Monday, September 22, 2025

Oliver Hermanus | The History of Sound / 2025

leavetakings and lies

by Douglas Messerli

 

Ben Shattuck (screenplay, based on his book The History of Sound), Oliver Hermanus (director) The History of Sound / 2025

 

I saw this film with my husband Howard early in its theater run rather than waiting for it to appear on Mubi, and both of us quite enjoyed it. Yet, by a few days later when I began this review I realized that my enthusiasm had somewhat waned, and that I wanted to love it far more desperately than I was critically able to.

   That is not say that Oliver Hermanus’ film was not emotionally moving or, perhaps even more important, given the film’s focus, that it was not a truly educative resource of American folk music.


     Beginning in the central character’s Kentucky youth, we are told that the young boy Lionel Worthing (Paul Mescal) has grown up with perfect pitch and the gift (or curse as some might describe it) of synesthesia, where he perceives music as an experience of color, taste, and touch as well as sound. He also possesses a beautiful singing voice, encouraged by the Appalachian musical traditions, and which, through help of a local teacher, allows him entry in 1917 into the New England Conservatory, at which point Shattuck seems to forget, at least in the script, all about his apt pupil’s special talents.

     Once there, after apparently only a brief time, Lionel has already made numerous drinking friends and one night encounters the man who will change his life, David White (Josh O’Connor), a born academic before he actually become one, who seems to know nearly everything about American folk music.

     In fact, it is as he plays in the bar a song which Lionel knows from his youth, that draws the young man to him, and before you know it, Lionel is singing out the lyrics of "Silver Dagger," to teach the soon-to-be teacher a new song:

 

Don't sing love songs; you'll wake my mother

She's sleeping here, right by my side

And in her right hand, a silver dagger

She says that I can't be your bride.

 

All men are false, says my mother

They'll tell you wicked, lovin' lies

The very next evening, they'll court another

Leave you alone to pine and sigh.

 

My daddy is a handsome devil

He's got a chain five miles long

And on every link a heart does dangle

Of another maid he's loved and wronged.

 

Go court another tender maiden

And hope that she will be your wife

For I've been warned and I've decided

To sleep alone all of my life.

 

    At least that’s the version we know today through Joan Baez. Lionel sings a slightly more sad or raw version with which he’s grown up. But if he teaches David a new song, it is the latter who shows him some tricks as the two retire to White’s apartment, half-drunk, playing water games (of the kind that emanate from the mouth, not the penis), and before you know it have fallen into each other’s arms, this time with their cocks involved.


   How the Kentucky boy has become so adaptable to what in 1917 would be recognized as a true sexual deviation in such a short time is not explained. But it is clearly love at first sight, the two men sharing not only music but the bodies through which that music is expressed. We simply have to presume that, unlike most of today’s young movie characters, Lionel was a quick learner with little sexual guilt.

    There is hardly time, however, for the plot to thicken or their love to simmer before the War calls up David, Lionel being too near-sighted for him to serve. After the couple make their sad leave-taking, the Kentucky boy scurries back from the now near empty Conservatory to his boyhood home, there to find much he still loves, including his mother (Molly Price) and a friendly father (Raphael Sbarge) the latter of whom, however, soon after dies, leaving the hard work of farming on his son’s now slightly resentful shoulders.

    Fortunately, White has returned safely from the War, basically of sound mind—although we later discover he is seriously suffering from what today we would describe as Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)—and, as he explains, has received a small grant to travel through the wilds of Maine to record the rural folk music that still remains mostly in the coastal regions. He intends to catalogue and preserve that music on wax cylinders, transcribing the songs’ lyrics by hand.  He gives his friend and place a date and demands he be there to join him: “Meet me Jan. 1 at the Augusta Train Station.”

     Actually, we later discover, it’s all a ruse; there is no grant, no institutional support. The fairly well-off and sophisticated David has simply cooked up a way to return to the love-making that he and Lionel had just begun before the War cut it short.

     It is this “on the road” part of the movie, with the two of them camping out together as they trek through the woodlands of Maine that makes up the longest part of this film, and creates the deep bonds—and sexual frisson—between the two as well as presenting the film’s audience with a small anthology of folk music.

     I love folk music a great deal, and as Lionel later argues as a musicologist, it represents the true heart of the common man. I spent the entire year of 2004 gathering the lyrics of just such an anthology of my popular folk favorites of the US from the 19th Century (Listen to the Mockingbird: American Folksongs and Popular Music Lyrics of the 19th Century), so arguably I have proven my allegiance to the form. But the songs presented in this film, although many of them quite lovely, sound all too much alike and are understandably performed by amateur individuals, the aged, the very young, and the special in these rural communities, not always the best interpreters of the works.


     At the same time, the love between the two men is so hidden and attenuated in this film that it makes Brokeback Mountain look a bit like an out and in-your-face porn film. This grand gay tour comes off more like the faded pictures of a scrapbook than a record of these two handsome beings lusting in a tented outdoors. Despite the rather colorful lives lived by both musicians, the movie itself appears most often to have been filmed through a lens that wiped away the very elements of synesthesia that Lionel claims to experience. As Variety’s Owen Gleiberman describes it: “The film is quite handsome, full of woodsy earth tones and dark clothing, without any bright colors to get in the way of the meditative gloom.”

 

     Peter Bradshaw, writing in The Guardian, nicely summarizes my overall feelings:

 

“Oliver Hermanus’s The History of Sound has admirers in Cannes; but I couldn’t help finding it an anaemic, laborious, achingly tasteful film, originally a short story by Ben Shattuck which has become a quasi-Brokeback Mountain film whose tone is one of persistent mournful awe at its own sadness.

     Hermanus has made great movies in the past including Beauty and Living [and I’d add the 2018 film Moffie] but this is a film that is almost petrified by its own upmarket values, paralysed under the varnish of classiness.

     It’s about two young men in early 20th-century America, a singer and an academic musicologist, who…hike around the hills and backwoods of rural Maine, meeting local people and recording their authentic folk songs on wax cylinders, sleeping under the stars and falling in love.

    Mescal and O’Connor are of course very talented actors and they never do anything other than an impeccable professional job but they have each shown more passion in, variously, Andrew Haigh’s All of Us Strangers [Mescal] and Francis Lee’s God’s Own Country [O’Connor].”

 

      Part of the story, obviously, is that although they do truly love one another, there are problems that remain unspoken between them, and that tension is what forces both to remain relatively cautious in their passion, particularly David who apparently is far more conscious than Lionel of the way society might describe their love. Lionel, on the other hand, is angry for what he perceives as David’s lack of political commitment, particularly when they visit a community that is being closed down by the police so that wealthy men might use the land for their own purposes. When they encounter the police camped out in the woods on their way to the small village they have just left, David does everything he can do but actually vanish from their sight, shirking any sense of responsibility to the lovely people they have just visited and recorded.


      The differences in their personality, however, might still heal, one imagines, if they were given enough time, but this film is actually a story of leave-takings, a betrayal of those who one has come to love or, perhaps, pretended to. And it is soon time, in this part of the film, for David to return to his teaching at Bowdoin College, and for Lionel, following his lover’s advice, to travel off to Europe.

     If David has already left Lionel behind twice, once to go off to War and now to return to the college which he attempts to convince his friend is not a place where he would feel comfortable, the next third of this somewhat over-long film, focuses on Lionel’s serial abandonments, first of the America he so loves, second of the Italy where he sings a very different kind of music in a renowned choral group and has taken up with a gay Italian boy, Luca, as his lover to whom he simply announces that he’s decided to take a job as a conductor at the University of Oxford.


     Once Lionel has relocated to England, a young socialite, Clarissa Roux (Emma Canning) quickly falls in love with him, and is all ready to whisk him off to the altar, but first must seek out the approval of her very wealthy but Bohemian-style parents (Emily Bergl and Michael D. Xavier). On a visit from Lionel to their mansion, they quickly approve, but the young Kentuckian now is beginning to have his doubts about turning straight, particularly since he walks the nights in memory of his time on the near-freezing ground with David. The cold stone floors of the Roux mansion can’t compare. The receipt of a message that his grandfather has died makes for an easy excuse to return to Kentucky to pick up the pieces for his ailing mother, as he quickly kisses his eager would-be wife goodbye forever.


   Back in Appalachia he discovers that he’s too late to help his mother, since she too has died, their modest shack having almost rotted away and now is literally blowing in the wind. After a brief meet up with an old acquaintance, now married, the itinerant Lionel heads off to Bowdoin to reconnect with his true love.

     Once there, however, he discovers a reality that he (and the film’s viewers) might never have imagined. His beloved David has died several years ago, so announces a senior professor who was Department Chairman in David’s tenure. What’s more, the college never commissioned or offered to pay for David’s tour of the Maine coast. No one has any knowledge of wax cylinders. Perhaps, the professor suggests Lionel might want to contact David’s widow Belle (Hadley Robinson) about the existence of such recordings.

     Even more startling than his death and marriage, is the youthful age of David’s wife whom he met and married when she was a 15-year-old teenager, who tells Lionel of her husband's sufferings after returned from the trenches and his basic abandonment of her. She makes it clear that the cause of David’s death was suicide, and reports she has read all of Lionel’s unanswered letters, now strangely relieved to actually meet him.

     She, herself, has remarried and has a child for which she interrupts this dreadful communication several times. She hands Lionel back his letters, and assures him that he is free to look in the attic for the cylinders.

     In short, David has betrayed Lionel time and again, having lied about full sexuality, his life at Bowdoin, and his own purposes for the trip into the Maine wilds. He has also kept Lionel in the dark about the horrors that he himself was suffering from his experiences in wartime Europe.

     This time, we fully understand Lionel’s quick leave-taking without checking the attic for the fruits of musical endeavors.

      I admit that all of what Bradshaw describes as Lionel’s “long goodbye” is sad and painful, even occasionally drawing tears from these tired eyes. But it is difficult after the series of endless lies both told to one another and themselves to fully share in their obvious longing to share one another’s lives. For both there were just too many barriers between them, country boy and sophisticated rich kid, for them to really share their lives together.


     Like so many movies with queer characters of the past, this film kills off the weaker of the two gay men and turns the other into a kind of transformed (we might even describe him as “converted”) individual. In the final scenes Lionel (played by Chris Cooper) has ceased being a man who’s lost his one true same-sex lover, having become a noted ethnomusicologist who in an TV-interview shares his passion for folk music, as well as for classical, pop, and other forms of sound. And guess what? Belle has found those wax cylinders, and seeing him on TV, packed them up and shipped them to him.

    Inside he finds a special one addressed to him: the voice being that of David’s who rather ineffectually explains that he has never come back to life after fighting in the war, apologizing to and thanking Lionel for his time and passion, signing off with the song, this sung in his own voice, “Silver Dagger.”

      The movie plot, accordingly, was also a sort of ruse, a come-on trying to attract us to watch a film filled with a then-nameless love and significant forgotten and now-lost songs, neither of which it even pretends to deliver, the writer and director knowing all along that this was an impossibility given the American culture in which their characters had been nurtured and in which they attempted to exist.

 

Los Angeles, September 22, 2025

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (September 2025).

 

Yen-Chu Chen | 癡癡的愛 (Craving) / 2021

the gift

by Douglas Messerli

 

Yen-Chu Chen (screenwriter and director) 癡癡的愛 (Craving) / 2021 [16 minutes]        

 

This remarkable Taiwanese short film by Yen-Chu Chen reads almost like a Kafka fable. A young man, Wei Jie (Ting-Jhen Hsu) is tending his fish in a small bowl, when a police officer (Hao-Zhe Lai) shows up.

    There has been a complaint—Wei Jie later imagines that it is from the old woman who lives below him—about noise. There is no evidence of any partying or that the rather admittedly smart-alecky resident has been making any noise whatsoever.


     Nonetheless, the police officer demands his identification, which the young man provides, joking that it is false; but admitting it is just a joke when he perceives that the young policeman seems to believe him. The policeman, accordingly, demands to see the full apartment which consists of just a small living room space and a bedroom, the very sight of the latter somewhat disturbing the policeman.

     He cannot observe, however, any real problems and prepares to leave. He puts his shoes back on and gets as far as the elevator before turning back, again knocking at the young man’s door and greeting the surprised tenant with a passionate kiss, which, after a pause, Wie Jie enthusiastically returns.


     Putting handcuffs on the lone apartment-dweller, the handsome policeman begins to fuck him, the two engaging in what appears to be quite fulfilling sex.

    Finally, the policeman has to leave, but begs to see his new lover the next evening. However, the young man declares he has other business that night and asks for a “rain check.” He raises his hands so that the policeman might release him from his handcuffs, which the officer does, while also stealing the young man ‘s keys which hang from a nearby hook.

    The next evening, the policeman arrives, opening the door, and wandering briefly through the young man’s living room, leaving him a small gift-wrapped box on a table.


     At that very moment, however, he hears a noise in the bedroom, and cautiously opens the door to discover his new-found lover having sex with another man (Young-Cing Liao).

     An overpowering rage suddenly overcomes him as he rushes in, after retrieving his gift, and brutally beats the stranger to death, pounding him over and over with the little box, while the young man, still in bed, pleads for mercy and forgiveness.

     Suddenly the policeman’s rage is over, and the realization of what he has just done washes over him in gestures of regret. He hands over the gift to the young man who quite hesitantly opens the box.

    Inside is a pair of handcuffs. Slowly, he hesitantly and somewhat apologetically offers up his arm, to which the policeman attaches one end of the cuff, while connecting the other to his own wrist. Together the two engage once more in passionate sex, the dead body lying on the floor near the bed.


    Throughout this film, it appears that the cop is a rookie—at least when it comes to gay sex, having been suddenly overwhelmed by a kind of love at first sight that drives him to want to possess the object of his desire. It seems that in doing his duty as a guardian of city, he has bottled up a craving so intense that when it is released, he simply does not no how to control it.

    But the power of this short work is that it offers up no attempts of explanations, resolves, or possible solutions. It is simply what it represents, a snapshot of a powerful desire that ends in revenge, murder, and a reiteration of the sexual release, which might be described as hinting at something close to a gay version of the desire portrayed so vividly in the Japanese director Nagisa Ōshima’s unforgettable In the Realm of the Senses (1976).

 

Los Angeles, September 22, 2025

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (September 2025).

Sunday, September 21, 2025

Zaher Saleh | War Within / 2017

the impediment

by Douglas Messerli

 

Zaher Saleh (screenwriter and director) War Within / 2017 [4 minutes]

 

We have seen the struggle before in many dozens of short films, a young man of faith, in the case a Muslim man named Khaled (Ryan Tschetter) struggling through prayer to release him from the inner demons of male desire, but in the process the visions of that homosexual desire only increasing. There are brief moments with his disapproving mother, a moment of momentary transformation when the sufferer puts on lipstick, a scene with him and several half-naked gay men on a couch, and finally a dinner, with the mother presiding, with a gay friend (Richard Cortez) whom he kisses.

     That kiss clearly represents his having come to terms with his sexuality, despite the remaining guilt and continued prayers.


      The problems with this version of the inner turmoil most gay men feel in coming out is the short film’s length (not much can be complexly expressed in only 4 minutes); the lack of any innovative film techniques (the work is filmed with camera viewing the figure in half face, full face, and head bowed in prayer in a series of monotonal browns and purples); the lack of nearly any attempt at characterization other the religious stereotype (the actors are not even credited); along with the unoriginality of its subject.    

     The struggle is based on real experience I am certain, but none of that is fully conveyed to the viewer of this short work, and we are left, yet again, I am afraid of perceiving faith as merely an impediment to the expression of life.

 

Los Angeles, September 21, 2025

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (September 2025).  

Barbara Willis Sweete, Phelim McDermott, and Julian Crouch | The Enchanted Island / 2012 [The Metropolitan Opera HD production]

everybody's opera

by Douglas Messerli

 

Jeremy Sams (writer and conceiver), with music by George Frederic Handel, Antonio Vivaldi, Jean-Philippe Rameau, and numerous others, Barbara Willis Sweete (film director) Phelim McDermott and Julian Crouch (stage directors) The Enchanted Island / 2012 [The Metropolitan Opera HD production]

 

Perhaps for the first time since the days of Baroque opera, an opera company, in this case the New York's Metropolitan, performed a pastiche, a mix of operatic works assembled and woven into a new story. As several critics noted, this might have been a disastrous mish-mash of music and story, but with the encouragement of the Met's general manager, Peter Gelb, Jeremy Sams' selections intertwined with elements of the plots of Shakespeare's The Tempest and A Midsummer Night's Dream, the opera community has a charming new work that threatens to become a standard in opera houses. Certainly I would go back for another visit to this quite satisfying piece.

     Prospero (David Daniels), having taken over the "enchanted" island of the title's name, has at first loved and then abandoned Sycorax (Joyce DiDonato), a sorceress banned to the dark side of the kingdom, now furious for the results. Prospero and his daughter Miranda, having stolen away Sycorax's spirit servant, Ariel (Danielle de Niese), spend most of their days reading books filled with the formulas of potions and magic spells, attended by Caliban, Sycorax's dunder-headed and brutish son. He, she argues, using him to gain entry back into Prospero's sight, should be the inheritor of the island! Yet it is clear, Caliban has little talent to rule anything.


     Passing by this isolated island is a ship bearing Prince Ferdinand, a likely suitor for Miranda's hand. Determined to marry her off to Ferdinand, Prospero plans to summon up a storm that will bring the Prince to is island and into the arms of his beloved daughter. Ariel, who is charged to carry out the spell, however, chooses—in part because of the influence of Sycorax—the wrong ship, and sets the storm upon a boat carrying four Athenian lovers, who wind up upon the island instead of Ferdinand. Confusing the two males of the foursome with Ferdinand, Ariel serves them a magic potion, which brings all those involved, Miranda, Helena (Layla Claire), Hermia (Elizabeth DeShong), Demetrius (Paul Appleby), and Lysander (Elliot Madore), into a confusing series of heteronormative and same-gender mismatches, each falling in love with the others, until it is difficult to know whom is madly in love with whom.

     IF in Cosí fan tutte, it doesn't seem to matter, these figures one by one they feel betrayed, confused by the vagaries of the heart, while Caliban cooks up his own scheme to be loved by one and all, men, women, animals, and demons from the dark.

     As in Baroque opera, each figure gets his or her own say in a series of beautiful arias, some well-known, others long forgotten.


     It is only by calling up Neptune (Plácido Domingo), at first furious for the interruption, then magnanimous in his help, that order is restored, Miranda married to Ferdinand, Sycorax restored to her proper position and the Athenian foursome paired with whomever they might at the moment desire.

     The frothy results are a delight, but would not have been so amazing without the wonderful costumes and sets of Phelim McDermott and his team (who previously put together the set and costumes for Satyagrapha). Every moment of this splendid work is underlined with their splendiferous wit.

     In a post-postmodern culture such as ours, it is only fitting that pastiche might come back into fashion, and if The Enchanted Island is any sign of its pleasures, bring it on. As the opera closes, even its performers seem enchanted by the experience as they joyously sing "Now a bright new day is dawning." Bringing together numerous composers, this is everybody's opera and an opera for everyone.

 

Los Angeles, March 16, 2012

Reprinted from USTheater, Opera, and Performance (March 2012).

Wes Anderson | Moonrise Kingdom / 2012

finding family

by Douglas Messerli

 

Wes Anderson and Roman Coppola (screenwriters), Wes Anderson (director) Moonrise Kingdom / 2012

 

Over the past several years there has been a spate of movies and plays devoted to and influenced by the tales of J. M. Barrie concerning Peter Pan. I reviewed two of those, Mabou Mines' Peter and Wendy (see My Year 2011) and, more recently, Rick Elice's Peter and the Starcatcher. Now we have Wes Anderson's Moonrise Kingdom that, although it has no direct references to the Peter Pan story, clearly has relationships to it. I suppose that in a time when "centers collapse"—as I maintain in this year's cultural annual—we should be prepared for children striking out on their own, seeking worlds or attempting to create new worlds that parents have failed at; or, as my movie-going companion, Thésèse Bachand put it, it is a time when children must parent the adults.

     Anderson's films, as several critics have noted, have always occurred at the intersection of children's fantasies and adult lunacies, of which there can be no better example than Anderson's most recent film. Just as in his 2004 film, The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou (see My Year 2004), Anderson's new film begins with a world in miniature, a representation of the sets we will soon encounter on a larger scale, which both underscores the theatricality that is so central to his art and suggests the toyland-like conceptions of Anderson's fantasies. Color, decoration, and costume dominate as he introduces, one by one, the cast of eccentric beings who are at the heart of this director's vision. Of course, this may seem coy and even fey to many moviegoers: both Bachand and my companion Howard found Moonrise Kingdom to be slightly irritating just on this account. Yet that is precisely why I so enjoy Anderson's art. From the very start, he makes clear that the story he will tell is "made up" out of series of component parts, a tale spun by a storyteller who seems to be creating the work as he goes along.


     Anderson makes that process clear by beginning his work with Benjamin Britten's well-known Young Person's Guide to the Orchestra, in which the composer, using a theme by Henry Purcell, takes apart the orchestra instrument by instrument and then rejoins them to help his listeners perceive how a work of music comes together, explaining how each instrument finds, metaphorically speaking, a role in the family of the whole. Anderson's metaphor is an important one, not only in representing his structural techniques, but in setting up his thematic concerns, since his heroine and hero, Suzy Bishop (Kara Hayward) and Sam Sakusky (Jared Gilman) have serious difficulties in finding their voices within familiar structures. Suzy is perceived as a troubled child—the fact of which she has discovered through a guide her mother has left on the top of the refrigerator—desperate to escape the hostile environment of the Bishop house, wherein her lawyer mother, Laura (Frances McDormand) —escaping her life in dreary affair with the local police captain (Bruce Willis)—is unhappily married to her lawyer husband Walt (Bill Murray), a man so disappointed with his lot in life that he wishes the impending storm would sweep him up and away, as if he might discover a new world similar to that which Dorothy encounters in Oz. Suzy is simply another sore issue in their failed relationship. When she goes missing the two respond accordingly:

 

                         Laura Bishop: Does it concern you that your daughter has

                                                 just run away from home?

                         Walt Bishop: That's a loaded question.

 

     Sam is an equally troubled boy, but his situation is even worse than Suzy's, for he has no family, both of his parents having mysteriously died, leaving him imprisoned in a large family of orphans in the Billingsley compound (certainly one of Anderson's private jokes, Barbara Billingsley having been the name of the actor who played June Cleaver in the utopia of American family life, Leave It to Beaver). Notified of Sam's escape from an island scout camp, Mr. Billingsley reports that they cannot allow him to return home, to the shock and bewilderment of Police Captain Sharp and Scout Master Ward (Edward Norton). The precocious Sam has difficulty surviving not only in that home, filled with delinquents, but in the scout camp with his equally delinquent khaki-panted peers.


     Sam and Suzy have met, quite by accident, one year earlier during a performance of Britten's children's opera, Noye's Fludde (see My Year 2011), based on the medieval mystery play. Showing us a flashback of their encounter and immediate attraction to one another, the director introduces yet more structural elements of his film, in particular, the pairing of animals and humans and the threat of a disastrous flood, which as the film's narrator (Bob Balaban) foretells, is about to settle over the New Penzance Island of 1965. Together, using Sam's scouting skills and Suzy's imagination and pluck, the two trek the island, attempting to outwit parents, police, scouts, and scouting master, as they seek a new paradise with one another on an isolated cove. For a short time they manage to elude their would-be captors, escaping, as Peter and Wendy, into a kind of magical Neverland where they might explore life as intelligent and sexual beings, hoping to establish the identities so rejected by all the others they have encountered before.

     Ultimately, of course, they are tracked down and returned to a "civilization" that further demeans them, the Bishops enforcing tighter restrictions upon their daughter and the Billingsleys ousting Sam from the only home he has known.

     When the authorities receive a call from Social Services (hilariously performed by Tilda Swinton, dressed in a kind of Salvation Army-like blue garb), the Police Captain, Scout Master, and the telephone operator are appalled by her cruel efficiency as she hints that the wayward boy may be sent to an orphanage or even given shock-therapy for his behavior.

      Even the bullying scouts, startled to hear of these potential tortures for their former camp member, decide to get involved, helping Suzy to escape and bringing her to Sam, now locked away on a boat belonging to the Police Captain. This time, they all run off together, Suzy reading to the boys just as Wendy has read stories to the lost boys and Peter Pan.


      Having now been abandoned by an entire scouting troop, the perplexed Scout Master Ward, Police Captain Sharp, and the Bishops again go in pursuit of the missing children, with the Captain Hook and Crocodile-in-one, Social Services right behind them.

     For once, I will resist revealing the rest of this delicious plot, saying only that in the brewing storm, lightning strikes thrice and the adult world is devastated before the children are miraculously saved, Sam finding a home with the lonely Police Captain and Suzy returning to the "darling" Bishops' snug house. Just as Mrs. Bishop formerly snuck off for trysts with her Police Captain lover, so now does Captain Sharp bring his new-found son to the Bishop house so that Sam might secretly visit the young Suzy. Each has found a family, in themselves and with others, bringing their distinct voices into the orchestra of life.

     Anderson cleverly repeats this theme once more even in the credits, as Sam narrates the orchestral components of composer Alexandre Desplat's original score.

      Corny? Perhaps. Obsessive? Obviously. Charming? I'll end with a quote from Anthony Lane's excellent review of this film from The New Yorker:

 

                          Who knows, we may look back on Anderson's works as we

                          do on the boxes of Joseph Cornell—formal troves of frippery,

                          studded with nostalgic private jokes, that lodge inexplicably

                          in the heart.

 

Los Angeles, June 4, 2012

Reprinted from Nth Position [England] (June 2012). 

Jafar Panahi and Mojtaba Mirtahmasb | ین فیلم نیست‎‎ (This Is Not a Film) / 2011, USA 2012

how to tell a film

by Douglas Messerli

 

Jafar Panahi and Mojtaba Mirtahmasb (directors) این فیلم نیست‎‎ (This Is Not a Film) / 2011, USA 2012

 


For the last several years, because of his house arrest and his inability to make films, movie director Jafar Panahi has been creating works that “are not what they seem,” or directing films that subvert the genre and save him from the censors. This Is Not a Film is precisely that, not a film but a film about film, about how one might direct a film and how one might tell a film narrative without actually realizing it.

   Locked up in his comfortable Teheran apartment on a day his family members have traveled to celebrate the Iranian festival Chaharshanbe Suri, preceding New Year’s eve, Panahi turns on his camera to record, in documentary style, a day in his life, including his awakening and breakfast. Determined to find a way around his ban, Panahi calls up his friend Mojtaba Mirtahmasb, and asks his to take up the camera, while he begins to read and, through the use of masking tape and imagination, to realize a movie that he was planning, but can no longer make, about a young girl, much like him, who has been locked up in her own home because she has determined to attend the university.


     The parallels between the locked-away girl and his personal condition are crucial, in that they convey the impossible frustration and desolation of a society closing individuals away from their destinies and creative endeavors. But almost as soon as he has begun to play out the scenario of a young girl locked away in her small room from the view only of a young boy who appears outside her window, the director gives up, realizing that, of course, you cannot “tell” a movie. As evidence he gives the example from one of his earlier films, showing a scene where an amateur actor suddenly behaves in a strange way that the director might never have imagined possible. A shot from yet another movie shows how a simple set design reveals much more about the character than he might ever have imagined.

      In short, the director shows us how film is not just about its narrative, the script, but about how actors, cinematographer, scenery director, and the others work together to transform what might have been imagined. Telling a movie is impossible. Or is it?


     Although billed as a sort of documentary, Panahi’s and Mirtahmasb’s film, pretending to be shot in a single day—the film as actually shot over a period of 4 days for a cost of around $4,000—the work incorporates a great many personal and political events which come together to make a far larger statement than they seem to represent. Panahi’s daughter’s pet lizard, Iggy, plays a large role as he roams the rather posh apartment, crawling up bookcases filled with books, and clawing his way behind them, casting a rather eerie presence which, clearly, is not unlike the Iranian officials. He refuses to eat his usual diet of lettuce and seems only happy when he is fed a few pieces of cheese, evidently a lizard delicacy. As Panahi complains at one moment, “your claws, Iggy, are hurting me, get off me, you’re hurting me.” And the very presence of the lizard fills anyone who is not a lizard lover with the sense of reptilian danger.


      As usual on this Iranian holiday, people set off enormous fireworks—even though they have been recently banned. And the city, which we glimpse through the many apartment windows, seems to be entirely on fire. His phone mates and his visitor complain of not only the impossible traffic but seem to suggest the entire of Teheran has gone slightly mad. “Traffic is impossible.”

     And the final appearance of a garbage-collecting young man, a student in Art Research, substituting for his sister, brilliantly introduces us to another perspective in the Iranian underworld. This handsome young man, embarrassed for his appearance (he keeps asking if he can change his shirt) and the smell of the garbage he is collecting, recognizes the famous director immediately, and is stunned by Panahi’s interest in him, as the filmmaker accompanies him in the elevator, floor by floor, until he reaches the lobby in making his garbage-gathering rounds.


      If nothing else, we can only hope for the future in the grace and comprehension of this young man, who, once they reach the lobby, advises Panahi to remain behind so that he will be safe. It’s clear the limits of reality are perceived by all.

     In the end, Panahi has found a way to “tell” his film visually, with amateur actors that do precisely what he has advertised, behave in way that you might not expect. This Is Not a Film is a totally understated work that profoundly makes its message clear through all the elements of cinema, while pretending, nonetheless, not to use them. It is, quite clearly, a radical expression of what it means to make movies in a society that cannot accept them, but yet having an audience desperate for their messages.

     Panahi put this “movie” on a flash drive, which was sneaked out of Iran in a birthday cake. The movie was shown, as a surprise entry, in the 2011 Cannes Film Festival, and later appeared at the New York Film Festival, demonstrating that the collapsed society cannot truly censor an imaginative mind.

    

Los Angeles, February 13, 2017

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (February 2017).

Index R-Z

Angelo Raaijmakers I, Adonis / 2021 Peeter Rabane Firebird / 2021   Tyler Rabinowitz Catalina / 2022 Tyler Rabinowitz See You Soon / 20...