Friday, July 24, 2026

Paul Dower | Camp Horizons / 2018

a world of no future

by Douglas Messerli

 

Sam Bowen and Paul Dower (screenplay), Paul Dower (director) Camp Horizons / 2018 [8 minutes]

 

Paul Dower’s Camp Horizons is basically an insignificant film about a very important issue, conversion therapy for gay men. Young Aiden (Matthew Hanish) has entered the therapy of this so-called “camp,” to please his mother, and has been assigned a room with, to his surprise, a former lover, Lucas (Griffith La Victoire).

     Lucas, so he explains, has been hooked up with Aiden because he has returned, now for the third year, as a “redeemed” individual whose life has changed since his “cure” from his homosexual tendencies. But even on the first night of their sharing a room, he discusses their former affair, Aiden’s fears, and before Aiden can even say anything attempts to kiss him.


     The incident, even though Aiden has not responded, has led to the young man’s “punishment” by camp directors.

     In 8 minutes, it is difficult to explain whatever hogwash the camp directors are trying to use to convince Aiden to “redeem” him. But in the last minutes of this truly ineffectual film, Aiden—when Lucas apologizes about the last evening while even insisting that Aiden needed to be punished for his own relapse—finally confronts him, suggesting that, in fact, he hasn’t at all changed. “How do you pretend. As if you are different? Lucas, you’re living a lie. …Why can’t you just accept who you are?”

    Lucas’s answer is quite devastating, if entirely mistaken: “Because no one else will.”

    What Lucas means, apparently, is that he cannot accept himself against any one else’s vision of reality. I am frightened that one day he will marry a woman with that view in mind and make life miserable for everyone, including himself. This is a world of no possible future as a full human being.

    At least, it appears that Aiden is packing up to leave.

    This is not only a lame film, but the answer is equally meaningless. I don’t know where these young men live, but they ought to move out of town as soon as possible, leave their families behind and discover a world of other possibilities.

     And frankly I don’t believe in the myth Dower has created. Certainly, even Oklahoma City where he grew up, must have permitted other opportunities. He went on to work later on some major films. If you’re going to deal with such a charged issue, you do have to produce something beyond what gets said in this film.

     The movie appears on IMDb, but has not even posted to Letterboxd and other sources, and I can guess why. It now appears on YouTube.

 

Los Angeles, July 24, 2026

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (July 2026).


Richard Boleslawski | The Painted Veil / 1934

ordinary sinner to sacred saint

by Douglas Messerli

 

John Meehan, Salka Viertel, and Edith Fitzgerald (screenplay, based on the novel by W. Somerset Maugham), Richard Boleslawski (director) The Painted Veil / 1934

 

What a difference 10 months made in Hollywood in 1934. By July of that year Joseph Breen, as the newly appointed head of the Production Code Administration (PCA) had begun his heavy-handed editing of Hollywood films, ending what was often the Pre-Code period—although actually the Code had existed since the late 1920s, but was not as emphatically enforced—now banning even mention of the popular “pansy” figures and any representation of homosexuality as well as refusing even many portrayals of adulterous heterosexual relationships.

       In February of that year, Greta Garbo had starred in the popular Queen Christiana (listed generally as a 1933 movie), playing her character quite clearly as a bi-sexual figure, in a relationship with her female servant Ebba Sparre as well, eventually, with the dashing Don Antonio de la Prada acted by her former lover John Gilbert. Although I have previously complained over the relatively heterosexual attitude the movie takes when, if it had remained truer to the original King of Sweden (her honorific title) it might have presented the first truly lesbian hero of film, at least there were a few scenes in Queen Christiana that hinted at the actual King’s and Garbo’s bisexuality. And the success of the film had to do, in part, from those sensational possibilities, that a female might actually be in love with a female servant and against the institution of marriage.

      By November 23rd of that year, the release date of her The Painted Veil directed by Richard Boleslawski there was no hope of bringing Maugham’s torrid heterosexual love story to the screen as it appeared in the book. Garbo’s friend (and reportedly, occasional lover*) Salka Biertel, along with John Meehan and Edith Fitzgerald didn’t even attempt to fully play out Katrin’s (Garbo’s character) sexual betrayal of her inattentive husband, Walter Fane (Herbert Marshall), through her affair with the charming but morally empty attaché to the British embassy, Jack Townsend (George Brent).


      What the film does succeed at doing in its first few scenes which celebrate the marriage of Katrin’s sister Olga (Cecilia Parker), is to play off of Garbo’s reputation established in that previous film so quickly that the censors hardly had the time to notice. Not only does Katrin give a totally unexpected gift to her sister—surely deemed by Breen’s supporters as shocking as Katrin and Olga’s mother perceives it to be—a delicate negligee for her wedding night. Ogla’s reaction says everything:

 

Katrin: My present for you. [holds up a negligee]

Katrin: But don't you tell mother! She'll think it's wicked!

Olga: Oh, it's lovely. But isn't it?

Katrin: Wicked? Why, of course, it's wicked!

 

      A few moments later, when you least expect it, Katrin kisses her sister goodbye, four times in a row, not on the cheeks as one might suspect, but fully on the lips. All right, she is her sister, and sisters are certainly permitted to do that even it seems a bit unusual, which is probably why Breen’s men didn’t demand it be cut. But Garbo, in fact, is the actor kissing fully the lips of the other actor, Parker, an act that has not been represented in quite this manner since what I describe as the very first LGBTQ+ incident in a film, when two women kissed on the lips in Eadwearad Muybridge’s 1887 study of female models in motion in The Kiss. Once, even twice might be still somewhat respectable, but as if she were desperately seeking some way to remember perhaps her only confident in a family of an old-fashioned not terribly loving mother and a mostly absent medical researching father. Without her, she recognizes, she will have no one to love. And it is out of the desperateness that we see her steal a third and lean forward into yet a fourth full kiss as if to seal the bargain of love that the two women have had, now being taken away by a quite foolish-looking bridegroom (Billy Bevan).

     It is for this reason alone that commentators of LGBTQ+ movies include The Painted Veil on their lists, making an even weaker case for this film as being described as a gay movie as Garbo’s release of earlier in the year.


     At least this time around we truly do get to see Garbo acting, frankly in a manner that often reminds me of a smart Katherine Hepburn, a woman who you are never sure about what she might say. Alright, we grant, she’s generally playing against one of the most intentionally boring figures of a motion pictures, Herbert Marshall’s Fane, but she often turns his lack of communicate skills almost into an absurd comedy, as when she runs into him again as she races to her father’s study to watch Olga leave. The conversation, in fact, might almost be said to foretell us of their soon-to-be abyssal marriage. Harold Pinter or even Beckett might have written the dialogue:

 

Walter Fane: I was waiting for your father. He’s there.

Katrin: Yes, I see him.

Walter: [as he looks out upon the dripping front lawn] It’s raining.

Katrin: [turns to look at him] So it is.

Walter: No, I mean it’s raining, and he’s got an umbrella.

Katrin: [laughing] Not really?

Walter: No, no, I mean it’s open….and he using it.

Katrin: [again laughing] Oh, poor father doesn’t even know it’s raining.

 

      There is a subtle message in this seeming nonsense. Walter, we soon perceive, despite the complete distraction of his research in Cholera, would never become so distracted by other human beings as not to notice the weather or any other natural phenomena around him. And Katrin even realizes this when, a few hours later, she accepts his proposal of marriage. Her reasons are clear: she is terrorized by having to remain behind to serve her loving father and weather the abuse of his mother, is desperate to travel, to see new worlds. And since Walter is about to travel to Hong Kong, she agrees to a marriage completely without love.

       He may be surprised by her willingness to go to China, but she explains it quite clearly: “I like China very much. I like America too. I like all the places I haven't been.” For her marriage is only a way out of the proscribed world of Graz, Austria.


       By the end of this film, we discover that Walter is a man of deep abiding love; but that love is clearly not expressed in terms that come even slightest close to a romantic love of a woman. Like Jack Townsend and all the other “whites” who inhabit the Chinese community, Walter seemingly expects Katrin to play bridge with the embassy wives and watch polo games in her endless spare time. But Katrin has no interest in bridge or the embassy wives, and doesn’t even know what polo is, although she later discovers she is fond of horses.

      Walter imagines, nonetheless, that she will be waiting at home for him whenever he arrives at midnight or even later, sometimes with new Cholera outbreaks throughout the country for which he attempting to discover a vaccine. Night after night, he is simply a no-show for dinner, falling into a desperate sleep, without even trying to imagine what his wife might have been doing with herself during his absence. Although he claims to love her deeply, it’s also clear he hasn’t a clue about what love between a man and a woman is about.

      Although off the screen, Marshall was apparently a notorious ladies’ man, married five times and divorced three as well as having numerous affairs, including one with Gloria Swanson, on screen his high-toned and careful British accent turned him into almost a model of a dislikeable prig which perhaps accounts for his later roles as a Nazi spy in Foreign Correspondent (1940) or the cuckolded husband in The Letter of the same year.

    In a sense, Walter’s treatment of Katrin is basically the model of the patriarchal notion of heterosexual marriage, the wife sacrificing her life to a man who doesn’t even realize that she’s made a sacrifice, or might be in the least a bit troubled by his utter absence.


     Is it any wonder that finding a reprobate like Townsend interested in her, a man who takes his job so nonchalantly that he is able to take entire days off touring her around Hong Kong including chauffeuring her through the famed Sun & Moon dance of the Chinese festival, one of the most marvelous of Hollywood Asian spectaculars that would match the later “Uncle Tom” extravaganza in The King and I, that Katrin may be attracted to him.

    For Jack, as well, Katrin’s curiosity and enthusiasms for nearly all new experiences if something he rarely encounters. At one point he proffers the observation: “Have you any idea how seldom I see anybody getting a thrill about anything?” And at another points describes her “I think you're the most curious curio in all China.”

    For the knowledgeable person, Jack offers the perfect opportunity for a disenchanted woman to go astray. When Jack comes to take Katrin away from her card game to see his ponies, she thanks the ladies, looking directly at his wife, who answers, “What for. My husband?” as he she is very well aware what is in store.

      Walter’s discovery of their “affair” is made through the simple fact that, arriving her one afternoon purposely early, with Austrian magazines in hand as gift, he finds her bedroom door locked and Jack’s hat on the outer table.

      His reaction is cruel, demanding that we will give her a divorce only if she gets a written letter from Jack stating that he will divorce and marry her—knowing full well that the attaché would never permit his reputation to be ruined which would almost mean the end of his career—or follow him inland to an unsophisticated world where the epidemic is raging.

       Here is a world without even the company of other women except for her Chinese servant. The only other non-native people left are a few nuns in a nearby orphanage and a truly self-demeaning and slight crazy alcoholic, Waddington (Forrester Harvey), by this time the last element of humor left this increasingly righteous film, he constantly apologizing for himself at the very meaning of embarrassing others with the truth, like a self-conscious queer that cannot contain himself from saying what others can no longer bear to hear.


     Suffering a sort of break down, even she announcing that she can no longer think straight, Katrin finally forces her husband to see how he has tortured her, bringing her to a god-forsaken place in order to die, almost as a punishment for the few kisses or whatever else she might have enjoyed behind doors with Townsend. Certainly, one cannot imagine she and Walter ever having sex.

        And the film, accordingly, turns them both soon after into saintly lovers of mankind in general without any individuals involved. Planning to go yet further inland, Walter arranges to send Katrin back to Hong Kong. But when he leaves, she gets the brilliant idea to begin working as a nurse at the orphanage, at least having something to do with her days. Her beneficent love for the children helps her to perceive the deep love of Walter for mankind and to realize how selfish the love she and Jack sought. Certainly, Katrin is no longer curious and original in her speech. The rest of Garbo’s lines sound like she was quoting from a marital pledge of allegiance.

       So deep is his love, that upon Walter’s return he orders the local Chinese commandant to burn the old section of the city, causing major riots to break out. Stopping by the orphanage to check up on an ill boy patient, he hardly notices that the nurse with whom he is now working is his wife.

    Returning to the melee in a fruitless attempt to explain to the people whose homes are being destroyed the necessity of the action, he is stabbed, Katrin rushing his side, hoping to tell him before he dies that she does now truly love him for his special kind of caring.


      In the novel, Maugham kills him off—as he should be for his total lack of any feeling about anything but the most abstract notions of love. But the new Hollywood, created, in part, by the censors, lets him live, with Katrin babbling on about her admiration for his ideals as they both collapse in exhaustion.

       Throughout the work, neither of them seems to be able to sleep, Katrin even before she leaves home staying up for all hours of the night, coloring them both with a slightly vampirish aura. They both, after all, maintain their energy through the tainted blood of others. Maybe now they can both sleep; but surely they will never again truly share a bed. These are pure spirits, without any bodily functions left. The hand-flapping, scolding, and gushing gay boys and the disdainful, dishing dykes are all gone, leaving us with empty symbols of spiritual love, without even the possibility of impulsively kissing other human beings quickly on the lips.

 

*Beginning as an actress, Viertel was among the wave of Germans and Austrians who escaped the growing fascist climate by emigrating to the US and moving on eventually to Los Angeles. There she became a friend and mentor to Greta Garbo, writing several of her scripts, including Queen Christiana, The Painted Veil, Anna Karenina, and Two-Faced Woman. The Viertels’ Santa Monica Canyon home eventually became the center of the German émigré community of European intellectuals, particularly at their Sunday night tea parties. Her guests included Sergei Eisenstein. Charlie Chaplin. Arnold Schoenberg, Christopher Isherwood (who moved into Viertel's garage apartment with his boyfriend in 1946, causing even Viertel some consternation for their vast age difference), Hanns Eisler, Bertolt Brecht, Max Reinhardt, and Thomas Mann, as well as Hollywood stars such as Charles Laughton and Ava Gardner.

     Not only was her home the center of the diverse émigré community, but she herself played go-between Hollywood and the noted members of her soirees. She actively fundraised for Eisenstein’s Que Viva Mexico! project. She introduced composer Franz Waxman to James Whale, whose score of Whale became his first Hollywood film. And she helped actor Charles Boyer to enter the Hollywood scene.

     Throughout the 1930s and 40s, while fighting against Hitler’s National Socialism, she continued to aid those who remained trapped in Europe by helping to found the European Film Fund, working with her contacts in Hollywood studios. Through the Film Fund, artists such as Leonhard Frank, Heinrich Mann, Alfred Polgar, Walter Mehring, and Friedrich Torberg received emergency visas that enable to escape Nazi Germany. Writing on the “Exodus: The Haunted Idyll of Exiled German Novelists in Wartime Los Angeles,” Alex Ross argued that “Weimar on the Pacific might never have existed without her.”

     During the McCarthy era, Viertel was among the many Hollywood writers suspected of being communists, and she was blacklisted, denied a passport to even travel to Europe in order to see her dying husband.

      In 1953, she left the US, moving to Klosters, Switzerland to be near her son Peter and his second wife, Deborah Kerr.

 

Los Angeles, July 25, 2023

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (July 2023).

 

Ford Fairchild | Hidin’ Somethin’ / 2025 [music video]

a housewife’s revenge

by Douglas Messerli

 

Chris Housman (composer and performer), Ford Fairchild (director) Hidin’ Somethin’ / 2025 [4 minutes] [music video]

 

This recent music video by country-style gay composer and singer Chris Housman consists of a simple revenge story right out of Alfred Hitchcock’s famed TV series, although perhaps this is a bit more perverse than even the master of murder and mayhem might have imagined.


      In bed together after spending the night love-making are too heavily tatted men, Housman and Gable LaDuke, the later playing the lying husband of preacher’s daughter Brauwyn Spinner. Housman wonders where, suddenly his night-time lover is on his way to. LaDuke simply mumbles something about the fact he has to do something that day, even though supposedly it’s his day off from work. However, he accidently leaves behind his wallet, and Housman discovers, picture by picture, the real truth through a picture and a hidden wedding ring.


   We quickly discover where he’s headed as we observe his wife (Spinner) reading an old love letter from another man she’s discovered in a box. From there on the song takes over, recounting her love and sacrifices for the man that all this time has been ‘hidin’ not only ‘somethin’,’ but his entire identity as a bisexual, gay-oriented man who has betrayed his wife and family.

     She cooks up a special pot pie which quickly puts him in a hidden grave, dug by hand, making her another person is now is “hidin’ somethin’.”

      But the whole story told in the lyrics about how many years she has put up with his “beatings and the cheating that…put her through hell,” reveals her fury and supposedly justifies her culinary murder.

     The heavily inflected voice and instrumentation on the chorus which repeats “hidin’ somethin’” is a powerful reminder of what is truly at issue in this musical narrative, again directed by Housman’s usual partner, Ford Fairchild.

 

Grew up at the crossroads of a preacher's daughter and a farmer’s wife

She thought she found a one woman man to love her ‘til the day she dies

But 30 years in, done raising his kids, and keeping his front porch swept

She found a box full of letters, he shoulda been better at hiding those secrets he kept


He finally found one hole that he can’t get out

‘Cause she’s got a shovel and a whole lotta ground

She goes way out where the lord can’t see

She ain’t weeping under those willow trees now

He’s getting what he had coming

She’s serving that backwoods justice

By the time that the sun comes up

He won’t be the only one hidin’ somethin’


She could take the beatings and the cheating hell that he put her through

But everything hit different when she read ‘bout the other folks he left black and blue

So on Sunday night, made his chicken pot pie, and she threw a little something else in

By the time it got dark she was rolling up a tarp, his cold heart won’t be beating again

 

‘Cause he’s found one hole that he can’t get out

‘Cause she’s got a shovel and a whole lotta ground

She goes way out where the lord can’t see

She ain’t weeping under those willow trees now

He’s getting what he had coming

She’s serving that backwoods justice

By the time that the sun comes up

He won’t be the only one hidin’ somethin’

 

     Clearly Housman has no sympathy whatsoever for the millions of men whose gay sexuality is kept a secret from their wives, family, and, at moments, even themselves.

 

Los Angeles, July 24, 2026

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (July 2026).

 

Marcel Varnel | Girls Will Be Boys / 1934

convenient cross-dressing

by Douglas Messerli

 

Roger Burford, Clifford Grey, and Curt Siodmak (screenplay and scenario, based on a play by Curt Siodmak), Marcel Varnel (director) Girls Will Be Boys / 1934

 

In this oddly titled British film—it concerns only one girl and she actually doesn’t want to be a boy—the truly misogynistic Duke of Bridgewater (Cyril Maude) is visited by his granddaughter, Pat Caverley (Dolly Haas) who, discovering the Duke’s hatred of women, dresses as a boy visiting in an attempt to uncover why he has excommunicated her father and to learn perhaps if he (her male double) might become the heir.


      Given the entry of a woman disguised as a man into all-male world ruled over by an addle-minded and toadying head butler, Grey (Edward Chapman) and a handsome business manager Geoffrey Dawson (Esmond Knight), there are plenty of moments of male hysterics as Pat convinces everyone she is a boy, except for Grey who has brought her, very much against his will, back to the Bridgewater mansion.

     Much like Gilbert Pratt’s 1924 comedy Grandpa’s Girl, Haas’ Pat proves to be a spunky, independent thinker who, although put through heavy training to turn him/her into a better physical specimen, inevitably falls in love with Geoffrey who together finally find a way to convince the old geezer of a grandfather that a female heir is just as good as a male.


     The only rather clever twist in this simple crossdressing tale is that when Pat turns back into a woman in order to help greet and serve as hostess to the visiting Princess of Ehrenstein (Irene Vanbrugh), her grandfather thinks Pat is still a boy now successfully dressing up in drag to provide the social graces he has felt missing when greeting the unwanted guest. The Duke doesn’t seem to be amazed at all of how wonderfully convincing his male heir is as a female impersonator, but simply seems mystified that all the men around her, including the Princess’ womanizing son, Sanders (Charles Paton)—who the female Pat flirts with in order to make Bernard jealous—can’t see through his grandson’s disguises.

      The work is well directed, and there are a few delightful comic moments, but for the most part by 1934 this kind of tale had become a stale subject that titillated and joked about crossdressing in the manner of Viktor/Viktoria rather than truly being interested in transgender desire. Pat, in fact, is totally relieved by having to transform herself back into her cis-gender self, and discovers, in the end, no matter how much she might wish to dismiss the woman-hating coot of a granddad, she loves him dearly; he realizing that the admiration is mutual, meaning that she will inherit the estate and marry its handsome business manager, the perfect resolution of family and financial concerns, in short, the best of all possible worlds.


      By 1934, frankly, the whole pretense of convenient gender confusion and resolution was becoming boring. Of far greater interest is the film in which Haas played just previous to this one, Das häßliche Mädchen (The Ugly Girl, aka The Ugly Duckling), directed by the Jewish filmmaker Hermann Kosterlitz (who in the US would later be known as Henry Koster), a film which used her character to explore the implications of being ostracized from society as the Jews were. By the time of its 1933 premiere, Kosterlitz had already escaped, but Haas’ co-star Max Hansen, who was reputedly half-Jewish, had in 1932 performed a cabaret song, "War'n Sie schon mal in mich verliebt?" ("Have you ever been in love with me?"), implying that Hitler was homosexual, which led the Gestapo to send a contingent to the theater to create a riot. The Film-Kurier described it:

 

“[W]histling was heard from various sides. The applause stopped. The whistling continued. The curtain remained closed because rotten eggs were thrown at the stage. Someone called from the balcony: "We want German movies! We want German actors! We do not need Jewish actors, we have enough German actors! Aren't you ashamed, German women, to applaud Jewish actors? Oust the Jew Max Hansen, who only six months ago sang a couplet about 'Hitler and Little Cohn' in a cabaret!"

 

     Soon after, Hansen left Germany for Vienna and then Copenhagen, while Haas quickly accepted the invitation to come to England to work on this film, and remained. Later she would marry American caricaturist Al Hirschfeld and perform in several stage shows including the 1946 musical Lute Song with Mary Martin and Yul Brynner, off-Broadway in The Threepenny Opera, and in film as the murderer, Otto Keller’s wife, in Alfred Hitchcock’s I Confess.

 

Los Angeles, March 29, 2022

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (March 2022).

Andrea Romano | 9ème étage droite (9th Floor to the Right) / 2022

a guide book to using others to impose order and power

by Douglas Messerli

 

Jonathan Palumbo and Andra Romano (screenplay), Andrea Romano (director) 9ème étage droite (9th Floor to the Right) / 2022 [16 minutes]

 

Lorenzo, an Italian-born masseur-physiotherapist (played by director Andrea Romano) living in Paris is looking forward to his date in met on line, Marvin (Mexianu Medenou). He’s showering when Marvin calls and explains he already outside the building, Lorenzo giving him the precise instructions “9th Floor to the right.”


  The tall and striking black man Marvin arrives, however. with a filthy homeless man, Thomas (Matthieu Sampeur), who he has found outside the building on the street and has brought him along to their encounter simply so that he might shower.

    Lorenzo is shocked, and at first refuses, but Marvin argues that all the man needs is 5-minute shower and embarrasses his new date by insisting that he has it all in control. Yet Lorenzo, although hardly being able to refuse, is not at all allayed. As Thomas heads into the shower, Lorenzo snaps “Do you do this often?”

    Suddenly, of course, he has brought the issues of both class and race to the door of his new supposed friend. And I know this issue fairly well since when I first moved to Los Angeles, my Sun & Moon offices were located in a high rise that had locked bathrooms; in those days in that neighborhood in 1985 there were perhaps even more homeless than now. If you recall those were the Ronald Regan days, when suddenly hospitals and other institutions were closed down, forcing their patients to the streets, to say nothing of the loss of jobs and benefits in a time before we even had Obama Care. I let in several people I saw every day on the street just to use the bathroom, but soon received a memo from the management making it clear they were not allowed any such egress of their facilities. I still continued occasionally, just out of empathy in a day before the city provided some port-a-potties and weekly showering spots for these folk had been forced to defecate in public. But finally, I was personally threatened by the management, and forced to stop any such sympathetic gestures.

   But, obviously, a private residence is a place where such intrusions are almost unforgiveable. The man looks almost sick, suffering from a disease.

    Marvin, it turns out, runs a start-up, connecting companies with Instagram influencers.


    Thomas, having finished with his shower, appears naked, the two men opening the door at that very moment when Thomas steps out from the shower. The gay gaze is obviously from director’s frame.

     Lorenzo rushes to get a towel, Marvin commenting, once they have closed the door, that Thomas is good-looking, a fact which Lorenzo simply denies, Marvin teasing him of being jealous, a strange thing indeed for someone to say that has shown up as a kind of Grindr date.

     Thomas interrupts their sexual small-talk asking if he has a T-shirt and socks he might wear. Lorenzo offers him both.

     But then it goes even further when Thomas asks Lorenzo if he has something to eat, Lorenzo quite stupidly asking “Are you hungry,” with Marvin responding, “Of course, he’s hungry.”

     He goes to the refrigerator and brings back what’s left of a delicious birthday cake, a piece of which Thomas immediately devours.


    But Lorenzo is clearly pissed, and no gentle stroking from Marvin can relieve the tension and the sense of intrusion in his daily ritual that it has already involved. Yet Marvin and he do lay back for a moment, Lorenzo still turning away. At that point Marvin, rests his hand on Thomas’ leg, who stands up in distress and confusion.

     Now we have entered an entirely new dimension, wherein we realize that the supposedly empathetic Marvin has brought back the homeless boy just for sex. His was not a reaching out of sympathy but out of a sense of his power. Marvin calls him crazy, as Thomas speaks out, “Okay a shower. You want my fucking ass!”

     Lorenzo who has not noticed the hand-resting event, is startled, upset beyond all else at this point, particularly when Marvin begins to deny his action.

     “Okay, a shower, but then you enjoy your time; we’re chill. What’s wrong?”

     By this time, we realize that everything is wrong including our own perceptions of who Marvin is, and how he has been manipulating the entire situation for his own pleasure, the fetish that some gay men have for homeless boys now having been placed on the table, so to speak.

     When Lorenzo finally tries to step in to make it clear that he had nothing to do with Marvin’s intentions, his new “friend” turns the problem on Thomas, even offering him 5 euro for his hot body.

     As Thomas leaves, Lorenzo quietly explains that he had nothing at all to do with this, while Thomas answers, as a lady leaves an apartment with her son in disdain of the situation. Thomas answers that he didn’t want to scream. Both, however, recognize the horror of the situation.

     As Lorenzo goes to clean up his bathroom shower, a kind of fetish itself, he tells Marvin he can leave any time he wants.

     Marvin follows him, trying to re-encourage, at least, with their sexual rendezvous, but Lorenzo turns angrily away. Marvin t still cannot comprehend, “What’s the deal here?” and Lorenzo tells him it’s over.

     As Lorenzo’s would be lover turns back to ask once more what Lorenzo’s name is, the Italian responds “Forget it.”


     Both men have been reprehensible, Lorenzo for not immediately offering his hospitality and friendship to the homeless man because of his own fetish for cleanliness and the order of his world, and even more so Marvin for his abuse and sense of empowerment over those in dire straits. But it does appear, at least, as Lorenzo now sticks his fingers into the cake, slowly devouring its deep chocolate, has learned something from the series of events, a realization of his own fetish and separateness if nothing else as he moves to the balcony, eating the cake with his fingers, which one might describe as getting “dirty.” He has presumably been awakened while, in this case, the black entrepreneur has not.

     This short French film has deep dimensions of political and social meaning where so many others simply focus on gay issues and sex. This work provides a much-needed spotlight on some of the failures of the gay community with its search for endless pleasure: cultural, financial, and sexual.

 

Los Angeles, July 24, 2026

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (July 2026).

    

Index R-Z

Angelo Raaijmakers I, Adonis / 2021 Peeter Rabane Firebird / 2021   Tyler Rabinowitz Catalina / 2022 Tyler Rabinowitz See You Soon / 20...