the swing of the pendulum
by Douglas Messerli
Francisco Lezama (screenwriter and director) Un movimiento extraño (An Odd Turn) / 2024 [22 minutes]
Argentinian director Francisco Lezama’s takes
several odd turns, not just one. Part of the reason for this has to do with his
authorial process. Opposed to what he describes as “the
classic-Aristotelian-three-act-hero-journey [that] has been imposed in
narrative fiction,” for many months before he writes and shoots a film Lezama
collects “dialogues, editing ideas, academic quote, silly jokes, etc.” on a
series of small cards from which he selects the best (about 20) of them, and
then determines the characters, plot, dialogue, structure and much else without
discarding any of the remaining cards.
As he argues,
the writers of the traditional method of narrative and filmmaking “are forced
to separate characters from their background, to create challenges for them, to
move them like puppets.” But his method seems, so he feels, closer to life, his
film reminding him “of tapestries and imagery from the Middle Ages. In these
paintings, rather than a clear single path, you can find a kind of wooded
landscape… a forest with many trees and many paths. I find in these references
much more inspiration, more openness, more vital electricity than in
classicism. In this wilder and woodlike form every digressive idea seems to fit
easily. Everything seems possible to unfold and enter the film — without
prejudices regarding whether they would work or not. I believe this is closer
than life. It’s something personal.”
This
almost Oulipian method allows him, in the instance of An Odd Turn, to
combine dissimilar and even contradictory concerns. The major figure of the work,
Lucrecia (Laila Maltz), works as a guard in a museum, who loves her job because
it allows her long nights with the art itself in which she illuminates with her
flashlight, seeking out their significance, so to speak, in the dark. And in
that sense she a figure of rationality, like Plato’s vision of man, seeking to
read meaning in the shadows.
So too, however, she is also a figure of
superstition, who often organizes her life around pendulum readings, using
anything from a tea-bag on a string to a brass plumb to foretell the future.
It doesn’t
always work. For example, she tells her friend that she has foreseen the museum
itself being robbed by the end of the month, an event that never happens.
On the
other hand, her mystical reading that the dollar will soon rise in value
against the Argentinian peso does happen, particularly after Argentinian President
Javier Milei suggests that the country should adopt the US currency which
created a run on US money.
Lucrecia
is also a highly sexual being, and before the dollar’s rise has been regularly
meeting up in the middle of the night with another museum worker. When their
communications are intercepted by a museum head, and she is given a choice of a
strong pay cut or being fired, she insists that her severance pay be in made in
US dollars.
And since
in the meantime the dollar has risen, the currency exchanges send their workers
into the street to call out, a bit like carnival barkers, that they can change
the peso into dollars—for a good profit of course.
The
clever former museum guard, now working the night shift in a coffee-cup manufacturing
plant, suggests the clear money-changer should use the methods of Grindr,
letting people know where he will be at all times geographically so that he can
meet up for rendezvouses.
Meanwhile she and the money exchanger also have sex which they both enjoy, and soon they regularly meet up for intercourse. He explains, soon after, that he has made an appointment with a bisexual man who is willing to include Lucrecia as well in a sexual trio. And eventually the film catches their encounter with the Grindr guy (Alejandro Russek) first in a gay bar named Lolita where he and the other male dance together, and finally in an apartment, where it appears that the two men are more interested in one another, and that Lucrecia must continually remind them that she too is part of their trio.
In fact, she is not at all sure of her
romance with the money changer and consults the tarot cards on the matter, but
he refuses to participate in the reading.
Accordingly,
there is no resolution in this wonderful tale, yet we learn a great deal about
these individuals struggling to survive in a society that has just steered
itself clear of the horrific period of the so-called “Dirty War” in which
hundreds were killed mysteriously by death squads against socialism, left-wing
Peronism or the Montoneros movement, along with Jews and anyone else who might
have been seen to question their tactics. The present, in its advance of “frictionless
capitalism,” as Lezama puts it, seems almost as problematic to young people
like the characters in this work.
Perhaps
the ridiculous mix of magic and clever entrepreneurship, as well as the almost
unflinching willingness to try out any new combination of behaviors, including
other sexualities, is the only answer in a world where the rigidity of a single
viewpoint often meant certain death.
Lezama’s
film does not specifically locate any of his characters within this complex of
ideas. They act eccentrically of their own accord. Yet his open-ended work
allows us to at least query a wide range of cultural aspects of contemporary Argentine
life. That he does all of this in a little less than a half hour is amazing. Little
wonder it was awarded the Golden Bear Award for short cinema at the 2024 Berlin
film festival.
Los Angeles, September 2, 2025
Reprinted in My Queer Cinema blog (September 2025).



No comments:
Post a Comment