women in charge
by Douglas Messerli
Charles Kenyon (screenplay, based on
a novel by Faith Baldwin), Lloyd Bacon (director) Office Wife / 1930
One might have chosen to simply
include this among the numerous films made from 1930-1933 that featured
stereotyped gay figures such as those I include in the long series of films
featuring male sisses and female toughs which follows this essay; but Lloyd
Bacon’s The Office Wife, begins with an event that might have been a
remarkable alternative to what has been described as the “Panze Craze” of the
early years of the 1930s.
In general, the film is interesting only because it takes as its central
theme the rise of female work force in the industrial age—mostly women working
as office secretaries—analyzes the situation, and felicitously resolves in a
manner which not all other movies with this theme have been able to. Moreover,
along with The Clinging Vine of 1926, it might be seen as representing
one of the earliest of the genre of “The Office Romance,” which quickly became
one of the most popular heterosexual film genres throughout the 1930s to the
present day including notable movies such as Howard Hawks’ His Girl Friday
(1940), Jean Negulesco Three Coins in the Fountain (1954), Billy
Wilder’s The Apartment (1960), Richard Donner’s Superman (1978),
Colin Higgins 9 to 5 (1980), and Cameron Crowe’s Jerry Maguire
(1996), to name somewhat curious examples from the following six decades of the
20th century.
Fellowes, now realizing Andrews’
situation, promotes a secretary respected for her intelligence more than her
body, Anne Murdock (Dorothy Mackaill), to replace her as he proceeds on his
honeymoon abroad. He returns to find an equally capable woman, but also a
beautiful younger woman who, as she makes clear to her sister Katherine (Joan
Blondell) with whom she boards, is not about to turn away a figure like
Andrews. She will use her intelligence not simply to help her boss but steal
the boss away from his marriage, a goal shared by many such secretaries
throughout cinema history.
After a particularly exhausting night, working late with Anne, Fellowes
finally kisses her, but at that very moment his wife appears and he is forced
to return to his life behind the closed doors of his home which Anne is only
temporarily inhabiting.
Now spending time with Ted, she realizes even more clearly that he is
not man for her, an intelligent woman who basically manages a company.
Fellowes, meanwhile, has tried to mend his relationship with his wife, but too
late, for she now wants a divorce.
The two unhappy lovers are finally nudged toward one another through the
machinations of Anne’s sister Katherine, who has discovered through Ted that
Fellowes and his wife are getting a divorce.
Working late for the last night of her employment, Anne finally reveals
her love for her boss, and he his love for her, ending the movie on the
predictable note, since the entire film was predicated upon the notion that
employers spend more time with their capable secretaries than they ultimately
do with their less than doting wives.
But she is not presented as a comic
figure at all. As Barrios continues, she is “strong, authoritative, talented,
and good humored”; “A woman in charge, in short, a paragon of the independent
New Women of the twenties” that was mocked in The Clinging Vine. “….She
is portrayed as mildly eccentric, perhaps, certainly not heterosexual, and
meriting her associates’ affection and respect.”
How amazingly different is this film of
1930 from the equally capable but titteringly laughed at and openly mocked
manservants, interior decorators, clothes designers, dance directors, and other
homosexual figures of the 35 movies I write about below. Without any reason
that this figure should necessarily be lesbian, Bacon and his writer Charles
Kenyon simply represented her as different the rest of the heterosexual
characters of the drama, and enriching the movie in the process.
Office Wife, accordingly, much
like Upstream, The Matinee Idol, Just Imagine, Myrt and
Marge, and few others treat their obviously queer figures with a respect
that few other Hollywood films could imagine, and employ them in a manner that
reveals their capabilities rather than the simple silliness for even having
existed. If only Hollywood filmmakers could have taken their cue from these few
films, and realized how truly simple it was to present significant queer
characters even within the confines of films that had no intentions of being
profound, perhaps Breen and his ilk might have been silenced—although given
their raging homophobia I sincerely doubt it.
Kate Halsey does not again appear in the
movie except for a couple of type-written paragraphs in which she has
summarized some of the lessons Fellowes later learns (“Give her six months at
side of any absorbed businessman and the office wife’s sufficient sympathy has
reduced the influence of the wife at home to a mere maker of beds and
pancakes”; “The fact that the businessman is unaware of his bondage, is the
final proof of the office wife’s iron hold upon him”) But her brief appearance
has been a significant one in that demonstrates the humanity and sophistication
of the film’s central character and his world as opposed to most of the other
“pansy” films that followed, in which homosexuals are tossed into the fray for
a quick laugh like so many freaks despite the fact that they capably watch over
their employer’s lives, design their furniture and clothing, furnish their
houses, and help them to accomplish their business successes—while in real life
they were sometimes even the actors, directors, and producers of the pictures
in which their diminished brethren appeared.
Los Angeles, June 6, 2022
Reprinted from World Cinema
Review (June 2022).




No comments:
Post a Comment