male fetishes
by Douglas Messerli
Christopher Bradley (screenwriter and
director) The Violation / 2013 [10 minutes]
Bradley’s film is a bit odder in other ways as well. Despite Mickey’s
hopeless love of Oscar, it is clear that the older boy wants nothing to do with
him, not only because of the age difference, but as we quickly discover, the
class difference between the two neighboring families. The Heims, with a
swimming pool in their backyard, are obviously rather wealthy. Whereas, the Dougherty
home inside looks more like a cheap boarding house.
And
we soon discover that the reason Mickey is even in their yard is that he works
as a lawnboy for the Heim family. As he announces the completion of his tasks,
Mrs. Heim (Beth Grant) wonders if in a few days when she and her family will be
attending her daughter’s wedding, whether he, Tina, and his mother might not
wish to watch the house for them, since, as she puts it, burglars often read
wedding notices in the paper and know who won’t be home. He and his family
could use their pool and watch their satellite-dish TV which plays on a largest
screen available.
Who could turn such an offer down? Well, Tina for one, who’s offended
that they couldn’t ask them to the wedding but find them suitable only to care
for their house. As for Oscar, she corrects her mother, he didn’t ask her out
on a date, but is a party drunk and asked her if she wanted to make out. But
Mrs. Dougherty (Elaine Hendrix) has no intention of missing out on the special
broadcasts from the satellite-dish and Mickey is obviously fascinated by the
opportunity to see the house from the inside where the object of his desire
lives.
The condescension continues when they arrive as Mrs. Heim describes the
guest bathroom, the television and the pool, suggesting that everything they
might want exists “right here in this little section of the house,” making it
quite clear that the private living room and bedrooms of her home are to be
unoccupied territory.
In Oscar’s bathroom, he stuffs the pants with tissues, sits it on the
closed bathroom stool and rubs his hands slowly up and down the pant legs in a
far more graphic representation of his loved one than Oscar could have imagined
from Tina’s pillow-bound bikini.
A
loud noise comes from downstairs, and when he rushes down, he discovers his
mother, who has evidently had far too much to eat and drink from the friendly
fridge, has thrown up. He hurriedly cleans it up, fixes the lamp she broke, and
gives her a hug. But it is too late to retrieve his waist-down shrine to the
male form from the upstairs bathroom before the Heims return. Mrs. Heim enters,
inspecting the place, as Mickey apologizes for the broken lamp. His mother has
obviously gone back home. Before he leaves, however, he rushes upstairs to take
care of the pants only to discover Oscar already standing in the bathroom
stunned by what sits before him.
Oscar’s only line in the movie says everything about him and the society
in which we live, “It’s not the same thing.”
But the 15-year-old Mickey has the most profound line of the film, “Why
not?”
All Oscar can do is turn in his direction, stare dreadfully into his
face, and stalk off.
Both boys have violated another person and both are equally culpable for
their acts. But society seems to suggest that one is an innocent teenage prank
of sexual desire, while the other is a horrible perversion against the human
race.
This film would be perfect on a short bill with the somewhat lighter
films I review above in this volume, Evan Roberts’ 33 Teeth (2011) and
Mathilde Bayle’s Le maillot de bain (The Swimming Trunks) (2013).
Los Angeles, February 28, 2023
Reprinted from World Cinema Review (February
2023).




No comments:
Post a Comment