dancing to death
by Douglas Messerli
François Ozon (screenwriter and director) Été
85 (Summer of 85) / 2020
Given that the major figures of François
Ozon’s most recent film features two young men, 16-year-old Alexis (who prefers
to be called Alex) and a two to three year older boy David (Benjamin Voisin),
it seems highly unlikely that issues of denial and delusion should have already
settled into their personalities. Except for the fact that both, in different
ways, are fascinated with death—Alex, like many young people simply being
fascinated with the rituals of death in different cultures; and David, more
seriously, seeking the thrill that comes from chasing after what might be
dangerous—it similarly seems odd that of the four LGBTQ films from 2020 I write
about in this essay on delusion and denial, only Ozon’s Summer of 85
ends in the death of one of its characters.
Alex does take the boat out, anchoring it briefly to fish, but soon
spots a rainstorm’s gathering clouds, with lightning on the horizon. He quickly
pulls up the anchor and tacks the sail in order to return to harbor, but the
winds quickly capsize the small vessel, sending him into the waters. Even his
attempts to hang onto the overturned boat seem slightly futile—that is until a
savior in a similarly sized boat shows up, tosses him a line, and tells him how
to upright the boat before towing him back to shore.
Clearly the slightly older boy who has just saved his life has had some
experience with saving the lives of others previously, for when he invites Alex
to his house, David’s mother speaks of his other rescued friends, the two of
them pushing Alex into the bathroom with the mother (Valeria Bruni Tedeschi)
taking a somewhat prurient interest in pulling off his clothes so that he might
take a hot bath. Before Alex can even catch his breath, David presents him with
a new wardrobe pilfered from his own closet, has invited to stay to dinner and
insisted that they spend the next day together. We’re now friends, David
insists, before Alex, somewhat more cautiously, can even come to terms with
what has so quickly occurred.
Yet even here, Ozon tosses us crumbs that might alert to the fact that despite
the palpable pleasure the two take in just being around one another, these
Hansels (the dictionary definition of the archaic word “hansel” is a gift given
for good luck at the beginning of the year or to mark an acquisition or the
start of an enterprise) may unknowingly have set out on a trip to the witch’s
oven. As they walk arm in arm with each other through the streets of their
provincial beach town on night, they encounter a drunk who keeps diving into
the traffic. David insists, despite Alex’s protests to leave him alone, that
they help him to safety. Shouldering him between them, they take the young man
to the beach to drop him into the safer sands. We might simply imagine the
handsome angel as showing his deep compassion, but as they pull the drunk onto
his back, so our new narrator comments, he suddenly observes the man’s
beautiful face which, he realizes, has probably occasioned David’s interest
him; and the next morning Alex discovers that after the two of them parted for
the night, David returned to the drunk on the beach, just to talk to him he
claims, leaving Alex and us to suspect something else has occurred between
them.
After their wild motorcycle ride, Alex asks whether David always speeds
through the roads so carelessly, moving in and out of oncoming traffic. The
older boy’s answer not only confirms that he does, but that in the maneuver he
is chasing as if to catch up with death, moving as close as he can possibly get
to it without crossing over.
A
third clue that something strange may be underfoot is when David suddenly
demands that the two share a pact that they will dance on one another’s grave
of after his death. Certainly, this pact which seems to come of nowhere gives
Alex some pause, but by this time he has so come under David’s spell that he
cannot deny him.
I
suspect that had we been able to pick up these authorial crumbs one by one in
their proper order we might have recognized another storm on the horizon. Ozon,
however, cuts up his narrative after establishing the fact that something
terrible has happened to David and that Alex has come under general suspicion.
Refusing to speak of the events to anyone, including the psychiatrist hired by
the police to help explain the inexplicable facts surrounding Alex and his
friend, the creative writing teacher asks his former pupil to write out his
story as if it were a fiction. Thus, we discover why Alex has become the
narrator, and why a linear narrative is nearly impossible. Soon it is revealed
that David has been killed in a terrible accident while riding his motorcycle,
and that the previously loving and open M. Gorman now refuses any communication
with Alex, believing that he been responsible for her son’s accident.
As
we move forward in what is now Alex’s fiction, we begin to perceive that indeed
it is not precisely the objective truth he (or the film) is revealing, but his
own vision of that truth. As Kate, who later befriends the troubled teenager,
explains it to him, David was not everything Alex imagined him to be; he was
another being onto whom David projected all the joy and youthful exuberance the
16-year-old felt in his first full enchantment with love. Even through the eyes
of a youth, truth is often denied, delusions of what the young imagine and want
to happen overwhelming the realities that eventually must be faced.
We now recognize that Alex is not precisely being arrested for causing
David’s death, although he personally feels some guilt for that as well.
Challenging David’s love after their sail boating party with Kate, David is
finally led to admit that he is now bored with their relationship, that Alex’s
love for him has become too predictable, without the challenges he loves. As I
have written about so very many characters in the LGBTQ films of these pages,
David is a man who finds it difficult to commit. Furthermore, we wonder why he
even might be expected to be at his young age to focus on one young lover. Love
and the desire to possess, from which Alex suffers, are some of the oldest
dilemmas facing couples for centuries. In anger, Alex storms out of the Gorman
shop, with little hope of reviving the perfect summer he has just experienced.
In
M. Gorman’s delusion, David has raced off after Alex in order to apologize and
explain. Perhaps even Alex fears that explanation to be the truth, that in his
lover’s rush to find him David was killed. Yet, by the end of this painful film
both David and we come to recognize that behind David’s acts lay an insatiable
attempt to embrace everything he hadn’t yet experienced or encountered, an
almost suicidal thrill of the new and different. Surely, he recognized the
dangers that exist in such behavior, which helps to explain his request to
celebrate that urge if it might consume him.
To
satisfy normative society, the judges cook up a story about Alex and David
fighting jealously over Kate, and, accordingly, justifying Alex’s bizarre
behavior after his friend’s death. As in many of Ozon’s works, the normative
world wins out over the queer more inclusive one that truly surrounds it.
By
film’s end, however, Alex’s queerness perseveres as, at work in community
service for his desecration of the grave, he strikes up a new relationship with
the drunken man whose life he and David once save. And the two them sail off
for the day in David’s boat, perhaps the only thing he has inherited from his
dead lover—except, obviously, for taking up with another chance for love.
Los Angeles, October 23, 2020
Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog
(October 23, 2020).




No comments:
Post a Comment