smoldering desires
by Douglas Messerli
Chapman Mortimer and Gladys Hill (screenplay,
based on the novel by Carson McCullers), John Huston (director) Reflections in a Golden Eye / 1967
I recall seeing John Huston’s Reflections
in a Golden Eye when it originally premiered in US movie theaters in 1967
when I was 20. I certainly comprehended, at that age, what the film was all
about. Three years later I met Howard—after a long year in New York City in
which I was actively involved (nearly every night) in the gay scene—sharing in
what is now a 50-year relationship. But I don’t think it dawned on me, at that
time, just how audacious this film was, directed as it was by the
heavy-drinking macho Huston with its sexually gay closeted “hero” performed by
every woman’s heartthrob, Marlon Brando, sharing the love of a wife, Elizabeth
Taylor—acting as if she were auditioning for the film in which she won awards
for just the year previously, Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?—with
another more outwardly heterosexual neighbor, acted by Brian Keith.
What is disconcerting is the intensity with which each of these
characters suffer the various torches lit from within. Perhaps the list complex
is the spoiled southern belle, Leonora, whose daddy was evidently once the camp
commander, and who hence has lived a life wherein she often proves that she is
stronger than any man on the base. As a child she played polo equal to some of
the male seniors, and throughout the film she rides her beloved horse Firebird
almost as if she were dancing out the captivity briefly imposed upon the
firebird of Stravinsky’s ballet. As I mentioned above, through Anacleto, music
and dance is equally central in the home of Major Morris Langdon (Keith),
Leonora’s current lover.
He wife Alison Langdon, who knows of her husband’s affair and is
secretly plotting a divorce, is so psychologically frail that she doesn’t even
attempt to truly conceive of how she might survive without her Langdon, let
alone imagine that he might use the situation to gently lock her away in an
upscale institution for the slightly mentally disturbed. Soon after Alison
dies, apparently of a heart disease, but in McCullers’ highly symbolic world we
also know it is another problem of the heart, her husband’s disinterest in and
his ultimate betrayal of her.
Even the seemingly level-headed Langdon appears to be a bit off-kilter
when, after his wife’s death, Anacleto disappears. Time and again he tells
Major Penderton (Brando) that he just wishes for the Filipino’s return—while
continuing to argue that if the former houseboy could only serve in the
military, he would be “straightened” out. Clearly there is a great deal of
denial and misconception of how sexuality defines one even from the most
reasonable of McCullers’ characters.
Penderton tires of his friend’s laments for the loss of Anacleto.
Indeed, we might almost be tempted, given the other characters’ deeply burning
fires of the heart, that Langdon is obsessed with the houseboy in a manner
similar to his wife’s dependence upon her companion.
Asked by Langdon whether or not he agrees with his assessment that an
individual like the houseboy might not become a different man with army
training, for the first time Penderton almost comes out of the closet, nearly
admitting to his own sexuality in his answer to his colleague: “no,” hinting that identity arises from birth not
from nurturing.
What he doesn’t know is that the young and very innocent Williams
(Robert Forster), who according to his bunk mates is still a virgin, has become
transfixed by Penderton’s wife, gradually turning into a complicated voyeur
who, while Leonora sleeps, slips into the Penderton home and into her bedroom
where he watches over her, rubs his face against her blouses, and sniffs out
her perfumes. These scenes of extreme voyeurism, in fact, are the most truly
sexual that this highly restrained film offers the viewer.
Huston, in the original filming, restored in the newest version I saw
the other day, muted all the colors of Penderton’s world, turning them into a
kind of dingy brown that snaps the colors of the female characters’ costumes
(particularly those of Leonora) into a focus that is almost garish. Is it any
wonder that Penderton detests all his wife’s highly colorful bric-a-brac.
It
is hard to say which of the two men, Penderton or Williams is the more
innocent, since they both can never act on their secret passions.
Yet, Williams, we recognize is a truly gentle soul who nurses Firebird
back to health and attempts basically to keep to himself, despite the taunts of
his fellow enlisted soldiers.
On
the other hand, in order to punish his wife’s emasculation of him and, perhaps,
just to catch another glimpse of Private Williams, Penderton regularly borrows
Firebird, painfully spurring the horse on and on and, after he is thrown,
brutally thrashing the horse, an act that Leonora repeats on her husband’s own
face during one of her bi-annual camp get-togethers. We recognize that violence
has become a way with both husband and wife in order to play out their
dissatisfactions.
So
too, actually observing one of Williams’ late-night entries, Penderton imagines
that his metaphorical white-knight is suddenly arriving to allay his sexual
longings. The Major attempts to comb his hair into place, turns on and then off
the light, leaving his bedroom door slightly ajar.
When the Private does not arrive at his doorway, Penderton enters the hall and
walks up the stairs to his wife’s room, in which Williams drops to the floor
stroking Leonora’s clothing.
The
inevitable and final action of outrage, as the author has previously suggested,
is almost insignificant. It will be written up, surely, as a response to an act
of breaking and entering. In her husband’s seeming attempt to protect his wife,
Leonora may even begin to admire him for a while.
Yet the true desires of these characters will
never to known or salved.
Los Angeles, July 18, 2020
Reprinted from World Cinema Review (July
2020).




No comments:
Post a Comment