cuddling with a corpse
by Douglas Messerli
Philippe Vallois, Anne Roumeguère and Rolf Schultz (screenplay), Philippe
Vallois (director)
Nous étions un seul homme (We Were One Man) / 1979
Although
We Were One Man is in the fact the literal translation of
Philippe Vallois’ amazing 1979 film Nous étions un seul homme, it feels
like there is something missing in the English language translation. The title
in French sounds to me like a possible war-time phrase, suggesting the French
fought as one person, as one man, the nation working together as a single unit
to rid themselves of the Germans.*
None of this is suggested in the English language translation, which,
contrarily, makes the film sound like it might be something closer to German
transgender Charlotte von Mahlsdorf’s 1992 autobiography, later adapted by Doug
Wright as the play I Am My Own Wife. Mahlsdorf survived by being true to
her gender identification, hiding from the Nazi’s in full sight by living as a
woman.
Yet given the context of Vallois’ film—in which a slightly crazed French
peasant, living alone outside a small village in an abandoned farmhouse,
discovers a German soldier who has been wounded, drags him home and nurses him
to health—such wartime jargon, if it existed, is terribly important. Although
that French fool, Guy Rouveron (Serge Avedikian) eventually develops a deep
mutual relationship of love with the Nazi soldier, Rolf (Piotr Stanislas), the
title is not simply celebrating their eventual sexual entwining, but strangely
argues that they too rose up as a single force, French and German, to fight for
the freedom to express not only their sexual desires but their personal
oddities and obsessions. Their war is a highly personal one that must be fought
out between the two of them with little support of the beings surrounding them.
Guy
surprisingly—given his almost gaunt, runt-like stature and a body that is
constantly leaning forward in potential motion—is the stronger of the two, at
least in his willfulness regarding Rolf. And it is the mad insistence of his
own reality that keeps Rolf from simply leaving and returning to his military
unit in the front. Moreover, as I have hinted in words such as “crazed” and
“mad,” Guy is anything but logical; in fact, there is good evidence by the end
of the film that he is truly insane, formerly locked away in an asylum which,
when the Germans arrived, the staff abandoned, leaving their patients to their
own destinies.
With his new friend, Guy now begins to clumsily commit to daily
work-outs, nature walks, and other activities which he has never imagined. For
his part, he offers Rolf the ability to work by sawing down trees for heating
tinder and to participate in other farm chores.
The
several long scenes of their almost comic workouts and treks through nature
evoke a sense in Vallois’ film of the many similar arcadian and often comical
passages in François Truffaut’s Jules et Jim (1962). This film owes a
large debt to Truffaut’s movie, including Guy’s later attempts to offer up one
of his weekly visits to Jenine to Rolf.
But Rolf, previously unused to thinking, has increasingly been curious
about things he is discovering about himself, including his growing attraction
to the impetuous, constantly-in-motion, Guy. And Jenine, herself, observing
during her regular deliveries of food and wine to the couple, the near bucolic
world in the two now live, plots a way to bring them closer.
As
Rolf gradually begins to identify his love for Guy, tensions arise, mostly
because of Guy’s inability to assimilate himself to the world in which he
actually lives and his confusion arising from being molded by what the society
around him deems as normal behavior. In many respects he is like Rolf before
arriving in the brave new world in which the German now discovers himself.
Accordingly, when Rolf attempts to translate their ruff-housing hugs
into an actual kiss, Guy suddenly pulls away, confusing and angering Rolf who
completely breaks off what he has now presumed was a developing romance.
Disappearing, like the camouflage uniform he keeps trying to recreate,
Rolf literarily moves off, returning to nature, and even hiding himself within
it—much to the anger of the even more clueless Guy. Guy now only gets momentary
glimpses of his friend, as if seeing him through the lens of a surreal-like
kaleidoscope.
Their separation leads to a violence one would never have expected of
the innocent Guy, who threatens his only friend with a knife and ultimately
kills Rolf’s beloved pet dog. Nonetheless, it is clear that Rolf has now become
the stronger, physically, mentally, and most importantly, emotionally.
As
the two lie together satiated by their lust, the peeping-tom Jenine joins them,
as if to assert her role in working to unite the two against the outside forces
they face. She is not seeking to join them in sex but simply to receive their
embrace for giving them a helping hand.
Yet
even though the Allies are nearing this still Nazi-held region, the forces
demanding regimented behavior still occupy the territory as Jenine’s father and
a local partisan leader, who having suddenly become aware of Rolf’s existence
in their territory and of his attachment to Guy, break in to find them in a
symbolically conjugal bed.
Jenine is sent home for later punishment, Guy left behind in recognition
of his innocent idiocy, while Rolf is taken away with the intention of a
painful cross-examination and execution. For perhaps the first time in his
life, Guy moves quickly with conscious intent, retrieving Rolf’s hidden pistol
and following Rolf and the local tribunal members.
Scaring them away with a wild shot, Guy now carefully aims and shoots
his lover in the heart, proving once again Chekhov’s maxim that if you show a
gun in the first act of a play who have to use it in the last.
His
assassination of Rolf is obviously more humane than what the others had planned
for him, and by killing his friend he can now also claim the body, taking it
back home with him to bury it in an earthen hideaway that Rolf had dug out when
he buried his dog.
Guy carefully places the body into the branch-and-leaf-covered dugout
and crawls in with it, cuddling up the Rolf’s corpse. Now no one can ever take
away his beloved other, as the two have literally been transformed into one.
If
this seemingly bizarre, slightly necrophiliac act seems a strange way to end
this stunningly original work of cinema, it’s the only way it could have
properly been concluded. For Guy’s act is now a true act of madness that
totally sacrifices the body to the heart in a way that, perhaps, not even a
military act of bravery can express one’s commitment and love to family and
country.**
*I asked several of my French friends about
this, writer and art dealer Jean Frémon that he’d never heard to such a phrase
applied to the War.
**This reminds me a little of the central
image that the great creator of monstrous visions, James Whale recounts through
the character portraying him in Gods and Monsters (1998) when his World
War I lover was shot and killed just outside the trench where Whale was
trapped, forcing him for days to stare out at the body impaled upon a
protective wire fence. If only he might have been able to retrieve that body,
bring it into his trench and sleep with it in his arms for a night perhaps
Whale would not have been haunted with horrific images for the rest of his
life.
Los Angeles, March 3, 2021
Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog and World Cinema Review (March 2021).




No comments:
Post a Comment