queering the opera
by Douglas Messerli
Bernard Natan (scenario, based on
the play by David Belasco and the opera by Giacomo Puccini with libretto by
Luigi Illica and Giuseppe Giacosa, and director) Le
Ménage moderne du Madame Butterfly / 1920
Given this film’s pornographic intent, we might imagine a series of
rather washed-out frames with a hand-held jittering camera. But this film,
credited generally to Romanian Jewish director Bernard Natan,* is well-lit and
quite sophisticatedly edited as we cut to the harbor of Nagasaki which reveals
the return of Pinkerton’s ship, before the director cuts further to reveal
quite crafted scenes of Nagasaki street
After the handsome Pinkerton rings a small hand-gong for someone to
greet him, the servant-boy Pink-hop (played by Nathan) hurries out and, as
penance evidently for his inattentiveness, begins unbuttoning Pinkerton’s
jacket, the Captain smiling with surprised joy at his attentions.
Pinkerton finally asks to see his wife, to tell her evidently that he
has since married an American woman.
Despite his long absence and the sad news he bears, Butterfly is still
highly attracted to him, and quickly begins a long embrace and kiss, as
Soussaki begins to unbutton his pants, the two of them pulling him down onto
the tatami mat, where he performs cunnilingus on Butterfly as Soussaki sucks
him off.
In the next scene we see him fucking Butterfly while Soussaki keeps his
penis in position, Pink-hop masturbating and visually cumming on screen as he
watches the sexual act.
Bernard Natan acted in at least one other pornographic film prior to
this one, and between 1920 and 1927, after emigrating to France the year of
this film, Natan produced and directed at least 20 further porn films, many
times appearing in them. A number of the films included homosexual and bisexual
oral and anal intercourse actions performed by Natan.
This film and Natan’s other contributions to the genre, however, were
far from the first pornographic films produced. The first known example seems
to have been made in 1908, with about 2000 hardcore films, about 600 prior to
1960, screened by 1970. Commentators guess that about 10 percent of these
mostly “stag films” contained some homosexual activity, from a simple hand on
the shoulder, thigh, or hip during hardcore anal or oral sex to more complex
LGBT references, but most were presented in the context of heterosexual
normality, accordingly rendering them into essentially bisexual acts.
Except for a few examples such as this remarkable film, I have basically
steered away from pornographic movies, although that is increasingly becoming
more difficult to do given the blurring of lines between the two aspects of
LGBTQ filmmaking and the increasing quality and narrative sophistication of gay
and lesbian porno films. The few examples I have included in the My Queer
Cinema volumes point to the increasing overlap of what once were thought to
be oppositional genres, which given the increasing openness of sexual
expression have begun to blend. Of course, at one time all of the thousands of
films I speak of in these volumes might have been perceived as pornographic by
the heterosexual hegemony.
Arguably, Natan and his crew had more fun even than the Marx Brothers in
queering up serious opera.
*Some have argued that this film was
not written by Natan, nor was he a performer in it.
Los Angeles, April 12, 2021
Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog
(April 2021).






No comments:
Post a Comment