cruising for eternal love
by Douglas Messerli
Lionel Soukaz and Guy Hocquenghem
(screenwriters and directors) Tino / 1985
Taking off her sunglasses, she salutes him as her “Gabriel,” her “angel,” and quickly asks him to get in. When, soon after, she attempts to take him into her Tunis hotel, she is met by the hotel security guard who attempts to eject the young man from entering—“we have our reputation to think of”—Myriam screaming and shouting at him in defiance, the way some wealthy Americans behave everywhere they go. The scene reminds of the earlier 1975 film by Rainer Werner Fassbinder, Fox and His Friends, where Eugen and Fox pick up a local Arab boy in Morocco, also refused entry, this time into hotel restaurant, the hotel management assuring them that have their own male escorts for such occasions.
In this case, the insistently loud American wins, she and her husband,
Henry, soon pulling the half-naked boy onto the terrace to have drinks,
hilariously served up by the waiter with Tino’s soccer ball. And before long
the two have literally moved him to a vertical position of the beach where
Myriam is busy rubbing suntan lotion across his abs before slipping her hand
below in to his swimming trunks.
To my knowledge, Bowie never made such a film, but it is great fun, and
almost a natural jibe given that at the time of Soukaz and Hocquenghem’s film
the singer was rumored to have had many a bedroom fling with Mick Jagger and
recently performed with him in Dancing in the Street (1985). The Italian
title, The Living God is, of course, another comment on Bowie—about the
adulation of one of his fans as much as the singer’s own ego—but is obviously
what Tino would like to be, particularly given his self-perceived good fortune.
Other than constantly stroking the boy, Henry seems mostly a man of
coarse words, and in Tino’s imaginative world shouts out his demands that the
boy become a sacred god, while his wife mostly sits and sulks, particularly
when Henry is around.
The couple, with Tino in their party, are soon on they are on their way
to Greece.
It is in Greece where he explains to the boy, probably without his
comprehension, that the two, husband and wife, have agreed early in their
marriage to share everything. Besides he’s pretty sure, he brags to his wife,
Tino prefers boys, “after all he’s an Arab.” “I tell you what,” he shouts out,
“you take the front I’ll take the rear...the butt!”
Confused by their bickering about him, Tino again imagines his role in
Hadrian’s Rome, the man who apparently had sexual relationships only with boys
and never with his wife. Once again, he does not seem to mind the ugly Hadrian,
any more than the unpleasant Henry pawing him. After all, he has been exalted
in his performative roles!
But the sexual interlude ends badly, with Henry slapping his wife to the
ground and verbally abusing her, as somehow she has performed it purposely to
embarrass him in front of a crowd.
The next scene in the contemporary world of the trio places them in
positions that seem to indicate a closure to their affair, as if the party were
over, the celebration having left them in a kind of drunken limbo.
Suddenly we see Tino running for the same subway, the doors having just
closed, and him attempting to get inside. He follows the car as it pulls away,
moving blindly with it until he hits a pole in his path and falls to the floor,
his forehead bloody from the crash, forcing us to wonder if he is now dead.
Most definitely La commedia e finita!
Obviously, the filmmakers suggest, things do not go well for those who
take up with such horrifying consumers, who eat up people the way they might
swallow up the food and customs of different cultures merely for the thrill of
the momentary difference. In a sense Henry and his wife are merely sexual
cruisers, out for the thrill not for the eternal love Hadrian felt for
Antinous.
It may be useful to recall what Guy Hocquenghem wrote in his 1973 essay,
“The Screwball Asses” in Recherches, a selection posted in this context
by Dorothée Perret on the blog PARISLA:
“The cruising machine has
established an impenetrable border between what turns us on and what makes us
think. This border is perhaps a defense mechanism against the intrusion of
relations of power…
Constructed like capitalism against death, the cruising machine… instead
of being madly in love with what is present, it desires what is absent, it
always desires the next object, it constructs itself on the establishment and
sacred assumption of lack, according to the absolute criteria of consumption…
If I leave my house to enjoy the weather, to buy bread or go see a
friend, and if I come upon a boy that I like, gay or not, I am blissfully
enjoying the present. But if I leave my house every night to find another queer
by cruising the places where other queers hang around, I am nothing but a
proletarian of my desire who no longer enjoys the air or the earth, and whose
masochism is reduced to an assembly line.
In my entire life, I have only ever really met what I was not trying to
seduce.”
Los Angeles, February 28, 2022
Reprinted from World Cinema
Review (February 2022).









No comments:
Post a Comment