up, up, and away!
by Douglas Messerli
Mike Kuchar (screenwriter and
director) The Secret of Wendel Samson / 1966 [33 minutes]
By 1966 the gay “coming out” movie
(version “A”) had become enough of an underground film trope that pop / camp
film maker Mike Kuchar felt free to create a satire of the genre.
The often banned and rarely seen films of this sort, beginning with Willard Maas’ Image in the Snow (filmed 1943-48, released 1952), Curtis Harrington’s Fragment of Seeking (1946) and Picnic (1948), Kenneth Anger’s Fireworks (1947), Jacques Demy’s Dead Horizons (1951), and John Schmitz’s Voices (1953), reappeared briefly on the 60s horizon with Gregory J. Markopoulos’ Twice a Man (1963), and just a year before the Kuchar movie, A. J. Rose’s Penis, itself almost a satire of the cinematic expressions of gay despair of coming to terms with sexuality.
Instead of simply suggesting his gay life with conversations with other
gay men, Kuchar puts his hero into a full relationship with a gay lover busily
jabbering on about their vacation escape at the very moment when Wendel is
attempting to get up the nerve to break off their relationship.
This angst-ridden gay man also does something that none of the other
“coming out” figures before would have dared to do, picking up a man on the
street and joining him “for a cup of coffee” in bed.
As in all the other such films, when Wendel cannot accept her sexual
advances, which in this version are played out in a humorous tussle in that
bed, he is subject to societal punishment.
In Kuchar’s version, however, the
religious iconography is replaced by camp versions of James Bond-like spies,
female and male, gangsters, medical figures, and a blonde symbol of female
virality à la Marilyn Monroe (Floraine Connors) who attempts to fuck Wendel
back into male normality somewhat in the manner of Anthony Burgess’ character
Alex in the A Clockwork Orange (the fiction appeared in book form in
1962).
When even those methods fail, they stand
him against the wall with his back to them, take out their handguns, rifles,
and tommy guns and shoot in the back, representing, as Annie Choi noted in her
2022 review of this film in Bleeding Skull, “the society that once
supported him, but no longer does.”
But like all the other works of the
genre, once Wendel has risen from the depths of his self-imprisonment, he faces
only the empty streets, with no one to whom he might shout out his celebratory
emotions. As I have repeatedly mentioned about the earlier films, even in 1966
there was still no one to “come out to.” Much as in Rose’s Penis the boy
and his former girlfriend meet up only to exchange their sorrow (although in Penis
she gives him back his penis).
Yet, in the last scene of the film there
are the morning bells coming a church tower, and the image we are left with in
Kuchar’s comic version of this world is of Wendel struggling in a giant
spider’s web, from which he has obviously freed himself to wander those streets
by film’s end. Kuchar accordingly leaves us with far more positive feelings. If
Wendel has been unable to shout his new-found freedom to the rooftops, as in
all the other such works he has most definitely shared it with the film’s audience
through his art.
Los Angeles, October 15, 2022
Reprinted from World Cinema
Review (October 2022).




No comments:
Post a Comment