the best of all possible worlds
by Douglas Messerli
Ang Lee, Neil Peng, James Schamus
(screenplay), Ang Lee (director) The Wedding Banquet
/ 1993
Before I hop up onto my bandwagon—which Ang
Lee’s LGBTQ films inevitably and somewhat inexplicably lead me to do—perhaps I
should give some evidence of my sanity and general fair mindedness by
describing the good intentions behind his 1993 film, only his second feature, The
Wedding Banquet.
The only thing that still rouses Simon’s ire is that Wai-Tung has never been able to tell his parents that he’s gay despite his living in a gay relationship. We well know today how difficult it is for gay men and women to break with the long traditions of Asian families who often still arrange appropriate marriages. Anyone who has seen the numerous movies, long and short, about young Chinese and Indian men and women today know the enormous difficulties involved, perhaps not as well perceived when Lee made this film.
Meanwhile, at Wai-Tung’s apartment building, one of his tenants, Gu
Wei-Wei (May Chin), an artist who has lost her job again and is unable to pay
her rent, is visited by her landlord to collect. Wei-Wei, a recent immigrant
from Mainland China without a green card, is highly attracted to her landlord,
and, despite his relationship with Simon—with whom she seems to have a better
friendship than with Wai-Tung—continues to attempt to seduce Wai-Tung, offering
him up a painting in lieu of her rent. In part, just to escape her wiles,
Wai-Tung accepts her offer of a rather awful looking painting.
Back at home, Simon suggests that in order to clear up the situation
with his parents for once and all, that his lover should marry Wei-Wei, thus
allowing her a green card, and resolving the marriage issue forever. But the
moment their son announces his intentions to his parents, they announce that
they are on a plane to witness the marriage. The two quickly remove all their
personal gay images, hanging up traditional Chinese scrolls and putting out
childhood photos of Wai-Tung. Since this film several movies have repeated the
same scene, much more humorously however, since here it’s a rather serious
endeavor. Simon meanwhile coaches Wei-Wei in all of his lover’s habits, body
sizes, personal marks, and lifestyle. She turns out to be a quick learner, and
of course in the process she will get what she’s always wanted, a marriage,
even just on paper, with the handsome Wai-Tung as well as the necessary green
card.
The Gaos arrive, bearing gifts, including a gorgeous traditional wedding
dress which Mrs. Gao (Gua Ah-leh) has saved and a large packet of money for the
bride. The dress fits perfectly, and the previously wild-tempered and sweaty
Wei-Wei transforms into the seemingly perfect daughter-in-law. Simon is
introduced as Wai-Tung’s landlord, who somewhat inexplicably lives with his
tenant. Simon pre-cooks most of the Chinese dinner, which Wei-Wei serves up to
great acclaim upon their arrival from the airport.
Their visit begins rather disastrously, however, as their son drags his
parents off to the Brooklyn courthouse where, arguing that neither of them are
interested in ceremonies, they plan to be married. The experience, wherein the
Justice of the Peace (Michael Gaston) cannot even pronounce their names
correctly, makes for a little comedy of errors while totally displeasing the
father and mother who have come the long way to see a real wedding.
Observing the look of total disappointment on their faces, Simon suggests that he treat them all to a dinner at one of their favorite Chinese dining spots. The restaurant, apparently, is not up to the Gao’s standards, but the owner, when he sees one of his few customers that evening, recognizes Mr. Gao (Lung Sihung) to have been his former “batman” (the personal servant of an officer) during the war with China. Hearing that it is Gao’s son’s wedding he insists on organizing an expensive wedding banquet—that of the title—truly celebrating in full style the wedding of his old friend’s son.
The banquet is arranged, Simon and Wai-Tung’s
friends quickly gathered up, and a true celebration occurs, pleasing not only
Mr. and Mrs. Gao, but Wai-Tung’s old friends, most of whom have not seen him
for years and know nothing about his being gay. A great deal of liquor is
consumed and the party continues even to the bride and groom’s suite, the
party-goers refusing to leave until the couple strip off all their clothing
under the covers in bed.
The unthinkable occurs, as Wei-Wei arouses her now bedded and very drunk
“husband”; and when we next see them, some days later, Wei-Wei is pregnant,
much to the delight of the Gaos.
At another point, Wei-Wei and Wai-Tung attempt to escape to visit an
abortion clinic, as the suspicious Mrs. Gao attempts to prevent them by
insisting she will join them. They finally drive away without her, but mid-way
Wei-Wei insists upon stopping by for a hamburger and soon after tells Wai-Tung
that she has decided to have the child.
Mr. Gao returns from the hospital, and the parents decide that as soon
as he recovers they will return home, Simon telling Wai-Tung deciding that he
too will leave him for his cowardice.
By the time of the Gao’s departure, Mrs. Gao has developed a close
relationship with Wei-Wei, and Mr. Goa, despite his wife’s refusal to hug Simon
goodbye, warmly shakes his hand, all appearing to be happy with the final
results, Wei-Wei now not only having a green card but a baby and a home in
which to live and Simon and Wai-Tung pleased to become the fathers of a
child—all long before gay surrogate babies and the idea of gay couples adopting
children had become a major topic in film.
In
short, the film ends with a remarkable series of seemingly joyful compromises,
make the film a truly conciliatory expression of the characters’ personalities
and symbolizing what critic Elisabetta Marion has argued represents Lee’s
intent of presenting a movie that that reaches “a peaceful coexistence between
apparently irreconcilable cultures, without conferring the leading role on
either of them.”
This was one of the best-selling features of 1993, nominated for the
Best Foreign-Language Film of the Academy Awards, and winner of the Berlin
International Film Festival’s Golden Bear, as well was winner of several Golden
Globe awards. My husband Howard, who just saw this film again after I re-viewed
it, said he totally enjoyed the film.
I
saw it upon its original release in 1993, feeling about it very similarly to
what I still felt this time in viewing it. And now from my band wagon I will
proclaim I simply couldn’t abide its smug contentions.
Let us begin over, with a little piece of information that I didn’t
share, surely incidental to most viewings. The film does not begin with the two
young boys deeply in love, but with Simon quite discontent over the fact that
every time he plans a vacation for the two, Wai-Tung bows out due to the
stresses of his job. The apartment building, perhaps only one of his many
properties—we never quite know where his substantial income is derived—is, to
put it politely, the next step up from what might get him the title of being a
slum-lord. The building does not permit air-conditioning and is hotter than
hell, the spaces are those precisely aimed at people as Wei-Wei, an always out
of work, quite talentless artist, who tries everything she can to win over her
gay landlord to seeing her as something other than a sweaty tenant
disinterested in keeping a job. I should add that when he takes out the
incredible talented and beautiful Mao Mei, Wei-Wei, having found a job and now
serving as their waitress, is so furious in finding him with another woman that
she immediately quits her new job, thus assuring that she will once more be
unable to pay her rent, get a proper fan to cool herself off, or even pay for
food beyond the cooked noodles she seems to consume. She is not at all the
lovely daughter-in-law, Mrs. Gao later encounters, and not someone you might
possibly consider as eventually a good mother.
Indeed, the relationship between Wai-Tung and Simon is so ephemerally
established that we truly don’t know what keeps the two together. Simon’s
excellent cooking seems to be the major attraction other than their equally
attractive physiques—the very same bonding force that seems to be behind the
cowboys’ relationship in his later Brokeback Mountain, which also
resisted establishing any notion of what a gay relationship might really mean
other than sex. We never hear them discussing anything other than Wai-Tung’s
parents and job, and there doesn’t seem to be anything substantive about
Wai-Tung’s interests; all we know is that he’s not really interested in art or
music. He never comments on Simon’s cooking.
What’s worse, it seems to me, is that Wai-Tung is almost totally
dishonest. He feels he cannot tell his parents, although we later discover they
might have quite easily accepted the fact that he was gay; he cannot even be
fully honest with Mao Mei, she being the one, having recognized the situation,
to admit that she too is playing a game to please her parents.
Indeed, the major incident of film is based on his and Simon’s elaborate
lie about his marriage to Wei-Wei. But even here he seems to me to be totally
selfish and unfeeling. How could he have imagined that his parents might be
satisfied, given that he is so protective of their feelings, with a courthouse
wedding. His stand-up marriage seems to be almost a punishment for them. And if
he has been so adamant about not wanting to involve Wei-Wei and himself in
ceremonies, how can he possibly agree to a huge wedding banquet that he knows
is now not just a sham played out for his parents but all those who once knew
him as a young man. He openly lies to all his old friends, forcing Simon to
endure watching a heavy-kissing heterosexual ceremony at the event and, of
course, to accept his bedding with the bride, to say nothing of engaging in
unprotected sex in a time when the US was most aware of the AIDS crisis (the
same year of the numerous movies about AIDS such as Roger
Spottiswoode’s And the Band Played On, John Greyson’s musical satire
about Patient Zero, Zero Patience, Derek Jarman's Blue, and Johnathan
Demme’s Philadelphia all premiered). Wai-Tung has not even thought about
bringing along a couple of condoms just in case.
Interestingly, we do get a very brief glimpse of Simon on the street
working with an ACT UP group, its pink upward pointed triangle standing out as
a pledge of his commitment in a nearby poster; yet his companion seems totally
oblivious to the fact of there is even a gay sexual crisis. One might have
imagined that Simon and Wai-Tung might have discussed that issue among
themselves earlier in the film. They discuss nothing but their missed vacation
opportunity, and Wai-Tung doesn’t even really do that, promising Simon some
other time in Paris.
What follows becomes even more impossible to believe. We do know that
Wai-Tung’s parents stay on longer than the two weeks they originally intended.
Mr. Gao’s mild stroke extends their stay even longer. Let us imagine that they
remained for three weeks more than the events of the marriage and banquet.
Within that short period, Wei-Wei not only discovers that she is
pregnant—possible only if she recognized that she had missed her period that
very week, but possible nonetheless—but has begun to have the effects of
pregnancy (she cannot bear to even look at sushi and is feeling even worse in
the mornings) within the same time span. Again, although it is rare, it has
happened; but generally, as I’ve read, it takes up to 8 weeks. Something
doesn’t quite add up.
All
right, it’s a plot strategy that doesn’t quite make sense. Worse is the fact
that the temptress Wei-Wei has finally found a way to get her man. Is it any
wonder that Simon will no longer permit Wai-Tung into his bed, and that he
announces that when the Gao’s leave, so will he.
When I shared some of my feelings with others, they described me as
being “picky.” But isn’t being “picky” or astute to the actions of others what
real relationships are all about? Sorry, I can’t trust a director who isn’t
careful enough about how he presents his characters with whom he expects me to
share their joys and pronounce them commendable. Since no on in this pretend
slice of life, expect perhaps for Simon, seems real enough for me to even believe them,
how can I be expected to care about Ang’s movie?
Los Angeles, August 21, 2023
Reprinted from World Cinema Review (August
2023).







No comments:
Post a Comment