destroying themselves
by Douglas
Messerli
Jacques Rivette and Jean Gruault
(screenplay), Jacques Rivette (director) Paris
nous appartient (Paris Belongs to Us) / 1975, released
1961
The “party” is more like a wake, in which some of the attendees blame
others for Juan’s death; and Anne soon is determined to leave, confused—like
the viewer—about the relationships of these figures to one another and by their
strange behaviors. But after that one evening everything changes in her life.
At first, she attempts to move ahead with her own activities; she is a
college student studying for exams. But as she begins, one by one, to
accidently reencounter the figures from the party, meeting up with Lenz and
becoming a member of his band of actors for a sort of underground production of
Shakespeare’s worst play, Pericles,
and then reencountering, quite by coincidence, Philip Kaufman, twice in the
same day, she is sucked into the very circle of beings she at first shunned.
\
Ultimately, she misses her exams, and
proceeds, almost like an underground detective, to find the score the dead Juan
had composed for Lenz’s production. Of course, as Luc Sante points out in his
interesting essay “Nothing Took Place but the Place Itself,” the search for the
lost guitar music is also a search “for the truth of Juan’s suicide”; but it is
also a larger metaphysical search into the reasons for her generations’—of
specifically the year 1957, when the film was made—youthful self-destruction.
Still, Anne, as beautifully performed
with an-open eyed intensity by Schneider, continues her search, she uncovers
the fact that even her brother has done some “dirty work” for Dr. de Georges,
and that the others have been strangely connected to everyone. If she might
never uncover the missing tape, she, nonetheless, finds herself attracted and
inexplicably attached to Lenz, despite his critical abuse of her acting. When
Lenz also commits suicide, Yordan finally admits to Anne that something indeed
is going on, and that perhaps Pierre is on the wrong side of events.
So, in fact, this little gathering of
conspirators has, all along, been destroying themselves. The Paris they leave
at the end of this remarkable adventure, may, after all, truly be “for us,”
those outside of their fragile self-deluded angst. And so too must we
comprehend Rivette’s fascinating fiction as precisely that, a riveting
narrative that has no real meaning in life itself. If this film, as Sante
suggests, seems a bit less fresh than the New Wave films it would help to
inform over the next few years, it is because Rivette, despite his astonishing
inventiveness, always seems to be also be looking over his shoulder back to
Cocteau and the other great theatrical imagists of French film—although finding
his own voice eventually in longer forms. It is the bridge of that past to
present filmmaking that helps us recognize Rivette as one of the most important
of contemporary French directors.
Los Angeles, May 10, 2017
Reprinted from World Cinema Review (May 2017).






No comments:
Post a Comment