by the neck
by Douglas Messerli
Jean Renoir (screenwriter, based on the novel by
Georges de la Fouchardière, and director) La
Chienne / 1931, US 1976
Returning home, he is again berated by his
wife and ordered to “get rid” of his paintings, the only true joy he has left.
What’s a man to do? Believing that Lulu is a nice girl, he puts her up in a
small apartment, buys furniture on the installment, and covers her walls with
his fanciful art.
The worst
of it is that Lulu still loves Dédé, and the two of them plot to get even more
money out of Legrand, eventually selling Legrand’s paintings to a wealthy art
dealer for vast sums.
Fortunately,
the director also adds in a great many comic moments—a scene in which Madame
Legrand is seen reading the novel on which this movie is based; the sudden
reappearance of her presumed-dead former husband, who photographic image
dominates the Legrand apartment; and Legrand’s attempt to take advantage of the
situation to get out of his loveless marriage, are just a few of the film’s humorous
high points.
Yet we
know this work must end on a tragic note, particularly when Legrand eventually
discovers—as the narrative requires—the treachery of Lulu and her lover. But
even here Renoir is careful not to let the melodrama get out of hand, and shows
us Lulu after her throat has been slit, with Legrand beside her, in
shock over his act. A small group of street performers gather with a crowd
outside her apartment, obscuring Legrand’s departure.
Soon
after, Dédé, loud and ostentatious as always, drives up in the new car he has
bought with the sale of Legrand’s paintings, demanding that the crowd move out
of the way, thus alerting them all of his presence. He rushes in to his Lulu
without even speaking to the concierge, who intended to ask him to bring Lulu
her mail. When she later discovers the body, soon after he leaves, she can only
presume that Dédé is the murderer; and so the court declares, sending him to
his death.
Again,
poor Legrand, destroyed by his guilt and with nowhere else to go, becomes a
tramp, accidentally meeting up again with his wife’s former husband, who has
also moved to the streets. By the end of this film, Simon is already dressed
for his very next role, that of Boudu in Boudu Saved from Drowning.
A brief
puppet show, using the stock figures of good and evil, begins the film each of
the three figures telling their own version of the tale we are about to see, a
bit like Kurosawa’s later Rashomon, the Legrand puppet arguing that
there is no moral to this tale. The film ends with another ironic image, the
self-portrait which Legrand has painted being carted away by a wealthy
collector as the artist reaches for a few coins tossed his way.
To get
realist performances out of his actors, Renoir reportedly encourage an
offscreen romance between Marèse and Flamant, which infuriated Simon, who
himself had fallen in love with the actress. After the film was completed,
Flamant was involved in a car accident that killed his passenger, the Lulu of
this film.
Los Angeles, January 6, 2017
Reprinted from World Cinema Review (January
2017).




No comments:
Post a Comment