bill, known as the Sexual Offences Bill, did not pass until 1967. In 1965,
when Lord Arran first proposed the bill in the House of Lords, 93% of the
British population still believed that homosexuality was a form of illness that
required medical treatment, a sentiment expressed as well in the bits and
pieces of the speech read out throughout director Thomas Hescott’s movie, even
though the year before that speech the North West Homosexual Law Reform
Committee was founded, abandoning the medical model of homosexuality as a
sickness.
The real focus of the film, in any event, is not on the Sexual Offences Bill, but on a single individual named Matthews (Samuel Barnett), who it appears for the first time decides to explore a gay bar in Soho, probably named the Flamingo, its entry being defined by a small pink flamingo neon sign, into which, after being propositioned by a prostitute, the frightened businessman, scurries.
Immediately he encounters the flamboyant black, “Edna May…Duchess”
(Cyril Nri), Matthews responding with his last name, pause, “Mr.” After a joke
about Matthews’ serious demeanor, wondering if he’d been caught down at the
docks sucking fishermen by the cops—almost scarring our new friend off—the
Duchess sweeps him back into the communal spirit of the place by permitting him
to buy her a drink and explaining, “We are all family here.”
Much of this beautifully filmed work involves, in between the fulsome
and misconceived statements we hear from Arthur Gore, Lord Arran from the House
of Lords* (“I understand that “it” is an involuntary deviation, not hereditary
but due to some emotional factor during childhood”), Matthews’ attempts to form
a relationship with Jimmy fail. He suggests he could financially help him, that
Jimmy might even move in with him, all to no avail.
In
one scene, after they have had sex, he quite hilariously attempts to convince
his new “friend” to attend a production of Orfeo with him at Covent
Garden. When Matthews attempts to explain that Orfeo is hoping to rescue his
wife with the possibility of losing his very soul just to be with her again,
Jimmy innocently asks, “Has he got ‘goons’?” Matthews responding, “No guns,
just a lute.” As Jimmy begins dressing to leave, Matthews asks once more, “Can
I kiss you?”
Meanwhile, Matthews is back at the bar sitting with Edna May as the
jukebox plays “O Danny Boy.” He has become a regular.
But finally, Jimmy begins demanding money. He hasn’t worked for the week
and he needs money for his rent. Matthews suggests that if he gets a place,
perhaps Jimmy could live with him, with the angry response, “I ain’t your
little project!” Finally, Matthews confesses that he likes Jimmy “a lot.” “We
allow ourselves to have friends and sex with strangers that doesn’t mean
anything. And I am tired of feeling that it what life is.”
“I ain’t like you,” Jimmy repeats.
But Matthews has finally become outspoken in his love: “I want more. I
look at you and I want more.”
They argue, Jimmy almost beating him. “You want to be careful how you
talk to me.”
Matthews: “I appear to be in love with you. And I can’t just turn it
off.”
Another visit to a public bathroom ends in Matthews’ arrest, and soon
after Jimmy turning against him, since he too has now been visited by the
police after they have found correspondence between the two in Matthews room.
Matthews loses his job and is forced to leave his boarding house. But he is
still willing to “take the blame for ‘leading’ him,” which in British law stems
from a presumption that gay men force their sexuality upon innocent others. The
only question Matthews has of Jimmy is “at the other end, will you wait for
me?” But again, Jimmy proclaims “I ain’t like you.”
In
Matthews’ interview with the police, we suddenly see the rise of gay liberation
through the smallest of units, the simplest of acts. He insists on knowing how
the letters are any indication of a criminal act. “Am I being questioned about
what I do or…who I am? Your job is to consider whether or not I have committed
acts of indecency and should be removed from society! If you’re asking if I’m
an ‘invert,” yes, I am. I am not the only invert in this country. Your child’s
teacher, your doctor, your bachelor uncle. …In the simple act of speaking out
we change the world.”
To see what this formerly timid man has become helps us to realize what
only a few years later made transgender women, boys, and others rebel against
the police attempting to close down their favorite bar in the USA, their only
home (in this case Stonewall) once again. They had had enough. They wanted
more! They had realized it was finally time to speak out.
In the very last scene Matthews is back at the Flamingo, sitting with
his now close acquaintance, Edna Mae. She complains that she waiting for her
ideal man but that probably such a man would be a policeman. They toast.
Suddenly her eyes catch a newcomer, crossing the doorway. Matthews turns to
look and observes Jimmy entering.
He
quickly gets up and goes to him, this time is question of “Can I kiss you,”
being answered with a kiss.
Although Hescott’s film might seem to resound with British gay history,
the real history in this fiction is made by the frightened businessman who has
finally reached the end of his patient wait for things to change.
*To be fair to Gore, he sponsored the bill
primarily because his elder brother committed suicide in 1958, reportedly
because he was gay.
Los Angeles, February 4, 2023
Reprinted from World Cinema Review (February
2023)



No comments:
Post a Comment