Wednesday, July 1, 2026

Alexan Kevork Sarikamichian | Cosmos / 2016

the pretty boys pout

by Douglas Messerli

 

Alexan Kevork Sarikamichian (screenwriter and director) Cosmos / 2016 [4 minutes]

 

In this self-described “fashion” film which might also be characterized as a music video, nothing of true importance really happens. Two beautiful male modes, Alex Farrario and Nicholás Lorenzon with one girlfriend, Stefania Koessl, tagging along spend a weekend on a farm in Argentina and the nearby woods.

 

   The two pretty boys pout their way through the shoot, posing often with a girl on the side or between them until the inevitable: the boys bond, find each other even prettier than the girl, and begin to hang out together for longer and longer periods of time, which makes the girl pout in irritation, the pulsing rhythms of the Original Artyfacts composition, “Paris, Texas” throbbing in the background.

     Before the 4-minute shoot is even finished it is clear to the woman that she no longer has a place in their new relationship.


     To characterize this “film” as empty gives it more credit than it’s worth. Unless you’re addicted to Hennes & Mauritz adds, there is absolutely no reason to watch this short Argentinian work, pretty boys though they be.

     Some publicist has hyped up a promotional description which makes it almost sound as if there is some significance to this piece: “This short film tells the story of three friends spending a weekend in the woods where true feelings start to arise. Being away from home and surrounded by nature and themselves, makes their true desires possible. In the woods, alcohol, sexual encounters, fights, jealousy and love are part of the same universe.”

 

Los Angeles, July 1, 2026

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (July 2026).

Douglas Hickox | Entertaining Mr. Sloane / 1970

everyone gets what they wants

by Douglas Messerli

 

Clive Exton (screenplay), Douglas Hickox (director) Entertaining Mr. Sloane / 1970

 

The LBGTQ world changed significantly between the stage premiere of Joe Orton’s Entertaining Mr. Sloane in 1964, and the movie version of six years later, directed by Douglas Hickox in 1970. What was a razor-sharp black comedy about middle-class hypocrisy with regard to any moral values and, in particular, all things to do with sex, had now suddenly—so producers felt—to be encapsulated within the burgeoning mod revival in “swinging London” that began in the mid-1960s with rise of pop art and psychedelic art that would come into fruition in the late 1970s as the so-called “mod revival.”

      It is perhaps odd to suggest this, but the original Orton play perhaps had more in common with the plays of the British “Angry Young Men” such as John Osborne, Arnold Wesker, Edward Bond, John Arden. Shelagh Delaney, and Harold Pinter of the late 1950s and early 1960s than with the kind of bacchanalian Britain expressed in the world of Colin MacInnes’ late 1950s projection of the soon-to-be mod swingers in Absolute Beginners (not brought into film until 1986 by Julian Temple starring David Bowie).

     As the writer of the Eye for Film blog succinctly put it:

 

“Between the first showing of Joe Orton's seminal play and the release of Douglas Hickox's film in 1970, the world changed dramatically—and not just in theatre. Sex between men over 21 was legalised in England and Wales (it would take another 13 years for Scotland to catch up) and the country had begun to talk about homosexuality and countenance it as part of life—it was still widely disdained but the old conspiracy of silence was broken. The fear which had controlled many LGBT people's lives was beginning to break down.

     In this different environment, Sloane still shocked, but for slightly different reasons. Most of those going to see it were already familiar with the rough outline of the play. Perhaps in the interests of preserving the original impact, Hickox upped the ante with suggestive camerawork and props. The see-through dress which Beryl Reed wears in the opening scenes sets the tone for a banquet of sleaze that expands upon the play with playful reference to the pop culture and cinema of the era.”


  One might add that Hickox also brought into Orton’s play Ed’s bubblegum-pink Pontiac Parisienne auto (which formerly belonged to Syd Barrett of Pink Floyd), a wink to a whole world through a camp emblem never imagined by the original playwright. If Orton’s astounding predicative plays contain many elements that now appear to be expressive of “camp” humor, at the time in which the author wrote them they were perceived more like grenades being tossed into an audience that had been far more properly brought up on the simmering melodramas of sexual frustration, dissatisfaction, and repression (read gay) of Terence Rattigan’s dramas, all of which Orton, like the “angry men,” detested. Ironically, the success of Entertaining Mr. Sloane can be attributed, in part, to Rattigan’s financial sponsorship of it.

    An even worse addition to the original work was Hickox’s introduction of some of the cheesiest songs that one might ever been scratched upon a film tape, including George Fame’s title song with lyrics by J. Alexander Ryan:

 

Breakfast in bed

that is what he said

he’d like to begin with,

him with smooth skin

with the blank eyes.

 

And it’s surprising how

it’s progressed from there.

Dare I hope given rope enough

you’ll be dope enough

to marry me. We’ll see.

 

    At least it uses internal rhyme! But so gawd awful it was in full that I nearly was ready to chuck the whole movie in and agree with Time Out’s put down, which argued that the play "loses much of its savoury charm in this movie version. Clive Exton's script opens out the play conventionally, to little effect, and Hickox's direction shows little flair for farce in general or Orton in particular."

    Yet Beryl Reid’s floozy portrayal of the nymphomaniacal Kath, Harry Andrews contributions as her misogynistic gay S&M-inclined brother Ed, and Alan Webb’s representation of their dithering, pickled onion-eating Dada, along with the beautiful peroxide-haired smooth boy with blank eyes, Sloane, personified by Peter McEnery, convinced me to hang on for the wild ride I knew was ahead—and I don’t mean the short drives Sloane nightly steals on Ed’s pink Pontiac with his boy-and bird-friends.


    Surely you know the story even if you’ve never seen the play or movie. The pretty murderer, despite Ed’s insistence that he stay away from the birds and, in particular, from his promiscuous sister (Ed: “Too many lads being ruined by birds! I don't want you making overtures to my sister. Does she disgust you?” Sloane: “She does a bit.” Ed: “Women are like banks. Boy, breaking and entering is a serious business.” Sloane: “I’m a law abiding citizen.”), as she might express it, “puts a bun in her oven” and seeks a way out by turning his body over to the inevitable whips, chains, and caresses of Ed.

     In the meantime, since the dotty old Dada, despite his waning eyesight, spots Sloane as the killer of his former boss, the pretty boy must first do him in.

     After a little bit of fuss over the death of their dearly beloved father, the sibling duo decide to flip their roles from being slaves to Sloane to his becoming a husband to the two of them through the most sacrilegious ceremony ever staged, Ed, with the credentials of a former navy man, marrying the lanky lad to his sister, and she, out of a whim, marrying the buggering bloke to Ed, in both cases stealing the Bible out of their now rigor-mortis stricken Da. No one ever might have imagined that such a thing would ever be possible: yet here we are in 2020 any day now we may possibly read of a bisexual bigamist. 


     If Reid, in her zany dishing out of her boobs and motherly affections dominates the film, Andrews, who long played macho leads before later in his life coming out as a gay man living with his partner of 30 years, comes off in this upside-down world as the man of patriarchal authority, able to rid himself of the dada, who because of catching his son in bed with a “felony” refused to speak to him for most of his life, but of arranging a way to please his voraciously sexually hungry “skin and blister” (as the cockneys rhyme with sister). One might say that in Orton’s working class fairy tale, everyone gets what they wants.

 

Los Angeles, November 8, 2020

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog and World Cinema Review (November 2020).

 

Craig Boreham | Teenage Kicks / 2016

loving all the wrong people

by Douglas Messerli

 

Craig Boreham (screenwriter and director) Teenage Kicks / 2016

 

Australian director Craig Boreham’s feature first feature film, Teenage Kicks, is both an extension and fuller explanation of his 2009 short film, Drowning. The same figures are involved, although some of the defining events of the film move the work is slightly different directions.


    Miklós Varga (Miles Szanto), the 17-year-old son of an inattentive father and a more than guilty and neglectful mother (Anni Finsterer), is clearly in love with his best friend Dan (Daniel Webber). They smoke drugs and masturbate together while watching lesbian porn films, while Dan’s father cooks up a hearty if seemingly inedible meal in the kitchen.

      Everything might, nonetheless, be perfect if only Dan weren’t straight and determined to engage in a disastrous relationship with his wealthy girlfriend Phaedra (Charlotte Best).

      Mik, moreover, adores his older drugged-out brother Tomi (Nadim Kobessi), and is unable to resist watching him through door crack as the man masturbates. This probably is not the first time he has witnessed the act. Only this time he is caught, and Tomi, furious about the fact, and perhaps finally made fully aware of his sibling’s sexuality, goes racing off on his bicycle, with Mik, with deep a deep sense of shame and need to apologize, stealing his father’s car to follow, a ridiculous chase which ends up with Tomi being hit and killed by another driver.

    Tomi, clearly this Hungarian migrant family’s favorite, and seen as the savior of their already fractured family unit, leaves a huge gap in all their hearts, particularly for Mik, who has lost not only a sibling and friend, but a secret love.


      In his endless guilt, the young boy even vows to look after Tomi’s very pregnant girlfriend Annuska (Shari Sebbens), all the while observing his true love Dan is drifting away from him into the arms of Phaedra. Mik had dreamed that he and Dan might run away together as they had long planned.

     Even worse, Phaedra, fascinated perhaps by the relationship between Dan and Mik, and, if nothing else, aware of its erotic aspects for Mik, seduces the boy, encouraging him to masturbate her, and proving, at least to Mik, that she has no long-term interest in Dan, even if he remains blind to that fact until almost the end of the film.

     Mik drifts off into a world of further drugs, even a temporary exploration of heroin, and finally, as in the short work, almost drowns, saved by Dan, to whom Mik finally confesses his love and his painfully rejected in the act.

   The young man becomes increasingly aware that his inattentive father is not really his true progenitor; part of his mother’s and father’s disinterest in his well-being has to do with the guilt that for a short period of time in past the mother, Illona, had an affair with her husband’s brother. Mik is the son of his titular uncle.

     The increasing complexities of the plot at times slow down and even drag the emotional core of Boreham’s movie. Too often Mik is forced to pout is way through his various crises rather than actually reveal them.


     But at the end, even after Dan has realized that his relationship with Phaedra was a chimera and that his friendship with Mik was based on a love he cannot return, the young man is still ready to run away from the small world in which they are trapped. But now Mik, in his growing sense of responsibility, is not ready to leave. He has learned, finally, who he is and realizes simultaneously his familial duties. He becomes, in part, the son they always imaged Tomi to have been.

      As I wrote about the earlier short: “the film provides no solution, not even an ending. The characters and we have come to perceive the problem even if there can be no resolve. And recognizing that problem, the tragedy of the short and brilliantly filmed work has been revealed, its only purpose.”

      One might argue, of course, that he now is also trapped into a world of familial duties in which he will never be happy. And there is every reason to suspect that he may never find the full gay love he seeks. In some respects, I have to admit that I prefer the short, cryptic version of this film, whose title more clearly characterizes its point-of-view.

     Yet Szanto’s acting is so strong that one almost overlooks the fact that the actor is on the far side of 17, some 7 years after his appearance in Drowning. As Guardian critic Luke Buckmaster observes:

    

“In a demanding lead role, Szanto gives a brave baring-all performance, unpredictable but acutely balanced. He holds himself so well; the contradiction of an out of control character and an actor hitting all the right beats.”

 

     Szanto won the award for Best Performance in a Male Role at the 2017 Iris Prize festival. And some critics have favorably compared this work with Anna Kokkinos’ 1998 movie about a gay Greek migrant and his family in Head On, a film I review elsewhere in these pages.

 

Los Angeles, July 1, 2026

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (July 2026).

 









Index of Titles (director, title, and date) A-Q

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.