Wednesday, September 2, 2026

Phil Connell | Jump, Darling / 2020

on thin ice

by Douglas Messerli

 

Phil Connell (screenwriter and director) Jump, Darling / 2020

 

Canadian director Phil Connell’s 2020 film Jump, Darling seems to ask the question, asked over the years thousands of times, that has no one answer: “Why does someone perform drag?”—especially an apparently sis-gender good looking gay boy like Russell (Thomas Duplessie)—who, after leaving his over-doting, well-meaning mother (Linda Kash)—has moved to Toronto to become an actor, and is now in a long-term relationship with a wealthy lawyer, Justin (Andrew Bushell).

      Russell is asked twice in this film why he wants to live the life of a drag queen, but if you’re looking for answers, particularly easy ones, in this moving if somewhat predictable film, forget it. The movie has a lot of other semi-related things on its mind.

      Before we even discover what the central character’s issues really are, Russell breaks up with Justin, presumably because of his lover’s disapproval of his rookie drag career as opposed to his more “normal” aspiration to become an actor. Before we even get a chance to see his routine, Russell falls down drunk of the barroom floor and soon after flees his town house with only a piggy bank and a few expensive bottles of wine to barter his way via taxi back to his provincial hometown in Prince Edward County to his grandmother’s house where an old car that she has promised him in a recent greeting card sits unused in her garage. Fortunately, he’s happened upon a cab driver who loves wine and appreciates their pricey labels.


      After a quick kiss and night spent with his tough-loving grandma, suffering from the slow onslaught of dementia, the disappointed drag star takes the wheel of the car to travel into the arms of Morpheus to Hades through the car’s emissions, until granny awakens, opens the garage door and gently nudges her grandson back into consciousness.

       By the very next morning Russell swears he’s off again, this time to an acting school whose address he evidently still doesn’t quite know, his grandmother suggesting that it might be better to discover the school’s location before attempting to visit it, using the subterfuge of her naked body desperately in need of a shower to lure him back from another taxi ride to nowhere.


      Realizing that he might be better off caring for her instead of rushing off without  even another bottle of vino, Russell determines to stay on, forging a check for $4,000 from her account in order to tide him and her over—since she has nothing to eat in her refrigerator and only a few agèd frozen meals in her freezer.

      We’ve seen this movie before, wherein the tortured youth moves in with the elder family member to fortify themselves against the normative expectations of the middle generation. In this case his mother Ene, waving the flag of “trying to do the right thing,” is determined to place her mother Margaret in an assisted living facility against her wishes and, discovering the location of her missing son, to try to nudge him back to the arms of Justin and his abandoned acting career. Neither of them apparently can bear with what her railroading appearances in their lives.

      Although cinematographer Viktor Cahoj presents us with a number of beautiful images of rural Canada, and turns Margaret’s old farmhouse into a virtual fun house of half-open doors leading to empty rooms, treasure-filled closets, and an attic, stuffed with trunks of memorabilia, where Russell makes his bed, Jump, Darling might have landed on the cutting room floor of LGBTQ memory were it not that Connell chose the then 93-year-old Cloris Leachman to play Margaret. Leachman, believe it or not went on to act in two further movie roles before her death the following year in 2021.

      The former Miss America contestant played many roles throughout her career that exposed her aging body in a way that no other actress might have permitted. And in this one she plays her age with a kind of feisty gracefulness that allows her character to show her disdain for those who embrace well-meaning normalcy like the town busybody Jeanne (Jayne Eastwood) and her daughter while also challenging and embracing some of her grandson’s problems and eccentricities. She truly takes pleasure in the meals he cooks for her, while tartly commenting on his nighttime outings and household redecorations. She realizes, moreover, that his presence is the only thing keeping her out of the Millbrook Care Home. As Glen Gaylor, writing in The Queer Review observed of Leachman’s performance: "You can’t easily manufacture her presence, her force, and her power. You see every wrinkle, every aging bone, and every slow, careful movement. I savored it, knowing this could easily be one of her last picture shows."

      Meanwhile, in a far less believable and more meandering style, Russell uncovers the local bar run by Hannah (Katie Messina) which seems to mix liberal town straight couples with the local queers, where somewhat inexplicably he develops an audience for his drag routines while courting the evidently bi-sexual bartender Zach (Kwaku Adu-Poku) who appears to be equally fascinated with and disgusted by Russell’s drag-personas, but can’t quite keep his hands off the cute new white boy who has chosen him from their first encounter as his lover. 


     Although Russell performs some of his best numbers at this unlikely venue, including his version of Scissor Sisters and Rough Trade’s “High School Confidential,” in which he almost simulates a lap dance with Zach in front of his girlfriend, the film moves further into fantasy territory when a Toronto impresario (Mark Caven) shows up as the small town john in an attempt to lure Russell, who has now renamed himself “Fishy Falters,” back to his Toronto drag bar or when, in an attempt to pay back his granny, Russell attempts to get a gig as a DJ and performer in a bar that doesn’t even charge for entry and is not really likely to pull in an audience just to watch him perform. The boy seems to be losing his sense of logic.


       Meanwhile back on granny’s old house, the two suddenly discuss the somewhat hidden truth of family life, particularly the fact that Margaret’s husband was an alcoholic and drug addict who killed himself by jumping from a New York City high rise, facts which leads her to worry that her grandson may be repeating some of the same patterns. We also discover that early in her life she was a figure skating star that was ready to join the Ice Capades until World War II brought her to her senses. Given the costumes and makeup worn by many figure skaters, we realize that perhaps early on in her life Margaret was heading toward a life not so radically different from that of her grandson.

       Finally coming to terms with the fact that whatever it is that he desires, the boy will not discover it in the small town where he grew up, he announces to his grandmother that finally he must move on, he attempting to protect her by hiring someone to check in on her several times a week and promising to visit her on weekends.

       Margaret, however, realizes that his plan won’t work when his mother hears of it, and begs him for one more favor before he leaves, to buy her pills, strong enough to do her in quick. She realizes, she explains, that she no longer has anything to live for. He recapitulates and tells her he’ll stay, but she insists that he explore the career he now seems determined to embrace.

       As he drives away in the car she has given him, he suddenly turns back in the horror of recognition of what he’s given her permission to do. But as he imagines himself and Zach as a couple regularly visiting the now almost comatose old woman in Millbrook Care Home, he turns back toward Toronto, recognizing that just as he must become a drag queen so it has come to be her time to join Morpheus on a voyage toward death.


     At the Toronto bar where he signs away his life for a pittance of salary, the famed Toronto drag performer Tynomi Banks asks him for the second time why is he devoted to drag: are you alcoholic, depressed, is a deep woman closeted inside of you waiting to get out, or are you simply into the quick adulations of the crowds? Give it up, he demands, it can only lead to unhappiness, as he recounts how he (Sheldon McIntosh) got involved. Earlier Russell has tried to explain to a couple of his straight former high school peers that drag had nothing at all to do with either sex or gender, but was a statement of dismissal for the rest of society’s disdain. My dances say “fuck it,” he declares. But after Banks’ warnings, Russell can only mutter something to the effect that he doesn’t know why he performs in drag, only that he must.

      Strangely, his premiere at this club is less a dance than a kind of “living statue,” a tableaux vivant dedicated to his grandmother, as he dresses up and positions himself as the figure ice skater he has seen in the picture of her as a young woman. There is no indication of how the audience receives his performance, but surely it must have touched the heart of his mother who has snuck into the bar to see what is precisely that son does.

      If Jump, Darling is at times a bit simplistic and even confused in its vision, its heart is so pure that for the first time in my life I cried while watching a drag queen perform.

 

Los Angeles, October 26, 2021 / Reprinted from World Cinema Review (October 2021).

Clea DuVall | Happiest Season / 2020

politics, money, and christmas

by Douglas Messerli

 

Clea DuVall and Mary Holland (screenplay), Clea DuVall (director) Happiest Season / 2020

 

     In Happiest Season Abby Holland (Kristen Stewart) and Harper Caldwell (Mackenzie Davis) are girlfriends who are close to celebrating their first year together. As required in these films Abby is the one who is allergic to the Christmas season, particularly since her parents have died; so, naturally just to cheer her up, Harper invites her to celebrate the holiday with her family in her hometown, which might allow her the perfect opportunity to introduce her to her parents and, just maybe, propose to her on Christmas morning. So far the plot lines up with the standard heterosexual-normative patterns of the genre. But since they’re lesbians, there has to be a rub: Harper admits to Abby that she hasn’t actually “come out” to her parents, particularly since her father is running for mayor of the city. She promises that she will reveal her secret just after Christmas, begging Abby to pretend to act like her straight roommate through the holiday festivities.


     We now know what the required “complications” are in this film, particularly when Abby is introduced to Harper’s father (Victor Garber), her “unusual” sister Jane (Mary Holland), and her tightly wound mother, Tipper (Mary Steenburgen), to say nothing of her lover’s highly competitive older sister, Sloane (Alison Brie).

      All sorts of situations conspire to make Abby begin to wonder whether Harper is the perfect companion she has imagined her to be, particularly when she discovers from Harper’s high school girlfriend, Riley, that she has long denied her sexuality. When Abby is mistakenly perceived as a shoplifter, pushing her away from the social events involving Harper’s political-minded father, it’s almost enough to make her wonder whether she was back in high school, when certain young suspicious woman like Abby were excluded from the popular and fashionable girls’ events.

      But Abby has her own past in this town, and is almost relieved when her old friend John (Dan Levy) arrives to pick her up for a night of personal celebration. Harper begs Abby to stay at home and the two girls are about to make up and kiss when Sloane catches sight of what’s going on and threatens to expose them to the family. She has her own secret, however. Her husband Eric and she are preparing to divorce.


      When the two sisters fight at the Christmas party, Sloane reveals to the family and their guests that her younger sister is a lesbian, which Harper immediately denies.

       Heartbroken for the denial of her love, Abby takes up John’s offer as they share their experiences of growing up queer. Abby has been lovingly accepted by her parents, while John’s father forced him out of his own house. Love and openly admitting that love are two different things, John advises. There is always a loving friend helping to keep things on track in these holiday scenarios.

      Finally realizing that her earlier fear of rejection had hurt her friend Riley and may now lead her to lose Abby, Harper admits the truth to her parents, inspiring Sloane to share her secret about her impending divorce. Harper apologizes to Abby and confesses that she truly does wish to spend her life with her. Accordingly, Abby forgives Harper and the two kiss. And Harper’s family, after a possible new threat to the girls’ happiness, truly accept the situation, taking a Caldwell family picture that includes Abby.

      An unnecessary coda scrolls one year into the future when the two girls are engaged, the youngest sister has become a novelist, and Harper’s father has won his mayoral election. This new Christmas the family attends It's a Wonderful Life, proving, apparently, that despite all the doubts and fears one has, life is beautiful.*

 

*The beloved Capra film is also a subtheme in The Christmas Setup, which is truly appropriate for that film since the way I read the film is that it argues that all you need to survive is money provided by a few equally poor friends. For the hero of the film, it’s not really in the spirit of Christmas giving since he’s the recipient in this case, even though we know that he’s been the benefactor for most of his life. Still, sorry to say, money is at the center of this work.

 

Los Angeles, December 24, 2020

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog and World Cinema Review (December 2020).

 

Chuck Jones | Rabbit of Seville / 1950

next

by Douglas Messerli

 

Michael Maltese (story), Phil Monroe, Ben Washam, Lloyd Vaughan, Ken Harris, and Emery Hawkins (animators), Chuck Jones (director) Rabbit of Seville / 1950

 

  With the death of film animator and director Chuck Jones on February 22, 2002, I decided to revisit several cartoon works by him, a joyful task which reminded me of my childhood, and gave me the opportunity to really watch these innovative and, often, abstract works of art.

     Jones' long career, spanning work for Warner Brothers from 1933 to 1962, when his job was terminated for illegally working on the animated cartoon feature, Gay Purree, saw a complete transformation in the cartoon industry from realist-like images and cartoon characters to abstract and even surreal-looking backdrops and absurdist figures. From early characters such as Charlie Dog, Hubie and Bertie, and The Three Bears, Jones refined and transformed his art, creating such memorable figures as Claude Cat, Michigan J. Frog, Pepe LePew, the Road Runner, and Wile E. Coyote. Working with Michael Maltese, he also transformed the characters of Bugs Bunny, Daffy Duck, and Elmer Fudd.


    Among the very best of his films was his 1950 work, Rabbit of Seville. In a huge outdoor amphitheater, similar the Los Angeles’ famed Hollywood Bowl, where the opera is about to begin, we hear in the nearby woods the gunshots of Elmer Fudd chasing after Bugs Bunny.

       Bugs escapes into the theater door, and suddenly takes on the role of the famous barber, shaving his enemy Elmer in various ways, pouring hair tonic over his head, giving him regular massages, and, in general, remaining as much as he can within the structure of the opera while attempting to cool down and cleverly manipulate Fudd’s furious attempts to kill him.

       The operatic text represents some of the cleverest of cartoon lyric-writing of all time: “Welcome to my shop! Let me cut your mop. Let me shave your cap. Don’t look so perplexed. Why should you be next? Can’t you see you’re next?”  “….There, you’re nice and clean, although your face looks like it might have gone through a machine.”

        Elmer continues to chase our funny bunny until, as Bugs often does, he quickly changes gender, flirting with Elmer while at the same time cutting the buttons off his pants to reveal his underwear.


       Elmer is delighted with the new “senorita” until he again spots Bugs tale and the war begins all over. Bugs throws him back into the barber chair, turning his head into a salad and fruit bowl. Soon after when Elmer is again on the attack, but Bugs brings an electric razor out of a basket like he were an Indian cobra charmer, the razor chasing after Elmer.

        Finally, the two fight it out by lifting up their barber chairs to unimaginable heights, until Bugs finally cuts a chord that slams Elmer back to earth. By this time Fudd is so confused and befuddled that bugs simply brushes him off, with Elmer providing a tip for his services. Spinning him off through the doorway, Bugs dances with Elmer, puts him back in the barber chair once again, gives him a serious pedicure always with his oversized scissors, provides his with a beard through a hair restorer, pours some Figaro tonic on his head, and plays out the chordal interludes of the famous  “Largo al factotum” on his own fingers.


       After another chase ensues with increasing weapons moving from axes, to guns, and eventually to cannons, until finally Bugs offers Elmer a box of chocolates, a bunch of flowers, and finally a ring, upon which Elmer turns into a full-fledged bride dressed now all in white, marrying him, dragging him up to what appears to be his home, and dropping him back onto the stage below. Bugs chomps on his carrot in delight.

   This 7.30 minute film was voted as one of the 50 great cartoons of all time, and who’s to argue.

 

Los Angeles, August 2, 2026

Reprinted from and earlier version in Reading Film: My International Cinema (Los Angeles: Green Integer, 2012) and revised in My Queer Cinema blog (August 2026)

Katherine Leggett | Small Town Secrets / 2005 [documentary]

the family who lived in the closet

by Douglas Messerli

 

Katherine Leggett (director) Small Town Secrets / 2005 [9 minutes] [documentary]

 

This short film reveals a world very seldom talked-about phenomenon in small town life. Documentary filmmaker Katherine Leggett interviews her father and shows family pictures of her parents living in the small Midwestern town of Stoughton, Wisconsin.


      Almost from the beginning her father describes loving his young wife: “She was very magic, Uh, I idolized her, which is probably a very dangerous word.”

      Kathrine admits he had a very conventional view of how it would all unfold: “You go to college, you graduate, you get married. You have a family and you live happily ever after.”

      But almost immediately he also reveals something that no one in his community might have imagined.

      “I was afraid that she had found out about my secret life. And I was going to be exposed. And then, I, you know, later, I realized that she didn’t know my secret life, but she had her own secret life. And if I had known about it, she probably would have lost custody [of their children].”

      Her mother, after having fallen in love with her female friend Margot, began to feel that living with Leggett’s father would be living a lie.

      She expresses that she was determined to remain in the closet for the rest of her life. But when she actually fell in love with another woman, it felt great, and she wanted everyone to know. Despite her mother’s own dreadful fears, the two were divorced, Katherine reporting that they moved, soon after, into duplex, where they both lived, cutting a small door between the two apartments so they could “pretend” as they moved back and forth between one another’s spaces at 4:00 a.m.. The very idea of this seems, given what has happened since, perverse. But you can’t judge a world before your time if you don’t realize the limitations of their society, and his Leggett’s mother confesses, the paranoia of the times. In a sense they were freed each by the fact that they were queer. One can only imagine the horror and heartbreak if only one of them had been gay, destroying and delimiting the other’s life. Yet these poor closeted folks remained frozen even in their own shared domain.


     As Leggett’s mother explains, they both wanted to remain as a presence in their children’s lives, but it was very difficult.

      The young Kathy wrote a note to her mothers saying that she doesn’t like Margot anymore, her mother’s lover, and doesn’t feel she can communicate, but asks, nonetheless, to find a way to talk. It is clearly a family in denial and disarray.

        Her father reiterates: “It was scarry being gay back then, really scarry.”

      While she apologizes for her attitudes in those days, he explains that he perfectly it understands. “You want to be the perfect family, like every one was.” But, of course, there are no perfect families, and even those who imagine themselves as being so may be the most restrictive and damaged for some of their children if not for all.


        The daughter admits that she was  confronted about their possible sexualities only once when they were in a whirlpool. She simply replied “No,” and dunked her head under the water and stayed there as long as she possibly could. And her father admits, that because of their closeted life, she too had been put into the closet.

        The mother admits that the truth wants to identify itself, and eventually will.  

        The father asks if his daughter still has pain about it, she admitting it was hard for all of the, for her mother to be with Margot and for the kids to do what had to do. It was clearly a impossible world for all of them, despite the parent’s best intentions.

         There is clearly nothing more to be said. These were different times, unfortunately for many, not different enough from what they are in some small towns today.

 

Los Angeles, August 2, 2026

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (August 2026).

Abraham Polansky | Force of Evil / 1948

descent into hell

by Douglas Messerli

 

Abraham Polansky and Ira Wolfert (screenplay), Abraham Polansky (director) Force of Evil / 1948

 

During a weekend I was to have been in New York—a trip cancelled because of heavy snow—I watched Abraham Polansky’s acclaimed film of 1948, Force of Evil. Unlike Andrew Sarris and some British critics, I do not feel that this film is one of the “great films of the modern American cinema.” But the movie does have a powerful film-noir quality and a brilliant performance by John Garfield which nearly matches his work in Body and Soul (which Polansky also wrote) and Marlon Brando’s edgy and touching portrayal of Terry Malloy in Elia Kazan’s On the Waterfront. I guess I’m reminded of Kazan’s film because each of these movies has as a subtheme: the corruption of one brother by another. But as opposed to On the Waterfront’s betrayal of a younger, more sensitive brother by the older sibling (portrayed by Rod Steiger), Force of Evil—in a more complex twist of events—concerns itself with a younger brother who, engaged in a high echelon of a gangster world, attempts to protect his elder brother, a petty crook who runs a small-time numbers business out of a private apartment.


     In order to save his brother Joe Mason (Garfield) has Leo’s business raided by the police; but the raid itself is enough to rouse the elder Mason’s conscience, and he threatens to leave the business, along with at least two of his employees who have suddenly realized just how entwined they have become with evil forces. In the perverted world to which they have become pawns, however, the crime is not in the “taking,” but in the “not taking,” and that is, as the movie puts it, what makes them truly guilty. Refusing to “live and be guilty” in the old manner, they are given no choice but to become more deeply involved in the gangster world from which they seek to escape.

     It is this illogical but inevitable descent into hell that makes this movie so mesmerizing. Once Mason/Garfield has set things into motion, there is no possible escape for either his brother or for his loyal secretary, with whom the younger Mason now establishes a swaggering macho relationship. Employees betray bosses; warring mob leaders join forces in the inverted world where paranoia is necessary for survival. Polansky and novelist Ira Wolfert’s almost incantatory dialogue and voice-overs create a three-sentence rhythm of sophistic logic:

 

                      People can be made to talk. Who was my phone talking to?

                      A man can spend the rest of his life trying to remember what

                      he said.


    Or, as Leo later says: “I’m a man with heart trouble. I die every day. It’s a stupid way to live.” In such a world Leo’s murder is inevitable; all the brother has done to protect him has only assured that he will be tossed upon the pollution-ridden river bank like “a piece of meat.”

    In a world where everyone is listening in to the most private of conversations, Joe is forced to open his own locked away telephone to the voices of the mobsters as they spin, like spiders, new

plots to enmesh anyone who is willing to see their own petty crimes as “not so bad.” As Leo, shortly before his death, comes to realize, even the pettiest of criminal acts permit the most perverse atrocities.

 

Los Angeles, December 7, 2003

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (December 2003) and Reading Films: My International Cinema (Los Angeles: Green Integer, 2012).

Erich von Stroheim | Queen Kelly / 1929

the swamp

by Douglas Messerli

 

Erich von Stroheim (screenplay), Marion Ainslee (titles), Erich von Stroheim and other uncredited individuals (director) Queen Kelly / 1929

 

I am sitting at my computer on an overcast and cold day in Los Angeles, perhaps the perfect weather in which to write about the tragic career of the Austrian-American director, Erich von Stroheim—with a particular focus on the film which might be described as ending his directorial career, Queen Kelly.

     Actually, there is no film titled Queen Kelly—at least as directed by von Stroheim. The work he had finished was never released in the US, and what was shown in Europe was only the first part with actress Gloria Swanson's mindless tacked-on ending. The original film was planned to be five hours long!

     Clearly, von Stroheim may have been mad to even attempt such a project. He had certainly failed grandly on other occasions. His 1919 film The Devil's Pass has been lost. He was fired by Irving Thalberg while attempting to film Merry-Go-Round; and his greatest project, Greed, based on the Frank Norris novel McTeague—originally 10 hours in length!—was finally cut down to two and a half hours, the remaining footage destroyed by a janitor. To this day it remains one of the greatest losses of Hollywood cinema.

     What delusions, accordingly, to attempt such a project with a new producer, Kennedy patriarch Joseph, who was having an affair with the leading lady; Swanson had just filmed Sadie Thompson, based on the Somerset Maugham story, "Rain," about a prostitute who is gradually forced to abandon her career in Pago Pago to return as a reformed woman in San Francisco. It is clear that, from Stroheim's description of his new project, which he called “The Swamp,” that she thought it similar in subject and location to her previous film.

     Von Stroheim, moreover, was not a reasonable man in any sense of that word. He was described as tyrannical on the set, demanding retake after retake, swallowing up time and money with his meticulous attempts to turn American cinema into a serious art. His project was clearly doomed from the start.

      Queen Kelly, by conception, is a film in two parts, mirror images of each other, as the heroine,

Kitty Kelly (Swanson), a young convent girl caught up in the romantic image of Prince Wolfram (Walter Byron) soon to marry the brutally insane Queen Regina V (Seena Owen), who actually meets her hero one day while walking with fellow students. Unfortunately, her under-drawers fall at the very moment he passes, and angered by his comments, she takes them off and hurls them at him—already a kind a scandalous act that may not have passed the Hays board. The Prince, however, is so charmed that he is determined the very same night (although he is to be married the morning after) to visit the young girl in her convent. He and his friend easily find their way into the convent, but have no concept of how, among so many rooms, to find the girl. By lighting tapers that create large plumes of smoke, and breaking open the fire alarm, the girls come to him, as he scoops up his prize.


      Back in the castle, he offers her platters of elegant food (she has been denied supper for her actions of the morning) and, most disastrously for an innocent young girl, champagne. Before long she almost passed out on the couch, the Prince hovering over her, she enraptured (a suitable word in her childish thinking) by his attentions. The Queen, however, is on the prowl, peeping through the Prince's windows where she sees the couple. Entering his room, she demands that he remain in his room like a bad school boy and she sends the young girl, dressed only in her nightshirt, into the hall. After attending to her consort, she stops the young Kelly, beating her with a whip and sending her off into the night. This scene and others represent what might be described as pure lesbian camp.


     Kelly, overwrought by the beating and fearing to return to the convent, jumps from a nearby parapet into the river, saved by an observant guard.

     So ends what might be described as Part I, the story of a romantic but dissolute Prince who falls in love with an innocent child.

     Yet, it was only the starting point of von Stroheim's quite shocking tale. When returned to the convent, Kitty receives news that her aunt (Florence Gibson), who has paid for her convent education, is dying and wishes her niece to visit her where she lives in German East Africa in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. The very ridiculousness of the location is perhaps what makes the rest of his project so fascinating. Clearly Hollywood had become enchanted with exotic locations.


     From the one scene that we have of that world, we discover that the aunt heads a brothel, and is determined to marry her niece, now inexplicably dressed as a male, to the horrific Jan Vryheld (Tuly Marshall), a mishappen monster who cannot contain his tongue-smacking leers after being introduced to the beautiful young girl. Dressed in mosquito netting and wreath stolen from a smashed wall hanging, the girl is led to the African priest who officiates, in Latin, the wedding vows over the aunt's death bed. It has to be the most perverse wedding ever conceived. Nothing can quite match Swanson's horror, as the nasty, crutch-swinging Vryheld licks his chops as he moves in her, crunching her makeshift veil under the stomp of his crutches, a bit of tobacco juice dripping from his mouth on her pale white hand. Despite her horror, Kitty agrees to the union, upon which her aunt breathes her last.

     There are no other scenes intact, only stills, costume shots. The tobacco juice disgusted Swanson, who asked Vryheld about it, he reporting that von Stroheim had ordered it up. So appalled, if we are to believe reports, was Swanson about the whole enterprise, that she quickly called Kennedy, who immediately closed down the production. $800,000 had already been expended.

      We have no other completed scenes, only stills, but we can fill in much of the story. Fending off Vryheld, Kitty takes over the brothel, intermingling with the cook and prostitutes, as she becomes quite clearly a powerful if somewhat frightening figure who they jokingly dub, Queen Kelly—everything, in short, that she was not in the first part. There are clearly numerous adventures to be faced before she once again encounters the handsome Prince, who, after the death of Regina, has been asked to return to the castle and rule the country.

      Swanson and Kennedy used others to create new scenarios, ultimately tacking on a final death of the repentant girl. The film was a failure wherever it was seen. It truly had become a kind of "swamp."

     There is something almost gothic about this series of events, particularly when we watch Billy Wilder's Sunset Boulevard, where Swanson plays a slightly crazed former silent film actor, cared for by von Stroheim, who serves and protects her up until the instant of her mad descent, as he pretends to film her grand return to cinema. Together the two even watch a scene from Queen Kelly. How von Stroheim endured that role is almost incomprehensible. Perhaps he just needed the money and was willing to accept it even playing across a woman who had stolen nearly everything, 22 years earlier, from him. After all, her career ended soon after his! He may have simply loved the aging actress, just as he, playing her former husband, did in the movie. Certainly, the very irony of his (and her) performance must be seen as the greatest nose-thumbing in the entire history of Hollywood filmmaking. That alone may have been enough!

 

Los Angeles, November 18, 2011

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (November 2011) and Reading Films: My International Cinema (Los Angeles, Green Integer, 2012).

Titles Index A-N

https://myqueercinema.blogspot.com/2023/12/former-index-to-world-cinema-review.html Films discussed (listed alphabetically by director) [F...