the target
by Douglas Messerli
Adam Tyree (screenwriter and director) Audition
/ 2015 [5 minutes]
During the second-decade of this century, USC
School of Cinematic Arts graduate Adam Tyree produced a number of interesting
short gay films that revealed a true talent. He has gone on to become an editor
and photographer of some note.
Audition,
a 2015 very short film, certainly revealed some of the frustrations of young
actors, but in the end isn’t one of Tyree’s most significant short works of the
period. There are others I reviewed that I thought to be much more successful.
The
young actor in this case, Carson (Bret Green), shows up presumably with
numerous other young handsome studs to read for a role in a gay film.
The
reading over, he’s reminded that it is a gay film, and his character will be
shown with full frontal nudity. Accordingly, he’s asked if he’s “okay” with
that and is immediately queried if he’d mind disrobing in front of the director
and casting director (David Beier).
“Like, right now?”
“Yeah, just so we, you know, know.”
Hesitatingly, he pulls off his shirt. There is silence. And he asks,
“You mean my pants too?”
“Sure.”
He
pulls down his pants and they ask him to turn around, which he does, tossing up
his hands in some frustration.
“How much did you say this pays?”
“Well, it’s a low budget film, so, 40 bucks a day.”
The writer/director’s personal description of this film reads: “Being an
aspiring actor isn’t as glamorous as it seems.”
The trouble with Tyree’s short glimpse of the inside of gay film
casting, is that most viewers of such films probably never imagined that
working on such low-budget efforts was ever glamorous. Moreover, I suspect that
Tyree meant to suggest that the body check was not only an affront but perhaps
represented a bit of unnecessary voyeurism; moreover, the fact that the actor
might be chosen for the way he looks instead of the way he acts seems to be an
affront.
Yet, it’s difficult to feel truly sympathetic for Carson. After all, gay
films are very much reliant on the appearance of their actors, particularly if
there are to be nude scenes. As one commentator on the IMDb site wondered, what
was the purpose of the film since, to him or her, it appeared a very ordinary
experience of a young actor without any significant difference from hundreds of
such interviews and casting sessions. And he is not as glamorous as he might
imagine himself to be.
Did Carson (and by extension Tyree) imagine that he’d be spared a check
of his body if the film contains nudity? Certainly, Tyree’s film eschews the
voyeuristic moment, and shows his actor only from the navel up. And we observe
that, in fact, the auditioner, Green, is little bit chunky. But this isn’t an
example of couch casting, and these men surely cannot be castigated simply for
checking out the territory they are about to explore in their film. They present
it all quite matter-of-factly.
In
short, for me the film doesn’t arouse much sympathy for Carson’s character or,
for that matter, I can’t discern a great deal of satiric of critical response
in Tyree’s movie. But I am certain that others, in the increasingly sexually
scandalized US landscape, will find what Carson has “suffered” as more than a
little offensive and perceive Tyree’s film as an insightful revelation. But
perhaps we’re all missing Tyree’s possible satiric target, the actor himself.
Los Angeles, June 6, 2023
Reprinted from World Cinema Review (June
2023).


No comments:
Post a Comment