leap of faith
by Douglas Messerli
Katalina Boham, Gustavo Nieto Roa, Mauricio
Pichardo, and Idania Velesquez Luna (screenplay), Gustavo Nieto Roa (director) Mariposas
Verdes (Green Butterflies) / 2017
Columbian director Gustavo Nieto Roa’s 2017 film Mariposas Verdes
reads a bit like a high school-level version of a good Eloy de la Iglesia film
of the 1960s, this time involving the entire LGBTQ contingent and a few abused
others fighting not only the neglect and bigotry of the own parents and their
abusive school mates but, in this case, the entire school administration
typified by the school principal, Bárbara (Cecilia Suárez) who embodies the
conservative attitudes as well of the Columbian church and government.
Yet the very age of these battlers leaves them far more vulnerable, even
after they have seemingly suffered so much. Both Mateo and Daniel have grown up
in unstable and abusive households. Daniel’s father is a violent patriarch who
regularly beats his wife and fights with her every night, holding entirely
machismo values. Mateo, the best student in the school, is the son of a
money-driven mother who has kicked out his father for not being able to provide
sufficiently for the family although he offers the love for the boy of which
she is incapable. In short, these children, along with their peers, generally
cannot look to their families for support.
And far worse than the bullying of their classmates is the support for
the bullies themselves by the school director along with her personal vendetta
against anything non-normative, which Mateo represents on several levels,
including his very intelligence.
Mateo’s sense of injustice by this time is beyond the breaking point, and he can perceive no other way to set the situation straight than himself becoming a performer of a political act that, having now had one suicide and a rape on the school’s record, will surely close down Bárbara’s evil reign, while possibly changing the entire way the authorities think about the intrusion of school leaders upon their student’s personal lives.
That act, foreshadowed in the very first scenes of the film, consist of the most horrible and unforgiving action possible: Mateo leaps from the top level of the building to his death face-first.
It is such a gut-wrenching event—one that is played out in smaller, less
significant ways by so many and transgender students each year—that it seems
almost impossible to forgive the excellent writers and directors of this film
for not having presented a more positive solution. Yet we know in our hearts
that given the hundreds of ways that the voices of youths still underage go
unheard, we comprehend that any major protest or action on their parts would
have simply resulted in the same reactions, silence and their suspension and
the end of their future educational goals. When the system is out to end the
education of their best student, one realizes that there is no justice
available because there is no logic involved and few would believe it even possible.
And in this sense, we also realize that nearly everyone in this film has been
in some way responsible for Mateo’s death, both for acting and refusing to act
or even speak out.
The
movie, accordingly is a painful one, with some simplistic presentations,
admittedly, of perhaps far too obvious villains; yet we all know that the
bullies who daily wear down the energies of gay, lesbian, and transgender
children continue to exist in the form of both their peers and often the
systems of administration themselves through faculty, school leaders,
government, and others in control. This film simply admits a reality that we
don’t truly want to face; that the very institutions that we rely upon to educate
and protect our children sometimes work toward goals that are at odds with that
role.
Los Angeles, July 16, 2023
Reprinted from World Cinema Review (July
2023).





No comments:
Post a Comment