the queer asian menace
by Douglas Messerli
Irene Kuhn, Edgar Allan Woolf, and
John Willard (based on Sax Rohmer’s The Mask of Fu Manchu), Charles
Brabin (director) The Mask of Fu Manchu / 1932
Charles Brabin’s 1932 horror adventure,
The Mask of Fu Manchu may have been one of the most racist films
Hollywood ever produced. Although there is no KKK here, thank god, the entire
East, the Orient as it was often then called, is seen as a terrifying threat to
the white race, determined with the leadership realized by Fu Manchu, to wipe
out Western civilization, and even procreate with its women to bring victory to
the Asian people.
Critic Michael Koresky, writing in Film Comment, summarizes:
“The very title should raise instant
hackles: the name Fu Manchu has long been a kind of shorthand for the complete
villainization of the ethnic Other in Western culture. Maybe the most
demoralizing fictional figure for assimilated or immigrant Asians in the West,
Fu Manchu was the invention of working-class British novelist Sax Rohmer, and
he grew equally popular in the U.S. in the first half of the 20th century. The
mastermind of elaborate sinister plots to kidnap, torture, or kill white
people, with the hoped-for end result of wiping out Western civilization, the
long-mustachioed brute was a personification of xenophobia and anti-immigrant
scapegoating, an embodiment of the “Yellow Peril” who operates from underground
lairs, employs slaves and minions to do his evil bidding, and uses witchcraft
and poisons. Beyond serial novelization and movies, the character has turned up
in comics, TV, and radio programs, and traces of the Fu Manchu archetype can be
found throughout the decades in any number of films that turn a distrustful eye
toward Chinese laundries and opium dens, from musicals (Thoroughly Modern
Millie) to comedies (Alice) to adventure pastiche (Big Trouble in
Little China).”
This “thriller” is utterly
watchable, and even somewhat engaging, nonetheless, not because of the valiant
behavior of its British white boys and one girl, but because of the fabulous
homosexual-like figure, played by Boris Karloff as Fu Manchu, who throughout
remains impeccably dressed, with dramatically long fingernails, a drooping
mustache, and filled with absolute delight in doing the British boys in through
various
When they finally capture Sheila’s handsome fiancĂ© Terrence Granville
(Charles Starrett), who, with Sheila’s urging, has brought the sword and mask
they have finally discovered to Fu Manchu, hoping to trade it for Sheila’s
father Sir Lionel Barton (Lawrence Grant), Fu Manchu’s daughter Fah Lo See, has
Granville hung up and sadistically whipped as she watches with excitement and
pleasure (Loy herself complained bitterly about her role, describing herself, as
Wikipedia puts it, “tossed” into the role by the studio. Reportedly she told a producer:
“I can’t do this…I’ve done a lot of terrible things in film, but this girl’s a
sadistic nymphomaniac.”)
When
Fu Manchu discovers that, in fact, the sword is fake—Sir Denis Nayland Smith
(Lewis Stone) having hidden away both the sword and mask in order to protect
them for later use—Fu Manchu gets special pleasure in simply stroking the near
naked body stretched out on a table, Granville dressed only in a loincloth, Manchu
about to inject him with a potent drug made up of poisonous snake venom, and various
other elements that will turn Granville into his minion.
The
plot is so poor piece together as a whole that it hardly needs retelling. It
consists, basically, of Fu Manchu, one by one, capturing the all the British
party, whereupon Fu Manchu plans exorbitant tortures from machines he has
created just for that purpose for each of them, and planning to sacrifice
Sheila as a virgin. At the last moment, as strapped to a see-saw device Smith
his about to be dumped into a muddy room of hungry crocodiles, he miraculously
cuts away his own bonds, escapes, and frees Dr. Von Berg (Jean Hersholt) from a
machine of huge pointed metal spikes coming at him from both directions, before
again freeing Granville from further injections. Together they direct the bolts
of electricity with which Fu Manchu often plays upon his rally below, wearing
what Monsters in the Closet scholar Henry M. Benshoff describes as looking
like “a Carmen Miranda from hell” in his fruit basket hat. Striking first the
golden sword he holds aloft, the current quickly kills him, soon after striking
down most of his followers, as Granville rescues his lover and carries her off.
When Karloff first came onto the project, fresh from Frankenstein he
was told there still wasn’t a script, and as time passed he asked for one
often, to which the producers laughed. Finally, as he was being made up each
morning they passed on several pages, scripted by gay writer Edgar Allan Woolf,
Irene Kuhn and John Willard each day for him to memorize. Karloff himself
perceived the sheets of paper he daily received to be more than incoherent: “Some
scenes were in written in beautiful Oxford English, others were written in—God
knows what!”
Although they have come to find the treasures of the sword and mask to
place in the British Museum, as the survivors return to England, Smith tosses
the sword into the sea so that no madman like Fu Manchu can ever come to power
again. They might have thrown the script in the ocean as well. Fortunately, the sets and the cinematography by Tony Gaudio
are all quite impressive. And strangely enough, this truly crazy film still
today, despite its blatant racism and suggest of the evils of homosexuality
still is watchable, in large part because of Karloff’s masterful acting.
Los Angeles, November 2, 2026
Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog
(November 2026).











