Tuesday, April 21, 2026

Pau Carreté | Enfant Terrible / 2020 [commercial advertisement]

in the know

by Douglas Messerli

 

Pau Carreté (director) Enfant Terrible / 2020 [4.11 minutes] [commercial advertisement]

 

Spanish director Pau Carreté is a commercial filmmaker who does short ads, this one of the knitwear company Alled-Martinez, that read less like company advertisements than, in the particular case, a very gay work that almost could be a trailer for a full gay film about high school speed-racing athletes, one in particular who has the hots for the lead, Alex, who simply watches the daily training and competitions of these beautiful athletes, clothed evidently in Alled-Martinez shorts and tops.


    Alex often sneaks out of his igloo of protection, smoking a joint in the bathroom, in this case wherein the next stall two boys are busy grabbing and madly kissing one another.

     Having discovered at age 15 that he suffers from COPD (Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), Alex is forced to remain on the side in his all boy’s school to which he parents have sent him so that he doesn’t “get distracted.” But the beautiful voyeur is most definitely distracted, particularly by the fastest runner on the team who nicely displays his ass as he rushes forward to win each match, his eyes locking on the boy watching him.


    The one thing, evidently, that our young beauty cannot bear is having his balls grabbed, which the runner proceeds to do when the coach frees them for the shower.

    Our young physically “challenged” boy is still powerful enough the take down the star athlete, forcing his other teammates to pull him off, while Alex steals the coaches starting pistol.

     As the naked sprinter showers, Alex joints him fully clothed in the shower, the better obviously to show off his lovely outfit by Alled-Martinez, knocks him to the floor and sticks the starting pistol into his mouth before pulling it out to engage in a long sloppy. Both stand and continue in passionate wet sex.

      This is a new kind of ad in which you have, evidently, to be in the know before anything makes sense. Except for the appearance of the name Alled-Martinez in the very first moment of this sexy little narrative, there is absolutely no clue that this might even be an advertisement. The tiny film captures your attention through its truly sex gay story.


      Desperate to find out understand even the genre of this short tale, I searched out the director, the title (hoping to find some IMDb or Letterboxd into), and finally that strange name that began the film. On their site, among many other descriptions I found this information, pertinent to this masterful little film:


“Homoerotic inspiration makes up the collection, as the garments inspired by preppy high school uniforms represent moments of adolescent sexual exploration. A slim-fitting red T-shirt with a single white cross, resembling the Swiss flag, was paired suggestively with extremely low-rise cargo pants exposing white boxers. The “Enfant Terrible” logo was seen stamped throughout the collection which also consisted of cotton graphic tops, long-sleeved striped polo shirts, a baseball overshirt in denim, lightweight shorts, and cargo pants in different colors.”

 

    Evidently, the devil wears Alled-Martinez, although I gather you have to be “in the know” the fully enjoy this little knowledge. The cast incidentally, made up of beautiful men, consisted of Alex Saez (our star rapist), Pablo Fernández (the speedy runner) and a cast of 20 other boy beauties. Had my high school colleagues only be so beautiful and well-dressed. Well, one was and my eyes, just as are Alex’s, were fully on his quarterback football motions. If only I’d have been as brave.

 

Los Angeles, April 21, 2026

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (April 2026).

Charles Ludlam | Museum of Wax / 1981-1987, remastered 2010

the museum of mayhem

by Douglas Messerli

 

Charles Ludlam (director) Museum of Wax / 1981-1987, remastered 2010

 

In the late 1970s or early 1980s (several sources suggest the project was begun in 1981), Charles Ludlam worked on a silent film Museum of Wax, a work left unfinished at the time of his death of complications from AIDS in 1987.

     The incomplete work was shown only three or four times after; but in 2010, singer/songwriter Anthony Hegarty along with the New York Film Forum approached Ludlam’s surviving partner Everett Quinton, who reported that both Museum of Wax and another of Ludlam’s film’s The Sorrows of Dolores were still sitting on shelf in his closet. Making a digital transfer of the works and adding music by composer Peter Golub, the Film Forum showed the films on February 22 of that year for the first time in 20 years.

    Since then, there have been only a handful of other viewings. But thankfully the Outfest site has posted the 21 minute work, featuring members of Ludlam’s Ridiculous Theatrical Company cast members—Quinton, Minette, “Crazy Arthur” Kraft, Lola Pashilinski, John D. Brockmeyer, and Black-Eyed Susan—in three small on-line segments. I also found these three segments posted on the blog of translator Tricia Vita. Vita, who as a child worked in carneys with her parents, translated one of the favorites of my Sun & Moon Press publications, the gay Japanese writer Inagaki Taruho’s One Thousand and One-Second Stories.


       A mix of elements from the horror, comedy, and melodrama genres, along with moments of vaudeville-like slap-stick routines, Ludlam’s film is a highly fragmented and a fairly incoherent work, but its major concerns are quite apparent. Using his own and his cast’s talent as quick-change artists, Ludlam and others appear at various moments in numerous “drag” outfits, mixing their sudden appearances and disappearances of the wax heads and other body parts along with the wax tableaux of the Coney Island wax museum hinting about sexual mayhem.

      The narrative, such as it is, involves an escaped prisoner who seeks refuge in the museum, and who with the help of the museum ticket-taker temporarily eludes the police, in some cases by posing, as in old Marx Brothers and Bing Crosby and Bob Hope “On the Road” films, as another of the museum’s wax figures. 


      Other subplots include a bearded villain, evidently the owner of the museum, desperate to rape any woman that crosses his path, including the ticket-taker, and an elderly woman visitor in a wheelchair. He is finally stabbed to death with a pair of scissors by a 1920s-style actress who might remind one of Sunset Boulevard’s Nora Desmond, an action that parallels one of the museum’s panoramas. To hide the body, she makes up the cadaver to appear in the Dr. Einstein exhibit.

       At another point our prisoner hero meets up with a second escaped prisoner and engages in a lengthy kiss among the body museum body parts with his prisoner-lover, reminding me of the two prisoners of love in John Requa and Glenn Ficarra’s 2009 film I Love You Phillip Morris.

       The actress also kisses another woman for several moments.

       In short, one of Ludlam’s major themes in this work is gender and sexual confusion, as well as questioning whether these figures are among the living or the dead.

       Do the two kissing women, one of them a male in drag, represent a lesbian couple or a heterosexual pair who just happen to be cross-dressing?


       Were the two prisoners lovers in prison or aspects of the same self who have just suddenly come across one other in their zany escapades as escape artists? And what is the director suggesting by posing his kissing male prisoners in front of a display of doll-like wax children being brought into life? Do they represent the offspring that this couple will never be able to produce, forcing us to ask if they are prisoners of their own gender?

       Similarly, are some of the figures we encounter simply visiting the museum or are they variations of the museum’s wax figures momentarily come to life as in the later commercial film fantasy, Shawn Levy’s Night at the Museum (2006).

     If one cannot quite argue that Ludlam’s film is profound or even as much fun as his numerous theatrical offerings, this black-and-white piece of cinema is stall enchanting. And we cannot help but ponder, given Ludlam’s highly expressive face, that he surely might have made a great silent film star. At least, before he died, he gave himself the opportunity to be just that.

 

Los Angeles, March 10, 2021

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog and World Cinema Review (March 2021).

 

 

Michelle Parkerson | Stormé: Lady of the Jewel Box / 1987

being green

by Douglas Messerli

 

Michelle Parkerson (director) Stormé: Lady of the Jewel Box / 1987

 

We have to thank Michelle Parkerson for capturing the important male impersonator and the sexual and social activist described as “the Rosa Parks of the gay community,” Stormé DeLarverie on film. Here she appears as an easy-going, intelligent force who in a brief moment with photographs takes us back to the time when she literally ran the legendary Jewel Box Revue, serving as its mistress of ceremonies in male drag—although she declares several times that she behaved no differently on stage than she did in actual life.


      She became the only female performer who introduced the numerous male drag impersonators of the Revue, basically managing its performances at the Apollo theater and its other venues, Maksik’s Town and Country Club, and Loew’s State Theatre. It was Stormé to whom everyone looked if there were any problems, and from the 1940s through the 1960s she basically ran the multiracial revue starring Lynn Carter, Robbi Ross, Leverne Cummings, Billy Daye, Dodi Daniels, Kara Montez, Kim August, and numerous others who performed, quite professionally and proficiently three to four performances daily, attracting large mixed-raced audiences of families and celebrity individuals in the days of segregation. The show, the forerunner of La Cage aux Folles, billed itself as starring numerous males in drag (in this period all the drag figures were referred to with their masculine honorifics of Mr.) with just one female, asking audiences to guess which one. Generally, they were stumped, particularly when Stormé added a moustache. In Parkerson’s film, Stormé observes that adult audiences couldn’t determine who was who, although the children in the audiences almost always perceived the gender difference, hinting perhaps that gender difference is not simply something that is learned but possibly innate?


     Stormé was particularly close to the headliner of the Revue, Lynn Carter. When his death was announced, she was so overwhelmed that they postponed the opening of the show for an hour, and even as she speaks about Carter in the film, she tears up and asks to move on to other subjects.

     Despite her reiterated strong sense of self-identity, at moments DeLarverie hints of years of oppression as a bi-racial lesbian who looked more like a man than woman, summing it up in a few words: “It ain’t easy…being green.”


     The performer also briefly expresses her admiration and personal feelings for photographer Diane Arbus, arguing that Arbus did not just frequent outsiders and freaks, but was a genuinely kind and gentle force who became a good friend of the singers. But no context is established the film, and it is never explained how Arbus’ photographs of Stormé in everyday male attire, but also in men’s three-piece suites and hats, had an enormous impact on gender-nonconforming women’s fashion long before unisex styles came into being.


   Unfortunately, the brief summary I have written above is more revealing than Parkerson’s documentary, which simply presumes we all know what Stormé is talking about when she mentions the Jewel Box Revue. Indeed, Parkerson’s documentary is so superficial that after her brief memories of her musical years, she immediately picks up with Stormé’s later life when she worked as a bouncer for several lesbian bars in New York’s Greenwich Village, here showing her working outside the doors of the famed Cubby Hole.

     We should also praise Parkerson for filming a full performance of the song “There Will Never Be Another You,” the Harry Warren and Mack Gordon classic, sung by DeLarverie, Even in her elderly years, the slightly waving baritone voice is something of a wonder. Stormé elsewhere has described her inspiration as being the singing of her friends Dinah Washington and Billy Holiday.


     What is rather shocking about this documentary of 1987 is not only that the director makes no real attempt to fill in on the details surrounding her subject’s life activities and passions, but fails to describe one of the most significant facts about Stormé DeLarverie, which one would imagine by the year of this filming would have been legendary. Stormé was a major, if not the central figures of the Stonewall Rebellion, as she describes it: “It was a rebellion, it was an uprising, it was a civil rights disobedience—it wasn’t no damn riot.”

      Stormé’s The New York Times obituary summarizes the immediate years before her job at the Cubby Hole:

 

 “No one questions whether Ms. DeLarverie was there on June 27, 1969, the night the police raided the Stonewall Inn, a gay bar, setting off protests that helped start the gay rights movement and are now commemorated during New York’s annual Gay Pride Week. But was she the cross-dressing lesbian whose clubbing by the police helped set the chaos in motion? Some witnesses have said yes, others no.

     “Nobody knows who threw the first punch, but it’s rumored that she did, and she said she did,” said Ms. Cannistraci, an owner of the Village lesbian bar Henrietta Hudson. “She told me she did.”

      Ms. DeLarverie was a member of the Stonewall Veterans Association and a regular at the pride parade, but she rarely dwelled on her actions that night. Her role in the movement lasted long after 1969. For decades she was a self-appointed guardian of lesbians in the Village.

       Tall, androgynous and armed — she held a state gun permit — Ms. DeLarverie roamed lower Seventh and Eighth Avenues and points between into her 80s, patrolling the sidewalks and checking in at lesbian bars. She was on the lookout for what she called ‘ugliness’: any form of intolerance, bullying or abuse of her ‘baby girls.’”

      The Wikipedia entry (relying on articles in The New York Times, interviews with DeLarverie, and other newspaper sources of the day, provides us with a more spectacular view of what that Stonewall night entailed: 

 

“At the Stonewall rebellion, a scuffle broke out when a woman in handcuffs, who may have been DeLarverie, was roughly escorted from the door of the bar to the waiting police wagon. She was brought through the crowd by police several times, as she escaped repeatedly. She fought with at least four of the police, swearing and shouting, for about ten minutes. Described by a witness as ‘a typical New York City butch’ and ‘a dyke-stone butch,’ she had been hit on the head by an officer with a baton for, as one witness stated, announcing that her handcuffs were too tight. She was bleeding from a head wound as she fought back. Bystanders recalled that the woman, whose identity remains uncertain (Stormé has been identified by some, including herself, as the woman), sparked the crowd to fight when she looked at bystanders and shouted, ‘Why don't you guys do something?’ After an officer picked her up and heaved her into the back of the wagon, the crowd became a mob and went ‘berserk’: ‘It was at that moment that the scene became explosive.’”

 

     How could a true documentarian dare make a film of this heralded gay icon without even bringing this subject up, let alone her many years of living in the famed Chelsea Hotel, or her later activities of working to benefit battered women and children? It appears that Parkerson glommed onto Stormé without really knowing her full story or even bothering to investigate further into her subject. While we can thank Parkerson for the brief portrait of this legend, it is difficult not to blame her for failing to fully engage her subject and fill in the information that might help the viewer to understand Stormé’s significant contributions to contemporary LGBTQ+ life. We might argue that Parkerson reveals that as a documentarian she, in another meaning of that word, is also “green,” totally inexperienced.

 

Los Angeles, July 18, 2023

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (July 2023).

Michael DePiro | Because of You / 2025

the terror of a kiss

by Douglas Messerli

 

Bryant Eberhart (screenplay), Michael DePiro (director) Because of You / 2025 [26.33 minutes]

 

17-year-old Brayden (Kellen Apple, billed here as Kellen Belle) is having problems. His parents, Ben (Dan Evers) and Kacy (KT Huckabee) are having difficulties even communicating with him, attempting to remind him about his college applications; and even his boss at the convenience shop in which he works, Gloria (Julie Chapin) notices that he is going through some difficult times, assuring him that she is willing to hear out his problems if he needs to share them.


      But things quickly look up for Brayden when he meets one his customers, Thomas (Chris Jehnert), a friendly cute, new boy in town, seemingly a few years older. They hook up just so that Braden can show him his depressed neighborhood, once evidently home to a major mall that his now fallen on bad times.

      We catch on almost immediately that Brayden is a gay boy whose silences and difficulties have mostly to do with his sexual confusion and insecurity, hardly new territory in queer cinema. Yet Brayden seems to be undergoing even more serious problems. As his father quickly discerns, his son has not been eating, and we observe Brayden vomiting. We can only presume he is bulimic. And finally, his parents confront him, demanding some sort of explanation. And as usual, when their son remains recalcitrant. The upshot remains what the father attempts to explain to his son: “We can’t help you unless we know what’s going on with you.”

      The trouble, of course, is that often even the 17-year-old finally recognizing his strange and queer desires doesn’t himself know what’s going on. He needs time to work it out himself, but there is no time; important decisions about his future, his education, his move away from home, all are staring him in the face.

      When Brayden finally walks away from his parent’s urgent pleas, it ends in a shouting match between father and mother, not a very reassuring response from the child.

       But he awakens to a call from Thomas, asking if he is ready to be his tour guide.


     The two boys have what appears to be a truly wonderful day together, just roaming the mall and the arcades that have replaced the former stores. They so enjoyed their day that Thomas asks if Brayden might be interested in hanging out with again.

        Even Gloria has noticed their rapport. But Brayden admits that he hasn’t really called him back since their first day-long meeting.

         Again, such details might be minor; Brayden seems to simply brush it off. But they are essential when someone like this boy is seeking another soul to whom he might talk to, explain, and explore the world with him.

        Gloria perceives that he is deeply hurt, but reminds him that not everyone is working against him, reassuring him quite beautifully that he will be alright. At the moment, she is the only force in his life who hints that she might even know of his difficulties, reassuring him along the way.

        But Brayden is not all right. He breaks down in tears in the bathroom. His fear, it is clear, that no one will like him enough to form a relationship, that we will be alone for the rest of his life.


         It is his mother, in a private chat, who explains just how much both she and her husband love him, care, and, of course, worry. She wisely suggests he spend sometime with himself, as long as he needs, while reminding him that they are still there to try to listen.

       In short, unlike so many of these coming of age dramas, this young man has support on many fronts. And the very next day he does finally hook up again with Thomas, planning for a meeting in the local park.

         Thomas explains that he too had been going through problematic times, the very reason why he moved away from his previous friends who had helped him become a virtual alcoholic, spending night after night with them drinking before realizing that they were not really his friends. And then one night ends with a physical alteration between him and his father. “He shoved me. And then I hit him, I hit my dad,” actions that led to his complete alienation from his parents.

     Thomas’ confession leads to the first time when Brayden steps up to take some responsibility, assuring his new friend and he is there for him, Thomas reassuring him that whatever is troubling Brayden that he will also try to help.


     But Thomas can’t answer Brayden’s desires. When Brayden admits that he feels better around Thomas and attempts a kiss, the friend that just promised that he will be there leaps up, attempting to make clear that he has no queer alliance, that he is fully heterosexual. Even worse, he runs off leaving Brayden even more in the lonely world he has been inhabiting. Why is a kiss, I can only ask, such a terrifying act that it sends other heterosexuals running in the opposite director. Mightn’t they accept it as a sign of affection before explaining they are not interested in gay sex? What is it about a kiss in US culture that so terrifies grown men and women?

     Brayden rushes home in despair, truly breaking down, his parents rushing up to his room with open arms and hearts. Enveloped in their love he can presume that Brayden survives, while his former friend, Thomas, is seen with a girlfriend in hand, pausing guiltily by the bench where he had abandoned Brayden. He is not a bad person, but like so many in society is a secret homophobe who couldn’t even see how excited the younger boy was around him and what it meant.


     If this film is strictly amateur soap opera, with acting that probably wouldn’t even make it onto a local community stage, and with a script that is far too declamatory—Brayden’s sort of semi-coming out is almost inverted, as his mother cries out: “We are who we are, honey, because of you”—we nonetheless are once more reminded of just how lonely and earth-shattering coming to terms with oneself as a queer being is for so many teenagers. Had I come home at that age and in tears confessed my sense of worthlessness, my father, had he suspected what the problem was, might have shown me the door. Here the father welcomes his son into his arms for a deep hug.

 

Los Angeles, April 21, 2026

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (April 2026).

Elene Naveriani | Wet Sand / 2021

a cremation by Douglas Messerli   Sandro Naveriani and Elene Naveriani (screenplay), Elene Naveriani (director) Wet Sand / 2021   ...