Saturday, January 11, 2025

Sven Spur | Eden / 2020

count me out

by Douglas Messerli

 

Sven Spur (screenwriter and director) Eden / 2020 [17 minutes]

 

Let me begin this essay by repeating what anyone who has made their way through the pages of the several volumes of My Queer Cinema will already know: I have nothing against pornography or with sexual cruising, and I have embraced both, porn as a viewer and sexual cruising (in my youth) as an active participant.


     Yet, this short film which borders on porn and concerns sexual cruising leaves me rather bored. Perhaps it is because the actors—given rather meaningless character names that matter little in the “story”—Wolf (Mustaf Ahmeti), Benny (Vincent van Driessche), Dirk Couvent (Philip), and Ludovic Harnais (Lu)—simply don’t attract me; they seem all at the edges of S&M, not my cup of tea. But it is also because the soft porn of this film (only one glimpse of a flaccid penis, no semen spewed) is not terribly sexually exciting. Even TV series have shown more sexually arousing images.

      Belgian director Sven Spur has his figures reveal a lot of butt and engages his actors in a great many anal fucks, but provides the viewer with very little in the way of sensual lust. If this is Eden, Adam was lucky to have escaped. Here it’s all mirrors and colors, red being the dominate one, perhaps suggesting, rather puritanically, that in Wolf’s endless sexual searches we are approaching hell.


     But even so, it’s all rather safe sex. Wolf wears a condom, as presumably do the others; and at one point he romps down the street in the rain with one of his meet-ups as if he were a young pup in love. Being a Wolf, however, he also howls.


     Perhaps the major reason this film leaves me cold is that it is simply boring. Wolf meets someone in the park for sex; he sits soaking in a spa pool waiting for Benny to swim over to him and encourage him into sex; he sits in a room of mirrors where he fucks Benny; he cleans out his butt in the bathtub; he has sex in a bedroom; and he ends up in a sling where he gets fucked by another. And that’s all there is. Nothing is made of these events, except perhaps a bit of jealousy by Benny as he watches his former partner get fucked, rather longingly and not as a voyeur.

     In so many gay films attractive men and cute boys have a much more active and sensual love life. Wolf, his ears and fingers stuffed with rings, seems on the hunt for something which he can’t quite reveal to us, even if he presumably finds what he’s seeking. Good for Wolf, but leave me out of this record of his acts. Well, in fact, the director already has.

 

Los Angeles, January 11, 2025

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (January 2025).

Máté Konkol | Budapest, zárt város (Budapest, Closed City) / 2021

controlling desire

by Douglas Messerli

 

Máté Konkol (screenwriter and director) Budapest, zárt város (Budapest, Closed City) / 2021 [13 minutes]

 

Hungarian director Máté Konkol’s 2021 film Budapest, Closed City is a very sad testament to a once great and vital European capital city that, at least from the viewpoint of our young teen tourguide Péter (Péter Dániel Katona) is quickly shutting down, all of its major cafes and bars having been closed by the government of Viktor Orbán, whose racist, homophobic, and generally rightist policies have turned Hungary into a country that the European Union no longer perceives as a democracy.



   Péter is touring around his British friend Adam (Adam Wadsworth) explaining how even old neighborhoods such as the one in which he was born, have been torn down. Clubs have disappeared.

     Eventually the native Budapest boy takes his friend into what looks like a highly graffitied toilet, so terrible that even Adam comments that this must be the filthiest bathroom in all of Budapest. Yet actually it poses as the entrance to a semi-hidden club where singers perform and many of Péter’s friends can be found. You can perceive that he is more than a little proud to be able to introduce Adam around, all of them presuming that he might be his boyfriend, but no one willing to speculate. This is not a world in which homosexuality is accepted, and being openly gay or even engaging in homosexual behavior can end in violence or imprisonment.


     The two boys drink, and Adam, who doesn’t smoke pot, even asks for Péter to roll him a joint. It’s clear that Adam is enchanted and basically in love with his guide, now nearly desperate to engage in sex.

    But even here Péter points to a woman standing in the corner who has been following him, even though he’s cut her from his intercut connections. Her intentions seem to be sexual, but it is almost as if she might be a kind of spy trailing his whereabouts and behavior.


     As the two boys finally leave the underground club, and sit together in what seems to be a subway passage or an underground walkway. Adam suggests that Péter should leave the city, to which Péter agrees, but it’s clear he won’t, his days spent in hard work, his nights in partying. Adam leans forward to kiss him, at first seeming to be accepted; but when Adam gets more serious Péter backs off, insisting “I can’t.”

     Adam gets up and walks off. Péter can only curse the impossibly frustrating situation. Soon after, the older woman from the bar comes up behind him, carrying a bottle of wine. Péter gets up and walks home with her for sex, clearly the only way to relieve his sexual duress. The next morning, he gets up early to leave for work. The film does not even bother to show us the two in bed, the sex, if it occurred, having been utterly meaningless. Péter is a gay boy who in Budapest apparently cannot even live a closeted life.

      It’s not only the city’s nightlife that the Orbán has basically closed down, but its citizens.

 

Los Angeles, January 11, 2025

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (January 2025).

Pauline Noel | The Pianist / 2024

the story of love

by Douglas Messerli

 

Jessica Limbardo (screenplay), Pauline Noel (director) The Pianist / 2024 [8 minutes]

 

Jackson, a composer/pianist has evidently been commissioned to write a new piece, but is obviously in the midst of a creative block. He has been drinking for days apparently (bottles of wine and scotch litter his otherwise immaculate apartment) without having been able produce anything of value.


     His lover Teddy rises and attempts to lure him back to the piano to compose, reminding him that Jackson once told him that songs are just like stories. “So tell the story,” he insists. “Tell me the story for love.”

     As he begins to play, the film shifts to the now stereotypical street scene (this in New York) with in love boys running every which way and bumping into each other in the middle of the street, only to rush off again hand-in-hand.


     But once more, as Jackson describes it, he gets “stuck in the middle.” Is this a reflection of their own relationship we have to ask? “I don’t want it to end” moans the pianist.

     Once more Teddy reassures him that he can do it. “I’ve seen you do it a thousand times.”

     The street scene returns, but Jackson blocks it out. He can’t go on.

    This was about half way through this little cliched film, and I too was about to storm off given the amateur theatrics and inane plot of Pauline Noel’s short film. Surely, as a writer, I can no longer talk about such simple-minded works!

      But finally the friction between the two actors produced a tiny bit of heat, Teddy facing off with his lover: “I know what this is. It’s just you and me here babe, where you gonna hide?”

      But then, the back story made it even worse. Apparently, Jackson’s still miffed because Teddy failed to appear for one of his concerts. There he was waiting to go on, and no sight of Teddy. But, Teddy tells him, life is cruel. Get over it, you’re a pianist, that’s what you do!

      I almost quit this little movie once again to switch on the 1940 film Knut Rocke to hear Pat O’Brien shout out, “The last thing George said to me, 'Rock,' he said, 'sometime when the team is up against it and the breaks are beating the boys, tell them to go out there with all they've got and win just one for the Gipper”—which given my disinterest in football and football movies should give you a clue of my state of mind.

      Back at our little movie, of course, Jackson finds a way through music to bring him back to love. What we discover, as well, is that the reason Teddy didn’t show up for the concert is that he evidently stepped off a New York street corner and was hit and killed by a passing car, and the concert, we discover, is a memorial for William Theodore Davis, the pianist’s beloved “Teddy.”


     Images of An Affair to Remember blur out the dance of Jackson and his dead Ted, tears presumed to have welled up in your eyes. The end.

     I recognize that this well-meaning film might have even been based on a real-life event, so I truly don’t wish to make fun of an amateur indie. And I’m a sentimental being. But….well, there’s a limit. This is most definitely what the males of Nora Ephron’s Sleepless in Seattle would describe as a “chick flick.”

    

Los Angeles, January 11, 2025

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (January 2025).

Friday, January 10, 2025

Christophe Honoré | Le lycéen (Winter Boy) / 2022

the fever

by Douglas Messerli

 

Christophe Honoré (screenwriter and director) Le lycéen (Winter Boy) / 2022

 

What we often forget is that not only is the US today torn apart by oppositional views regarding politics, but that the politics themselves involve aesthetic and cultural values that have also helped to tear apart some of our educational and cultural institutions, as well as often creating a huge sense of confrontation between teachers and students, creators, performers, and their audiences, and between art, literary, and film critics themselves.

      I have heard from several university professors, in particular, how some of their students simply refuse to read certain texts; and I had my own experience with this a few years ago when teaching a graduate literature course at Otis College of Art and Design when a female student announced to me and her classmates that she would not read Gertrude Stein, which was a strange proclamation since Stein was not even on the syllabus that semester. When I asked her for her reasons for this refusal, she simply announced that she hated her writing. Although I did not teach Stein that semester, I did mention her a couple of times, presumably why the woman quickly dropped a required course, endangering her own status in the program. Or perhaps she simply didn’t like me because I liked Stein.


    Reading the reviews of what I perceived as a moving and loving movie by French director Christophe Honoré, Winter Boy (2022), I was again made aware of how far too often presumably sane-mined film critics sometimes circle around the fresh body of a work of cinema as if it were a piece of dead carrion awaiting to be delighted in or attacked by the circling critical buzzards.

     Winter Boy is admittedly a fairly complex film, even while its story remains quite simple. Several critics were simply puzzled by the fact that this film dared to focus on more than one genre, embracing a kind of gay coming out film along with a psychological portrait of grief in a family when the father suddenly dies in an automobile accident as in James Agee’s A Death in the Family, while also exploring the problems of teenage angst, occasionally engaging with current French politics, and hinting at an unspoken melodrama of parental dissatisfaction with life and possible suicide. One critic wondered with which genre the movie was trying to engage as if somehow the director had needed to make a choice or at least choices from a limited luncheon menu instead of attempting to embody the fullness of such an experience for a young 17-year-old gay boy at a time in his life where everything had suddenly become indeterminate and impossible to comprehend.

      Most critics, such as Devika Girish of The New York Times threw out most of the possible “choices,” and honed in on the what they saw as psychological naturalism: “the film shines when it allows its actors to quietly play out family dynamics, with [Vincent] Lacoste [as the boy’s older brother], [Juliette] Binoche [as the boy’s mother], and especial [Paul] Kircher [the 17-year-old boy] wearing the many shades of grief with effortless, endearing naturalism.” Alistair Ryder, writing in The Film Stage also saw it as a “contemporary coming-of-age tale,” while Juan José Cruz of Premiere represented the film as “a powerful story about the scars left by adolescence and how we face self-discovery.”

     The nastiest review of the lot, Soham Gadre’s essay in Film Inquiry, faulted the film for it “muted realism,” comparing it negatively to the preferable melodramas of Douglas Sirk such as Imitation of Life. Speaking of that film, Gadre writes:

 

“Every scene is still crystal clear, the movements of the characters, the colors of the walls and dresses, and the way Sirk positions and shifts the camera mid-conversations.

      Completely in contrast to that was my recent screening of Christophe Honoré’s Winter Boy, a movie where the images, the characters, and the mood started to leave my mind almost immediately, leaving nary a trace. I haven’t seen a movie this forgettable in quite a while. Bad films of course leave a lasting impression in both their unsavory aesthetic choices, insulting thematics, and lamentation of the time wasted watching them.

     Honoré’s film was genuinely harmless and inoffensive.”

 

     It is certainly true that, in some respects, Honoré is not generally interested in the costumes and sets of his scenes or in even moving his camera about in various shots. Winter Boy presents a

truly claustrophobic world, first in the young boy Lucas’ boarding school, where his lover Oscar (Adrien Casse) is prone to pop into his small cell at any time for a meet up in bed, and then, when his brother Quentin, a cousin, and a family friend come to carry him home with the bad news of his father’s death, with an entire household of grievers who hug, hold, and fondle him like a whining puppy to passed round the room. The streets of the small alpine villages of Chambéry and other locations in Savorie where the film takes place are crooked and cramped. And later, even in Paris, Lucas’ brother Quentin lives in a small slightly disheveled artist apartment, shared by his best friend Lilio Rossio (Erwan Kepoa Falé). Honoré focuses on the immediate bodies and faces, not on costumes and architectural spaces. Writing in Deadline, Stephanie Bunbury nicely sums up my argument:

 

“Honoré works with a sort of narrative uncertainty principle. His account of the family’s tumult sweeps like windscreen wipers from the endless wake to Lucas’ risky sex life, back to the brothers’ scrapping and back again to Lucas’ increasing confusion, continually spreading out and then peeling back the surface of their lives. The camera stays close to them, rarely pulling back further than the opposite wall of a small room. The psychiatric hospital where Lucas is eventually confined, lined with airy cloisters, is paradoxically one of the few spaces in the film that feels open and free.”


     A significant number of critics, moreover, found the work to be far too melodramatic and emotionally fraught, in the manner of the melodramas of Sirk and Nicholas Ray. Critic Philip Brasor, for example, observed: “The boy’s subsequent breakdown has a theatrical aspect that makes you wonder how much of his suffering is for show, but the sudden inconsistencies in his temperament point to something more disturbing. His mood swings like a pendulum in a hurricane during the wake and funeral, which his grieving mother, Isabelle (Juliette Binoche), asks him not to attend, knowing what damage it might do to his already fragile equilibrium. If Lucas’s narration initially indicates an immature personality full of itself, the behavior on display dispels any notion that the boy knows what he’s doing. By the time he accompanies his older brother, Quentin (Vincent Lacoste), to his home in Paris you don’t know what to make of him.”

     Dennis Harvey, writing in the San Francisco on-line journal 48 Hills, finds the memorable melodramatics of this film to be its downfall—just the opposite of Gadre’s argument.

 

“This character [Lucas] is so tiresomely self-over-dramatizing, we lose sympathy fast. His response to a grievous loss is first denial, then a sort of unexplained seizure, then all kinds of melodrama, including a pass at prostitution and a suicide attempt. We can understand that he’s flailing. But the film seems to treat all this as grand passion rather than the attention-needy cries of a sexually precocious but immature, rather bratty boy. No wonder his older brother (Vincent Lacoste) is almost constantly fed up with Lucas’ theatrics.

    Honoré is an erratic talent whose work I’ve sometimes found as exasperatingly indulgent as his protagonist’s behavior here. Winter Boy is one of his more disciplined enterprises, but it still can be maddening, in a peculiarly stereotypical French way wherein characters constantly traverse the gamut of emotions as if hammering out xylophone arpeggios.”

 

     In short, it seems that Honoré is being accused for using any approach to the film he might proffer or eschew. In actuality, the director achieves a work that at moments is a quiet naturalist-like work, while in the next it moves to high pitch, almost camp, fever that Rainer Maria Fassbinder would have loved. The central character, after all, is a hormonal-charged teenager, openly gay, but not at all sure yet whether or not whether he wants to be fully tied-down to a relationship. He loved a father who he was not at sure was proud of him or fully pleased with his sexuality; moreover the father was on the road most of time; although Binoche’s character was clearly in love with her husband, it is also obvious that she poured out a great deal of her love to her second son, the elder, Quentin, having, as Lucas himself describes it, abandoned the family.

     Finally, all of the critics seem to forget the early scene in which Lucas and his father are traveling together, his father speaking vaguely of the dissatisfaction of his live and the next moment almost causing an accident that might have killed both father and son; an incident which he begs Lucas to keep from his mother, and which Lucas never again speaks about. So there is a sense to the young boy that he, himself, is partly guilty, both for hiding the event and perhaps for being the cause of it.

      Although his mother devours him with love, it is a needy love which he cannot truly fulfill. To  care for her, he would have to abandon his boarding school and attend a religious institution nearby. He is simultaneously desperate to discover what else is in the world, what is available to him, and what his response to the wider world might be. All of this comes together as a series of confusions, angst, and anger with the fact of his father’s death, which he himself believes might have been intentional.

      Is it any wonder that he seems calm and collected at one moment and falls into a kind of tormented fit of hysteria in the very next? I think Derek Smith, writing in Slant, perhaps best caught the director’s sense of both Lucas’ and Isabelle’s emotional states: “Honoré approaches grief in a similarly subtle, intriguingly indirect manner. Where many films show grief merely as a crippling hindrance, Winter Boy sees it as an emotional state that constantly rises and recedes, disrupting the flow and morphing the meaning of everyday experience.”


    A week with his brother in Paris seems to be the perfect answer, a way to defuse Lucas’ grief and help him simultaneously to discover new experiences. But, although some critics seem to approve of Quentin, what Honoré shows us is a young artist of apparently little talent, imitating the masters, while his black roommate Lilio appears to have a true, almost Dadaist originality to his work. Yet Lilio must work as a chauffeur and take on an occasional job as a prostitute to make ends meet, while Quentin, backed by a supporter, gets all the shows. The supporter/dealer suggests to Lilio that there’s an upcoming African show for which he might consider entering work, despite the fact that Lilio is, in fact, Spanish.

     Although he invites his brother to join him in Paris, Quentin basically abandons Lucas to the streets, insisting that he not return home until 6:00 in the afternoon so that he might woo his dealer. And even then Lucas returns to find the door locked, his brother having gone off to a local bar to celebrate. Quentin invests a single morning at the Louvre on his brother, the rest of the time ignoring him or putting him in the care of Lilio. Is it any wonder that the boy sees in the handsome elder gay man both a possible father and lover?


     Lucas tries, successfully, to pick up someone in an internet connection, and is open to all new experiences. As he tells the cute young boy who would like to meet up again with him, right now he is looking to take up space rather than construct new relationships. And when Lucas discovers that his new hero is also a prostitute who won’t have sex with him, he lashes out like any thoughtless boy his age by both attempting to emulate and punish him by making a date to fuck the same man.

     These are not rational acts, of course, but they totally understandable given the overwhelming emotions of love, abandonment, fear, and wonderment which he now daily faces. When Quentin discovers him about to have sex with Lilio’s john, he puts him on the first train home, further abandoning a brother who needs love, and not the kind his mother might provide.

      I would argue, accordingly, that it is perfectly comprehensible why finally this troubled boy attempts suicide. Except for his school friend who wants a relationship and actually loves him, Lucas is faced with a needy, suffocating mother, a disinterested brother, and a dissatisfied father who, in his mind, took that dissatisfaction into death. To whom can he turn for all the things he truly needs: love, adventure, guidance?

      A final critic, Felipe Freitas, writing in Always Good Movies, pointlessly castigated the director for closing down the movie in “tedious disgrace,” the film ending “ridiculously, in flagrant hypocrisy,” presumably because the boy winds up, after slashing his wrists and refusing to speak, in a psychiatric hospital, certainly the last place at that age or a few years later when I ran away to New York City without even telling my parents and lived a gay life far wilder than Lucas’ would wanted to have ended up. But what other choice do people without the comprehension of a young gay man’s needs have? At least there he is cared for, free to come and go at will.

      However, it is only a trip down from Paris by Lilio, the only individual who does know precisely what this boy needs, that resolves the situation. Lilio has clearly been in the boy’s shoes, and admits he sometimes still is. That simple empathy, that reaching out is just what Lucas most needs. After his visit, Lucas determines to speak again, explaining to his mother that he is ready to return home and move on.

      At film’s end, our troubled young rebel has come of age. Even his mother finally is able to relinquish her anger over her husband’s death. We doubt whether or not Quentin any longer cares. What Quentin doesn’t know is that he is already a hack, destined to become another man disappointed with life.

      But nearly everything is now open to Lucas. Perhaps he will now return to his boarding school and his good friend, and then later move to Paris on his own to discover what he wants to do with his life. The grief may never end, but the fever has broken.

      This is a gay film about grief, angst, politics, and anger presented alternately through the lens of realism and theatrical exaggeration almost worthy of Fassbinder’s clueless heroes. If only the critics, as Lilio did, could have shown the same empathy and reached out to the movie instead of demanding it fit their desires and needs!

 

Los Angeles, January 10, 2025

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (January 2025).

Don Roy King | Marcus Comes to Dinner / 2018 [TV (SNL) episode]

the shock of recognition

by Douglas Messerli

 

Kent Sublette and Bryan Tucker (head writers), Don Roy King (director) Marcus Comes to Dinner / 2018 [TV (SNL) episode]

 

In season 43, Episode 10 of Saturday Night Live, Tim is bringing home his boyfriend, as his mother (Aidy Bryant) reminds her husband (Sam Rockwell), warning him to make an effort to be open and accepting.

     On the porch of their home, Tim reassures his boyfriend, Marcus (Chris Redd) that it will be just a short visit. Marcus asks if they know he is a porn star, and Tim makes it clear he has told them no such thing and he mustn’t discuss it.


     Almost immediately upon seeing his new boyfriend, however, Tim’s father can’t get over the feeling that he recognizes Marcus from somewhere. “I feel like I see you all the time.”

     Soon after Rockwell’s character asks if he works “at that coffee shop on Second or something?”

When he asks what Marcus does, Tim assures them that Marcus is a dental hygienist. His nervousness is palpable, his mother assuring him that there’s no need to be tense: “Your father and I are happy that both of you are here.”

    She can’t get the wine opened and wonders if Marcus will help, and as he puts the bottle between his legs to work the opener, when the cork pops, Rockwell also nearly pops out of his chair as well. Again, he reminds Marcus that “I know I’ve seen you.”


      The mother tells her husband that these two boys have the same taste in everything and that she has one of their favorites, snickerdoodle cookies, in the kitchen.

       When Tim asks after his sister, however, his mother complains that she is out of control, that she has two tattoos. “You don’t have any tattoos, do you Tim?” No mom, he assures her. But when she asks Marcus, he begins to suggest that he has a “couple,” Tim’s father interrupting to say “a couple of guns right over your butt,” jumping out of his chair to announce, “O, you’re a gay porn star. I feel so stupid. I’ve got one of the top-tier porn stars in my house and we’re feeding him cookies.” The father goes on to talk about numerous other porn stars such as Jason Thrust and the Cockeyboys and how seeing one of the scenes made him even subscribe, “I wasn’t waitin’ a whole week for the next scene.”

    He stands up goes to the coat rack and puts on a coat. “Anyhoo, I guess I’m gettin’ a divorce, and now I’m probably stepping down as pastor. Goodbye family.” He walks out the door.

      “Well, okay,” responds Tim’s mother. “That was a lot to take.”


       Suddenly, Tim’s father rushes back into the house to retrieve his laptop.

      “Okay, sure, you’re gonna need your laptop.” She turns to Marcus, “So, ‘Pumpgood?’ is that Irish or…”

      “No, ma’am that’s from porn.”

      “I know. It was just a joke. My marriage just fell apart. Will you let me have one thing?”

      Family life takes another nosedive on Saturday Night Live.

 

Los Angeles, January 10, 2025

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (January 2025).

Index R-Z

Angelo Raaijmakers I, Adonis / 2021 Peeter Rabane Firebird / 2021   Tyler Rabinowitz Catalina / 2022 Tyler Rabinowitz See You Soon / 20...