Monday, August 17, 2026

Christian Jacob Ramón | Hard / 2021

other than sex

by Douglas Messerli

 

Christian Jacob Ramón (screenwriter and director) Hard / 2021 [12 minutes]

 

In terms of its narrative, Christian Jacob Ramón’s 2021 film Hard is pretty much a one-liner. But thematically it exposes a problem that probably happens for more commonly than men, both gay or straight, would easily admit.

   

     The figures of Ramón’s short film (Chris Montavlo and Nash Ferguson) meet up for a sex date, both finding one another attractive and personally appealing. And after a short period of introduction, they get intimate, one of them suddenly discovering the age-old problem that happens sometimes even when one is most sexually excited: he can’t get an erection.


     After a brief pause and an inquiry of the unafflicted one—“Is everything okay?”—they go at it again with the same result.

     But when even self-arousal doesn’t help the man with a limp penis grows frustrated and particularly upset by the other’s question, “What, am I just not your type?” Assuring him that it’s not at all the situation, he insists that this has never happened to him before. His friend apologizes for the “joke,” arguing, “Bodies are weird,” as the two simply lay out of the bed together to talk—something which alas couples in one-night-stands often don’t take time out for.


     The one with the “problem” finally suggests his bedmate tell him an embarrassing story about himself, which might make him feel better. After some hesitation, the other agrees, telling a story about how, forced to take Taekwondo lessons as a child, he chooses a fast-food restaurant which he and his parents have visited before one of the sessions to pretend he was sick, mocking gagging. The people in line immediately ask if the child is okay, his father insisting that he’s fine, “he’s just faking it,” as the boy continues without anyone, the others in line or the employees responding, finally having no alternative but to give up and stop.

      So begins a mutual game played out between the two, a demand, for example, to identify who of the three quintessential Charlie’s Angels the other would like to be (for my younger readers, he is speaking of the TV crime series that ran on ABC from 1976-1981). They talk about their coming out experiences and share some of their salient moments from the past.

      The two cuddle up in bed, the one suggesting this was not the way it was supposed to turn out. But, in fact, it appears to turn out better. Finally, the one with the erection masturbates, assuring that the entire experience has been truly a joyful one. But the other is still unsure, particularly when his friend suggests, “I have an early morning tomorrow,” as he readies to leave.

      Such situations are difficult for all men, but particularly for gay men who simply statistically don’t get the opportunities to meet that many other men with whom they’re truly interested in developing a relationship. And the presence of two male egos brings with it a sort of unspoken macho demand: sex is after all the focus of first gay encounters, although perhaps that should change.


      Accordingly, when his friend leaves, he curses himself for his inability to perform, fearful of never seeing the young man he enjoyed again. On the phone to a friend after, he admits that he can’t help feeling that he “ruined it.” A knock on the door announces the return of his date, who has left his coat behind. But also explains that he truly does have to work early the next morning, that he truly did enjoy his time together with the other, and that “I’d be perfectly happy to take this slower….I mean, I’m still in this if you want.” They kiss, and the moment he leaves, obviously, the man’s erection returns.

 

Los Angeles, January 16, 2023

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (January 2023).

Arthur Hiller | Plaza Suite / 1971

the click of a door

by Douglas Messerli

 

Neil Simon (screenplay, based on his 1968 stage play), Arthur Hiller (director) Plaza Suite / 1971

 

I’ve yet to find one film source of guide that has not described the three short plays by Neil Simon, written under the name Plaza Suite other than as comedies. Perhaps it’s just the times or my current age, but this time returning to these pieces, although once again Simon peppers his script with one-line zingers, only the last piece might truly fit the comedic category to my way of thinking, since it ends somewhat happily with the marriage of a young woman terrified of the ceremony in which she must play the bride.

     In may be, in part, the result the loud-mouthed, angry-old-man antics of actor Walter Matthau, who has utterly no ability for nuance; Simon, it is rumored, hated the acting in this film in general, particularly Matthau. Or perhaps it is just the director Arthur Hiller, who despite the numerous comic films he churned out in his career, is not truly a director with a light touch. More importantly, it is the series of events that the first two playlets that seem to me so very sad and reveal, along with the third work, a kind of cynicism of married life that is embedded in nearly all of Simon’s plays, including even early, more comic works such as Come Blow Your Horn, Barefoot in the Park, and The Odd Couple.


      I’ve never been a big fan of Simon’s works, but one, in particular, in its somewhat bitter dimensions seems too have more heft than his comic recordings of squabbling couples.

     If you’ve never seen this triplet offering, all three pieces take place in the same room, 719 of the Plaza Hotel, a legendary institution which almost didn’t survive a transformation of its building into a condominium reconstruction—which already in 1971 the seemingly prescient Simon script wondered whether, in its aged elegance, might be torn down.

      In the first piece, Karen Nash (the always marvelous Maureen Stapleton, who played all 3 central women figures of this work on the Broadway stage) has traveled from her suburban home to the Plaza, planning to meet her husband Sam there to commemorate their 24th anniversary in the very suite in which they celebrated their wedding night.

      Stapleton, who in the script is supposed to be around 48 or 49 was actually 46 at the time of filming (which is funny, given Sam’s comment that when she forgets her age she always rounds it up, not down like other women); yet, she looks older and speaks more like she was a woman in her late 60s, probably because then old age was defined as arriving earlier than it currently does in those decades. In any event, she has clearly lost her youth, and carries herself like an older woman, wearing plastic galoshes over her shoes, and walking with a definite death-leaning slump.


     Her husband has clearly been missing in action for a long while, spending more and more nights in the city because of his work, and she hopes that this celebratory evening might even ignite new interest in their relationship. There is something wonderfully innocent in her desires, as she chattily explains to bellhops why she is at the hotel and why she is now inhabiting this particular room, as she orders up the same meal—hors d'oeuvres (with anchovies; in Simonian logic they eventually appear with anchovies) and a French white wine (which with Simonian logic arrives late).

     When Sam finally arrives, he is, apparently as he has been many a night, in a huff, determined to read through a contract between busy calls to his secretary Miss McCormack (Louise Sorel). Obviously, he hasn’t a clue why his wife has trekked into the city to meet him, nor is he in any mood, even when she explains the occasion, to take any joy in her company. They argue about everything from her birthdate, the floor on which they spent their wedding night together—he claims it as the 8th floor—and even the number of nights he has gone missing from his suburban home.

     Despite her plucky determination to offer up a beautiful evening to Sam, moreover, it becomes clear that she also has a barbed tongue and, in her pain over the failure of their relationship, is equal to his dismissals of her, mocking Sam’s attempts to think himself thin and his natural cranky behavior. At moments, they both attempt to stop the endless bickering, but always it begins again almost immediately, as the two clearly have lost touch with any of the love they might once have shared.

     When the secretary final does show up with a set of botched papers—which means, of course, that he will have to return to the office—Karen finally pleads with him to stay and almost jokingly, but obviously with deeper inner fears, claims he might be having an affair with Miss McCormack.

     We only have to wait a few dramatic beats to hear him admit the truth, that he is having an affair with her and, despite his attempts, has no will to cut it off. Clearly always ready to play the victim, Karen suggests she is willing to forgive him, but her pleas that he might give their own relationship another try goes unheeded, and he walks out the door, leaving her to imagine the loss of her husband for the rest of her life.

     Our final view of her might almost be out of Stapleton’s early film, Miss Lonelyhearts, with overnight case in hand, trudging back the next morning to the train that will take her back to her empty house. If this is not tragic—even she excoriates her husband for the banality of his love interest, secretary and boss—certainly Hiller did not intend us to laugh.

     The reason I returned to this rather insubstantial film was become of the second playlet which stars Barbara Harris (who died on August 21st of this year; Simon dying five days later), in which another suburban housewife, Muriel Tate, drives into the city to meet up with a former beau, Jesse Kiplinger (again Matthau), who is now a successful Hollywood producer.

     Muriel is a sort of less-wealthy housewife who might be right out of Stephen Sondheim’s musical Company, which appeared only 2 years after the Broadway premiere of the Simon play, being one of the women who lunch ordering up another “vodka stinger.” Indeed, despite her best intentions, Muriel is quite delighted by Jesse’s attempts to get her back into bed; and while endlessly saying, like Groucho Marx, “I must be going,” she is both attracted to the “stingers” and the possibilities of sex.


    Like nearly all male seducers, once Jesse has lured Muriel back into his room for yet another round of drinks, he clicks the lock of the door shut. But in doing so, Simon, at least in the #MeToo generation, sucks any possible comic oxygen out of his work, leaving us with a kind of bitter Don Giovanni-like rape. If Muriel has another sexual round with Jesse—we never see the final conclusion of his sexual actions, but we have to presume it—we are certain that it will be quite uneventful for both; even if they did once, as kids, have great sex, they are no longer children and, as our nearly inarticulate President spoke the other night, the “lingering stench” of their now middle-aged bodies won’t be pleasant.

     What is pleasant in this short piece is the kind of “ditzy” performance by Harris, who balances her horror of the event with her absolute delight in the fact that, given the unspoken sexual failure of her husband Larry, someone might still find her attractive. She’s ready from the start, despite her assertions, to drink herself in oblivion in order to submit, very gradually, into a slave of temporary pleasure—constantly postponing the time she must be home from 3:00 o’clock, to 4:00m and finally to 7:00 to allow herself the latitude for one last jump back into adolescent romance. She and we both know, Muriel will face only utter disappointment, and that the next time Jesse is in town, she will also demur. But for Muriel it is a temporary ointment for the disappointments of her life.


     If this slow rape is funny, I must be missing something. It is now among the sad stories we daily hear about women, you and older, being trapped by power, far, and sublimated desire.

    The last piece of this not-so-funny comic opera might well rhyme with the central character of the piece (although never fully seen except for a couple of quick camera flicks), with the strangely waspish name, particularly given the overtly stereotypical Jewish portrait of her not-so-loving parents, “Mimsey” (Jenny Sullivan), while reminding me of the structure of this work, “flimsy.”


     Here, as in both the previous plays, a door suddenly clicks into a lock, as the young would-be-bride closes herself into the bathroom of the same hotel suite, perhaps the only way to truly escape that claustrophobic suite with its mean history and her parents, equally hysteric—the male in Matthau’s case is the primary example of that word—and the money-oriented life her family leads.

     Roy Hubley, after all, is paying for a highly expensive wedding which his daughter is now suddenly refusing to attend; and his wife Norma (Lee Grant) is bout to lose “face” and be treated with further abuse from her husband.

     At the heart of this sillier piece are numerous pratfalls, torn tuxedos, rained-upon head-wear finery, ridiculous treks across the outer ledges of the famed hotel, along with entries into other people’s bedrooms and endless calls from the panicked parents of the groom who must face the growing impatience of the wedding-goers.

     So weak is this playlet, that all it takes is the rather chubby, long-haired groom Borden Eisler (Thomas Carey) to stand outside the locked-away Rapunzel and shout out, “Mimsey, cool it,” and out she comes, ready to ride away on his motor-bike. Well, this, finally, is a comedy, as empty as it can get, like an after-thought of the deeply disturbing betrayals we have previously witnessed. I suppose I might even have laughed, except that I am afraid Mimsey can’t “cool it,” given her horrific childhood, for long. Someday, far too soon, she will trek back into the city to see the empty shell of her dreams.

 

Los Angeles, September 23, 2018

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (September 2018).

    

Stanley Dunmore | Sunset Lullaby / 2024

the moment love is lost

by Douglas Messerli

 

Stanley Dunmore (screenwriter and director) Sunset Lullaby / 2024 [14 minutes]

 

Two beautiful young men, Adam (Felix Edwaards) and Noah (Matteo Piombino) drive into a field of tall grasses and flowers, presumably to picnic and spend the afternoon making love. But we realize from the beginning, through their silences and inexplicable short outbursts that something is wrong.


    As they lay, almost in paradisical splendor among the tall flowers and weeds, we begin to perceive their problems. The time is a bit further into the future, 2066 in this sci-fi love tale, and by this time androids and human beings have naturally come to cohabit, in this case representing almost perfect couples such as Adam (the human being) and Noah (the android), living together and fully enjoying one another’s company.

     But there is a catch, as there generally is in all sci-fi fictions. Every 25 years, the androids undergo a systematic reprogramming that automatically erases all of their memories; and this is about to happen on this auspicious day, Adam terrified by the prospect, and Noah attempting for at least the last few hours of his cognizant reality to not be reminded of what he has known will happen all his life.

     This couple attempt to play together for a while; they simply attempt to enjoy the last moments of their time together, Noah arguing that there are always fragments of memory left, and that surely he will not be able to forget all of their beautiful times together. Adam takes photographs of his lover, surely the only reminders of a lost relationship, those pictures we are carry somewhere on our computers or in our wallets.


     The story thus becomes a kind of parable for losing any lover, to death or—although this short British film does not bring up this issue—when one lover loses the other to a disease such as

Alzheimer’s or even AIDS, where death came sometimes quickly stealing away all the time the two had invested in one another’s loving.

      As the sunset begins to invade their spectacular afternoon, Noah begs his friend to sing him a lullaby about the sunset, trying his best to recall the tune, but unable suddenly to remember it, and falling in frustration into the other’s arms.

      When he awakens, surely, he will not probably even understand why he is in the other’s arms, and may even be shocked by the encounter. Who knows, in his new reincarnation, whether or not he will even be gay? This film does not, fortunately, take us there, but leaves the two in their desperate last moments, both attempting to recall the love they shared. But then, can any of us remember all the love we shared with another? I have lived with the same man for now 56 years, and my memory is still strong; but even I can’t remember our early passions, the full reasons why we were so suddenly drawn together and determined to live our lives with one another. No matter how great our memories are, we cannot relive our youths, out passions, our fears, our desires.

     We are all, in some manner, reprogrammed, focused now on our elderly lives leading to our graves. Love may still be there, but it is not the same as our youthful visions and perceptions of the future. As the greatest of composers, writers, dancers, and artists have always perceived: love is always transitory.

 

Los Angeles, August 17, 2026

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema (August 2026).

Rodolphe Marconi | Basket et Maths (Basketball & Maths) / 2009 [TV movie]

division and multiplication

by Douglas Messerli

 

Sébastien Perroy (screenplay), Rodolphe Marconi (director) Basket et Maths (Basketball & Maths) / 2009 [TV movie] [7 minutes]

 

This quite sweet short film is about two French basketball players on the same high school team, Jérôme (Jean-Denis Marcoccio) and Cédric (Aurélien Baty).


     Already in the first frames of this 7-minute film, Jérôme fantasizes that he comes out to his immediately accepting parents, explaining that he is in love with Cédric. But this is just fantasy, neither we nor he know how his mother (Katherine Erhardy) or father (Gilles Barande) might really respond to such an open admission. His mother is mostly interested in her son finishing his cereal.


     Soon after, we learn that Jérôme has been helping tutor his friend with his math studies. After he helps Cédric with a math solution, the boy not even able to comprehend what a denominator is,  

Cédric suddenly leans forward and quickly kisses his friendly tutor on the mouth, immediately explaining that what happened “never happened.”


     But now, more than ever, Jérôme is smitten with Cédric, and can hardly keep his eyes of his naked derriere in the gym locker room, where he is angrily confronted by his friend. Jérôme even admits his obsession to his fellow friend Romain (Ugo Venel), who suggests that he is simply in love with Cédric, and notes how wonderful that is.

     Yet the boy has no peace, knowing that it now appears he has no place in his supposed straight friend’s life. Jérôme sits home alone on his bed, sadly pondering his situation.

      But then suddenly, in this delightful little fantasy, Cédric shows up at his door, asking it they might play a few hoops. How could Jérôme resist?

      And he soon discovers that Cédric has broken up with his girlfriend Chloé, his friend assuring him that math lessons can begin again. The two walk off seemingly knowing that they have now opened to the door to their full relationship.

      Apparently, this short film was presented on French TV in 2009, another example of how retrograde US television still is.

 

Los Angeles, August 17, 2026

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (August 2026).

Shariff Nasr | El Houb (The Love) / 2022

his last night in the closet

by Douglas Messerli

 

Shariff Nasr, Philip Delmaar, Fahd Larhzaoui, Tofik Dibi, and Sahil Amar Aissa (screenplay), Shariff Nasr (director) El Houb (The Love) / 2022

 

About a week and half ago I posted an essay on a short film, Stille Dorst (High Tide), by Dutch director Claire Zhou about a Dutch-Morocco man who has left his wife and comes out as gay, an incident which she explained was based on the fact that so many Moroccan married men spent secret time outside their marriages in gay activities.

     And now I have just seen a truly powerful film directed by Shariff Nasr which confirms and more fully describes just that problem, El Houb (The Love), which I watched as part of the NewFest (The New York Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Film Festival), a work which all critics and publicists described as a “brutal” and “serious,” but which also looks at the issue with some “funny” or “hilarious” results.

      Let me begin my making it absolutely clear, although the work is mostly serious, it is actually a not only a hysterically funny drama but close to being psychologically hysterical in its presentation the central character’s—Karim Zahwani (performed by actor Fahd Larhzaoui, whose own life is said to the source of much of the script)—experiences in an operatic-like melodrama played out in a grand, histrionic manner that only such a man and his family, fictional or real deserve.


     Like so many of his friends, Karim obviously has homosexual tendencies, although also like his friends he has attempted to drown them out and hide them with relationships with women, in Karim’s case a young Dutch girl, Eline (Britte Lagcher); and like several of his friends with such contradictory and haram desires he gathers in the gay bars to play homoerotic games such as participating in “underwear nights,” or becoming so drunk that he can’t remember the gay encounters he has, or at least permits himself to forget and not be responsible for what happens.

     On just such a night, so very intoxicated that he can no longer remain standing, he meets a young engaging Ghanaian man, Kofi (Emmanuel Boafo) who literally takes him home to assure his health, but of course because he is also attracted to this grown man who still behaves as if he were an immigrant boy.

       Indeed, Karim is what you might describe as a fairly well-to-do Dutch businessman, of man now of burgerij behoorde, the burgher class, and representing such a figure, as well as because of his family and extended community of Moroccan friends, he demands each time he meets for sex at Kofi’s apartment that he close the curtains, even though the apartment appears to be a high rise and the curtains are transparent. Observed one night with Kofi by some of his friends, he immediately turns away from his companion, causing a further split between the two, as Karim’s paranoia becomes more and more rampant.


       When they finally return to a more serious relationship, Karim, getting up the nerve to invite him to his glorious high rise suite of rooms, for one of the first times in this early part of the movie seems to truly be enjoying their relationship; a knock at the door, however, turns out to be his father, Abbas (Slimane Dazi) who witnesses, in one of the first moments of the exaggerated farce the rest of the movie features, the two men rising from their shared bed naked.

       Something clearly needs to be done. And, although Kofi advises against it, and any level-headed man of middle age who has kept the secret for such a very long time and for very good reasons would perceive it is no longer necessary or even possible, Karin determines to have it out with his family, coming out at a time when generally it no longer has any significance.

      And yes, this is a “coming out” story presented in such a highly theatrical manner that he might have as well entered in media res a Ronald Tavel or Charles Ludlam play of the Theatre of the Ridiculous.


     Karim does not just enter his family apartment, which might almost be described as part of a compound of their Moroccan-born neighbors, but when his father and mother, in their horror of what he is about to tell them pretend that he is not even there, he enters the closet into which as a child he often escaped. Literally, he returns to the metaphorical “closet” in which his life has never left. The closet, moreover is not simply the LGBTQ standard world, but a place a great power, since within are the controls to the family’s water supply and electricity, which he turns off in order to gain their attention. Ironically, in doing that he also denies them the elements of communion, food (bread) and water (wine).

       Moreover, this particular closet features a small grilled window, serving not only as a gay hiding space, but a confessional box, from which he will serve with his family members, particularly his mother Fatima (Lubna Azabal) and jobless and drug-addicted brother Redouan (Sabri Saddik) the role of priest, he listening to their confessions, while they are forced to respond the questions with which he challenges them.

       In short, the grown man Karim has infantilized himself again, or perhaps has never been able to be anything else in this absurd clan where truth must not ever be spoken.

       Strangely, over the long two days and night he spends within, things do get spoken and indeed do happen. Much of what occurs is from the outside as a result to the gossip-prone community around them, who observing that the family’s electricity and water has been turned off, presume they are in dire financial need, and throughout the rest of the film trot in an out with various dishes of food and packages of money, one of which the local Iman himself has sent when Abbas begins a telephone call to him, but stops in the midst of making the call as Karim reminds him of what happened to his cousin Soufian (Nasrdin Dchar) when the Inman was called in just such a circumstance. 


       Soufian, a close friend to Karim had also come to accept his homosexuality and could no longer play the good husband to his wife. But through the intrusions of the Iman and others, eventually committed suicide. He, in turn, becomes one of the ghosts that haunt Karim’s closet along with his younger self (Shad Issa) who often seems wiser than the man he has become.

       Gradually, as the family members, despite their fierce pretense to ignore him, pass by the closet doorway, communicate with their locked-up son. Fatima, despite her anger, brings food and blankets for the night ahead, Redouan in an attempt to understand why his brother has returned to such childish ways, and even Abbas who although he refuses to speak directly to the walled-off son, overhears the others’ conversations.

       Strangely and frustratingly for gay men in the audience, Karim makes no pronouncements during his long internment, and doesn’t attempt to explain or justify his behavior, but simply asks questions that reveal an amazingly complex childhood in which the constantly demanding mother is gradually revealed to have had a childhood lover whom her parents would not accept. She evidently had a brilliant career before her as a doctor, but in the man her parents selected, Abbas, she gave it all up for his less financially successful form of employment, which explains their current middle-class if comfortable living space.

        When Redouan challenges Karim, the problem is gradually revealed, but the second son who could never live up to the expectations that Karim had set is far from sympathetic, like his parents but more bellicosely calling him a “queer,” “faggot,” and whatever other derogatory term exists in his undeveloped vocabulary.

       The ghost of Soufian visits Karim to remind him that he did nothing to support him in his time of greatest need. And the childhood version of Karim makes it clear that he cannot comprehend the grown man’s current hysteria, although glimpses of the boy growing up give provide us with some glimpses of the familial exaggerations that he is now performing.


      At one delightful point, the child lays on the floor in the foreground watching Dutch television with Abbas and Fatima sitting on the couch behind sharing a box of popcorn. Suddenly on the screen two young boys appear, look at one another, and kiss (something that probably could only have occurred on Netherlands Television), the parents in the background tossing up the popcorn into the air as in slow motion they both seek out the TV control to change the station.

       And despite Fatima’s seeming obedience of all her religious and cultural traditions, having quite apparently given up her own happiness and intellectual abilities in the process, the child still reminds Karim of how at a wedding party, she quite forcibly changed the traditions by demanding the men leave the hidden “men’s corner” and come join the others for their photographs. She could have made changes if she’d wanted, and Karim and his younger self, moreover, accuse her of knowing of his sexuality but of doing nothing to help him or release him from guilt.

       In one beautiful scene the young Karim dances with another boy until Fatima intrudes, pushing his friend away to stand a young girl before him, insisting that he dance with her instead. 

      In the kitchen, meanwhile, the dirty dishes pile up, and tempers flare. Despite the donations of food at the door and the gift of a full lamb from the local butcher, no one of the family members want to eat.


    Abbas calls in Aline, who sits, like the others, outside the door to ask Karim what is going on.  Karim says little, only half-explaining the situation by suggesting that if there ever was a woman who might have helped him it would have been her. But even that elliptical phrase makes the situation quite clear to her and she furiously stands, outraged having discovered about her lover’s sexuality in such a ridiculous manner.

      Despite the incident, Fatima still imagines that he might make a go of it with her; when he incredulously asks her, “Didn’t you see what just happened,” her answer is simply “we’ll find another one.

      The neighbors also grow more and more inquisitive, one of the nosiest of them daring even to enter the house before they manage to send him on his way. But even worse is the fact that they have spotted a black man, obviously Kofi, sitting on a bench nearby; and they are nervous, perhaps ready to call the police. Karim’s expensive new car, parked outside the complex, has already been impounded by the cops.

    At one point when Redouan returns the second day, he reports a gift from his brother’s lover, evidently a kind of snow-cone, and he now has Karim’s cell-phone so that when Kofi calls he is about to tell him that him lies, endangering Kofi’s own life. For the first time Karim attempts to break out of the closet, while Redouan firmly holds him in. This community appears to have no respect for outsiders or those they have rejected, as the memories of burial of Soufian and the hypocritical lies of those tossing sandy soil into his grave repeat in Karim’s haunted memories.

      Finally, Fatima arrives with a pliers, forces open the door and turns back on the electricity and water power, leaving her son again in wonderment of what she could have altered in both their past and present if she had only dared to. But now she is bitter, hateful, describing the son who, she whispered on one of her passes before the confession, she would always love, as himself being haram.

      Karim has little choice now but leave his closet forever, but as he attempts yet again to communicate with his family, now eating at the table, they again pretend he does not exist refusing to even acknowledge his presence.


    Furious, Karim begins to pick up vases, furniture, even the TV set all of which he has bought for them and break them into pieces as he tosses them across the room, yelling “homo vase,” “homo chair,” “homo TV,” etc. He gets a can of read spray paint and paints the words “Karim Is Homo” across the living room wall.

      There is nothing left for him to do. Not only has he truly come out of the closet but he has openly declared his identity. He turns to leave, Fatima screaming out her anger and demanding her husband, who sits with his hands to his head in near despair, do something!

      Finally, Abbas stands, goes over to Karim and pulls him slowly back to the table, asking him to sit down, as the family continues their meal, the windows are wide open to reveal them at dinner together to the entire neighborhood.

      The mix of the ridiculous and the profundity of tears and love that absurd behavior has obscured for their entire lives has seldom so fully been allowed to enter the domain of cinema. Nasr’s film permits the whole world to enter into what had once been hidden and closed.

      Even grown men must at some point “come out” of the darkness in which they have spent their lives in a fearful crouch. In this case, tears streamed down my face.

 

Los Angeles, October 22, 2022

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (October 2022).

 


Index R-Z

Angelo Raaijmakers I, Adonis / 2021 Peeter Rabane Firebird / 2021   Tyler Rabinowitz Catalina / 2022 Tyler Rabinowitz See You Soon / 20...