the journey
by Douglas Messerli
Richard Amory and Scott Hanson [uncredited]
(screenplay, based on Amory’s novel), Andrew Herbert (director) Song of the
Loon / 1970
Fortunately, a local Astonia-dwelling native American who follows “the
song of Loon” (the Indian phrase for those of their tribe who enjoy sex with
their own gender) sends the poor boy to the tribal Indian Guru, Bear-Who-Dreams
(Lucky Manning), who prescribes that Ephraim take “the journey” by first eating
hallucinatory mushrooms before spending several days in nature totally in the
nude. Evidently, it does the trick, freeing Ephraim from wanting anything else
to do with Montgomery and opening him up to free love, particularly—after the
growing attachment he has already established with Cyrus—in the waiting arms of
this backwoods charmer, the two joyfully building a cabin together just in time
to spend the winter shacked up in bed.
Sadly, Calvin has fallen in love, meanwhile, with the still closeted
Montgomery. Getting drunk, Calvin finally publicly admits that he is in love
with Montgomery, who, still terrorized by his deeply-hidden desires, denies the
relationship, ending the film by trying to slug it out with Calvin in a kind of
drunken showdown of a wrestling match in the middle of main street—which we’re
almost certain will end up in sex if it doesn’t send one them off to the
cemetery first.
This feature film, Song of the Loon, with its truly queer mix of
epic naturalism (both white and red-skinned nudes filmed in sepia-toned and
negative-reversed images as the camera abstractly caresses their intertwining
arms and legs, as well as their exposed buttocks) combined with a plot
seemingly spun out of urban hippiedom philosophy might have been marvelously
funny if it weren’t for the fact that director Andrew Herbert and screenwriter
Richard Amory, on whose novel this work is based, weren’t so terribly serious.
It’s almost as if the French cineaste François Reichenbach (see my essay on his
Male Nudes of 1954) had inexplicably hooked up with
In
most respects, amazingly, Herbert’s homespun innocents are more straight
forward about their sexual desires than are the central tortured characters of
the Bertolucci and Fassbinder films of that same year. And while the latter
directors’ films are vastly superior in both cinematic and literary terms,
there’s something almost giddy about the truth-telling “cowboys-and-indians”
trope of this truly looney concoction. Serge Goncharoff’s musical score is even
quite impressive. But I’ll bet anything that Herbert never even heard of Jean
Genet! And the closest thing Amory has seen of leather is a pair of brown
buckskin pants.
Sex has never been so squeaky clean as it is in Song of the Loon,
but it is utterly honest about its faith in “out-in-the-open field” gay desire.
Denial leads to violence, this works shouts out; running naked in nature leads
only to love. And who can argue against that?
Los Angeles, January 8, 2021
Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog and
World Cinema Review (January 2021).



No comments:
Post a Comment