masturbatus interruptus
by Douglas Messerli
Donald Richie (director) Boy with
Cat / 1966
This 6-minute film by the great
scholar of Japanese cinema and writer about all things Japanese Donald Richie, Boy
with Cat from 1966 was one of about 11 short films by Richie that were not
meant for public showing, some of them involving homosexuality.
The handsome young Japanese man indoors on a summer afternoon in this
film—despite the insistent noise of some kind of noisy machine and the
incompetent rehearsal nearby of a pianist attempting to play Ludwig van
Beethoven’s Moonlight Sonata—determines to masturbate.
To help arouse himself, the young
man still takes out a stack of pictures and begins leafing through them as he
lays on his side, raising his shirt ever-so-slightly to rub his chest before
moving his hand down to his penis and stroking it through his pants.
There is nothing here to necessarily suggest he is gay, and we can never get a glimpse of the photos clearly enough to determine whether they are of female or male figures. Are they pictures of friends and acquaintances or simply the kind of old porno cards one use to be able to purchase? We never know.
Although the subject may be heterosexual
or homosexual, the camera is definitely involved in a homoerotic representation
of the act, according with Richie’s own homosexuality. And the early scenes of
the strikingly beautiful young man are quite similar to those in many early gay
porno films when setting up the scene was just as important as the result.
Except in this case, as we witness, with
the ungodly noise he and the viewer must suffer along with the increasing
affectionate attentions of his pet black cat who every time he begins to pull
his pants down or lay on his back jumps up on groin for a petting, the
sexuality of this film quickly turns to comedy. And we can only laugh when the
boy finally gives up, stands, tucks in his shirt, and seemingly contemplates
the situation.
Richie’s film, accordingly, transforms
the entire issue of sexual pleasure and our imminent voyeurism into a
commonplace act of gentle satire. The stills reveal, however, just how
homoerotic this “uneventful” film remains.
Los Angeles, October 13, 2022
Reprinted from World Cinema
Review (October 2022).

No comments:
Post a Comment