Sunday, January 19, 2025

Lee-Song Hee-il | 후회하지 않아 (Huhoehaji Anha) (No Regret) / 2006

what really matters

by Douglas Messerli

 

Lee-Song Hee-il (screenwriter and director) 후회하지 않아 (Huhoehaji Anha) (No Regret) / 2006

 

Lee-Song’s seminal 2006 film No Regret is often described as the first gay feature film in South Korean cinema, although there were others such as Road Movie of 2002 with that also dealt with gay issues. What can be said, it that it is the first feature film by an openly gay Korean director.


     This film and his later works, moreover, expressed an aspect of LGBTQ cinema that one might describe, in the best sense of this term, as old fashioned. Lee-Song’s works mine the melodramatic tradition of US filmmakers such as Nicholas Ray and Douglas Sirk, as well as Rainer Werner Fassbinder. Moreover, unlike almost all the other films of their time, Lee-Song’s films were about gay sex.

      As Fran Lebowitz recently explained, it is difficult for many of us who are older than 35 to comprehend why the Rainbow Coalition has in the past few decades has spent nearly all their energies fighting for two issues which were not among our youthful priorities: gay marriage and serving in the military. Most of us before that time saw marriage as a delimiting heterosexual church and governmentally-controlled bond which often led to disaster; and those of us growing up during the Viet Nam War wanted nothing but to stay out of military harm and its utter destruction of human life. Marriage and war were perceived by my generation as terribly restrictive and destructive institutions that we as lovers devoted to the sweet life wanted absolutely nothing to do with. It’s not that we weren’t politically involved. We’d survived years of police harassment and possible imprisonment, we’d fought back at Stonewall and many other local battles, and we fought the war of neglect for AIDS. But checking in with the minister or priest or even a friendly freelance marriage guru and signing up to wear fatigues and bomb the crap out of Iraq or Afghanistan was just not our thing.

     Lee-Song, although still a young man today at 54, still believes obviously that the major issue in the gay community is sex, and his films concern how his characters, outsiders in Korean culture, attempt to negotiate their ways to get what they need to survive, both on the literal level of survival and in terms of their sexual desires.

     I find, accordingly, a kind of fresh air breathing through Lee-Song’s films that I am sure younger people can’t at all sense. There is no stench here of trying to appeal to the society at large. His characters are natural outsiders who have found wonderful, often destructive, yet utterly entertaining and outrageously original ways to survive in a society that either doesn’t even know they exist or want them dead. And in that sense, his films breathe a new life into LGBTQ cinema that is akin to the “New Queer Cinema” values that critics such as B. Ruby Rich and others championed.

      At 18, Lee Su-min (Lee Yeong-hoon) has just been released from his loving orphanage where he has spent most of his life. Unable to afford an education, he heads straight for the capital city, Seoul, where he works at a factory job and a position as a night-time driver in order to pay for his computer classes. Everything might have gone well, except the factory is laying off staff, warns his orphanage home friend Hwan-sun (Lee Seung-won) with whom he shares a rooftop hovel.


      One night, driving one of his drunks home from a bar—a familiar role for such night time drivers— he meets Jae-min (Kim Nam-gil), a wealthy man who immediately falls in love with the young driver. Pretending to have left his money in a billfold back in his apartment, he invites Su-min up to his place, trying to seduce him into bed.

      Su-min is curious, but leaves without fulfilling his client’s desires—although there is a moment, as only Lee-Song can dramatize, when he moves off to the elevator that we can tell he is tempted to turn back and revisit the situation. But the client is rich, Su-min simply trying to survive, and nearly everything in this complex film about lost possibilities is based on his survival instinct.

      Soon after, however, when Su-min is fired from his factory job, he suddenly discovers in the process that the son of the owner is none other than the handsome Jae-min, who, when he realizes that the man he just fired is Su-min arranges for the factory to fire another man instead, keeping Su-min in his job. When Su-min perceives the switch of a man with a family to support over himself, the factory owner’s son heartthrob desire, for what it is; he storms into Jae-min’s office and rejects both the job and anything further to do with his would-be admirer.

      For a while Su-min works as a dishwasher in a restaurant where Hwan-sun is employed as a floor scrubber, but once again he meets up with employer outrage, in this case when a plate as not been properly sanitized and cleaned. For the world in which he now exists, people like our hero Su-min and his friend Hwan-sun will always be perceived as dirty, unclean orphan boys, not to even mention what the society does not know, that, in Su-min’s case, he is also an outsider homosexual.

      Despite, his deep reservations, Su-min joins up with night-club owner (Jeong Seung-gil) of XLarge, a male brothel, who tells him that he doesn’t hire “faggots.” “Our customers don’t like faggots. I’m a faggot myself, and I don’t like ambiguity.” At first, Su-min runs when he sees the degradation with which he will have endure. But he returns and becomes one of the customers’ most sought-after boys to bed. Most of the visitors to XLarge are drunkards who drink themselves into a frenzy as they watch the half-naked boys dance—often turning into a lap dance—before taking them into the narrow little rooms the club offers. What kind of sex these customers offer is never established. One can only suppose that it is a kind of sloppy drunk sex, with plenty of voyeuristic behavior without full erections.


      But as Su-min’s new colleague Jung-tae (Jo Hyeon-cheol) makes clear, there’s money to be made at the club, particularly if a wealthy man takes a special liking. Jung-tae has a girl and is simply waiting until he makes enough money to marry her and live in luxury—the goal, one might add of many a prostitute throughout the movies I’ve seen about this underground world.

      Jung-tae insists he’s only in the job for money, and he won’t let anyone fuck him—the very moment after Su-min has apparently let his first john do just that. After explaining about his girlfriend, he suggests that he’d even suck off Su-min—if he paid him, strangely establishing a relationship where the two prostitutes of different sexualities have formed a kind of odd sexual bond. Indeed, it is just such ambiguous conversations that enrich Lee-song’s story, the relationships between the various individuals never quite falling into the proper categories of straight and gay, master or slave, bottom or top. Everyone in this director’s work slips through life ambiguously despite the club owner’s insistence that he hates just such behavior. These are survivors who quickly adapt to those in control of the billfolds.


       Indeed, the scenes of the brothel are some of the most interesting in the film, simply because their work here for the first time is perversely honest. As opposed to placing boxes on a rolling assembly line, here Su-min offers his most precious commodity, his own body, to display and perform as he emotes. At least, here he is wanted as a full human being instead of a pair of hands attached to muscles. This is a gay world devoted to the body and nothing else, the way so many gay men have long treated themselves in their dives into bars, bathrooms, and other pick-up places. If the “pick-ups” are not particularly attractive, they offer money in the place of a beautiful face.

      But into this world one night suddenly strides the factory owner’s son Jae-min, pretending to pick from amongst the “Madame’s” best boys. Obviously, he still has Su-min on his mind, and the handsome orphan boy will have nothing to do with it. He storms out, returning only for fear of completely alienating the club owner. He fucks Jae-min, but makes it clear that if he ever attempts to return, he will kill him.


      So begins a rather violent struggle, as Jae-min tries again and again to return and contact the man who has so stolen his heart that he cannot survive without him. XLarge even tells Jae-min that he has left their employ, but it doesn’t keep him from his constant search for his whereabouts.

      We also observe another Jae-min accompanied by his mother (Kim Hwa-young) and his supposed well-off female lover who together spend a great deal of time seeking out possible wedding gowns for an occasion that clearly has never been established and about which Jae-min is utterly disinterested. Of course, that does not stop his imperialist mother, who is determined, despite the recognition that her son is gay, that he shall be properly married. She is a warrior-queen of the old world who will find a way around her son’s disinterest in female flesh even if she must sacrifice the bride on her own bed, which she later almost accomplishes.

      This is most definitely not the tame fare of Ang Lee’s The Wedding Banquet (1993), a Chinese fantasy in which the necessary bride wins her gay lover, even if her bargaining includes his other gay lover. If nothing else, Jae-min is fierce in his attempts to win over the violently reluctant Su-min. Through the XLarge connection, he makes an anonymous appointment with Su-min in a hotel room.

     There, in half light, he tells the story of a shy man who falls in love with a poor man, the poor man refusing to accept the shy man’s heart. “What should I do?” he pleads. Su-min’s answer is to “give it up,” but when Jae-min turns he appears to have a gun (perhaps only a toy plastic gun) in hand: “I’d rather kill you.”


     Su-min puts a brutal question on the table: “Of all the cocks I suck every night, why should yours be special?” Jae-min responds: “Because it’s special. And yours is special.”

     Once more, Su-min leaves. But this time, we can again see that despite the film’s title, it is with regret. Something has been touched, a flame sparked between the two in seemingly eternal struggle.

     By the time Su-min returns to the brothel, Jae-min has entered the establishment madly looking for Su-min, opening doors, screaming, and demanding to see the man for whom he is now ready to go to war.

     The other prostitutes grab him, pull him to the exit and, in particular the brutal Jung-tae, beat him severely, Su-min entering at that very moment to demand they cease.


     He carefully hoists up Jae-min and carries him on his back to safety and a love affair that changes both their lives. For the first time in both their existences, they take a day off, visiting the beach like to teenage gay lovers, and begin to heal in their adoration of one another. It doesn’t hurt, of course, that Jae-min is wealthy, and can pay for their joyful time off. But Su-min is only too happy to quit his job as a prostitute.

     Inevitably, however, Jae-min’s mother returns to reap her revenge. Insisting that her son’s former girlfriend is pregnant, she demands he marry her, and will broadcast the pregnancy to the world if necessary to protect her investment. The wedding invitations have already been printed. As critic Hayley Scanlon, writing in Windows on Worlds, summarizes the mother’s position: “Jae-min’s mother even later tells him that she doesn’t care if he continues to sleep with men, but that he must marry the woman she’s chosen for appearance’s sake, little caring for the emotional wellbeing of the oblivious fiancée she is about to condemn to a loveless marriage.” After visiting his father, Jae-min realizes that he has no choice but to abandon his true love, Su-min, with whom he now cuts off all communication.

     Even Su-min’s attempts to visit him results in a freeze-out, as Jae-min, girlfriend in hand, and flanked by his father and mother, refuses to even recognize his pleading lover.

      Before these major incidents, a great deal of other important sub-plot incidents have occurred which give this film a further rhythm and complexity. Su-min’s former prostitute friend, Jung-tae has lost all of his money as his girlfriend and a man to whom he has loaned his money run off together, she employing all his credit cards. Always violent, he becomes even more determined to get even with the world.

     Another young wide-eyed boy from the country, Ga-ram (Kim Dong-wook) has been hired by “Madame,” a kind of clumsy but charming oaf who Su-min takes under his wing, offering him his bed since the boy has no place to stay.

     Both of these figures play a large emotional role in Lee-song’s near epic cinema. As he accumulates money, Ga-ram purchases a new car which, at the very moment in which Su-min is attempting to make contact with Jae-min, the boy crashes, killing himself in the event. The boy whom we have seen with his arm thrown across his loving bedmate’s chest in a couple of scenes, has now also disappeared from Su-min’s life, a loss signified by our hero’s collection of Ga-ram’s ashes from the cemetery.

     Simultaneously, Su-min comes to perceive that his isolation from Jae-min is not his former lover’s decision, but obviously that of his family. Accordingly, he asks the now angry and quite vicious Jung-tae to help him kidnap Jae-min and to destroy him as a representative of those who promise love but cannot keep their commitments.

      Such melodrama thrives in the mishap of coincidence. And in this film, the moment after Jae-min has pretended not to even recognize Su-min, we see him in the elevator. There he finally turns to his fiancée, explaining that the man who has just come up to him is, in fact, the one he truly loves, that he cannot love her and never has.


      Furious, she slaps his face. The wedding is clearly over, Jae-min having finally proven that he is a man willing to defend his queer love and not a pawn in the powerplays of his parent’s cruel regime.

      But it is too late. Shu-min and Jung-tae have already hog-tied Jae-min and deposited him in the trunk of his own car. They drive to a distant woods where Jung-tae digs a grave, depositing the son of the factory owner—symbolic to him of all evils of those with money—into it, as he begins to toss the soil over the body of Su-min’s still protesting ex-lover.

     Finally, unable to bear it any longer, Su-min intervenes, demanding Jung-tae stop. But this time the prostitute has grown into a villain of such proportions that he not only refuses, but attacks Su-min with the shovel, knocks him over the head, and tosses his unconscious body into the grave as well.


     Furious with everyone, he goes sculking off into the woods, presumably to make his way back to civilization or destroy himself for now having been responsible for the death of two men.

     Jae-min, still conscious, attempts to awaken his lover now laying off over his own body, but he cannot break loose from his ties. But finally, Su-min returns to consciousness. This time we observe Jae-min carrying his lover on his back.

     They make their way back to Jae-min’s auto. All this time, it has been snowing, and as they make their way down the road, Jae-min suddenly loses control, the car slamming into a tree. It is almost as if fate is determined to kill them off several times until they learn their lesson.


     Both men, fortunately, have survived, and a local police car has spotted their crashed auto and the policemen are on their way to check on their well-being. But as the two come back to consciousness yet again, Jae-min reaches over to grab his friend’s cock, the two, who now realize what matters most, beginning to engage to sex as one of the policemen puts his face to the window to check on them.

      The police go their way, realizing that they are needed here, as the two men presumably reacquaint themselves, despite everything that has happened, with what truly matters in life, love and sexual satisfaction.

       I don’t care how many young men in gay films trot down the marriage aisle, how many lesbians finally make it through boot camp, I have never seen a happier ending to an LGBTQ movie as in Lee-song’s No Regret.

 

Los Angeles, January 18-19, 2025

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (January 2025).

 

Saturday, January 18, 2025

Houcem Slouli | Désir conditionnel (Conditional Desire) / 2023

riddle of desire

by Douglas Messerli

 

Houcem Slouli (screenwriter and director) Désir conditionnel (Conditional Desire) / 2023 [15 minutes]

 

What we don’t know at the beginning of Tunisian director Houcem Slouli’s short film of 2023 is gradually revealed without dialogue. Ahmed (Slim Dhib) and Salma (Imene Ghazouani), newly married, live in a life of seeming entrapment. They have almost regulatory sex, but sit with quiet impatience with one another most of the rest of the time.


     Salma’s life seems particularly defined by entrapment. Both characters are shown behind banisters which create bars, but Salma is particularly in a state of stasis, pots boiling over as she swallows chocolate bars and forlornly finger-spoons melted chocolate into her mouth, as if she were desperately trying to salve what she is missing in her life. At one point, the camera catches the decorative bars across a window while at the same moment portraying our heroine upside down in the mirror, hinting at both how her world has shifted her life and entrapped her simultaneously.



     There are no arguments. They have what might be described as dutiful sex before Ahmed rises and goes to the coffee-shop which he apparently owns and operates by himself.

      But gradually, we get glimpses of Ahmed in bed with a man, Cherif (Ghassen Trabelsi).


      Although the married couple sit calmly entrenched in the relationship in the house, their comings and goings on the staircase are noted, at one point, comically, their motions further entrapping each other as she forces him back toward their apartment while he pushes her to retreat back down the staircase.




   Their only conversation with each other consists of two central questions preceded by the statement: “The situation weighs on us.”

    Then, in a “face-off” in which they stare off in different directions:


              Salma: “Why did you say yes?”                   Ahmed: “Why didn’t you say no?”

       Soon after we see Salma with her own same-sex partner, Feriel (Aicha Azzouz) as two giggle together in bed.


       We perceive, in other words, that in the restricted society in which they live, both have chosen a marriage with the other to hide their own queer passions from others. But family has already interceded. Ahmed’s mother wants to know when she might expect them for dinner. Salma’s sister advises her that it is time for her to have a baby. And meanwhile, the very presence of the other puts restrictions of their sexual lives that they obviously did not previously experience.

       Slouli’s work never preaches, and, in fact, says absolutely nothing about their “other” desires and relationships, but in their empty stares, their own formulaic sex we sense their frustrations and impatience.


       Again, these are not exaggerated expressions. One might almost suggest that there is an almost Kabuki like aspect to Slouli’s work, the slightest gesture representing a world of significance making clear that although they have chosen the form of their imprisonment it is prison nonetheless.

       Whether they can maintain the charade, fitting the pieces of their passions into their relationship, or if they might actually grow to love one another as friends is not answered in Slouli’s riddle of how desire can become conditional.

       This film is a truly profound gem about a culture in which the personal sexual desires of individuals are so restricted that he chokes off nearly all joy and life. That these two have, at least, sought out some sort of compromise speaks to their bravery, given the suffering they still must endure.

 

Los Angeles, January 18, 2025

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (January 2025).

 

Krit Komkrichwarakool | Freefall / 2017

leaping into pity

by Douglas Messerli

 

Krit Komkrichwarakool (screenwriter and director) Freefall / 2017 [19 minutes]

 

I wanted to love this short film by Canadian director Krit Komkrichwarakool, particularly because of the gentle acting by both Chris McNally as Lucas—the lover and now full-time nurse of Ivan, suffering from ALS (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, better known in US as Lou Gehrig’s Disease)—and Andrew Jenkins (playing Ivan). Both beautiful men have created an intense quiet drama that deserves the viewer’s attention.

 

   Yet the film is so surrounded by sentimental and, at moments, even kitsch images and devices that it’s hard to focus on the drama itself. First of all, both men are musicians, Lucas an amateur pianist who begins the film playing against the city skyline as busy workers hurry by, and Ivan, evidently a professional pianist who cannot resist joining Ivan that morning, the two of them creating a “beautiful ballad.” The resultant piece, which we later see Ivan—before the development of the disease—performing is described, at several points, as “a song written to his dream,” while “he put the dream into the song.”

     Mostly we see Lucas playing nurse to his lover. The major dramatic incident having happened long ago in the past, the night Ivan was first diagnosed in the hospital, when Lucas determined to finally leave him, unable to deal with what lay ahead (or, as he puts it, “I jumped.”) But obviously he returned, and Ivan is determined—now, after having lost most of his use of his legs, that he is even losing the use of his arms—to know why? Later, Lucas answers the question in the now quite traditional linguistic reversal in situations of love: “I didn’t stay because you needed me. I stayed because I need you.”


     But with all the pretty music, the repeated images of the lone piano player being joined by a partner, and the needy kisses of a man soon to die, this film, alas, is nearly all sentiment. If there are a few witty moments, a mockery of its own skydiving metaphors, they are simply too few such moments to escape the overwhelming sense that we should break out the tears and rend our garments in the desperate fear that is overcoming Ivan and the endless sacrifices made by Lucas.     

     Although Ivan is resentful about Lucas’ possible pity, the film itself wallows in it. And by the end of this short work we feel only pity, since we actually know so very little about the characters themselves.

     Besides playing early morning piano, what did Lucas actually do for a job? What did Ivan’s musical career consist of? Certainly, it cannot have had it its high with the little ditty by composers Samuel Kim and Blake Matthew. And what were our loveable fellows’ lives like before that fateful day by the lake? Did they have any friends? Why has Ivan fired all the other nurses? And what does he mean that they were “flirty”; did they hire only gay nurses? In short, who is this suffering man and his saintly nurse?

      Empathy is one thing, and I’m a born sentimentalist; but if I’m going to invest my tears in a movie I want to know why and what I’m blubbering about.

 

Los Angeles, January 18, 2025

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (January 2025).

Friday, January 17, 2025

Leland Montgomery | Hotter Up Close / 2022

a new sexual planet

by Douglas Messerli

 

Christopher Matias Aguila (screenplay), Leland Montgomery (director) Hotter Up Close / 2022

[16 minutes]

 

Skinny, with a slightly too ovoid face, Chris (Christopher Matias Aguila) is about to celebrate his 30th birthday, but is a bit at odds with the world since his boyfriend, Brad (John David Williams), not only broke up with himand who had been sleeping with what Chris describes as “every animal in the 100 acre wood”— but was utterly dismissed by his former lover.


     His best friend and co-worker Dana (Liz Jenkins) insists he’ll find someone else. “What about that guy who comes into the shop?”

      “Aiden,” Chris nearly chokes on his drinking straw, “Are you insane. If I think Brad is out of my league, Aiden is, like, on a whole other, like sexual planet.”

      But at the moment it’s time for them to rush back to the coffee shop where they work as barristas.

     No sooner do they return to work, however, than the beautiful Aiden (Francisco San Martin) stops by, inviting them both to a pool party, causing Chris to nearly choke on the muffin his has just stuffed into his mouth.



      Chris quickly tries to squirm out of it invite, but Dana accepts for both of them, and even runs out to get a new pair of swimming trunks for her best friend.

      Although Chris has been listening to tapes in order to build up his self-confidence, one look at the stunningly bronzed muscled bodies in and around sends him into a tizzy. There is no way he might be able to fit in. Moreover, he lathers sunbathing lotion on his face that makes him look like a mime.


    Yet, Aiden does come out of the pool to greet the two, although a cutey in a yellow speedo, Marcus (Elijah Olachea) immediately calls him back into the pool to play whatever ball game they were engaged in.

      Chris leaves to pee, but immediately inside the house encounters her former boyfriend Brad, who’s just been fucking a highly effeminate individual named Indigo (Luke Millington-Drake), which makes things even worse. Yet, re-encountering his old flame does put some anger back into the generally spineless Chris, as he puts on his glasses and prepares to meet the world again—even if he knows it’s not his world.


     Fortunately, Leland Montgomery’s short film, with a script by the man who plays Chris, is a fantasy. And the moment Chris leaves the bathroom he runs into Aiden, who’s been looking for him. In fact, he wants a kiss.

      Chris is so stunned, he temporarily halts the kiss he’s dreamt of and demands an explanation, which Aiden gladly provides, explaining that he finds Chris funny, clever, and moreover, cute, and he is love with him. Chris asks one more question, this about Markus, in who Aiden quickly explains he’s not at all interested: “He’s real, real dumb.” And yes, they kiss, transporting the delighted lead actor into a new sexual planet.


       When Chris and Aiden exit the house, the whole party is singing happy birthday to him, Dana with cake in hand and the only straight man at the party (who Aiden declares has a large penis) breathing down her neck. How Aiden knows about his large penis is not explained, although Chris is clearly curious.


       There is absolutely nothing profound about Montgomery’s film, and nothing much to say about it. Except for his use of highly stereotypical figures, it’s what we used to describe as a sweet little flick with lots of pretty boys as a reward for watching it.

 

Los Angeles, January 17, 2025

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (January 2025).

 

Meredith Scott Lynn | Parental Guidance / 2008

the straight kids scold their queer elders

by Douglas Messerli

 

Meredith Scott Lynn (screenwriter and director) Parental Guidance / 2008 [4.40 minutes]

 

Ava (Rachel Nicole Hamilton) and Max (Ryan Ochoa), children, are sitting outside a cabin within which Ava’s two mothers and Max’s two fathers are all busy loudly arguing with each other. Why is never established.



     But Ava and Max are totally fed up and flee to the nearby lake. Max is the first to speak: “Ava, I know you’re hurting. And I can relate to your pain. But we can’t take untimely and dysfunctional communication personally.”

     So begins a conversation between the children that is a level far over their parents’ head, as they commit themselves, if it should ever come to be, to a relationship: “If our winding hearts lead us to one another’s paths in maturation, I will always try to stay mindful of your needs and encourage you to make them known to me.”

     Ava responds with something similar, but these are, after all, amateur child actors and their diction does not always fully translate to my older ears as they breathlessly rush through these long-winded lines.

     But we get the point. They are fully mature, while the parents are like children throwing tantrums.

    If director Meredith Scott Lynn had perhaps extended her one-line satire and created children that behaved closer to the characters in the novels of Ivy Compton-Burnett, in which the children always speak in more grammatically perfect sentences and in a much more intelligent way than the adults, Parental Guidance might have succeeded.


     But frankly, in this silly little piece, we cannot believe either the children nor the adults. Why should two lesbians and two gay men all be shouting at the top of their voices, and why should the

children commit to eternal understanding of one another. If their parents are really that hot-headed it is doubtful that these children would have come to these values or the language they are trying to hurry through. As it is, I might suggest these two obnoxiously correct little beings should enter the cabin and quiet down their maters and paters by simply reminding them there are kids in the house.

     But this little fantasy isn’t interested in a solution, just the obvious juxtaposition of responsible behavior. Sorry, I don’t believe it for a moment. And I was happy that everyone soon after was hurried off stage and back into their real lives.

     Finally, what was the point of this satiric exercise? To point out that even gay men and women lose their cool now and then? That two gay men and two lesbians in the same room generally results in chaos? That future straight children know best? That normalcy is better that being queer? Since its subject is not really about the gay couples it mentions only in passing, the film seems to be moving in the direction of queer baiting, 

 

Los Angeles, January 17, 2025

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (January 2025).

Index R-Z

Angelo Raaijmakers I, Adonis / 2021 Peeter Rabane Firebird / 2021   Tyler Rabinowitz Catalina / 2022 Tyler Rabinowitz See You Soon / 20...