love torn apart
by Douglas Messerli
George Barbakadze and Fleur Cooper (screenplay),
George Barbakadze (director) The Bridge / 2005 [8 minutes]
Long before the current United States Immigration
and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) attempts to rid the US of as many people of
color without (and sometimes even with) citizenship as they can round up, ICE
still created havoc with many families, particularly young couples not yet
married who had arrived in the US to begin a new life, sometimes one being
accepted for a green card while the other was rejected.
One day,
one of my best students came to me with just such a problem. He had fallen in
love with a beautiful Swedish woman, but they weren’t yet ready for marriage,
and despite his father’s governmental connections (he had been a US ambassador to
several countries), Immigration had denied her permission to remain in the US
any longer. “What should I do?” he asked.
I was a
strong believer in advanced education, convinced that without it capable young
men and women would be strongly delimited in their futures. But his love for
this woman seemed so powerful that I could only advise him to follow her back
to Sweden. “After all, I said, you can always get an education a little later,
but if you miss the woman you love, you may never find another like her.”
He
followed my advice, and today, living in Sweden, they are still married some 50
years later.
Such problems were often were even more
difficult (and probably in the US are now even worse, because they can
marry) for gay men and women who couldn’t marry. After all, ICE had no interest
in bringing queers into the good ole USA!
Before
same-sex marriage was permitted in most Western countries, these difficulties weren’t
limited to the US, but occurred in nearly all nations, whose departments of
immigration’s decisions of who could stay and who must leave seemed sometimes
like a throw of the dice.
Australian
filmmaker George Barbakadze, in his short film The Bridge, tells of just
such a couple, Luka (Glen Upton) and Niko (Andre Cunningham), young Georgian
gay men who escaped from their homeland in response to its homophobic
attitudes.
Luka has
arrived in Sydney first, followed by his friend. Perhaps because he is an
architect, so it appears, he soon receives a letter announcing his permanent
residency in his newly adopted country.
The problem
with this short work is that there is hardly any dialogue or even developed
interplay between the two lovers. We know so little about them and their lives
that the only thing we can be sure of is the film’s assurance of their love and
the fact that they have been torn apart through governmental bureaucracy, which
continues to sadden Luca for the rest of his life.
This is an
important issue, but to recognize the effects it has upon individuals who only
seek to find a safe place in which to love one another, we first have to
understand them and their love for one another, something that Barbakadze’s eight-minute
work does not provide.
Although
his director has taken on a truly troublesome and profound issue, he hasn’t
done it any service by delimiting his tale to occasional languishing looks between
the two men and the moody score by Alies Sluiter. We need to understand more
about their lives, hear their voices, however accented they may be, and observe
them showing the love we are led to believe exists between them. The old
literary saw about showing instead of telling in this work is entirely
appropriate. They need to show us more than their coming and going for us to
understand how cruel these immigration departments often are in their
generalized treatment of individual lives around the world.
Los Angeles, October 24, 2025
Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (October
2025).



No comments:
Post a Comment