Thursday, April 2, 2026

Yariv Mozer | שבלולים בגשם (Shablulim BaGeshem) Snails in the Rain / 2013

sweating it

by Douglas Messerli

 

Yariv Mozer (screenwriter, based on a story by Yossi Avni Levy, and director) שבלולים בגשם (Shablulim BaGeshem) Snails in the Rain / 2013

 

About a decade ago this week Yariv Mozer’s Snails in the Rain made its premiere in Israel. The reviews were mixed, but no one could ignore its devastatingly beautiful male star, Yoav Reuveni playing the central character Boaz, for whom Mozer finds every occasion possible for him to pull off his shirt and whip up a sweat. People are constantly bumping up against him, likely intentionally just to be get near to this hunk—or is he intentionally bumping into them, the male runners and locker room mates.


     Yet Boaz is no dumb hunk, but is a linguistics major at the university who is expecting soon to hear about a scholarship, which is the reason why he haunts the local post box outlet. We follow him also as he swims, as he works moving furniture to extend his small student income, follow him into the classroom where he is studying primarily with Professor Richlin (performed by the director himself), and settle down with him as he returns home each evening to be with his girlfriend Noa (Moran Rosenblatt) with whom Boaz has a seemingly close sexual and emotional relationship.

     Yet despite Boaz and Noa’s nearly perfect pairing, we sense something amiss. Noa is applying for a scholarship of her own in architecture in a city elsewhere from Jerusalem where Boaz hopes to study, and she has not shared that information with her lover.


      Moreover, Boaz has begun to receive letters from an unknown male admirer, expressing his deep but frustrated love for him. Not only does this unknown figure apparently know a great deal about him, but is watching him day and night. The very idea of a stalker, who this obsessed figure appears to be, is enough to send anyone into a spin; and Boaz, saving the letters and hiding them from Noa, seems almost traumatized by the event, now carefully observing every male who often, simply because of his beauty, are cruising him. His best friend Nir (Yehuda Nahari) even seems suspect in his friendly roughhousing and his sudden “bro” kisses.

      But quite soon we begin to suspect that something deeper is bothering Boaz. As blogger Marlon Wallace astutely observes: “…Everywhere Boaz goes, he catches attention from both guys and girls. It's no wonder as he is an absolutely beautiful, young man, gorgeous beyond compare. The issue though is that Boaz notices the people who notice him, but only if those people are other men. Some women do double-takes when Boaz walks by, but Boaz never sees them. He only sees the guy on the night jog, or the guy on the bus, the guy in the locker room, the guy in the library, the guy at the cafe and the guy at college.”


       The very fact that he saves these letters, moreover, and reads them over and over again, suggests that he is fascinated by the mysterious sender. And we soon begin to suspect that there is another deeper emotional response at work here. So too does Noa, when she discovers the letters and reads them for herself, obviously feeling that her companion is under some sort of deep tension. Just as Boaz often seeks solace in sex with Noa, so does she continually attempt to keep him close, masturbating him in the bathtub and even accommodating his brutal anal rape of her one day when he returns home filled with fear and frustration.

      Meanwhile, the tension is beginning to show in the outside world as well, as Boaz pulls away from men who watch him in the shower and almost beats up a young man attempting to display his penis to him in a urinal.


      Mozer also keeps interspersing scenes from Boaz’s compulsory military service. There, among only men, his beauty was also noticed. Not a particularly model soldier, he nonetheless was given leeway just for his looks, and at one point a fellow soldier whom he had just voyeuristically watched make love to a woman engages him in a series of deep, long kisses, which Boaz at first rejects but returns to accept.


    What we begin to realize is that Boaz is gay or at least bisexual, and the pulls he feels toward homosexuality are terrifying him as he attempts to resist them while still increasingly moving toward them. At one point, the letter writer begs him to show him that his love is not meaningless by switching on and off the kitchen light 3 times at precisely 10:00. Noa has also read the letter and attempts to distract him with a late dinner and movie; nonetheless, Boaz finds an excuse—a sudden desire for leftovers—to return to the kitchen. There he does, in fact, switch the light on and off two times, but overcomes his compulsion before making the third connection, sending the poor letter writer, whose identity Noa has already uncovered for us, into utter despair.

      But so too is Boaz ready for a near complete breakdown, as he races out of the house and hurries off to a gay sex spot in a park where he allows a beefy man to masturbate him, returning home to immediately take a shower, trying to wash the “dirty” act away as he breaks into tears.    


     Yet everything is okay now. The dark urges have passed. He’s won his scholarship and he still has retained Noa’s love. His professor, the writer of those nasty letters, has left the university due to “an illness.”

      We all know that different cultures are dealing with LGBTQ+ experiences in different ways and at different speeds. And even today, despite a substantial number of gay filmmakers—including the radical Amos Gutman, to whom this film is dedicated—who have opened up new a sexual frankness regarding gay cinema, Israel, with its governmental forces aligned closely with religious tenants is still not an easy place to openly discuss gay issues. But frankly, as effective and brilliant as this film is, I, as one of the letterboxd commentators writes: “am growing a little fatigued with queer cinema coming back to the effects of self-loathing and internalized homophobia as seemingly the only tools for telling dramatically compelling stories about the culture. There has to be someone out there interested in telling a queer story that doesn't fall into miserabilism.”

      Moreover, I am increasingly skeptic and even somewhat incensed by films that allow their troubled male gay boys to pretend that they are able to resist the pull of their sexual desires by marrying a woman like Noa, as this film suggests, and have children who grow up in a loving marital atmosphere—those icky, slimy snails being only something that come out on rainy days, mostly long left behind. But as gay cinema has often reminded us, boys who enter closed heterosexual relationships are often so frustrated that they end up in public bathrooms and the bushes to where Boaz has run to satisfy their needs until even that doesn’t work. Their children suffer and their marriages often end, as does Nir’s relationship, in despair.


      And even in Mozer’s film, as Boaz hugs his young daughter close to him, a pregnant Noa coming to join in the hug fest, he is last seen staring off into space as if seeking out something in his life that is still missing and which he will not allow himself to seek.

      Perhaps this film can be described as an honest one that still frustrates those of us who seen so much of gay behavior that continues to close off and sublimate its desires instead of opening up to a wider view of sexual activity. It’s painful to watch a man throw away freedoms that for more than a century now have been hard fought for and won.

 

Los Angeles, June 27, 2023

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (June 2023).

Robert Aldrich | The Killing of Sister George / 1968

how to turn a friendly nurse into a bawling beast

by Douglas Messerli

 

Lucas Heller (screenplay, based on the stage play by Frank Marcus), Robert Aldrich (director) The Killing of Sister George / 1968

 

Given Robert Aldrich’s fascinating if downward-spiraling career in which, after producing one of the most important of late film noir works, Kiss Me Deadly (1955), he went on to create several works that were just a step above exploitation films—including Sodom and Gomorrah (1962), What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? (also 1962), Hush Hush Sweet Charlotte (1964), and The Legend of Lylah Clare (1968)—which because of their truly campy plots and dialogue and their use of motion picture stars that were working beyond the standard limits of their career or in periods in which their careers seemed almost to be dying, transformed these near-gothic films into popular gay cult movies; yet in the end, one has to admit that his version of The Killing of Sister George, based on a British stage black comedy of 1964 was not that truly awful.


    As in Baby Jane, in which he paired the warring Bette Davis and Joan Crawford, and Sweet Charlotte which reached back into the 1930s and 40s for its brilliant cast of Davis, Olivia de Havilland, Joseph Cotton, Agnes Moorehead, and Mary Astor, Sister George, in which he first sought to cast Davis, then Angela Lansbury—both of whom might have been brilliant in the role, but, at least in the case of Lansbury, realizing that she still had a full career ahead of her, declined from playing Aldrich’s sleazy characters—featured Beryl Reid, who had played the central character June “George” Buckridge on stage, and Susanna York, the pretty ingenuine of Freud (1962), Tom Jones (1963), A Man for All Seasons (1966), whose beauteous innocence was quickly washed away by makeup artist Bill Turner who seems, at moments, to have dipped her entire head in cold cream, while at other moments painting her in white-face. We’re told, moreover, that at 32-years of age, she had at 15 had illegitimate child almost as old as the female producer Mercy Croft (Coral Browne) with whom she eventually runs off.


    Aldrich encouraged Reid to shout out her lines as if she were still on stage attempting to reach the second balcony, and turned the black comedy into a semi-tragic tale of an end of a career/end of life elder lesbian actor with plenty of tears and sentimental rages tossed into the mix. At moments, Aldrich seems to be attempting to recreate the battle scenes between these two lesbians as if they were performing an alternate version of Edward Albee’s Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? And, as some commentators have pointed out much of the lesbian content, some of which Aldrich added to the original play, is filled with numerous stereotypes.

    Yet, for all that this film from 1968 is a hell of a lot more honest about gay life and presents it in a more fascinating manner than almost any work of its day and far into the future. And The Killing of Sister George, is a film, I’d argued, that has been vastly mocked and overlooked.


   The plot is truly a one-liner. June Buckridge (Reid) has long played a character on the BBC series, Applehurst, named Sister George, a nurse, who rides around town in a motor scooter offering up gentle and healing advice.

    Since several the characters in the series had been killed off, she is now certain that she may be next, hence the title of the work. We are not quite sure whether her suspicions are correct or whether her behavior with regard to what she suspects actually cause the event to occur. But in person “George,” the name she now goes by, is quite the opposite of who she really is. Off screen is an often a drunken, opinionated, foul-mouthed lesbian whose relationship with “Childie” (York), who collects numerous dolls and herself might remind film-goers of the role played by Carroll Baker in the 1956 film Baby Doll, written by Tennessee Williams, is almost as perverse.


    In this case, however, Childie is apparently quite involved with George sexually, and their relationship, given the abuses heaped upon her lover by George for fear of Childie’s possible involvement with younger men and women, along with George’s punishment of the girl by insisting when she is found guilty of bad behavior to kneel before her and chew up and swallow of the butt end of a cigar, suggests that they relationship consists mainly of sado-masochistic games.

     When she becomes inebriated, which she often does, George is quite capable of what Childie describes as “naughty things,” such as, walking off the set in fear of being cut and catching a cab

within which sit two young (novitiate) nuns who she quickly begins to sexually abuse. As she describes her love of gin later in the film: “Appearing to be drunk happens to be one of the easier ways of getting out of some of life's most embarrassing situations.”


     With increasing concerns over her behavior, the officials at BBC actually do consider finding a way to kill off their beloved character. One of the producers, Mercy Croft (Coral Browne) is actually sent off to George’s and Childie’s home to demand an apology in writing to church authorities for the taxicab incident.

     Once the officious and superficially charming Croft gets a look at Childie, she quickly befriends her, praising her poetry (which we can only suppose is quite infantile) and basically attending to her in a far kindlier manner than George. What we soon discover, finally, is that Croft herself is a far more reserved and closeted lesbian.

     And indeed, at the next reading of the script, George discovers that she has been written out of a couple of episodes of the show, suffering the fiction of a cold.

     Despite all these tensions and difficulties, George and her much younger lover, who have now been together for several years, are basically in love, spending one of the loveliest scenes in this film in a lesbian nightclub, the Gateways, where they perform together a quite charming Laurel and Hardy skit, after which the lesbians across a crowded room, hit the dance floor to the memorable tunes of the club band.


     While there have been other, usually brief depictions, of lesbian and gay bars in film, this is certainly the first time we encounter such a full picture of a gay nightclub in a Hollywood movie, the only previous film lengthy images of a lesbian bar being portrayed in the privately filmed work Mona’s Candle Light of 1950. We perhaps do not get such a full view of a gay bar or club again until Saturday Night at the Baths (1975), The Ritz (1976), and Nighthawks (1978).  


     It is at Gateways, where Mercy Croft unexpectedly shows up, that George is finally told that she actually will be killed off by riding her scooter into a ten-ton truck. George quips: “I refuse to die in such a ridiculous manner!”

     But even though she brilliantly and quite comedically does everything she can to undermine the filming of the death scene, die she must and does.

       At a going away party she again does her best to scandalize TV officials, as Croft officiously claims to have found a new role for her, that of a cow on a children’s show.

       Croft, meanwhile, steals Childie away from the party, convincing her to pack up her clothes and join her instead of remaining with the abusive and incorrigible George. Back at George’s house, as Childie attempts to decide which dolls to take along, Croft finally makes her move in a long scene added by Aldrich, in which she finally gives into her lust, stroking the younger girl’s breasts, kissing her intensely, and moving into bed with her at the very moment George returns.


     After another furious attempt to keep Childie by her side, responding when the girl insists she wants now to live by herself, “By yourself? You couldn't even cross the bloody road by yourself!” But finally, she realizes the girl has openly betrayed her, as the 32-year-old mother a teenage girl goes off with the producer, leaving George without any role to play in life and utterly alone.

      If this is perhaps what heterosexuals imagine is inevitably the end of all homosexual relationships, at least we know that in George’s case, as one commentator argued, she will not enter the next room and hang herself as the closeted lesbian Martha Dobie (Shirley MacLaine) in William Wyler’s second version of The Children’s Hour did just 7 years earlier.

     What George does is return to the now empty studio, chuck the fake coffin in which her character was buried through the window, knock down a couple of expensive movie lights, and sit down to simultaneously mock and accept her ridiculous situation, ending the movie with the long bawling, lowing sound of a “Mooooooooooooooo.”

    Some of the reviewers of the day, notably The New York Times’ Renata Adler, seemed almost shocked by the openly sexual imagery of the work, Adler observing, from what today reads almost as a homophobic position:

 

 “The prolonged, simultaneously serious and mocking treatment of homosexuals, I suppose, inevitably turns vicious and silly—as homosexuality itself inevitably has a degree of parody in it. But there is a scene between Coral Browne (the gossip columnist in "Lylah Clare"), playing a villainous lesbian studio executive, and Miss York's left breast, which sets a special kind of low in the treatment of sex—any kind of sex—in the movies now. Miss York, whenever her face is in view, looks embarrassed. Miss Browne approaches the breast with a kind of scholarly interest, like an icthyologist finding something ambivalent that has drifted up on the beach. The scene goes on for ages (Mr. Aldrich's attempt, I suppose, to gather some of the refugees from Therese and Isabelle). It is the longest most unerotic, cash-conscious scene between a person and a breast there has ever been on screen, and outside a surgeon's office.”

 

      If The Killing of Sister George is a terribly flawed work, I nonetheless, mostly agree with what critic Derek Winnert wrote in his 2018 review:

 

"Aldrich has been accused of coarsening and commercialising a subtle play. But, nevertheless, it is a spirited, highly entertaining, even sometimes enlightening, possibly even liberating movie, pulling lesbians out of the closet.

    …. George is a great character, a gin-swigging, cigar-chomping, sadistic masculine woman, the opposite of the sweet character she plays on radio [TV]. Reid brings her to vivid life, both pathetic and sympathetic.”

 

Los Angeles, April 1, 2026

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (April 2026).

My Queer Cinema Index [with former World Cinema Review titles]

https://myqueercinema.blogspot.com/2023/12/former-index-to-world-cinema-review.html Films discussed (listed alphabetically by director) [For...