Friday, September 25, 2026

Kenji Mizoguchi | 赤線地帯 (Akasen Chitai) (Street of Shame) / 1956

A WORLD FROM WHICH THEY MIGHT NEVER RETURN

by Douglas Messerli

 

Masahige Narusawa (screenplay, based on a novel by Yohiko Shibaki), Kenji Mizoguchi (director) 赤線地帯 (Akasen Chitai) (Street of Shame) / 1956

 

Kenji Mizoguchi’s last film demonstrated him, once again, tackling important issues about women, and, in particular, geishas or, in the case, open prostitutes. His own sister had been forced into prostitution after her family abandoned her, and, even though she later married a wealthy businessman, it is clear Mizoguchi never recovered from is feelings of anger over his father’s business and familial failures.


     But whereas and earlier film such as Women of the Night (1948) tells a dark story of postwar geishas, including territorial stand-offs of various denizens of the street, the women do come together with such great resilience that one might almost imagine that these women will survive and, perhaps, even find happiness.

     By 1956, the year in which the Japanese Diet was debating whether or not to delimit and ban prostitution, Mizoguchi seems no longer to be able to imagine any future for his five desperate women, trapped in a run-down brothel named Dreamland, with no longer any geisha allure.

     If each of his characters represent a slightly different type, they all share sad tales of having to work to support their sons and sick husbands, to pay off debts, or describe their behavior in reaction to abuse at home.


   Mickey (Machiko Kyō), the youngest and most outrageous of the five women, has run away from her home in Kobe to Tokyo’s Yoshiwara district in order, in part, to punish her own father who has apparently had mistresses and often himself visited such brothels where she now works. Desperate for love and attention more than money, Mickey is the consummate consumer: Mizoguchi presents her constantly eating and borrowing against her future wages to buy perfumes, jewelry, and other items. When her father comes to bring her home—not for her own sake but because her profession may harm his own business, her sister’s marriage, and her brother’s future educational opportunities—she lets loose her hatred of him, revealing how painful it was for her and her mothers (who has recently died) to deal with her father’s extended absences. Mickey alone appears to be content to be where she is, but we can only imagine that within a few years, as an overweight penniless woman, she will have no future left to her.

     Yumeko (Aiko Mimasu), whose husband has died, works to support her son, whom she has place in the country with a relative; after he shows up in Dreamland, she discovers that he has left the farm to work at a nearby factory, and hopes that she may now be able to move in with him; disgusted by her profession, however, he rejects her and demands that she no longer communicate with him.

     Perhaps the saddest of the group is the plain-faced Hanae, whose husband is ill and dying, and waits nearby each evening with their young son upon his back. The couple has previously attempted suicide, and Hane (Michiyo Kogure) comes home one evening to discover her husband trying to hang himself once again. It is clear that no matter how much she works, she will never provide enough money to buy him the proper medicines or hospital care he needs in order to survive.


    The eldest of the woman, Yorie (Hiroko Machida) finds a man who wishes to marry her, and finally decides to leave the world of prostitution behind. The women celebrate her freedom, with Mickey alone insinuating that she will be back before long. Yorie does, sadly, return; her husband has used her like a slave, forcing her to work long hours with no release and no appreciation. At least in Dreamland, she is apaid a few Yen for her work.

     Only Yasumi, the most successful of the geishas, seems to know how to work the system. Having had to enter into prostitution because of debt for her husband’s jail bond, she perceives her encounters with men like business deals, leading on a small businessman who desires to marry her by suggesting that if she can pay off her debt she may join him. Having stolen the money from his company, her customer grows violent, throwing her to the floor and, at first, seeming to kill her. Yet, apparently, she survives, now having saved the money in order to buy a nearby futon shop which now services the brothel in which she worked.


     In the film, the Diet, as in the past, defers it decision on prostitution, but in reality Mizoguchi’s film is said to have been one of the forces that led the Diet to finally ban such previously licensed institutions.

     Yet there may be some truth in what the brother’s owners keep telling their employees. Will the government truly support the women who have been forced to sell they bodies in order to survive and pay off debts? Although these women cannot ever hope to truly escape their lives of shame, can they be truly assimilated into the larger society?

      Mizoguchi’s realist conventions may make everything seem evidently, but the strange, half-experimental, half science fiction-like musical score by Toshiro Mayuzumi (with a theremin as one of the central instruments) takes this film into other territories. The women of Dreamland, it seems, are trapped between two worlds, one just on the dark side of ordinary culture, the other half existing in some outer space from which these dreamers can never hope to return.

 

Los Angeles, November 2, 2015

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (November 2015).

     


D. A. Pennebaker | Original Cast Album: Company / 1970 [documentary]

for the record

by Douglas Messerli

 

D. A. Pennebaker (director) Original Cast Album: Company / 1970 [documentary]

 

Yesterday, exhausted from several days of watching very intense LGBTQ feature films, I awarded myself the opportunity of viewing the noted documentarian filmmaker D. A. Pennebaker’s Original Cast Album: Company. The film was to have been the first in a series of such cast recordings, and received excellent reviews; the producers, however, in the meantime had been hired by MGM, and the series, most sadly, never occurred.


     We have only this “pilot” work, but what a memorable film it is! Criterion, which has re-released the film, most recently with commentary by critic Frank Rich, composer/lyricist Steven Sondheim, and Elaine Stritch, and others, listed it among their LGBTQ films; so it seemed to offer the perfect excuse for me to rush back into the arms of Broadway theater. Yet there is little outwardly “gay” in this production. Indeed, except for composer/lyricist Sondheim and the musical librettist George Furth, I don’t know of another artist in the work who is openly gay.


     The original cast album was recorded just a few weeks after the show’s opening as most such albums are, when Jones had not yet left company which he would shortly after due to the stress of his divorce proceedings with his then wife Mae Entwisle after nearly 17 years of marriage. Although Jones performs a remarkable couple of takes of the third act solo “Being Alive” and a quite touching version of “Barcelona” with Susan Browning—Sondheim even arguing that not only was that performance of “Being Alive” his best but that no one did it better*—that actor, who later became a born-again Christian, has never been one of my favorite performers.

      Now if the film had featured the terribly gifted but unfairly overlooked Larry Kert (the original Tony on Broadway’s West Side Story) who replaced Jones soon after, that would have truly made it a “gay film.”


      Kert was a particular target of the notoriously mean-spirited Jerome Robbins who kept calling him a “faggot” throughout rehearsals, despite the fact that Robbins and most of the male dancers were also gay; obviously Kert didn’t even attempt to hide his gay sexuality. He died, as so very many of the greatest talents of the time, of AIDS in 1991, leaving behind his lover, Bill Pullen.

    Only later, in England, did they dub in Kert’s performances for Jones’ on the recording. But the one we hear in this film is Jones as the central character, “Bobby, baby, bubbie,” beloved by all but in love with no one until he sings the two songs noted above. Although one of his male friends suggests a possible gay relationship with him in the musical, that conversation was, of course, not among this album of songs.

     Although the musical opened to some quite negative reviews, and, early on, was in danger of closing, it eventually ran for a long run of 690 performances, finally fully introducing Sondheim in Broadway as a significant composer, not just a lyricist, who would soon change the very nature of the medium through his introduction of darker, more complex themes, music, and lyrics that those than the musical theater productions that came before.

     One of the most difficult songs to perform is “You Could Drive a Person Crazy,” sung by Donna McKechnie, Susan Browning, and Pamela Myers, which, with its close harmonies and fast- talking lyrics, is easy to flub. We see this song, which surprised even a long-time pro like Thomas Z. Shepard, the record producer, in its complexities, performed several times before they get it right.


      Similarly, and even more difficult to perform is the brilliant patter song “Getting Married Today,” sung by Beth Howland. This tongue-twister is surely the tour-de-force regarding the combination of simply singing the lyrics and enunciating them fully enough to have them comprehended, at which amazingly Howland succeeds. She married Charles Kimbrough, who played Harry in this production.

       And Pamela Myers, in “Another Hundred People,” discovers for the first time that she has changed an F-sharp to an A of Sondheim’s original score, and now sings it correctly, Sondheim getting what he wrote down on the record, so to speak. This song I have always believed intimates some of the chordal developments and even lyrics of Sondheim’s later Sweeney Todd, particularly when early in the song she sings the elongated line “It’s a city of strangers,” with great similarities to Sweeney Todd’s “City on Fire.” Both serve as cries of the dangers of the urban space which many of Sondheim’s works celebrate, but with always the Bernstein-like lament for the need to escape to “a place for us,” free from those dangers. And Company, in particular is a nearly claustrophobic world in which Bobby cannot even escape his friends in his deepest most private desires and thoughts until he finally refuses to attend the celebration for his birthday, and leave the ever-present “company” behind.


       The major piece of this film, however, is its last. After everyone else has finally left the Columbia Records studio at East 30th Street and Third Avenue at around 3:00 in the morning, the orchestra, Sondheim, Furth, Shepard, Hastings and the orchestra remain behind with Elaine Stritch to perform the final number, “Ladies Who Lunch,” she having given over her earlier scheduled time to Jones.

       Having heard this song sung by Stritch now so many times, I can recognize almost immediately how tired and stressed the singer is. Sondheim, in retrospect, suggests in was one of those times where she kept drinking a few sips of alcohol just give her the courage to continue going on, and by the time of her song, was drunk enough that she couldn’t live up to the demands of the song.

      The composer insists she first bring down the song into a lower key in order to not hurt her voice. She sings it lovingly and knowingly, but it’s “flaccid,” as Shepard puts it, slower than its usual pace, perhaps even a little better narratively expressed, but without the zest of protestations of those shallow ladies who try to do everything imaginable to fill in their empty lives. By the end of the song, even Stritch can hardly “rise, rise, rise” to full occasion of her narrative dismissal of the lot.


     She sings it again, making it even worse. And again, back in the original key, attempts to belt it out. We are witnessing the difference between a great performance and several mediocre ones. If there was ever an example of that important difference in defining the greatest of both a performer and this series of performances is revelatory.


       At nearly 4:00 a.m. on a Monday morning, they finally tell Stritch to go home, almost against her protests. They have the orchestra play the piece without her. And the film ends the next day, as a rested Stritch, made up for her evening performance, stops by the studio to sing it the way it should be sung, layering her version over the previous recorded orchestral one. Stritch seems also a little fearful, even after her performance, that they still may cut it. But they assure her that everything is now as perfect as any such a recording can ever be.

      As cameraman Jimmy Desmond states, no one could have imagined that such an event would be quite so dramatic; and indeed, as Pennebaker agrees, it’s the perfect film taking only one day and night.

 

*After writing this essay, I did a comparison listening to four of the major singers of this song, Dean Jones, Larry Kert, Raúl Esparza, and Neil Patrick Harris. The results were surprising. Far and away, the best dramatic version was sung by Dean Jones. Sondheim and others had been on target in their evaluations. Esparaza was the most dramatic and often terribly effective, but there was just too much self-consciousness involved with his performance, and his voice as not as lyrical as was Jones’. Larry Kert had the very best voice with remarkable clarity, but there was no depth to his “Being Alive,” which he sung almost as a ballad instead of a discovery of the true contradictions he was suddenly to terms with. Surprisingly, Neil Patrick Harris did a commendable version of it, although it was definitely the weakest of the four. The prettiest version was by yet a fifth singer, John Barrowman, who sang the role of Bobby at the Kennedy Center. But this was from a song album and truly is not comparable with a theater production performance; it was lovely to hear, easy on the ears, and beautiful to listen to, but had next to nothing to do with theater. There are two illegally photographed versions of the Kennedy Center performance on YouTube, unbearable to watch and impossible to listen to. When will people comprehend that such “snapped” performances are not only a crime but truly are a disservice to the artist.

 

Los Angeles, September 6, 2023

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (September 2023).


Tim Hunter | Working It Out / 2007

the black speedo

by Douglas Messerli

 

Tim Hunter (screenwriter, based on his stage play, and director) Working It Out / 2007 [6 minutes]

 

Gay comedies about spousal cheating do not represent my favorite genre, and I am afraid that although I sometimes find them momentarily fun in their nasty put-downs of marital constancy, they leave a truly unpleasant after taste.

     Australian director Tim Hunter’s comedy Working It Out at least presents the cheating game from both sides of the room. Gay couple Peter and Marcus meet up for an evening workout before their dinner of Thai chicken.


      But already in the changing room, one of them has had eyes for another bloke, Jeremy who appears out of nowhere. By the time they’ve begun their exercises, they already mutually bickering as long-term couples are prone to do, Marcus, having noticed the look Jeremy gave to his partner wonders out loud who he is, Peter pretending to know nothing about him, just a guy he’s noticed about. After a few moments of further give-and-take remarks, Peter admits to having previously spoken him, admits that he finds him attractive, and has observed that he wears a black Speedo in the pool. But, he insists, just because he’s spoken to him does not mean that he’s sucked his cock and had sex with him.

      Inevitably, the conversation turns to other accusations, Peter suggesting that Marcus might be a little more outgoing (“I come here to work out, not to socialize or pig out,” is his comeback) and Marcus arguing that it’s clear even if he hasn’t had sex with him, he clearly wants to.

      Peter ultimately calls Marcus jealous, which he admits he may be. Peter suggests they could have a threesome, but Marcus says that wouldn’t want a threesome with the two of them. And so it goes, the back-and-forth attacks and imagined sins of both partners.


   When Jeremy comes and joins them on the treadmill beside where they’re working out, Peter introduces Marcus and himself, suggesting he’s never told him his name.

      In the shower, finally, Jeremy meets up with Marcus, relaying his apologies since he didn’t know he (Peter) was his boyfriend: “Is it problem?” Marcus tells of him of Peter’s idea about a threesome, of which Jeremy seems most interested. But Marcus suggests, “Why spoil a good thing?” They kiss and plan to meet up next Thursday when Peter has a meeting.

      In the steam room, meanwhile, we see Peter, touching his cock as he awaits Jeremy’s arrival. The man in the black Speedo soon appears.


     The most profound thing you can say about this comedic gesture is that it reiterates the notion that gay men are inherently unable to maintain monogamous relationships. Not only do I doubt the truth of that—although it is certainly likely that gay men of a certain generation before AIDS, when marriage was not possible and sex an easy alternative for urban gays, might have found it difficult to alter their behavior when marriage became a possibility—but from the looks of heterosexual divorce rates, it appears that heterosexual couples have never been very good at maintaining look-term relationships either. Perhaps just an open admission and acceptance of occasional outside sex might resolve many of the problems about sex outside of a relationship. As many have long argued, the human animal has never developed a gene for sexual exclusivity. Maybe a threesome might be a better solution than a gay couple secretly sharing a fortunate outsider. It’s the lies, the pleasure of the secret that most interferes with solid relationships, gay, lesbian, or heterosexual. I wonder, do bisexuals make for more honest mates, or do they hide their bisexuality, being tempted by absolutely any beautiful person who they may meet?

 

Los Angeles, May 8, 2023

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (May 2023).

 

Index O-Z

Dave O'Brien Straight Boys / 2005 Nick Oceano El primo ( The Cousin ) / 2008  Ken Ochiai Phoenix / 2006 Carlos Ocho Relación Abierta ...