castles of hallucinations
by Douglas Messerli
Gregory J. Markopoulos
(director) Bliss / 1966
Gregory J. Markopoulos
(director) Gammelion / 1968
Kirk Alan Winslow has described the
process: “A single roll of stock was run back and forth inside the camera
apparatus, while carefully selected passages of frames were laid down
(exposed), sometimes alone, sometimes upper-imposed or faded-in and out, at
precise positions pre-determined by the filmmaker.” This new type of filmmaking
was described as a “portrait,” the sitters for which might be either individual
persons or, as it is in Bliss, a place.
Indeed, the beautiful images of the church presented over the period of
six minutes do truly result, to the attentive watcher, in a kind of “bliss”
which remind one, in part, of the last scenes of Andrei Tarkovsky’s great film
of 1966, Andrei Rublev—although without the ravishing embracement by the
camera that defines the great Russian director’s relationship with the art he
depicts.
Given the twisted combination of love and
death of Harry and Caresse’s own life, Markopoulos’ “narrative” might almost be
suggestive of their relationships; but, in fact, the story the director implies
in this work is based on French writer Julien Gracq’s beautiful, slightly
surrealist fable of a homosexual/heterosexual love triangle, The Castle of
Argol, a work about which I wrote in My Year 2005. I’ll briefly repeat the
plot:
“Gracq’s work is, on level, a highly romantic
homoerotic tale. A young man of great wealth and intelligence, Albert,
purchases a castle and the surrounding landscape. He moves into Argol and
immediately perceives its mystery and magic-like surroundings, particularly the
nearby forest of Storrvan, which appears as a threatening overgrowth of
towering trees. Suddenly he receives a message that his dear friend and
soul-mate Herminien is planning a visit—along with a stranger named Heide.
Herminien and Albert, who have roomed together as students, see
themselves almost as twins, each able to intellectually stimulate one another
beyond the range of all others, and each able to read one another’s deepest
thoughts.
As
Albert prepares for their arrival, he visits the nearby desolate seashore,
discovering there a graveyard. On the surface of one tombstone he inscribes the
name of the strange visitor, Heide. Clearly, Heide is already an intruder, but
upon her arrival he is mesmerized by her beauty and intelligence. Over the next
months, a deep relationship develops between the two, galling and festering
hatred in Herminien, who simultaneously recognizes that he has brought Heide to
Albert for his friend’s tacit approval and for sharing his love for Heide.
But
Albert also seems strangely aloof and cold with regard to Heide’s sexuality.
One afternoon Heide and Herminien sneak away into the forest, failing to return
by sunset. Intrigued and almost hypnotized by their disappearance and forest
itself, Albert follows them into the dark woods, only to discover the body of
Heide, brutally raped by his friend. He takes her back to the castle and nurses
her to health. A long time later, they both follow a cleared path through the
forest and discover the body of Herminien, who has been thrown by his horse. He
too is returned to the castle and restored, but a new hatred develops in Albert
regarding him. Heide remains secluded in her room, obviously unable to face
either of them, while Herminien and Albert return to their intense
conversations.
Heide commits suicide, and they bury her in the seaside graveyard.
Herminien determines to leave, but Albert follows him into the woods, putting a
dagger into his side.”
Gammelion, accordingly, is not truly
a “narrative,” but an expanded treatment of the location. But since the
deconstructed images are so briefly represented, while often blurred or
presented as overlaying images, we cannot even quite get to see the clearly
beautifully stark and haunting views of the castle and its environs. We are
forced, rather, to edit our own version of what we imagine we are seeing (and
at times hearing), and we are encouraged, accordingly, to take these seemingly
unrelated and briefly glimpsed “snaps” into our own consciousness in order to
create a possible meaning. As P. Adams Sitney, writing of Markopoulos,
suggests: the new style that the director had developed, “creates the aura of
fiction without elaborating any specific fiction.”
Yet, anyone acquainted with the Gracq
work cannot help but be reminded of the hallucinatory quality of the book
itself, as each of the fiction’s figures attempt to make sense of and
comprehend each other and their relationships within the confines of Albert’s
castle. If Markopoulos’ work can at all be described as a narratively coherent
work, it is in its procedures rather than in terms of characters or plot.
Indeed, there are no characters and there is no story to Gammelion
except of the viewer’s own making. And yet, I came away having the feeling that
I had experienced a near mystical tale, my eyes still blinking for the
intrusions the screening purposely had put upon any of my own determined
intentions to connect. The logic of the conscious mind, quite obviously, is
suspect.
Los Angeles, April 7,
2015
Reprinted from World
Cinema Review (April 2015).



No comments:
Post a Comment