Monday, July 27, 2026

Joren Molter | Dòst (Dust) / 2018

there is nothing in kropsdam

by Douglas Messerli

 

Britt Snel and Matthijs van der Veer (screenplay), Joren Molter (director) Dòst (Dust) / 2018 [41 minutes] [TV movie]

 

Appearing on Dutch television, Joren Molter’s Dust almost approaches a feature film at 41 minutes, and most certainly it has the depth and heft of a longer film.

     This is a story, told so very often in LGBTQ+ movies, about a provincial love that simply because of the world in which it takes place cannot possibly survive. In this case the someone mentally challenged Alko (Henk Jan Doornbosch) and Björn (Liam Feikens) are best friends, and have been clearly from childhood. There is most clearly a love between them which perhaps they both only slightly recognize.

      Besides this is not a world of same-sex love, but of heterosexual normality, with Alko participating in dirt cart dragging, a constant discussion of girls, and possible kisses. Agricultural Netherlands is not the place for a deep love of two boys.


     The movie begins with a down-and-dirty ride through the mud on small open carts hooked up to what appear to be small go-carts. Alko wins the race to the surprise of his friends. He is hugged by Björn and cheered on by the others, despite their general disparagement of him.

      Their conversation is basically about their first kiss by a female, which one of them, when asked, replies, his mother, insisting that all of his friends were probably first kissed by the mothers.

       Here, they grow white asparagus for the world’s best tables, and you see the boys working the fields, carefully pulling up the tender stalks.

       A local girl, Marie (Yamila Huft), clearly interested in Alko, challenges him to an asparagus spear sucking content, in which both of them attempt to put the still quite dirty spears in their mouths, pushing it down as far as they can, obviously imitating the process of sucking a cock. The girl wins this contest.

       And, in some respects. Of these teenage relationships are about contests, who can first kiss a woman? Who can first have sex? Almost everything in this world is a challenge and a game, and if you’re aren’t up for it, you are mocked by your peers.


      Alko evidently eats regularly with Björn and his parents, beforehand which they wash up, helping each other, sometimes playfully, but often tenderly, with their grooming.

       Potato stew is generally the fare.

       Early on in this story, as provincial boys of this age often do, they practice French kissing together since, as Björn insists, the girls expect it, and now Alko has a date with the spear-sucking champion. They begin by simply darting out their tongues between their fingers, but soon explore each other’s fingers, putting a smile on their faces.

     The date between Alko and his new girlfriend goes mildly well, she attempting to explain to him once again how to kiss.


     Soon after, Björn and Alko explore masturbation to learn how it might feel with a girl, Björn jacking his friend off. He dare not show how much he enjoys it. And in that single act, moreover, something has changed. Alko now cleans himself alone, Björn given a turn in the bathroom without the sharing rapport of earlier.

    Alko shows up for a date with Marie, who on this strange date literally bicycles with her heavy-weight friend sitting behind her, through the flat-lands of provincial Holland, facing the head-winds.

     They break into the local swimming pool, now closed, play silly games, and mostly eat, clearly a pleasure they both share. But finally, through a piece of red licorice, which they share from opposite ends, she gets him to kiss her, evening opening up her zipper so that he can put his hands on her vagina. But when he tries to take a condom out of his billfold, she forbids him: “When I’m sixteen.”

    The game-playing, the challenges, the awards are again demanded and promised for any heterosexual boy.

      Now Alko hardly even talks to his former friend, asking only if he knows when Marie’s birthday is. The others boys bicycle past shouting, “Alko, Björn: Lien (Benthe Horlings) is again kissing in the trailer anyone who wants to.” 

      A bit like the whore in Fellini’s movies who titillate young men, Lientje, although much younger, literally chalks up her kissing conquests by scratching the numbers upon her walls. Björn enters first, she kissing him and declaring he was the best.


     But she herself is still only a child, the kissing game is still child’s play despite the fact she is French-kissing all the boys. Oddly, Alko doesn’t even bother with Lientje, since, presumably, he now has his own girlfriend.

      Now, at a local bar they celebrate Björn’s conquest of the local kisser, drinking at a bar, topping beer evidently with what appears to be whipping cream. When he refuses to drink, the boys all ask “Are you a man or a woman,” gender demanding, quite obviously, a certain kind of behavior.

         They each swallow down their drinks, some in one gulp, while Björn stands watching, an outsider to their activities. It is clear that he has begun to recognize the he is not whatever the male models are in his community.

      With the peer pressure upon him, and former teasing for being gay, Alko moves on to become friends with the rowdy group. When Lien shows up behind the bar to ask if Björn has something tasty for her, as Björn walks off.

         As Marie and Alko dance, she whispers that she will be sixteen tomorrow. Björn quickly shifts the music to something that can’t be slow-danced to.

        It’s clear he is hurt and frustrated by the inevitable shift of his boyhood friend’s attention, no matter how Alko may try to remain at least somewhat friendly. And it’s also quite clear now that Björn, the true outsider as perhaps a gay boy, feels betrayed by his friend Alko, surely never a lover, real or imaginary, but someone upon he could count as true friend and companion. That betrayal is what so often hits the gay boy or girl in the provincial worlds in which they grow up. There is ultimately no one there any longer to depend upon.

      Gay boys, recognizing also that they can never be friends with the most popular and successful boys of their crowd seek out those also ostracized or ignored by the society in which they live. Certainly, that was my experience, seeking out friendships with my peers that were not entirely satisfying to either of us. One of my friends, when he discovered I was gay, completely cut me off. Others simply moved away into heterosexual marriages and disappeared from my life as I knew they would. They were temporary friendships formed out of desperation and desire for the other relationships I knew might cost me painful abuse in their mockery and refusals to even imagine a friendship. We gay men do this to ourselves in small-town or rural areas in order to survive, but we also know at the very same moment that our relationships are lies, imaginary replacements for beautiful boys we might wish but fear to seek out.

        In Molter’s work, Alko is the epitome of the gay female hag, a boy friend (not a boyfriend) that serves as a temporary stand-in for what might someday be. But the betrayal hurts as much as if he were the one someone Björn is really attempting to befriend.

    Accordingly, when such friendships collapse, there is not only the pain of the loss, but the recognition of one’s own delusions and, you might even describe it, a kind of abusive friendship that mattered only through accident and coincidence. Moreover, Björn perceives his friend is no champion, now a part of the heterosexual crowd, but a confused youth who has been convinced that finding a girl will answer all of his problems and bring him into the general crowd.

      It’s enough to make a grown man cry. And I did.

    When Alko, worried about the state of his former friend, puts his arm around him to comfort him, Björn leans in for a kiss. Alko kisses him back, but we know and he knows this truly means the end of the relationship. Björn is a fag.


     For the rest of his days Alko will join the rowdy, heavily drinking local party boys, with no room in his life for real love and friendship.

      Björn even goes further, stopping by Alko’s house apologizing for last night and suggesting that if he wants he can “hit him.” Alko’s mild “it’s okay,” however, is in someways even worse, a kind of false forgiveness that never again result in their possibly being together.

    Alko buys a treat of decorated pears for Marie’s birthday. But others have seen Björn’s kiss, and Marie now accuses him of being gay and will have nothing to do with him, bicycling off when, at the old pool, he has attempted to meet up with her so they might finally celebrate her 16th birthday.

    The other boys equally now abuse Alko for being queer and he is mocked by the very ones with whom he thought he might have joined in the club of hormonal heterosexual admiration. Björn, realizing what has happened, can no longer have anything to do with Alko, nor that boy with his former friend. The breach has been made by the community who have outlawed both as perverts. Working side-by-side with the other boys, it is Alko wo receives the brunt of behavioral betrayal, called a faggot. Björn has apparently long been seen to have been “different,” but now one of their own has shown they cannot trust him as a friend, even though he has long been treated with mockery.

     When he attempts to explain to Marie what the situation is, she gives him the finger.

     The entry back into so-called teen normality, once someone is perceived as having left it, is terribly difficult, if not impossible. The truck home from the fields leaves both Alko and Björn behind.

     When Alko returns to the bar, they all scream that Alko is here. For a moment he is pleased, but when the song begins “If you don’t jump now you’re a faggot,” he realizes it is another attempt to mock him. But this boy, never a deep thinker, does begin to jump, even though soon after he is held down by two others.

     The next day at work, when Björn attempts to comfort him in his dejected state, Alko finally screams out to keep his hands off him, to stop trying to French kiss him, etc., screaming out and pushing him away for all to hear that he is not interested.

      All stop work in the midst of their washing and cutting the white asparagus for shipping, as  Björn leaves, no other choice allowed.

      The next day, his so-called friends are attacking another young man (who probably is Björn) for being a dirty faggot. Alko observing it briefly, walks off in another direction.

      Finally, rejected still by Marie, he accuses her, as she makes out with another man, of getting half-raped, which leads the other boys, given the context of his and her words, to presume that it was he who was “half-raped” by Björn, and they go after the gay boy again. Alko hardly resists their actions.

      When they ask if he touched him, Alko cannot respond. And they assume the worst. We have seen the masturbation sequence, a truly innocent act given their ages.

      Björn’s fellow works explode a soccer ball through his windows, Alko contributing to the general chaos, and running away with the rest of them like scared rabbits. Alko is now one of “them,” but he has no longer any place to run to. He will always be suspect in the local community, and he no longer has any escape of friendship with Björn and his family.

      We last see Reinert and the other bully boys on their way to a group field party, drinking small, hotel-like containers of alcohol. They celebrate the may pole, again noting its phallic significance. Singing, as the flames of their usual bonfires go off, about how there is nothing “in Kropsdam,” their imaginary community which director Joren Molter takes up as a subject in another film.

      As Alko watches, he spots Björn with another man, his old friend holding up a young child an showing him love, as he stands alone, finally joining in on the son “There is nothing in Kropsdam.” Clearly there is nothing there any longer for him, where Björn has evidently found a loving community.

      If Moler’s film is not a great work of art, it certainly comes close to it in its bringing up of terribly profound issues about how to live in a world intolerant of gay beings. We might presume that Björn will soon move away and find a new life for himself, while Alko and his gang must remain in Kropsdam, trapped in their nothingness.



Los Angeles, July 27, 2026

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (July 2026).

 

Lloyd Reckord | Dream A40 / 1965

justified paranoia

by Douglas Messerli

 

Lloyd Reckord (screenwriter and director) Dream A40 / 1965

 

Jamaican-born British director Lloyd Reckord’s short 16-minute film Dream A40 reminds me a little of a truly intelligent version of the American TV series The Twilight Zone with a plot which Rod Serling and his colleagues never might have imagined to write.

     The time we are about to enter is back in the terrible days before the British Sexual Offences Act of 1967, a final realization of the 1957 Wolfenden Report’s recommendation which had taken those 10 years to come into existence.


    The twilight world that the two young gay men (performed by Michael Billington and Nicholas Wright) are about to encounter lies simply along route of a country road trip down a major highway, A40, that takes the riders from London, through Oxford, and eventually into Wales—that wild and wholly territory which took a couple of other British day trippers into The Old Dark House of haunted horrors overseen by the Femm family, including gay brothers Saul and Horace, cooked up in the imagination of filmmaker James Whale.

      But this time the travelers barely get out of London when an obviously flirtatious woman in her Austin Healey cruises the handsome driver of the Ventura Ford Station Wagon (Billington) encouraging him to speed up and away from her heterosexual gaze.

     His partner, in the back seat, (the much more laid-back Wright) teases him about the unwanted solicitation by playing Eve to his buddy with an apple he’s brought along for sustenance, reaching round to put it into his lover’s mouth before quickly withdrawing it as he continues chomping away on it in his friend’s ear. The driver finally pulls it away from his companion and finishes it off, his mate now casually stroking his arm since they now, symbolically at least, are both sinners about to banned from their paradise.

      Almost at that very moment a car pulls up where a little girl (Beverly Green) stares them down through her the open window of her family’s auto. The act is rather innocuous, although the driver quickly pulls his arm away from where he was stroking his friend. Wright’s character laughs it off, while Billington’s troubled and seemingly paranoid figure fusses “You find that sort of thing funny, don’t you?”


       In this terrible apocalyptic year of 2020, we might all find that trivial incident to be even more of a laughable matter. After all, what is his consternation all about? As his younger riding companion puts it, even if the girl witnessed their minor expression of affection she certainly wouldn’t know what to make of it. Yet the incident has so troubled the driver that even when they pull into a roadside restaurant to get a bite to eat, he finds it impossible to even imagine stomaching a sandwich, and almost as quickly as they have entered the establishment they are back on the road, with the easily flustered driver speeding up clearly over the limit.

       Perhaps to today’s younger audiences the meaning of these insignificant events would be hard interpret. But let us remember, as British Film Institute curator Simon McCallum has written, 1967 was

 

                …crucial period in the fight for LGBT rights in

                post-war Britain, where a rash of prosecutions of

                high-profile gay men evoked earlier scandals, not

                the least the persecution meted out to Oscar Wilde

                and others by the Victorian establishment.


     Careers were ruined and cover-up marriages destroyed. Imprisonment was common, and when locked away in a goal individuals suffered journalistic, peer, and family shaming. As in the case of the significant mathematician and war-time hero Alan Turing, suicide was a common way out.

     For our young tourists the next few minutes play out as almost a cross between a standard gay porn trope and a horror story right out of Franz Kafka, as a motorcycle cop, all in black, silently pulls the gay men’s car over before spiriting them away to mysterious castle wherein other men (and one woman) are already seated on rows of benches as if awaiting to be read out their punishments. A hanging noose horrifically swings overhead.

       The angered Billington character stands in a kind of rebellion, answering his friend’s question as to his destination with a bark of despair: “There must be some way out of this place,” almost as if the dreamworld in which they have found themselves did not reveal its own entry, suggesting they now live in a nightmare world having little to do with the logic they had experienced in the friendly party the night before. A bit like a labyrinth of mirrors, in and out appear to point in entirely opposing directions.

      As he enters another room he sees a great many men gathered around what is obviously urinals in a bathroom, suggesting the cottage sexual activities of many urban gays. But these humorless beings look to be more out of a vampire flick rather than enjoying themselves in group masturbation. He quickly runs from the scene, the director portraying the M. C. Escher-like landscape through wide-lensed views of backdrop porticos. Climbing over a short wall he finally reaches a space where in the distance he sees a human being, rushing toward him.

    The man is a cashier who cautiously lifts a glass barrier to accept a bribe which might free the driver and his friend.


   Yet as our would-be hero returns to retrieve his companion, he finds him half-trapped within the noose, blinking his eyes once before, apparently, he slips away into death. The survivor bends down to pick up and carry away his lover in a manner that can only remind anyone who has seen Whale’s 1932 picture of the Boris Karloff figure, Morgan, spiriting away his master/lover Saul Femm up the stairs of the “old dark house.”

    If the handsome but fret some adventurer had previously appeared to us as inexplicably paranoid, we now recognize it as having been more than a little justified.

 

Los Angeles, September 15, 2020 | Reprinted from World Cinema Review and My Queer Cinema blog (September 2020). 

Stewart Hannah | Listen / 2019

the difference

by Douglas Messerli

 

Stewart Hannah (screenwriter and director) Listen / 2019 [5 minutes]

 

In this very short love story, we meet Adam (Knowe Rata) who is having a difficult time with the fact that his companion of 1 years, Tom (Luka Klindo) has broken up with him to just think things out.

    It’s now been almost three months, and Adam has still not received a full answer for why Tom has suddenly needed to think out what he perceived was a healthy relationship. Adam argues that Tom simply won’t “listen,” evidenced by the fact that he goes about everywhere with earphones around his neck.

     Adam claims he could comprehend if there was someone else involved or if only he had any kind of explanation, but Tom walks away again frustrated by what he describes as Adam’s selfishness.

     Adam follows, finally pulls away Tom’s head phones and refuses to return them, rushing off with Tom on the chase; he trips, however, on a rock and the phones go falling over the cliff into the Australian waters below.

     But if nothing else, he finally gets a full conversation out of Tom, who explains that he knows what pain Adam is going through and he still loves Adam. He’s just not sure of what he wants for the future and needs the time to think it out.


     They hug and kiss, and obviously must both go on their ways into an unsure future which faces so many couples, gay and straight who perhaps entered a relationship too quickly or were simply unready for the difficulties and loss of a sense of self any deep relationship requires. There is often one in the relationship who depends upon its existence for his definition and sense of protection, while the other feels he’s had to give up everything for other’s needs. Until one can be sure that the partnership is more important that the presumed independence and sometimes loneliness which comes with that, the friendship cannot move on, each will always feel difference.

     As Tina Turner might have argued, although certainly with a much more cynical intent, “what does love have to do with?”

 

Los Angeles, July 27, 2026

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (July 2026).

Index R-Z

Angelo Raaijmakers I, Adonis / 2021 Peeter Rabane Firebird / 2021   Tyler Rabinowitz Catalina / 2022 Tyler Rabinowitz See You Soon / 20...