Monday, June 29, 2026

Juan Mirarchi | Impulsos (Impulses) 2025

the insecure poet

by Douglas Messerli

 

Juan Mirarchi (screenwriter and director) Impulsos (Impulses) 2025 [6 minutes]

 

Argentine director Juan Mirarchi’s Impulses is a very short and ineffective study of personal doubt and insecurity. Despite the love of his hunky lover (Damián Ramis), the cute young man (Ezequiel Pache) cannot quelch his fears of inadequacy in an unfortunate narrative overlaying of deep and dark musical mutterings.

    The only way out, so it appears, is to produce via an old Olivetti typewriter, a poem that relays all of his doubts.


     Fortunately, his heavily tatted lover appreciates his obviously amateur attempts to express his anxiety.

     Frankly, I don’t. And I can’t imagine why anyone might even want to visit this small work even though it passes like a flash before one can even imagine what it is attempting to delineate.

      As one commentator on Letterboxd, Jorge Iván opined, “To me it’s a lack of understanding of what [the] medium can do.”

       I might add, as a poet, it appears to be a lack of understanding of what any medium can accomplish.

       Beyond all that, we never hear a word of poetry uttered, and the visuals are so predictable that we might find better gay models any day on our local porn network.

       Finally, I might add (obviously just a random comment which might arouse many different reactions), I prefer the look of the unsure bottom to his seemingly assured top. I, a poet, fortunately never was made to choose one role over the other.

 

Los Angeles, June 29, 2026

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (June 2026).

       

      

Sam Peter Jackson | The Space You Need / 2025

gravitational pull

by Douglas Messerli

 

Sam Peter Jackson (screenwriter and director) The Space You Need / 2025 [21 minutes]

 

This silly and slightly wacky sci-fi romance is nonetheless truly charming, particularly since there is absolutely no way to take it seriously, allowing you to just sit back and have fun.


     Leo (Matthew Morrison), whose family business, Coulton Aluminum, formerly devoted to baked beans and potato peelers, has suddenly and quite inexplicably gone into the business of commercial space travel, offering up ordinary people the chance to make space flights, through Dexter Intergalactic Endeavours. Now for a low-cost price once only available to billionaires, as company spokesman, Janet Claremont (Christy Meyer) explains, well-off suburbanites can celebrate birthday parties in space, weddings, baby showers, even bachelorette parties in zero gravity.

     Yet Leo’s partner, Julian (Nick Hayes) is chaffing at having to now spend full time at such company events and their vacations with Leo’s parents at spa events. Julian suggest that he has now seen Leo’s father naked more than he has his own lover.

     Mostly, he regrets that they never do anything spontaneously anymore. They used to escape from every event, where now they are required to remain at events given Leo has become a CEO.

     Julian is a sci-fi writer, author of several fictions, but simply can’t create a new work. Something is missing in his life, and both men feel that despite the love they once felt, they are now living on different planets.

     Leo no longer wants to share Julian’s enthusiastic viewings of Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey or even various Spielberg sci-fi fantasies. There is utterly no hope, these days, that the two might escape to a Berlin leather bar as Julian might fantasize.


     Indeed, Julian dreams that he is visited by a leatherboy (Branko Tomović) who follows the pieces of candy he lays out straight to his mouth, only to ask him if he’s taken out the bins and bought a cake for his dad’s 70th birthday.

     Even Julian’s best friend Bex (Oliver Cudbill), an effeminate replacement for the usual best girly friend' but, in this case, also a lawyer, is startled by his comrade “having a wet dream with a kind of earthbound extraterrestrial.” We also now learn that Julian’s new book just isn’t happening.

      As if this all weren’t enough, Leo comes home to announce that he is going into space on one of his company’s early launches.

      Julian is distressed, even terrified as Leo calmly packs up to take off in a rocket into space.

     Soon after Julian is telephoned by company liaison Janet Claremont to report that something has gone wrong on the flight, and the travelers, Leo included, have been transferred to a Japanese space station. They are all perfectly all right, but there is a delay before Leo can be retrieved.

      Trying to communicate with his lover during a bad connection further frustrates Julian as he and his friend Bex threaten to sue Leo’s company.  

   Not to worry, Claremont has called into service a young handsome, and gay, assistant, Milo Messenger (Giles Cooper), to help guide the dismayed companion through the unexpected incident.

     If the first session where he can hardly hear Leo speaking does not go well, a visit soon after to a local falafel stand invigorates Julian, and before you know it, Milo, a huge fan of Julian’s writing, and the author himself begin to find they have a great deal in common. His important

question of why, despite hinting of it, Julian has never created a truly gay sci-fi character triggers Julian’s imagination.



      As the week passes, with everyday contact with Julian and Leo, Julian and Milo find more and more in common with each other. This is a romance we have been waiting for, but it is suddenly interrupted as the Japanese report they will have a ship ready to return Leo to earth by the next Thursday.

     Basically, the time has come for Julian and Milo to say goodbye. But there is a further glitch the next day as Leo not only refuses to meet up on screen with Julian but refuses to return home. Janet assures Julian that such a decision is simply not possible, and his lover will be returning on the next Japanese pick-up. But clearly something has happened that Julian has simply not prepared for.

     Leo returns home to a now completely ill-at-ease, troubled Julian, hardly even knowing what to say to the man he loves. Fortunately or unfortunately, depending upon your point of view, Julian doesn’t even have the opportunity as Leo confesses that during his time in space he has fallen in love with a Japanese spaceman, Haruto (Kuni Tomita), the two having a sexual experience in space that can’t even be imagined by those on earth.

     Suddenly, the earthly Leo, realizes that perhaps his friend has been more spontaneous that he has, and rushes off to re-connect with the beautiful and totally compatible Otis.

     A year later, Leo and Haruto celebrate their marriage, an event attended by Julian and Otis, who have, true to form, escaped early. The newlywed open up the gift from Julian of his newest sci-fi book, obviously now with a gay hero.


    If this British film is about a breakup, not usually a very pleasant topic in gay cinematic literature, in this case it is a fortunate event in which both the original lovers have found a new space in which to explore their lives.

 

Los Angeles, June 29, 2026

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (June 2026).     

Jean-Pierre Melville | Le Cercle rouge (The Red Circle) / 1970, USA 1993

on cue

by Douglas Messerli

 

Jean-Pierre Melville (screenwriter and director) Le Cercle rouge (The Red Circle) / 1970, USA 1993

 

It is a somewhat shocking that Melville's great detective-gangster film did not get its USA premiere until 23 years after its French opening. So many similar but lesser films—including the entertaining The Hot Rock (1972)—might have learned a great deal from Melville's masterful direction. Like many a heist movie, much of Le Cercle rouge is devoted to the clever tactics of its robber-heroes, Corey (Alain Delon), Jansen (Yves Montand), and Vogel (Gian Maria Volonté).  But Melville takes his work much further by exploring, at least for the first half of the film, their abilities to outwit the police and others who might wish to stop them, while also taking us into the minds of their pursuers, particularly Le Commissaire Mattei (Andre Bourvil).

     Much of the entire film is shot in silence, so much so that Le Cercle rouge might almost have been a silent film with just a few story board titles. Indeed the film begins with a kind of story board to explain its own title:

 

                     Siddhartha Gautama, the Buddha, drew a circle with a piece

                     of red chalk and said: "When men, even unknowingly, are to

                     meet one day, whatever my befall each, whatever the diverging

                     paths, on the said day, they will in inevitably come together in

                     a red circle.

 

Buddha said nothing of the kind, but Melville's fiction is perfect to establish from the very beginning that fate is at the heart of his tale. No matter how hard the men at the center of his story try, no matter how clever they are, how blessed or damned may be their lives, they will  one day meet their fate. Accordingly, we see the film from the very beginning less as an adventure the likes of Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid (filmed a year earlier) than as a stunningly beautiful playing out of these men's destinies.


     Each of them is somehow charmed, intelligent—even Mattei admits that about Vogel—but doomed, which, in turn, despite their embracement of evil, makes them sadly appealing. We watch them play out their fates with the same kind of impassion with which they treat their victims. Vogel shoots down the petty criminals about to kill his new "friend" Corey with the kind a cool cruelty that one might devote to killing a cockroach or silverfish found in the bathtub. In truth, I become far more emotional about that bathroom activity than he is with humans.

     We are, however, free to admire this sinister trio simply because we know, just as Corey knows as he chalks up the red circle at the end of the billiard cue, he will one day lose. Indeed, he does, admittedly, lose the game a few moments later when Rico's men discover him at the billiard hall.

     That is not to say that Melville's "heroes" are necessarily admirable. Each lives a life of almost utter misery. Corey has just been released from five years in prison, Vogel has just escaped from a train taking him to prison breathlessly outrunning squadrons of police, and Jansen, a former policemen, is suffering from the DT's. But then, none of the policemen seem to live particularly harmonious lives either. The Chief of Police (Paul Amiot) is a bitter paranoid, convinced that "All men are guilty. They're born innocent, but it doesn't last."


     Mattei, Melville suggests through his immaculate dress and behavior, his lonely pleasure of three fat cats, and the several rings he wears—which he cautiously removes before his final meeting with the Chief of Police—is gay. Not that he has any time for sexual encounters. In fact, none of these men have time for sex—heterosexual or homosexual! There has perhaps never been a film that so utterly removed from the female sex. Only one woman plays any part in the action, Ana Douking, described as the "the old girlfriend of Corey," who lies in bed and hovers about Rico's bedroom door when Corey appears to demand money. She has no lines, and Corey leaves photographs of her on the prison desk from which he retrieves his other possessions. The only other women who appear in the film are a bartender and the chorus girls, who ridiculously sing three numbers in Santi's resturant/bar. The red circle, at least in Melville's vision, is a male only club, a world for Clydes without Bonnies.

     Henri Decae's photography, moreover, portrays the world they inhabit in dreary, muted colors. It is cold, it rains, it snows. Paris never looked so unpleasant—except in the beautifully lit-up jewelry store, shining with diamonds, emeralds, and rubies. You can well understand, given the emptiness of these men's lives—in their lack of sex, money, food, drink (Jansen has gone sober), without even Mattei's beloved pets—why they are drawn to those shining jewels. And they will do nearly anything to capture those lit up tokens of wealth which might give them the possibilities of a life they now live without.

     It's interesting, in passing, that this film—so different from Eyes without a Face—was also chosen by Pedro Almodóvar for inclusion in the 2011 AFI Fest. Unlike the other film, Almodóvar mentioned, this did not particularly influence his current The Skin I Live In. Yet there is commonality; just as the woman in the Franju film, the three robbers must cover their bestial identities, hiding their faces with masks.

     Like dancers, tight-rope walkers, perfectly-timed performers, the three mount stairways, climb through ceilings, cross buildings, miraculously cut open windows, skillfully circumvent protective beams, and shoot out other warning devices, scooping up a suitcase of the baubles with such success that they cannot even find someone to serve as a fence.


    Forced to turn to the mob, these men have clearly been led back into the red, the bloody world which they have helped to create. In his own way, Mattei is their perfect match. As skillfully as they have been able to complete their heist, so does Mattei manipulate his informers, picking up the young son of the mob-involved Santi on a trumped up marijuana charge. The only flaw in his plan is that the son, just as the Chief has argued for every man, is truly guilty; he has been selling pot and attempts suicide when the police turn away from questioning him. But the ruse still succeeds; Santi must play along if he is to free his son, turning into the informer he insists he will never become.

     One of the most remarkable scenes in the film, and one that suggests that Corey and Vogel have grown closer in their days together, is the moment when Corey takes the elevator down from his flat, the bag of jewels in his hand, to deliver them to the head of the mob. Melville's camera follows Corey down, panning up to Vogel waiting in the apartment. Again, it moves down with Corey, and up to Vogel, the latter positioned atop of Corey. Clearly the image is sexual, but we recognize it primarily as a linking of the two; Vogel is troubled about Corey's next step. Something is wrong, and he knows it. He picks up the rose—another kind of red circle—which has identified Corey to the mob connection in Santi's restaurant.

     His attempt to save Corey by rushing into the mobster's villa, demanding that Corey take the bag and run, results in his own death as well as Jansen's (awaiting in the car) and, ultimately, Corey's. All three are killed on the run, and Vogel can painfully report to the Chief, the lives of at least these three guilty men have come to an end.

 

Los Angeles, November 7, 2011

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (November 2011).

 

 

Peter de Rome | Encounter, or Paul & Richard & Michael, & David & Alan & Buddy & Hugo & Tom & Terry & Peter & Richard & Carlos / 1970

twelve gentle men

by Douglas Messerli

 

Peter de Rome (director) Encounter, or Paul & Richard & Michael, & David & Alan & Buddy & Hugo & Tom & Terry & Peter & Richard & Carlos / 1970

 

Born in Juan-les-Pins, Côte d'Azur, France, Peter de Rome grew up in England, where he worked as press agent for Arthur Rank and Alexander Korda. In 1956 he emigrated to the US, where he worked for a while at Tiffany’s, later as a civil rights campaigner, and eventually as publicist for David O. Selznick.

     In the 1960s, during which he spent a great deal of time on Fire Island, he began to make films, shot with an 8mm camera, of himself naked, having sex with someone he picked up on the streets, etc., intending the films only for the viewing of friends, but many of which were later collected in his 1973 anthology, The Erotic Films of Peter de Rome.

      Not part of that collection, Encounter was made in 1970, just a year after the earliest of his erotic film, Double Exposure (1969). The much larger cast of Encounter, including 12 men credited in the subtitle by only their first names, represents a move away from the “personal” work, paving the way for his only two feature films, Adam and Yves (1974) and The Destroying Angel (1976). Although he continued to make a few more shorts in the late 1970s, he stopped creating new works in the 1980s out of a kind of disgust for what film critic Alex Davidson describes as “the increasingly explicit but poorly filmed pornography” of that period. In an introduction to The Erotic Films, issued in 1984, de Rome wrote: “Until and unless I can make the sort of films I want to make, I am not interested in making any.”


      Although Encounter presents us with a gay sex orgy, it is less about the actual sex between the 12 men—some of whom were hired from a list of models and others of whom de Rome simply encountered upon the streets of New York—it is not really about sex but suggests rather a kind of ceremonial group activity. The original music was by composer Olivier Messiaen (much of whose work might be described as religious), but for the British Film Institute DVD he commissioned a new work by Stephen Thrower.

      One might even suggest there is something a bit comical in the film’s portrayal of what first seems to be a gathering or a secret society or cabal, as various men walking the Brooklyn Bridge and the lower Manhattan streets suddenly jut out their arms in a salute not that much different from the Nazis—except that a few of them, I observed, who were noticeably limp-wristed. Following the inexplicable salute, they begin moving, somewhat like the pod-people in Invasion of the Body Snatchers, all in the same direction, much to the perturbation of the “normal” passers-by.

      Obviously, what de Rome is satirizing here is the common heterosexual myth that gays recognize one another through a secret code, just as their late-night hangouts are secretive dens of disrepute where they meet to socialize in a private world outside of the sexual mores of the society at large.

       These twelve, representing almost every racial type, style of clothing and hair color, appear out of the blue, from traveling by bus, taxi, bicycle, and foot, to follow one another a bit like automatons, entering, one by one, a seemingly derelict loft space where they march up a long set of stairs, by the second-landing already tossing off their shirts to reveal their handsome lean chests.


     As they enter the loft space and their eyes adjust to the darkness they slowly reach out to one another, first caressing one another’s faces before slowly moving their hands down across pectorals, backs, and eventually buttocks. Soon, as if by magic, they are all nude (BFI writer Davidson notes that the one thing all these men have in common are “their luminous buttocks left free from tan lines).

      On cue, they begin bending, sitting, and rolling to simulate orgiastic sexual behavior, but except for the appearance of an occasion semi-erect penis, de Rome does not portray any of these sexual acolytes actually engaging in sex. Their actions represent more of a ritualistic dance instead of the pawing and groveling of sex-starved men.


      In the darkened room, the camera lovingly pans over their swaying and shifting bodies before presenting them in a perfect circular formation, their backs facing out, which suddenly opens up—almost as if they were dancers in a film choreographed by Busby Berkeley—to reveal floral-like petals of interlocked legs. Immediately the credits announce “The End” to what we might imagine is actually only the beginning.    

     De Rome, in this lovely work, has accordingly combined the ridiculous—the normative society’s absurd ideas about what it means to be gay—with the subline—the actual kinship and bodily fraternalization of men who sexually desire other men. Even the political implications of their early salute drop away as we now recognize that the outstretched hands represented a greeting and reaching out to one another instead of a coded statement of hidden bonds. These 12 men are the very opposite of angry men in judgment (as in the film Twelve Angry Men of 1957), but rather undertake a peaceful retreat to a place where they are no longer fearful of being judged.

 

Los Angeles, October 18, 2020

Reprinted from World Cinema Review and My Queer Cinema blog (October 2020).

 

Index to My Queer Cinema A-H

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.