the helpful neighbor
by Douglas Messerli
Ly Tran (screenwriter and director) Rose
Canyon / 2017 [15.48 minutes]
Ly Tran’s gentle LGBTQ-friendly movie
expresses a lovely tale about a young man having difficulty coping with life,
but not because of his sexuality.
Indeed, Rose Canyon seems to exist in an alternate universe that
I never have experienced, but would be wonderful if it were true. In this world
young men such as Oliver (Robert Charles) may be suffering over the sudden
absence of a father, who evidently left this boy’s mother and him one day for
another woman, simply packing his bags and leaving the house; but there are
almost immediate healing forces of love that quickly arrive to help bring him
back into everyday living.
For the several days after his father has disappeared, Oliver’s mother
has been laying in a near-catatonic state on the living-room couch. Her son,
caring for her as best he can, has skipped school and retreated to his room for
long periods of sleep and empty stares without expression into space. As the
director represents it everything that might have drawn the mother and son up
and out into the enjoyment of their home has disappeared. The closet is emptied
of all but one garment. The dining room table and chairs sit eerily immobile
like funereal forms in a darkly lit room; the patio furniture receives the rain
and the glares of the sun as if it were ready to suddenly be taken over by
rust. Suburbia never looked so gloomy.
“My mom says you might be out for a few
days, and I thought I’d drop by give you the homework....” Kai asks if Oliver
is coming to school the next day, but the boy doubts it. A little oddly, Kai
asks “When do you think you will?”
Oliver’s response is vague to say the least: “I don’t know.”
But Kai does not quite let up his pressure, suggesting he can come back
and give him the assignments for as long as his classmate is out of school.
The suffering boy tries to brush him off, turning and ready to close the
door.
But it is at this moment when “the helpful neighbor” story gets
interesting, and slips its gears from being a more traditional “coming out”
story.
As the door almost closes Kai loudly clears his throat, Oliver reopening
the door to hear what else he might have to say. “Sorry. I was wondering....I
actually came here to tell you something. We’ve had a few classes together,
and...a...I like you. As in...I have feelings for you. And I was wondering if
some time you wanted to go out.”
Oliver’s response is also somewhat unexpected: Oh!. Ahh. I mean, I mean,
now’s probably not the best time.”
The somewhat pushy Kai continues, “Would there be a better time?” a
question that appears not to be asking precisely when they might get together
but “if” there is a possibility of their “hooking up.”
“I don’t know.”
Kai immediately jumps in with specifics. “How about next week?”
“Well, uhh, I just have a lot of things on my mind right now.”
Kai almost accepts defeat. “Okay.
I guess I’ll see you later then.”
But Oliver, recognizing what is in jeopardy, gives some way.
“No...I...(bashfully smiling)...I’d like to. I just want to be alone right now
though.” A long pause. “I’ll see you later, and thanks for the homework.” He
closes the door.
I’ve quoted this basically uneventful passage in full because it easily
reveals something I have come to gradually realize about my reading of LGBTQ
films. I now perceive that what most attracts me to these works, and what makes
me interested in queer cinema in general is not just the fact that these works
document queer activity or show personal interrelations between same-sex
figures that are not readily available in the vast body of heterosexual
normative worldwide film-making, but that in almost all of these works there is
something also unusual or queer about the narrative, the writing, the
characters, or the images they present.
What interests me most about these works is not when they follow the
general patterns of whatever genre of narrative into which they fit, but when
suddenly something slips in the gears of that well-made work, when a scene that
might have been naturalistically rendered suddenly moves into a highly
theatrical mode or when, as in this case, the usual clumsy attempt to check out
whether the boy you love might, in fact, be gay enough to like you as well.
Unlike almost film I’ve encountered in the now nearly 3,500 works I’ve viewed,
no previous film so easily presumed that possibility as does the 15.48-minute
short, Rose Canyon. This must be one of the first times that queerness
is expressed as simply the normal: “I have feelings for you.” Kai has utterly
no difficultly and just a little reluctance in expressing what any straight kid
might blather out to the neighborhood girl in a moment. And Oliver receives the
news that he appeals to the other boy with an equanimity that is breathtaking.
He’s ready and willing, just not at the calamitous moment in his life.
Queer movies are not just queer in their subject matter, but even in
their way of expressing what they have to say. They seldom behave as one
expects—which of course might be argued about any truly interesting work of
art—but are irresistibly attracted to the process of letting the gears of the
plot or character slip to reveal that something else is going on, that somehow
what is happening don’t quite work out the way one expects.
This is particularly true of the Hollywood films that I have read as
coded works; the reason they’re so obvious to a lesbian, gay, bisexual, or even
sexually unsure person is that somewhere along the line of their smoothly
running parts, a figure, a detail of story, a camera shot goes awry, does
something no one might have imagined it doing. And if you look carefully at
that moment you discover that the work probably is saying something else than
it wants to, revealing another possibility of viewing what is happening on the
surface. It’s much like “dropping a bead,” (see my essay “Dropping Beads” in
the 1935-1939 volume of this series), letting out a little bit of information
that only someone sensitive to of “clued into” it might recognize as expressing
a greater truth than what it appears to say.
In Rose Canyon the fact that absolutely nothing is hidden about
Kai’s desires is what makes one take note. The boy wants to help his friend out
of his funk and into his bed without even quite knowing why the other is
suffering; and it appears he won’t let up until he succeeds in finding out the
reasons for his pain or helps to effect that change.
Kai shows up the next day with homework assignments in hand as well.
This time it is clear that Oliver read his friend’s message quite easily the
previous day. “I told you, I’m not really in mood for dating right now,” Kai
responding, strangely cautiously, “We don’t have to be...dating. We could just
hang out.”
A
slow grin comes over Oliver’s mouth: “If I go on a date with you, will you stop
coming over?” This might represent the strangest acceptance of another’s sexual
advances ever witnessed.
How might Kai think about not taking up his
offer. They go on a long walk where Oliver suddenly finds himself in Rose
Canyon which as a child he evidently often visited with his beloved father. It
is, so he discovers, one of Kai’s favorite places in which to contemplate and
simply watch the sun go down, which they do together.
The next stop is a large public artwork, presumably one of artist Robert
Therrien's outsized pieces of furniture (or someone imitating him), in this
case a large red chair upon which the two sit, as Kai further questions his
friend about his problems, discovering that Oliver’s father has just abandoned
him and his mother.
Before the night is over, they wind up in Oliver’s bed, Kai waking up
the next morning in a hurry to make it to school for a math exam. He tries to
encourage Oliver to join him, but his new lover still refuses, preferring to
suffer it out apparently for a while longer at home.
Kai leaves and in the midst of his exam Oliver unexpectedly enters the
classroom, as a large a smile crosses Kai’s face, realizing that he has helped
his friend and won his love—amazingly without even the least bit of subterfuge.
Los Angeles, May 16, 2021
Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog and
World Cinema Review (May 2021).


No comments:
Post a Comment