edward owens: the queer experimental filmmakers’ rimbaud
by Douglas Messerli
Black queer filmmaker
Edward Owens made only four films at the ages of 17 and 18 which today have
become central documents in gay experimental filmmaking of the period. But
everything regarding this remarkable individual—from the fact that after he was
mentored by filmmaker Gregory Markopoulous who brought him to New York and
introduced him to some of the major figures of experimental gay filmmaking of
the day (Andy Warhol, Gerard Malanga, Marie Menken, Gregory Battock, and
Charles Boultenhouse); that he returned to his home in Chicago and never made
another film, pulling away from his art evidently because of his drug addiction
In many respects, his work contains
elements of what I have described as the “coming out” films of the generation
that included Markopoulous (b. 1928), Willard Maas
(b. 1911), James Broughton (b. 1913), Curtis Harrington (b. 1926), Kenneth
Anger (b. 1927), John Schmitz (date unknown), Jacques Demy (1931) and others.
These cinema experimentalists whose work first appeared in the late 1940s through
the 1960s defined an early version of coming out when, as I have described it
previously, there was no “there” to come out “in.” Unlike the second wave of
such films which arose around 1998 and is today ubiquitous—in which the male or
female individual finally after coming to terms with their sexuality within,
reveal it to their friends, family, and the world—these early queer
experimentalists found only a void facing them after they had made the nearly
unimaginable recognition that they were sexually different from nearly all the
others. Who and what were they? And how were they to survive in a truly hostile
environment that did not make communication with others easy?
To a certain degree, the long dark pauses of Owens’ work appears to simulate the closeted angst of films such as Anger’s Fireworks (1949), Demy’s Dead Horizons (1951) and Schmitz’s Voices (1953) in which sleeping figures on narrow beds are forced, through dream images, to come to terms with their former connections with females and their gradual resistance to and removal from heterosexual sex. Alternatives appear in numerous different manifestations, sometimes confusing or even terrifying the sleeper with possibilities of violence and/or death. But even if death occurs, it arrives with the possibility of some sort of resolution or resurrection, at least the love of those who can comprehend the individual’s suffering, his fellow homosexual males or the hovering mother figure who haunts so many of these works in the form of the pièta. Often the figures rise and explore the world around them, but their explorations do not form a coherent narrative as much as they do a series of dream possibilities, variations, often, in a sexual search and discovery.
Los Angeles, August 25, 2025 | Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (August 2025).

No comments:
Post a Comment