Saturday, February 21, 2026

Rainer Werner Fassbinder | Händler der vier Jahreszeiten (The Merchant of Four Seasons) / 1971

a remarkable loser

by Douglas Messerli

Rainer Werner Fassbinder (screenwriter and director) Händler der vier Jahreszeiten (The Merchant of Four Seasons) / 1971


Fassbinder’s Hans Epp (Hans Hirschmüller), like so many Fassbinder characters, is a kind of remarkable loser, a man seemingly determined from birth to fail. While some of these figures live lives of petty thievery and involvement in the gangster underworld (as in Love Is Colder than Death, Gods of the Plague, and The American Soldier), others are hopeless dreamers (Fox and His Friends) or simply ordinary men driven to insanity (Why Does Herr R. Run Amok? and In Year with 13 Moons) by the unaccepting world around them. None of these “remarkable losers” are quite alike. They are simply all incapable of living within the confines of post-war German life.

     Epp is perhaps the most commonplace of these individuals. The son of a domineering bourgeois mother (Gusti Kreissel), whose husband probably died in World War II, Epp is simply not brilliant enough to live in the world which his mother and elder sister imagine for him. He might have made a good mechanic, but his mother will have nothing to do with people who live what she calls “dirty” lives. She would much better that the “dirt” be of the intellectual kind like her journalist son-in-law, Kurt (Kurt Raab), who works for a Catholic newspaper without truly believing the tenants it espouses. The only family member who seems to comprehend how they have treated Epp and loves him despite his shortcomings, is his younger sister Ann (Hanna Schygulla), an intelligent college-going beauty. But she has no major influence over the other family member’s behavior.


     Failing at his school studies, Epp escapes to the French Foreign Legion, but even there he fails, as we find out later in the film, when, upon being tortured, he reports the whereabouts of his legion base. His torturer, having gained the information, is ready to shoot him, but two Legionnaires, observing the scene from nearby, save Epp. One of the two turns out to now be Epp’s closest friend and, as in many of Fassbinder’s films, a kind of surrogate male lover—Harry (Klaus Löwitsch), who later moves in with Epp and his wife.

     Returning home from the Legion, Epp is met with utter disdain by his mother, but finds a decent job, soon after, as a policeman—that is until he is caught receiving a blow-job from a prostitute he has just arrested. With no other choices remaining, Epp is forced to take to the streets as a fruit vendor, selling the “Frische birnen” (fresh pears) with which the film begins. Having been rejected by the “love of his life” (Ingrid Craven)—again because his working status is below her family’s standards—Epp is now married to a sensible and forceful woman, Irmgard (Irm Hermann). Despite providing a working-class living for his wife and daughter, Renate, however, and being gifted with a full and melodious voice that draws the neighborhood women to his cart, Epp, it is clear, is still ashamed of how he makes his living, particularly when called up to deliver fruit to a woman he once loved, while being carefully watched by his now somewhat dictatorial wife.

     One might say that Irmgard’s careful watching over of her husband quite literally drives him to drink, except that, once he begins to become inebriated with his equally failed friends, we realize that Epp is himself the cause of his own problems. He simply can’t resist destroying nearly any good thing that so rarely occurs in his life.

     Tracking him down when he doesn’t return for dinner, Irmgard tries to bring him home from his drunken binge without success, and when he does return him, he beats her brutally (even if Fassbinder presents all blows and slaps in these early films as melodramatic gestures that symbolize rather than actualized the real violence of his character’s lives).



Insisting that she will leave him, Irmgard, with Renate in tow, retreats to Epp’s family, who, with the exception of Anna, predictably once again take her side against their own flesh-and-blood. When Epp finally shows up, everyone including the viewer expects further violence, but Epp is rendered meaningless by the familial wall of disdain so effectively that he can only sing a few lines of the ditty that brought him and Irmgard together, before he falls to floor as a result of a heart attack. Only Anna has the perspicuity to call for an ambulance, as the others stand around in simple startlement.

     Visiting her slowly recovering husband at the hospital, Irmgard swears she will stay with him, but when he is eventually released, it is clear he can no longer lift the fruit crates or maneuver the cart; the doctor wards that any serious drink will immediately result in his death.

     Somewhat like Maria Braun in Fassbinder’s 1978 BRD trilogy, Irmgard suddenly springs into action, suggesting that she take over a permanent vendor stand and that they hire someone else to handle the cart. She even bargains for a new cart, while Epp interviews a clearly unqualified immigrant, Anzell (Karl Scheydt) with whom, unbeknownst to him, his wife has had a sexual encounter during his hospital stay.

    If that coincidence seems exaggerated, one must recognize that throughout this film, the director has used all the conventions of melodrama (particularly in the manner of US, German-born director Douglas Sirk), adding to them the numerous tableaux and heavily theatrical gestures (such as Anna’s melodramatic drop to the floor upon hearing of her brother’s decision to join the Foreign Legion) that also dominate his very next film, The Bitter Tears of Petra von Kant. These gestures further help, in their success in alienating the audience from simple realism, to create temporarily comic of slightly-camp scenes which point against the mimeticism of the work in general.

    When Anzell turns out not only to do a fairly good job as Epp’s fruit-selling replacement, but also honestly reports his sale—which Epp nefariously watches over during the day—Irmgard plots to protect herself from the knowledge her sexual transgression by suggesting Anzell overprice the fruits and share the difference with her, all the time knowing that her husband will observe the maneuver and fire him. While the inevitable happens, Anzell retaliates by telling Epp that he has been sexually involved with his wife.

    While Irmgard emphatically denies the charge, Epp recognizes the truth and, soon after, begins to fall into even deeper depression. Momentarily, he is buoyed up by meeting his old friend Harry, inviting him into their home and placing him in charge of the cart. But Epp soon shows signs of even deeper depression, staring for hours off into space through their apartment window, as Harry takes over Epp’s previous help with Renate’s homework and other daily family chores.


   A would-be sexual encounter with his “great love” ends with Epp leaving before engaging in sex; a visit to his sister gives him little pleasure as the student continues working on a manuscript during their conversation. Bit by bit, we watch the man stitching together the numerous failures of his life to end, finally, in his recognition that he would be better off dead, echoing the same feeling when he had upon his rescue in the Foreign Legion. And even Harry, he now perceives, has betrayed him in watching to see if he would confess before saving him from death.


     Dining with his drunken friends, Epp swallows down shots of liquor, one by one, toasting to all the people who have slung arrows into his pain-racked body: mother, sister, wife, daughter, lover, Harry, and all his would-be “friends.” Predictably, his head falls to the table, as Harry, coming to his side, reports that Epp is dead.

     At the funeral, Irmgard, practical and sensible as always, suggests that Harry continue to live with her since it would be better for her daughter, for Harry, and for herself. The final line of this comically-tinged melodrama of another of Fassbinder’s “remarkable losers” is a banal “okay.”

 

Los Angeles, July 22, 2016

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (July 2016).  

 

Wednesday, February 18, 2026

David Lynch | Blue Velvet / 1986

red, white, and blue

by Douglas Messerli

 

David Lynch (screenwriter and director) Blue Velvet / 1986

 

Blue Velvet is a very dark—perhaps I should change that adjective to “horrific”—satire about small town USA in the manner of Alfred Hitchcock’s brilliant analysis in Shadow of a Doubt, the work which David Lynch points to as his major influence. Lynch’s work, however, has none of the lightness and goofiness of Hitchcock’s presentation of Santa Rosa, California, family life. Whereas the innocent young heroine of Shadow, Charlotte “Charlie” feels an almost clairvoyant link with her uncle Charles, the villain of Hitchcock’s masterwork, the two innocents of Lumberton, Oregon, Jeffrey Beaumont (Kyle MacLachlan) and Sandy Williams (Laura Dern) have absolutely no ties to the evil forces that inhabit their logging community.

    But we sense something horrible wrong from the very beginning in Lynch’s film, as Jeffrey’s father is comically attacked by the green snake of a front-yard garden hose, which brings his son home from college. And Lynch hints early on that the lovely wooden houses of Lumberton are infested with dangerous insects, first based only on hearsay, but soon after by evidence of the blight itself.


   Walking through a wild field wherein sits an abandoned wooden shed, Jeff actually discovers a human ear filled with a swarm of black ants. He bags up the ear as if it were a kind of disgusting prize and, being the good citizen he is, takes it immediately to the local police, asking for a detective Williams (John Dickerson) who lives near his family home. He is told that he should tell on one about the ear, and that the detective in turn will not be unable to share any information he discovers about to whom the ear might have belonged.

   Almost immediately, however, he meets us with the detective’s daughter, Sandy, who has “overheard,” her room just above her father’s home office, what she knows so far about the case, that it may have something to do with a local lounge singer Dorothy Vallens (Isabella Rossellini), who lives in a nearby apartment building.

    Just as for Charlie in the Hitchcock movie, that’s all it takes for the clever Jeff to prove, with the help of Sandy, that young men and women, particularly those of the generation having grown up with The Hardy Boys and Nancy Drew mysteries can outwit any police department gumshoe. Their endless curiosity and daring lead them into a world that as Detective Williams himself proclaims, they would be better off not knowing.

   Within hours, Jeff has hatched a plan to check out Dorothy’s apartment pretending to be a pest exterminator, someone hired to wipe out those bugs who have made their way into the Lumberton abodes.

    And just as quickly he is dropped into a world, ostensibly draped in red (the color of Dorothy’s curtains and one of her dresses), white (the colors associated with Jeff himself: his house, its picket fence, his tie, and at one point his suit), and blue (Dorothy’s bathrobe and most notably her signature song, “Blue Velvet”), all colors of the US democracy, but here involved in a perverse series of events that leads him and Sandy into the dark side of the Republic: the red, white, and blues in this world are just too intense, textured, and somehow obscene in a manner that can’t quite be explained.     

    On this first visit to Dorothy’s apartment, he merely steals copies of her keys. But it doesn’t take long for him to leap even further into this allusive world by taking Sandy on a sort of date to hear Dorothy’s nightclub act, where she sings the famed Bobby Vinton song, sneaking soon after to visit her apartment and this time seriously search for any evidence that might connect her with the missing ear, the voice and the ear, obviously, being almost comically connected in this strange dream-like work.


    At this point everything changes, as Jeff and Dorothy both are sent down a rabbit hole where they discover an alternative universe.

     Dorothy returns home and undresses, Jeffrey hiding in the closet where he can see nearly everything, in some senses a straight college boy’s dream. She soon after she hears him move, as a hanger falls into place, discerning his existence, and, with knife in hand not only demands to know who he is and what he is doing in her apartment, but demands he strip: “Get undressed. I want to see you!”

    He strips to his underwear, Dorothy demanding that he now stand as she moves to the floor, again inquiring what he wants. When he has no answer, she pulls down his underwear, apparently ready to engage in fellatio with the young man, while also refusing to permit him to touch her or even look at her.

   In some teen films this might be such a young man’s sex dream, but here it is so unexpected and seemingly out of context that we can see it merely as perversity.


   She orders the naked boy to the couch, demanding he lie down, where, still with knife in hand, she smothers him in kisses.

   But the knock on the door tumbles the entire scene into even a deeper hole of madness, as she orders Jeff back into the closet (returning him to the role of voyeur and perhaps, in this twisted world, insisting he somehow return to his youthful world as an outsider innocent of sex) as Frank Booth (Dennis Hopper) enters. He is the true psychopathic monster at the heart of this underground sex, drug, and kidnapping world who, before the eyes of our still somewhat innocent voyeur (and the audience’s perhaps even more surprised eyes and ears) plays out an S&M drama of such twisted Oedipal proportions that it is difficult, in not impossible, to fully explain.


   Booth, demanding immediately to be called “Daddy,” angrily calls for his regular glass of bourbon, that she turn off the lights and never look at him as he becomes a temporary voyeur, and asks her to spread her legs, obviously to better observe her “bush.” What follows is an enactment of an almost textbook case of heterosexual childhood Oedipal lust, where Booth pretends to have sex with his woman he now perceives as his mother before his own father returns home. But it’s more complex than that, as he putts on a plastic mask which presumably gives him a kind of oxygen-deprived rush, reminding one a bit of the amyl nitrate inhalers of gay men. He proceeds to play out a game of having sex with his “Mommy,” insisting that “Baby wants to fuck.” At the same time, he is disgusted by the involvement of his mother in the act, and abuses her for her incestual fornication by beating her at the very moment he grows every more sexually excited, quickly coming in or on her in a manner that has more to do masturbation than with true sexual intercourse. It is so specific and perverted that we can only imagine that it represents perhaps regular childhood occurrences of Booth with his own mother before his father’s returns home, which also might explain his fetishization of blue velvet, clearly a memory of a nightgown his own mother may have been wearing during these episodes. It is also quite clear that he truly detests women and the need to engage in sex with them.

    Finally, he stands, comes somewhat back to his senses and tells her to “stay alive. Do it for Van Gough,” obviously a reference to the person whose ear has been brutally severed. Booth quickly exits, and Jeff comes out of the closet once again, checking on Dorothy’s condition and attempting to cover her with a white shawl which she rejects—his color, and that of innocence.

    But as he gets ready to leave, she calls out Don, asking him to hold her. She’s scared, she admits, and wonder in amazement that her Don is back. And once again she initiates a sexual relationship with the young boy, asking if he likes her, to feel her nipple, etc. It appears she is as psychologically confused as was her abuser and would somehow, like the mother of Booth’s fantasy, bring her newfound son into her own sexual confusion. Certainly, she seems to have adapted several of Booth’s S&M tropes, including the demand that she not be looked at while she engages in sex, as if anonymity would free them from any feeling of guilt. When he refuses to hit her, however, the charade is over; he will not participate for her self-punishment for having become involved in a relationship with someone like Booth.

    By the time he leaves Dorothy after this second visit, with the help of a truly heavy-handed clue hidden under her couch—a photograph of herself, her husband Don, and her child, wearing the party hat which also sits out on a table in the room, as well as their marriage certificate behind the framed photo—Jeffrey has basically figured out the entire plot, that Booth has abducted Dorothy’s husband and son to force her into sexual slavery. Perhaps he has cut off her husband’s ear to intimidate her; yet how the ear ended up in the abandoned lot is never explained.

     In fact, a great deal of the plot remains inexplicable even at film’s end.  

    What is now apparent is that Jeffrey has already developed a crush on Dorothy, and sees her yet again when he allows himself temporarily to act out her S&M demands, hitting her in the face.

    He now also observes Booth selling drugs and meeting up with a man dressed in a yellow suit coat, who the boy calls the Yellow Man (Fred Pickler). Later he sees the “Yellow Man” meet up with a different “well-dressed man.”


    In between these terrible revelations, Jeffrey seeks out the solace of comfort of Sandy, with whom—despite his boyish infatuation with Dorothy—he finds himself increasingly falling in love, despite her own commitment to the high school football player Mike (Ken Stovitz). Yet he does not tell Sandy everything and attempts to keep her away from his increasing pull into the vortex of horror with Frank Booth’s world represents.

    Finally, when caught leaving Dorothy’s place by Booth, he and Dorothy are abducted and forced to endure a high speed joyride along with Booth’s violent cohorts to Ben’s. Ben’s place, outwardly called This Is It, is a kind of strange bordello, older women lining the walls, ruled by the queenly, obviously gay Ben (brilliantly performed by Dean Stockwell), where Don and little Donnie, Dorothy’s husband and child are being held.

     Later we discover the “well-dressed man” is also Booth obviously dressed for drug pickups; yet even we now begin to realize that, as in so very many such sexually complex narratives, there is a double personality to Booth, clearly defined by his evident attraction to the utterly laid back and effeminate Ben, who Booth finds to be incredibly “suave,” and to whom he toasts: “Here’s to your fuck.”


     It is hard to determine precisely what role other than perhaps serving as the keeper of Dorothy’s family Ben plays in the complex world of Booth and his thugs. But here, at Ben’s place, we perceive another very different side of Booth, a man who almost looses it over Ben’s lip-sync performance of Roy Orbison’s song “In Dreams,” which even more than the nostalgic song of lost love which “Blue Velvet” represents, tells of a dream world impermissible in the macho world in which Booth and Ben live:


A candy-colored clown they call the sandman

Tiptoes to my room every night

Just to sprinkle stardust and to whisper

"Go to sleep, everything is alright"

I close my eyes, then I drift away

Into the magic night, I softly say

A silent prayer like dreamers do

Then I fall asleep to dream my dreams of you

 

In dreams, I walk with you

In dreams, I talk to you

In dreams, you're mine, all of the time

We're together in dreams, in dreams



But just before the dawn

I awake and find you gone

 

I can't help it, I can't help it if I cry

I remember that you said goodbye

It's too bad that all these things

Can only happen in dreams

 

Only in dreams

In beautiful dreams

 

    What becomes obvious is that in his second, double-life of Booth is a would-be gay man desperately in love with the cold-hearted, effeminate Ben, who smokes cigarettes from a holder stick, and performs the song almost as if it were a drag routine.

    That is not to say that Ben is a nice fellow; Dorothy is allowed to see her Don and Donnie, but clearly, discovering the one missing ear, the meeting does not go well; and when Ben is introduced

to the captive Jeffrey, he slugs him hard in the stomach.

    Back on the road, Booth again puts on his plastic mask in an attempt, this time in front of the others, to abuse Dorothy. When Jeffrey, from the backseat, attempts to prevent Booth from continuing, the other Booth personae puts on lipstick and violently kisses his “pretty boy” before

Raymond and Paul beat him to a near pulp, as Dorothy pleads for them to stop, leaving him near the saw-mill at which their nightly voyage has ended.

     Returning to town, bloodied and seriously bruised, Jeffrey finally determines he has to contact Detective William’s to tell him of all he has learned, while trying to keep Sandy out of the picture.

There he discovers the identity of the Man in Yellow, Williams’ partner Tom Gordon who has been busy murdering Frank’s rival drug dealers and stealing the confiscated evidence for Booth to sell.

    Again Jeff and Sandy meet up, this time their car being closely followed by auto they can only presume belongs to Booth. They attempt to escape it, finally discovering that it is Sandy’s boyfriend Mike, yet another macho male threatening to beat Jeffrey for stealing his girlfriend. But almost at the very same moment, Dorothy appears, completely naked, herself beaten, bruised, and confused on Jeffrey’s porch.

    Jeffrey and Sandy rush her into the house, met by Jeffrey’s mother (Priscilla Pointer) who calls for medical help. But now, almost in a trance, Dorothy recognizes Jeffrey has her protector, describing him in front of Sandy as her “secret lover.” Sandy predictably slaps him in the face, he calmly telling her to report everything to her father as he rushes off to Dorothy’s apartment, not even knowing what to expect.


     There he finds the Yellow Man, Detective Gordon, still standing, although near death, with Dorothy’s husband Don sitting in a chair, a strip of blue velvet stuffed in his mouth, dead. As Jeffrey attempts to back out of the apartment, and slip down the staircase, he encounters the “Well-Dressed Man,” Booth’s doppelgänger, and rushes back inside. There he grabs Gordon’s police walkie-talkie, reporting his whereabouts and telling the squad that he is hiding in the bedroom, knowing from the previous night’s car trip that Booth and his men listen to the police interchanges. Once more, he hides in the closet, a place we well knows by this time, sneaking back out at the last moment to steal Gordon’s gun.

     When Booth enters, he rushes back to the bedroom ready to shoot his prey, firing a couple of shots before realizing that there is no one there.

     He finally moves toward the closet, but when he opens it Jeffrey fires, killing him dead.

     Sandy and her father arrive a few moments later, with Jeffrey handing over his gun, now having become a murderer.

     He has ended the film almost as the young “Charlie” does in Hitchcock’s Shadow of a Doubt, she escaping her uncle’s clutches at the very moment he is beheaded by another passing train. Hitchcock’s heroine closes the film quite tragically, having to keep inside all she has discovered about her uncle and the death she has, in part, caused, all in order to protect the innocence of her beloved family; but in the process she has had to abandon her belief in family and the innate goodness of mankind.

     Strangely enough the young justified murderer of Lynch’s film—despite the far deeper horrors he has undergone—ends the film back in an innocent posture, totally ensconced in a relationship with Sandy, each of the mother’s looking on. Jeffrey’s father Tom has returned home from the hospital, and Dorothy sits holding her son Donnie.

     Even the robins, which early in the film Sandy has dreamt have all left town, have returned, one of them shown about to devour a large bug. In short, Lumberton has been cleaned up; order restored. The American way can move nicely forward. In Santa Rosa, meanwhile, at least for Charlie, the myths of the American family have been inextricably lost.

     That’s why I describe Lynch’s work as a satire. Hitchcock’s black-and-white picture is a far more tragic view of the American Dream, even if it presents a world less perverse, free at least of such a conflicted gay man as Frank Booth—unless you want to make a case that the “The Merry Widow” Uncle Charlie is precisely that; fortunately Hitchcock didn’t take us there.

 

Los Angeles, February 18, 2026

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (February 2026).

   

Tuesday, February 17, 2026

David Färdmar and Björn Elgerd | Vi skulle bli bra föräldrar (We Could Be Parents) / 2016

valentine to a scornful lover

by Douglas Messerli

RATING

Björn Elgerd (screenplay), Björn Elgerd and David Färdmar (directors) Vi skulle bli bra föräldrar (We Could Be Parents) / 2016 [15 minutes]

 

Sitting in a vast empty lot outside of an abandoned industrial plant, Erik (Björn Elgerd) points a camera at himself in order to make a movie for his former lover, Marely, who has broken off their deep relationship.


    Gradually we perceive that Erik, somewhat physically challenged (he seems to have partial nerve damage on his left side), has been amazed in the first place that Marely had fallen in love with him, stood up for him, and protected him from the verbal scorn of others. Over time, however, he came to recognize that their love was real, which provided him with the greatest joy of his young life.

    He expresses of all this to Erik, hoping to lure him back. But it may also be true that, although Erik seems to comprehend a great deal and speaks coherently, he may also be somewhat mentally challenged, given what we soon also discover.


   We observe him stop the filming midway as a car drives up. He gets in momentarily to suck the driver off, clearly being paid for providing the brief pleasure to the older man, holding up the currency for the camera to see when the car pulls away. When he sits down again before the camera, he makes clear that he knows that Marely has left him just for such acts, believing that he has been unfaithful. But Erik doesn’t see it that way.

     Erik, we discover, has long wanted a child and since Marely had been strongly against surrogacy from third-world countries were women are forced to undergo such pregnancies for money, he had been trying to raise enough money to pay for a willing surrogate mother from the middle class of the USA.

     Still, he has been afraid to tell all this to his lover for fear of what precisely has happened, that he would lose Marely’s love and be sent away.

      If Erik’s logic seems warped, he still sees some things quite clearly, as when he points out that he doesn’t feel like a commodity in prostituting himself since he is doing it for a cause that would give joy to them both, becoming parents. And if Marely feels that in choosing to do such a thing he has been disloyal to him, then he too must see him as a commodity, someone whom he bodily controls. His logic may be someone twisted, but he is also correct in his assessment. Isn’t the demand of monogamy a kind of sanctioned control, a demand to be the slave of another?

     Erik points out, in his twisted logic, that he has also donated sperm to several lesbian couples, so that perhaps he already is an unknown father. And he is happy that he has been able to provide these couples with what they need to discover the joy of parental love. He holds up a picture of two women for which he has donated sperm.

     Again, he begs for Marely’s return, now in tears.


     In the last scene of his film, we discover the device on which he has been filming this plea is a drone which he now sets into aerial motion so that Marely will be able to see the words he has written out over the parking lot of this desolate factory, where he now also may be living: “Jag älskar dig” (“I love you).

     In a strange mix of perversity, preposterousness, and an emotionally moving plea to have love return, Erik makes his case. And we feel moved by him, and wish that only Marely will watch this ridiculous valentine, forgive him, and return.

     No matter what Erik has made a strange case not only for his desire to be loved but to able to give love, since he promises that with or without his former companion, he plans to adopt a child. Whether or not that can truly come to be, we don’t know. But clearly in his world, miracles can happen.

 

Los Angeles, February 7, 2026

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (February 2026).

 

.

Roger Lambert | A Seaside Story / 1986

let’s do it

by Douglas Messerli

 

Roger Lambert (screenwriter and director) A Seaside Story / 1986

 

British director Roger Lambert has filmed several tales of young gay or queer-oriented young boys, Follow You, Follow Me (1979) and I Want to Be Famous (1976) among them.

    Superficially his 1986 short film, A Seaside Story is  not a gay work, staring two young boys, Martin (Martin Plunkett) and Sam (Sam Butterfield) who go on vacation for a weekend together in Lyme Regis.

    If this might simply seem to be a recounting of a series of incidental events happening to the two 17-year-old friends who have very different interests, however, look closer. For Lambert’s work is a very subtle satire upon on several issues, including the heteronormative attitudes of young men out to simply get a kiss or possibly a fuck from a young female meet-up, the values of young boys with regard to the immediate pull of their testosterone vs. higher intellectual concerns, and a delightful satire regarding the younger generation in connection with the elderly.


    It all begins with the boys’ arrival at a guesthouse where they are met by an eccentric landlady (Gwen Nelson) who is absolutely delighted to meet up with the very youngest guests she has ever entertained in her basically elderly vacationers. She even rustles up a bottle of wine left to her by her long-dead husband for the only customers who have dared to ask for a wine list. Indeed, she dotes over the boys, particularly the far cuter Sam, who she encounters in a bath towel after he takes a shower, requesting that he change a light bulb for her, which, obviously means, accidently dropping the towel—much to her delight. Her comment: “In vaudeville they used to do it with feathers.” She holds it up, to protect him from our camera view more than from her own perusal.


    Martin, meanwhile has gone off to bed, imagining how next day he will meet up with the girls he’s already scouted out, Zaile (Zaile Burrow) and Sarah (Sarah Mitchell) who are vacationing with their mother (Sue Tracy) and her obnoxious boyfriend Phil (Phil Rowlands).

     The landlady invites the young boarder to come downstairs and have a nice night-cap with her, and Sam spends the evening playing Fats Wallers “Ain’t Misbehavin” and Cole Porter’s “Anything Goes” on the piano in the parlor with Gwen humming along. Martin, in fact, is a bit annoyed by all the late night music.



     The next day while Martin heads off to the beach to impress Zaile and Sarah, Martin sneaks off to the seaside village’s bushes where he comes upon a rare Monarch butterfly feeding off the milkweeds, probably having been blown off course from North American on its way to the Canary Islands or the Azores.

     Since Martin and his two new girlfriends seems rather disinterested, Sam runs back to tell the elderly Gwen of her news, who completely knowledgeable of local flora and fauna, dons her World War I military camping clothes, pulls out her tent, and marches off the watch the friendly Monarch.



     Since he shows utterly no interest in them, the girls ask Martin if his companion is gay. As a commentator on the IMDb site notes, Martin is somewhat of a “mullethead” who answers, “No, he’s just an ecologist,” under the illusion, evidently, that they’ve equivalents and you can’t be both.

     Just from his love of nature, and musically accompanied in this film by Porter’s “Let’s Do It, Let’s Fall in Love,” Sam camps out (quite literally, but also a bit in the contemporary gay sense) with Gwen and Zaile, having fallen in love with nature itself.     

     Martin gets his longed-for kiss from Sarah, as well as a wet drubbing from three young local boys whose soccer ball he has accidently kicked into the ocean. But Sam, the boy who’s more interested in the birds and bees that in the female species, seems to have all the real fun, discovering the beauty of the world around him and in the process completely transforming the life of a bawdy old woman and a young girl who, unlike her sister, is now perhaps more interested in making a new friend than in capturing a couple of quick smooches.


   If Martin ever happens to wake up, he might find a beautiful gay boy in love with life in the very next bed.

 

Los Angeles, February 17, 2026

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (February 2026).

   

 

Titles Index A-N

https://myqueercinema.blogspot.com/2023/12/former-index-to-world-cinema-review.html Films discussed (listed alphabetically by director) [F...