Tuesday, June 2, 2026

Roman Ilyushenko | Violine (Violin) / 2012

a better drug

by Douglas Messerli

 

Roman Ilyushenko Violine (Violin) / 2012 [12 minutes]

 

The German film Violin is another example of the films I have been describing as sexual teases.

     In this 12-minute work, directed by Roman Ilyushenko, a young lonely violinist, Oli (Johannes Huth), is visited, fresh out of the shower, by his “drug dealer,” Jan (Hannes Sell) or a boy who you might more generously describe as his local source for pot.

      Given that Oli’s just out the shower and dressed in a bath towel, the film gives Jan the chance to case out the place, creating a scenario which Oli doesn’t deny, that he lives in the lovely apartment most of the time alone, his parents spending their time traveling.


      At first Jan, in his strutting surety seems almost somewhat threatening, teasing the other boy when he discovers he’s a violinist. The best line of the film is Jan’s: “I always wanted to be musician, but my parents insisted I get a job. I think I found the perfect compromise.” Jan shares a long spliff, obviously marijuana mixed with something stronger, making Oli cough.

      But before long, the gentle responses of Oli, who plays a couple of short passages for him and encourages him to even try the violin out for himself, bring out what seems to be a far more curious and engaged person. And as Oli moves around behind him, showing him how to make a chord with his fingers while helping to bow the instrument, the scene turns briefly in a romantic moment, as Jan drops his hand to rub it just above the other’s waist, and a moment later is kissing Oli’s neck and ear that promises a highly erotic love scene.


 


      Jan’s phone rings and he’s off for another meet-up, leaving Oli with nearly an open mouth, empty, and lonely once again. “How much do I owe you?” he asks. This time it’s on the house.

      We can only hope that Oli quickly uses up the remainder of his bag, calls up his pot-dealing friend for more of the better drug he’s just experienced, and gets down to business before any further interruptive calls.

      Other than some beautiful film stills, Violin doesn’t really have much else to offer.

 

Los Angeles, August 5, 2023

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (August 2023).

Mervyn LeRoy | Little Caesar / 1931

the beginning is the end

by Douglas Messerli

 

Francis Edward Faragoh, Robert N. Lee, Robert Lord, and Darryl F. Zanuck (screenplay, based on the book by W.R. Burnett), Mervyn LeRoy (director) Little Caesar / 1931

 

Arguably William A. Wellman’s The Public Enemy (upon which I write above) and Mervyn LeRoy’s Little Caesar both of 1931, along with Howard Hawks’ 1932 Scarface established and defined the genre of the gangster film. But the first two had the advantage simply because the Hays Board was far less attentive to their tropes, which by the time of Scarface had become so apparent that they demanded far more cuts for Hawks’ film that the earlier two. Some argue that Scarface was one of the most highly censored films in Hollywood history.

     Both of the 1931 films, moreover, have deep homosexual and/or homoerotic content that the latter lacks.


     The basic plot of Mervyn LeRoy’s Little Caesar is so simple that it barely needs retelling.  Growing tired of drugstore robberies, Caesar Enrico “Rico” Bandello (Edward G. Robinson), soon known as “Little Caesar” announces to his long-time friend and gang partner Joe Massara (Douglas Fairbanks, Jr.) that he wants to go East to join up with the real gangs headed by the likes of Pete Montana (Ralph Ince). Joe, his long-time friend, tags along to Chicago, but increasingly expresses his desire to leave the gang and spend his time on his major love, dancing, as well as attending to the ladies he’s sure to find in the city. In a sense, we see in both men at a turning point, a kind of beginning where they desire to move out of their youthful commitments into their adult lives.

      Rico has no interest in girls, suggesting they confuse a man’s mind, the same way as he views alcohol, which he refuses to drink. He insists Joe remain with him, and dance as a sideline, what today he might describe as a “hobby.”

      In short, the writers and director have already set up a strange set of interlinkings that one might never have imagined for the macho-permeated genre as most people perceive it today. Rico’s close relationship and even dependency on Joe as his “front” man (clearly a possible sexual term as well), and Joe’s desire to dance, particularly with his partner Olga Stassoff (Glenda Farrell), a woman with whom he obviously has previously had a relationship most definitely reads queer. Strangely, it is this rather perverse triangle of human relationships that is at the center of this film throughout.

      However, we almost lose sight of Joe for long periods of time as Little Caesar serves out his time first with Sam Vettori, finally determining that he has enough backing to ease him out of control and take over; and then, after being threatened by Little Arnie Lorch (Maurice Black), head of the nightclub wherein Joe dances, he intimidates him so fully that Lorch heads off with his henchmen to Detroit.

      The only time that Joe has been pulled back into Rico’s control is also the second most notable scene in the movie, when Rico, still working for Vettori, robs Lorch’s nightclub, using Joe as the lobby lookout. It is at that very moment when he encounters Crime Commissioner Alvin McClure (Landers Stevens) about to leave the place having just discovered that Lorch is involved with the gangs. Little Caesar takes the opportunity to kill him, thus hoping to relieve the gangs from the Commissioner’s determination to destroy their kind.


      Local Sergeant/Lieutenant Thomas Flaherty (Thomas E. Jackson), however, takes over the job of bringing down the gangs, focusing particularly on Rico with the same passion that McClure had focused on Big Boy, Montano, and Vettori.

       If having brought down two major gang leaders is not enough for Rico, the overlord, Big Boy (Sidney Blackmer), asks Rico to take over for Pete Montana as well. We never discover what happens to Montana, but in the very next scene Rico is in charge. And it is when he is finally at his apogee, seeming to have found a new companion in his henchman Otero (George E. Stone) that he insists that Joe return to him.

       His intentions are only slightly coded, the script covering his real reasons by suggesting that he now wants Joe around him again because his old friend knows too much. He tells Otero that Flaherty may have been trying to “put the heat” on Joe and Olga about identifying who killed the Commissioner. After all, Rico has previously brutally gunned down his former driver Tony Passa (William Collier, Jr.) for the very same reason—the driver, like so many others, finally so terrified of the depth of his involvement that he is on his way to confess to a priest. But the astute viewer realizes there are other explanations for Rico demanding Joe come back to him.


     Just before Little Caesar meets with Big Boy, he seems quite close to Otero, even coyly inviting him into his bed for a conversation about his future plans, clearly a psychosexual indication that he might be ready to establish a closer relationship with his new underling. But Otero is primarily a “yes man,” having none of the honesty and intelligence of Joe Massara. And although he is comely, he is, like Rico himself, short in statue with none of Joe’s good looks, and certainly lacks the memories that Joe and Rico have from their long past together.

       When he finally takes over the Northside territory of Joe Montana as well, Rico fills his apartment with rococo and gilded furnishings, and—after an odd intertitle suggests, “Rico continued to take care of himself, his hair and his gun, with excellent results.”—he proudly struts down the small staircase, well dressed, calling out, “Otero, what did I tell you, huh?” He laughs. “I knew it was coming. I knew he had his eyes on me all the time. And let me tell you something Otero: It’s not only Pete Montana that’s through but Big Boy himself. He ain’t what he used to be…”

       Otero answers, “Sure boss, pretty soon you’ll be running the whole town.”

       “Otero, you said a mouthful.”


       It’s at that point that his doorman announces that there’s a guy with the name of Massera out there who wants to see you. Otero is obviously disturbed by the news, asking what Joe wants since he hasn’t been seen around there for months.

       Rico answers that he sent for him, explaining that he wants to know if Flaherty has been working on Joe which he’ll find out after he has a little talk with him. But we quickly see through his camouflage. When Joe strolls in, quite impressed with the new place, Rico beams in appreciation. He immediately sends Otero off, the man easily ready to leave since he believes the conversation is all about finding out if Joe has squealed.

       And at first the conversation seems to be centered around those very issues. “I thought it’d be kind of nice to have talk together, like old times.” Joe tells Rico he’s looking good, and Rico returns the compliment. Again, he brings up the notion that “dancing’s all right for a sideline. But it ain’t my idea of a man’s game.”

       Joe is immediately set on edge, knows what’s coming. “And I kind of took pride in you Joe. Brought you into the gang, pushed you ahead. But now you’re turning into a sissy.”

       Joe asks him can’t he just let go, keep going along with him. But Rico insists he doesn’t want to, that they started out as pals and they have to keep going along as before. It’s not the gang he talking about, we perceive, but their friendship, their relationship. Joe is in fact more than a friend serving Rico’s purposes almost as a trophy wife, a man he wants at his side forever. “I need you Joe,” he implores, “Someone I can trust.”

        Still, Joe insists he quit the gang.


       For Rico, it clearly isn’t the gang: “You didn’t quit. Nobody ever quit me!” It is himself he’s talking about, it is the relationship between them somewhat like a married couple that he’s referring to, not that of a henchman to his leader.

        If he begins to attack Olga, even threatening to kill her, it is not, we realize because he’s truly afraid that she or Joe will tell the police what they know, but that she is interfering with his own relationship with his “friend.” “It’s she who’s made a softie out of you!” he insists. When Joe pleads for him to leave Olga out of this, that he loves her, Rico cynically responds, “Love. Soft stuff.”

        A minute later, Rico gets a telephone call from Big Boy who clearly suggests another man to serve as Rico’s main partner, but “Little Caesar” insists he doesn’t want him. “I got a kid by the name of Joe Massara that will help me.” When he returns to the room, Joe’s gone.

        In some respects, this is the major scene of the movie, the moment that Rico has been living for all along, a moment in which he had always hoped to share with the man he loves, Joe. And we suddenly recognize just how much it has meant to him, that dream, and in realizing that, we must admit that Joe means more to him perhaps that even the struggles he has undergone to attain his wealth.

        Although he’s threatened Joe and Olga both, it’s all been to keep Joe near him; now with Joe gone he can only plot revenge, like a spurned husband.

       When Joe returns to Olga he orders her to pack immediately, planning to go on the run, himself knowing, perhaps for the first time, that he is Rico’s fetish—and now his target as well. But Olga knows that wherever they might run, it would never be far enough, and calls Flaherty to tell him that Joe is ready to talk about who killed Alvin McClure.

       Both the major forces of the film, the worlds of the gangster and the police suddenly move forward to converge at the very point where the film begin: Rico and Joe sitting in a room together plotting out the future. But when they meet up this time it for the last time, an end.

        Rico reaches Joe’s apartment first, with Otero as his backup. Realizing what his happening Rico now has no choice but to kill Joe; but when he puts the gun to his heart, he cannot pull trigger, so deeply does he love the man. He is now the “softie,” the one in love who’s he’s mocked, turning to leave and even stopping Otero from shooting by pushing away his hand, the bullet only grazing Joe.

       The police chase begins Rico’s inevitable fall as he winds up, finally, in a flophouse, stupidly falling for Flaherty’s newspaper challenge that Little Caesar is “yellow,” afraid of facing what all his other mean have accepted in their arrests.

       The final shootout. killing Rico, with his horrible recognition that all his ambitions were for nothing— "Mother of mercy, is this the end of Rico?"—occurs inevitably under a sign announcing the happily dancing couple of the normal heterosexual world, Joe and Olga. Rico’s perverted world—mean, violent, homocentric—has been replaced by law and order, but strangely, one might almost say queerly, represented by a sissy and seemingly “foreign” woman who entertain their audiences in dance. It’s clear that it their popularity, the musical comedy and the gangster film do after all have some deep affiliation in Hollywood during the Depression. And perhaps it was that very link to that world in Joe that Rico—just like most of the audience for this film—was truly seeking, to finally sit back assured of enough money to enjoy his life. But only Joe could have shown him how to do that.

 

Los Angeles, February 24, 2023

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (February 2023).

 


Fitz Lang | While the City Sleeps / 1956

worse than murder

by Douglas Messerli

 

Casey Robinson (screenplay, based on the novel The Blood Spur by Charles Einstein), Fitz Lang (director) While the City Sleeps / 1956

 

If you think Ben Hecht’s and Charles MacArthur’s The Front Page portrayed a group of ruthless and vengeful reporters, you need only watch one of the grubbiest versions of the media world in Fritz Lang’s 1956 noirish film, While the City Sleeps.


    Throughout his long career Lang always recognized evil when he saw it, and pointed it out to viewers again and again. Based on an actual murder spree in 1946 by William Heirens, in this film named Robert Manners, who was dubbed “The Lipstick Killer” because in one of his three murders he penned a message to the police with the victim’s lipstick, the story Lang tells does not focus as much on the pitiable effeminate “momma’s boy” (played by John Drew Barrymore) as much as on the reporters who are all out to crack the case.

     Media baron Amos Kyne, who lies dying in an early scene of the work, would like to have willed is empire to former reporter and now TV newsman Edward Mobley (Dana Andrews), who, a bit like the gumshoe private eye in The Big Sleep, would rather lay back and enjoy a drink than go out to get his pet more cat food, and who seems to have little ambition except, perhaps, to bed newswire secretary Nancy Liggett (Sally Forest).

     Accordingly, when Kyne dies, his kingdom goes instead to his detested playboy son, Walter (Vincent Price), who, would rather spend its money than properly run the company.

  Walter determines to find a new executive for the media combine by pitting three heads of departments: newswire head Mark Loving (George Sanders) vs. Sentinel editor Jon Day Griffith (Thomas Mitchell) and “honest” Harry Kritzer (James Craig), who is having a not-so-secret or honest affair with Walter Kyne’s wife Dorothy (Rhonda Fleming). So already, even though they are not playing gay characters in this film, we are presented with two figures played by Price and Sanders who ooze from all sorts of gay associations they played throughout their careers, which help turn Lang’s film into a rather bitchy affair.


      Loving (Sanders) has gossip columnist Mildred Donner (Ida Lupino) in his court, so he is sure he’ll uncover the murderer; while Kritzer, with his inside “connection” is certain he’ll get the post.

     But Griffth has a more important ace in his pocket: Mobley, who a has old time connections with police head, Lt. Burt Kaufman (Howard Duff, later married to Lupino and rumored to have had gay affairs). Moreover, Griffith is simply brighter than all the others.

    Although he is the most likeable and objective member if these news hounds, Mobley, so Lang insinuates, is the most like the murderer himself, successfully seducing the only “normal” person in the film, Nancy; and like the murderer, furtively clicking her door open so that he might reenter it at any time. In at least two meetings he is drunk, and later he allows himself to be seduced by Mildred, while blaming Nancy for her suspicions. Worst of all, he uses Nancy as “bait” for the killer, announcing his involvement with her and hinting of her location on national television.


     By the time Mobley finally realizes that the murderer might kill in the daytime as well as at night, it’s almost too late; the man keeping an eye of Nancy has left for the day.

     The murderer attempts to kill Nancy’s neighbor, who happens to be Walter’s wife, who has rented the next-door apartment for her affairs with Krizer; and Mobley finally joins the police to chase down the killer in a scene that vaguely conjures up Holly Martin’s chase after Harry Lime in The Third Man—this version filmed supposedly in the New York subway, but actually set in the Pacific Electric Belmont trolley tunnel of Los Angeles.

      Griffith finally gets the job and Mobley the girl. In the end these two appear to be the only slightly redeemable folks in the entire Kayne empire, but it is difficult to see this ending as a happy one. Griffith will surely still plot day and night to keep his job, and Mobley’s and Nancy’s marriage seems doomed from the star. It’s clear that in Lang’s world no one is truly innocent, everyone being equally guilty just for being part of the human race. More than any other director, Fritz Lang, it seems to me, truly believe in original sin.

     Yet, this underrated work reminded me yet again of how honest and gritty the mid-1950s film could really be: no sweet housewives here, nor in Hitchcock’s The Wrong Man of the same year, or Sweet Smell of Success in the following year. Too bad that by this time, Lang had pretty much given up on Hollywood.

 

Los Angeles, January 3, 2017

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (January 2017).    

Abbas Kiarostami | شیرین Shirin / 2008

images of desire

by Douglas Messerli

 

Abbas Kiarostami (screenwriter and director) شیرین Shirin / 2008


Abbas Kiarostami’s 2008 film, Shirin, might be described as a film with a film, or a cinematic work with film effects. Throughout this almost two-hour movie, we see nothing but an audience of mostly women, head on, as they watch and react to a film on the screen which we never get to see, but can hear.

      The story, a kind of melodramatic version of Tristan and Isolde concerns a 12th century Armenian princess and later queen, Shirin, who falls in love with a Persian prince, Khosrow. He is equally in love with her, but in order to save his kingdom he must ally with the Romans, marrying a Roman woman. Each time the would-be lovers come close to one another, something happens to keep them apart; finally Shirin even gives up her kingdom to order to live in Persia, although her love can never be consummated, and she and Khosrow die without ever knowing each other’s love.


     This is what we might describe in the US, as a “chick flick,” and we observe several of the dozens of women watching it in tears or, at the very least, with their faces rapt in consternation and attention. Almost all of them, except for the French actress Juliette Binoche, are Iranian women, and Kiarostami presents us with several types, each of whose reactions are somewhat different.

     Strangely, even without being able to view this film—or perhaps one should say because we are unable to view the film—we must imagine it, perhaps, as in my case, as a splendiferous color spectacle, laced with Persian miniatures. I can see only the most beautiful of dark-haired males in Khosrow, since even a lovely queen has given up her kingdom for him.

     However, we might equally conjure it up, given that the only things we have to work with are the dialogue, the music (an historical film score by Morteza Hananeh and Hossein Dehlavi), and the visual clues from the faces of the audience members, as rather realist, plain-faced warriors whose beauty lies only in each other’s eyes, a dreary comedy in which the lovers are horribly misled.

     In some respects, the central characters’ love for one another is not unlike our own relationship with the missing images; we desire to se the missing film, but must do so only by using our own imaginative desires and those we equally imagine from the faces of the film’s viewers. In a sense we are watching the desires of our own desires, a kind of wishful imaginative experience that has ultimately nothing to do with what might be showing on any screen.

     In this sense, this is an extremely queer film or a very heterosexual one, depending simply on who is watching it, who is imagining the desires on screen and off. Are the women excited more by the heroine or the hero? With whom do they most identify? And what forms of beauty and notions of love are they encountering upon the screen?

     Actually, it may not be anything at all since Kiarostami filmed these characters’ responses to the film (rumored to have been shot in his own home) by simply asking them to gaze at a series of dots above his camera. Even he had no idea, at first, what movie he might pretend they were watching, and only at the last moment chose the famous 12th century tale.

     It reminds to some of what the Iranian-born sculptor Siah Armajani once told me about his childhood filmgoing experiences. A local theater owner would gather up pieces of US and British cinema that had been cut from the films for purposes of censorship. He’d then link those pieces together in a loop and, while showing the, create a personal dense narrative for his mostly youthful audiences that decried the evils of the West. “Never before or since,” Siah sighed, “has film been so immersive and exciting. We had to imagine those narrative connections which the strange ‘forbidden’ images only hinted at.

      If there was even a precise example of the adage that film is the canvas of our own dreams, Shurin is its exemplar. In this work the director has perhaps made one of the purist and theoretical works of cinema ever, forcing us to become the creators of his own cinematic work.

 

Los Angeles, New Year’s Eve, 2016

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (December 2106).

 

Glenn Jordan | Rites of Friendship (Season 2, Episode 10 of the ABC TV series Family) / 1976 [TV episode]

a glass snowball vision of a radical past

by Douglas Messerli

 

Gerry Day, Bethel Leslie, and Lawrence Konner (screenplay), Glenn Jordan (director) Rites of Friendship (Season 2, Episode 10 of the ABC TV series Family) / 1976 [TV episode]

 

During the period in which this ABC series ran, I was in graduate school finishing by PhD, and my husband Howard was then a curator of art at the Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden. I had also just begun publication of the journal, Sun & Moon: A Journal of Literature and Art. In short, neither of us had much time for television. I had never even heard of this fairly popular series with ran 1976-1980 until my Facebook friend Eric Henwood-Greer mentioned it.

     This particular episode was schedule to premiere early in the second season, on September 28, 1976, but because of its controversial subject, some suggest, was postponed until the week following Christmas, a time recognized for very small audiences, although others such as Henwood-Greer and the original producers argue that it was a preferable time since most families had gathered at the holiday and could watch it together at home.

     Today the plot of this episode hardly even seems head-turning, let alone shocking; but it its time it was far ahead of most other TV fare. What is shocking is that even almost a decade after Stonewall, young men were still being arrested for simply showing up in a gay bar.

     In this plot, the middle school daughter Buddy Lawrence (Kristy McNichol) and her old brother Willie (Gary Frank) are rounding up their favorite Mexican food at a fast food restaurant since their parents Kate (Sada Thompson) and Doug (James Broderick) are spending an evening out at a restaurant.

   Suddenly while waiting for their order, they spot Willie’s best friend of many years and a regular visitor to their house, Zeke Remsen (Brian Byers), evidently having returned home temporarily from school to Pasadena from college in San Francisco. Willie immediately invites him to return home with them to share their Mexican meal, but Zeke declares he has other plans, and will join them the next day.


      Later that evening, we discover what those plans were, when Zeke calls Willie from jail, after he has evidently struck a policemen in a bar. Willie immediately runs to the jail with for a bail-out, his father, a lawyer, soon to follow.

      But when Willie queries him as to why the incident occurred, Zeke, after several pauses, explains the severity of the situation by sharing the fact that he was underage at a gay bar, and that, in fact, he himself is gay.

      Willie is immediately taken aback, and pulls away from his best friend mostly out of homophobia, but also, in the case, taken aback that after all these years when he thought they both had shared everything with each other, he discovers that the boy he has thought of his brother has not revealed such an important aspect of himself.

      Actually, Zeke has returned to Pasadena mostly to reveal his sexuality to Willie, and not previously been able to bring up the subject for fear of precisely what now happens as Willie pulls away from his friend and refuses even to talk with him.

      At one point, Zeke even further scares off his friend when he suggests that Willie is afraid of contracting what he sees as a social disease, particularly given their long friendship.


     Doug agrees to represent him in court, convince that he will be better treated by the judge if Zeke’s father appears along with him. But Zeke has not come out to his father, who he knows is even more homophobic than Willie. Yet Doug convinces him it will be best if he now explain to his father. When he does so in Doug’s presence, the father orders the lawyer friend off their property, and with Zeke queries does that mean him as well, he answers “I don’t care happens to you.”

     Doug invites him back to the Lawrence household to stay until the trial is over.

    Yet Willie continues to ignore him, bowing out of even sharing the family dinner with his former best friend.

    Finally, Kate tells her son just how ashamed she is of his behavior, even though in casual conversation she suggests to her older, recently divorced daughter Nancy, that she can’t imagine a worse thing to happen to someone, presumably referring to his homosexuality. Nancy doesn’t see it as quite serious, and Kate, given her ability for sympathy, quickly comes around. But her comment still stings even today, a belief commonly held still in 1976, six years after Howard and I had been openly living together in a gay relationship.

      Eventually Doug, rather surprised given the standard behavior of the presiding judge, gets Zeke off without any mark on his record. And Zeke heads off to the airport to return to college.

      When Doug returns home, he also tells his son just how disappointed he is with his behavior, attempting to explain the difficulty Zeke must have had in sharing his own sexual doubts given that it might mean—and apparently does mean—that he would lose the love of his best friend.


     Chastised, Willie hurries off to the airport to catch Zeke before his flight. The two talk, Willie apologizing, and apparently a rapprochement does occur, although as he is called for his flight, Zeke’s wave of goodbye looks far more like he is waving off the former friend forever, having realized that he will never be seen the same way by Willie ever again.

      A weak subplot was written in, apparently to provide some sense of “normality,” in which Buddy is asked out to a major school dance by the most popular boy in her school. But not knowing how to dance, she begs her older sister Nancy to teach her. But when the time comes, the distracted older woman with her own child and still facing divorce problems, forgets, distancing her even more from her little sister. Zeke finally teaches her to dance.

      While, it is heartening to see such a scene on TV, the fact that the network chose to air it when they did, that just being in a gay bar could possible mean imprisonment for a college kid or, at the least, end in a stretch at a home for juvenile delinquents, or that a generally positive, intelligent woman like Kate Lawrence could not imagine a worse fate for a young man—all of this just a few years for the sudden recognition that young gays were dying of AIDS delimits my joy of viewing this ground-breaking TV episode. I was certainly attending gay bars regularly (albeit in the liberal college city of Madison, Wisconsin as opposed to Pasadena, California) at Zeke’s age without even imagining such possible consequences. TV makes what I believe was a relatively open-minded time now seem so antiquated and retardare. Zeke even declares that he is unhappy in college, presumably while living in one the gayest cities in the world. Watching this video makes me feel somewhat like staring into glass-covered snowball depicting a world that I never realized still existed, an upper privileged middleclass world that could not even imagine that gay men and women might be among their neighbors and friends.

 

Los Angeles, June 2, 2026

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (June 2026).

Index of Titles (director, title, and date) A-Q

  https://myqueercinema.blogspot.com/2023/12/former-index-to-world-cinema-review.html Films discussed (listed alphabetically by director) [F...