swallowing abuse
by
Douglas Messerli
Osama
Chami and Enrique Gimeno (screenwriters and directors) Según Mateo (According to Mateo) / 2017 [20 minutes]
Spanish writers and directors Osama Chami Enrique
Gimeno, in least in their films, are fascinated with the dark corners of sex.
Their later 2021 film, Young Diego, concerns implied and willful
cannibalism. And the central character of this earlier work, According to
Mateo, is clearly into pain and S&M.
Mateo
(Enrique Gimeno) and his lover Marc (Michaël Assié) return home from a club
with a young man they have picked up, Luke (Joe Busk).
At their
apartment, Luke immediately spots a broken mirror on the floor, the pieces of
which Mateo picks up, now hanging the frame by using a large butcher knife, it’s
blade pointed towards him, as a hammer for the nail.
The
well-dressed Marc checks their drug trove, discovering that they are out, and
calls his drug dealer Jon (Manuel Castillo Huber) for an immediate new
delivery.
But
meanwhile, it appears, Mateo has been cut, both in his forehead, and more
severely in his hand, which is bleeding. We can’t perceive whether the cuts had
to do with the broken mirror and the knife, but Marc insists upon wrapping his
hand in gauze while Luke holds it, the act leading to a kiss, and before it has
even begun a threesome as Marc removes Luke’s and Mateo’s shirt, and then his
own, the three moving off into the bed.
Yet as soon as the three begin to have sex,
Marc screams out that Mateo has bitten him, Mateo immediately jumping up and
moving out of the room. A minute later we can already hear the sounds of
lovemaking between Marc and Luke, as Mateo dresses and leaves the house.
Downstairs, he discovers the drug dealer, ready to deliver, Mateo
arguing that there’s no longer anyone upstairs and that he will pay for it. But
Jon is skeptical and wants to deliver it himself, Mateo insisting that he take
him anywhere, Jon finally relenting and taking him to his own home on his motor
bike.
There,
Mateo discovers Jon’s collected of pinned and framed insects, that the man is a
kind of self-taught entomologist, all of which might remind any regular
movie-goer a bit of Norman Bates in Hitchcock’s Psycho, a man interested
in animal taxidermy.
Finished, he commands Mateo to swallow it and leave.
Once
again, however, Mateo remains, even as Jon turns his back to him in returning
to his killing, positioning, and framing of insects. When Jon turns back into
the room, Mateo lays on the floor seemingly in preparation for the S&M like
threats, scissors in hand, that Jon makes as he runs the flat blade of the
small scissors down his chest. Finally, Mateo stops him when his hand and metal
slips over his right gut, Mateo insisting it is the correct spot.
Jon takes up the small scissors and stabs
its point deeply into Mateo, the handsome young man now bleeding in several
spots somewhat like a wounded Christ. When Jon is finished, helps Mateo to put on his shirt and again turns away,
clearly disgusted with the violence Mateo has invoked.
Mateo
stumbles out and walks back home, crawling into bed with Marc, now alone. Mateo
calls out “Marc…”, the other answering “What?” The film goes dark with Mateo
answering, “Nothing.”
Theirs is
clearly a relationship of nothings, centered it appears in an utter lack of
communication. In the film’s introductory statement, Chami observes that Mateo “can’t
feel anything if it’s not through pain,” but we are shown that, never told.
Mateo and Jon, in their dance of death say very little and don’t bother to
explain why their have taken up the roles of torturer and victim. It is clearly
their natural roles in life.
It is
also rather apparent that Mateo’s desire for feeling has much to do with his
lover Marc, who seems disinterested in his own companion, clearly on the
lookout for new sexual thrills that young boys like Luke provide.
Many an
observer has been disgusted by the violent actions depicted in this work, but
they are far less violent than most Hollywood action films and this film is
certainly not near as graphic as many a commercial horror film. There is a kind
of elegance, contrarily, in Chami and Gimeno’s images, a fin de siècle approach
to eroticism and a moral justification for Mateo’s bloodletting as evidence of
Marc’s obvious disdain of his bedmate. Writing in Gay Celluloid, Dave
Hall summarizes the film as being “a work that makes for uncomfortable and at
times painful viewing, as the narrative focuses on issues that culminate in the
hurt one man feels; both emotionally and physically.”
Los Angeles, August 19, 2025
Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (August
2025).





No comments:
Post a Comment