Tuesday, July 1, 2025

Rainer Werner Fassbinder | Warnung vor einer heiligen Nutte (Beware of a Holy Whore) / 1971

a sheep in wolf’s clothing

by Douglas Messerli

 

Rainer Werner Fassbinder (screenwriter and director) Warnung vor einer heiligen Nutte (Beware of a Holy Whore) / 1971

 

1971 was an amazing year for filmmaker Rainer Werner Fassbinder, even for a man who made many films every year; that year he managed to shoot five feature films: Rio das Mortes, Pioneers in Ingolstadt, Whity, Beware of a Holy Whore, and The Merchant of Four Seasons, while both he and his communal-living cast were recovering from the particularly exhausting film, Whity.

      Beware of a Holy Whore, reportedly, recounts some of the difficulties the group had while shooting Whity, not only the delays in promised governmental grants, but with materials—both that film and Holy Whore were shot in Spain, where sets, shooting locations, and equipment were more difficult to procure—while also being mired in the numerous interpersonal relationships between the actors and crew. Even applying for the grants was an arduous business; as Fassbinder joked, “I can make an entire film in the time it takes others to read the small print of a grant application form.”


       It is no wonder, accordingly, that the director, Jeff, depicted in Holy Whore (the dark-haired, somewhat overweight Fassbinder being played, ironically by the handsome Germanic looking blond and blue-eyed Lou Castel) is seemingly disinterested in making the film for which the cast and crew are huddled in a semi-luxury hotel, awaiting his arrival. By film’s end, Jeff is utterly exhausted, an empty shell of a human being.

       It is the same kind of exhaustion we witness also in two models that Fassbinder surely used for this film, Federico Fellini’s 8 ½ and Jean-Luc Godard’s Contempt, the exhaustion not only from the never-ending demands creation makes, but from the kind of decadent world that seemingly accompany films and their multiple creators. Godard’s film, like Fassbinder’s, is also about violence and brutality, both sexual and intellectual, while 8½ clearly humorously and seriously accounts a mini-history of both.

      For those who know about the Fassbinder “commune,” as one character describes it, there are many in-jokes in this film—Fassbinder, himself, plays the harried directorial assistant, Sasha, and Magdalena Montezuma plays a character to whom the director had once been married, named Irm, while Irm Hermann, who played in 19 of Fassbinder’s films, is nowhere to be seen in this one; and Fassbinder’s real-life, short-term wife, Ingrid Craven here appears as a married woman desiring a bit role; and there are also several subtle references to previous Fassbinder films—but to read the movie as entirely autobiographical, I believe, would be a mistake.      

      Certainly, the various sexual goings-on in this film—heterosexual, lesbian, gay, and, in particular, bi-sexual—which we are forced time and time again to observe through various voyeuristic tableaus—may have been part and parcel of a Fassbinder shoot. At some points it appears almost as if every one of the numerous cast and crew members are determined to get each other into their beds or least upon a lobby couch. And by film’s end, they do seem to be entwined into a large group grope similar to the comical goings-on in Jack Smith’s Flaming Creatures. Yet behind the basically satirical vision of Holy Whore there are also a great many serious issues which seem far more personal, as the director character attempts to work them out, than general. If this should not be understood precisely as a group autobiography, it is certainly one of Fassbinder’s most personal works, even though he uses a stand-in for himself. 



d, given the almost bi-polar shifts in Jeff’s behavior once he does fly in on a plane (procured evidently from another isolated paradise, Ischia) it would have been almost unbearable to actually see Fassbinder playing himself. At once, instead of hugging his boy-toy of the moment, Ricky (Marquard Bohm), Jeff puts his arms around his hunky assistant-director, David (Hannes Fuchs) and then hugs several of his women actors, including Hanna Schygulla, playing herself.

      Soon after he slaps Irm, and when she drunkenly shouts out about his abuse of her, slaps her several more times and fires her on the spot, demanding she leave the site. The drugged-out cameraman, Deiters (played by Fassbinder’s openly gay filmmaker friend, Werner Schroeter) has already abused her, telling her, after a brief kissing session, that she needs to clean her teeth more often. Yet she is the only one saved from the emotional abuses which follow.

       By the next morning Jeff is shouting for and at nearly everyone, furious about the shooting location, the Spanish equipment, and the cinematographer’s inability to immediately comprehend his rather complex instructions. The actors take too long to get into costume, and the group translator is seen in the distance, for long hours at a time, entwined in a kiss with a driver. Furthermore, the money from Bonn has not yet come through. Both Jeff and Ricky wish for one another’s complete “destruction.”

       If Jeff is explosively violent, he can also, at moments, be tender in his manipulation of his cast. But the film he intends to make is utterly brutal:  As he describes it to his actor, Eddie Constantine, who has complained that he cannot give a karate chop to his female victim, “Lemmy Caution is always such a gentleman, so noble. What I want to show here is the guy at the height of power. Brutal cold-blooded, capitalistic, rational, cold as ice. I don’t want to show a rain of sympathy for people who cat in the name of some fascist government."

       In short, the world of drink, drugs, and sex which these characters inhabit is also, in a more political sense, what the movie-within-the-movie is itself about.


       The two worlds, the satirical film about filmmaking and the murderous film at Holy Whore’s heart, accordingly, are oddly mirror images, one comic and one tragic, but both suggesting that all of these figures, “real” and “imagined,” in giving their lives over to art and artifice, allow themselves to feel a sense of holiness, while still whoring for their own sense of control over one another and reality. In this world, status, even being one of Fassbinder’s original Munich group members, having grown up in a better financial situation, or imagining future scenarios for their lives, is crucial and, in the end, self-destructive.

       Of course, the real holy whore is art itself. The support that the German government lavished on film and theater during the 1970s and 80s, as Thomas Elsaesser intelligently reminds us in the DVD liner-essay, encouraged directors such as Fassbinder to become “clowns and professional enfant terribles,” in part to justify the control and power the government had built up to delimit such behavior in everyday life. Each, directors and government, needed the other to justify their existences and to satisfy their desires, the fact of which the young Fassbinder immediately perceived.

       Fassbinder’s films are almost always centered on real moral issues, but are presented, as here, in a manner which forces you to see them for what they are: artificed creations. If they are actually whores, things which make you want to love them, they, at least, are honest enough to make it very clear that they are not entirely holy, that their beauty is a created one through make-up, camera tricks, and clever acting.

     Perhaps none of the great filmmaker’s works revealed this so clearly as Beware of a Holy Whore, a work which you can simultaneously love and find utterly perverse. These are beautiful people acting quite brilliantly, but they’re only to be let out of their box for one or occasional nights. Art, alas, is not life—a fact, despite his utter dedication to it, of which Fassbinder was only too aware.

      The film ends with a statement by another bisexual author, Thomas Mann: 

    

"I tell you that I am often deadly tired of representing humankind without participating in humanity."

 

       By the end of 1971, Fassbinder must have exhausted. In 1972 he made only one film, The Bitter Tears of Petra Kant.

 

Los Angeles, September 14, 2016

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (September 2016).

Harry Dixon | Notion / 2018

choices

by Douglas Messerli

 

Harry Dixon and Mitchel Wicking (screenplay), Harry Dixon (director) Notion / 2018 [30 minutes]

 

This student film was made was made at the University of Grimsby in Lincolnshire, and the accents of that region, it will be difficult, particularly if you attempt to use the subtitles, for US audiences to follow the dialogue.

    But fortunately (or perhaps unfortunately, depending upon your viewpoint), this short from by director Harry Dixon follows many of the conventions of a “coming out movie.”


    As in so very many queer movies about 17-year-olds in their last year of school, Notion involves a great deal of afterschool drinking among both the boys and girls, in this case as they gather at Liam’s house most nights, since his parents seem to be endlessly traveling, leaving him alone to care for their quite handsome house.

    We see two such events, the first of which includes Liam (Adam Barlow), his best friend Alex (Ethan Bradshaw), and three girls, Georgia (Elizabeth France), Mollie (Evelyn Seaton-Mooney) and Beth (Megan Curry). In this film, the women seem to drink more than the men, particularly Beth, who complains of each day in school of a constant hangover, and Georgia, who can’t hold her liquor, quickly vomiting her most recent intake on Alex’s T-shirt.

     Liam quickly sends off the three girls, and suggests Alex borrow one of his shirts, promising to wash the other and return it.

     The visit to his bedroom that this facilitates, however, results in a discussion between both of them about their unhappy homelives, particularly given the death of their mothers; and before they even know it, the two discover themselves in a deep kiss.


     Alex, in particular, quickly backs away and quite literally races off, soon after announcing to all that he remembers nothing of the night and that he’s now hooked up with Georgia, the least likeable of the three girls.

     Liam remembers the events all too well, and his stunned by the sudden departure from his life of Alex and his endless denials. But then Alex has always taken the easy way out, seeking a job even while attending the university while insisting that an education only slows you down.

     Liam, on the other hand, is a serious student; and Alex’s rejection of him appears to open up a kind of new vision of what he might accomplish, and he googles what courses and experiences it takes to become a cancer researcher.

     The second part, sans Beth, brings together Alex and Georgia with Mollie and Liam, Mollie clearly fed up with the other couple.

     They drink enough to repeat the fiasco of the first time they came together with Beth, but this time, quite amazingly, everyone goes home somewhat sober, Liam regretting that he has even attempted to restore relations with Alex.

      But as he moves upstairs to bed, there is a knock at the door, and it is Alex returned. We half hope that he might finally have recognized the truth of the kiss, that he is truly in love with Liam, but like so many boys of his age, he refuses to face reality. He has come back for his lousy white T-shirt, which Liam brings him, cleaned as promised. He leaves again without any apologies, with even acknowledging that in accepting the T-shirt he has had to remember what happened.


      Liam stands by the closed door, saddened that the boy he loves has just left his life forever; we witness Alex in bed with Georgia, clearly unable to sleep, but finally turning over to hold her close as if she might protect him from his unthinkable memories and desires. We can foretell Alex’s future, having witnessed it time and again in queer cinema and everyday life, that he’ll marry and regret it for the rest of his life, perhaps even one day waking up to realize that he is truly gay and can no longer remain in a relationship with the empty-headed Georgia or, even worse, will again refuse the truth, and stay for the sake of his unhappy family.

      Liam’s face might also be said to demonstrate some relief, since he is now moving in a totally different direction in his life. He has been accepted to the college of his choice, and will surely become the cancer researcher he chosen for his career. Clearly he can find someone more appropriate as a lover than the now forever-closeted Alex.

      In this “coming out” film, the realization of loving another of one’s own sex leads not a romp in bed, but a life outside the closed-off world of high school experience. How well I know that feeling, and looked forward to college for those very reasons, even if my sexuality was not fully perceived and certainly not completely accepted by inner myself. But within a year I would discover who I truly who I was and what I wanted out of life. That changed, of course, over time; but allowed me to become someone who is happy and proud of most of my life.

 

Los Angeles, July 1, 2025

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (July 2025).

 

 

 

Craig Frank | Look Away / 2016

breaking up is hard to do

by Douglas Messerli

 

Eli Lieb and Steve Grand (composers and performers), Craig Frank (engineer) Look Away / 2016

 

In 2016 open gay pop singers Eli Lieb and Steve Grand came together to perform a song about a gay couple breaking up, not a typical subject in the history of LGBTQ+ popular musical recordings.

     The song was co-written by the performers, and was recorded on the day after Lieb had actually broken up with his current boyfriend. As Lieb has been quote in several sources:

 

“The footage is so real and raw, that I struggled if I even felt comfortable putting it out.

      I wasn’t sure I wanted everyone to see the pain I was in. But then I realized that this pain came from love and is a part of life most people experience at some point – we’ve all been there. I hope it helps remind people that pain and love are so closely related to not forget how powerful love is.”


    Fortunately, as Grand himself notes, the country-western crossover singer is an “irreverent goofball,” which surely helped to balance the painful back-to-back seriousness of the duet, where despite the lyrics, the couple is actually looking off in different directions as they consider both their pasts and futures, now alone from other.

 

Verse 1:

I’ll never touch your body again

We gave it our all, but this is the end

So we say that we tried

Watching you fade, I know it’s goodbye

 

Chorus:

But I can’t look away from you

I can’t look away

I’m trying to face the truth

from the mess that we made

So we say that we tried

But I can’t look away from you

I can’t look away

 

    The video also features the two in the recording studio, with Grand on the piano (Dave Eggar on strings), and the two in various poses around the studio.

     If the music is rather blandly pop, the performance and lyrics make it another break-through in LGBT music videos, particularly in its direct commentary on the touch and smell of another male sharing a bed, not a common subject in popular music.

 

Los Angeles, July 1, 2025

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (July 2025).

Monday, June 30, 2025

Daniele Guerra | Hear My Voice / 2021

everything can change so quickly

by Douglas Messerli

 

Alex Kassab (screenplay), Daniele Guerra (director) Hear My Voice / 2021 [12 minutes]

 

Four years after moving to London for his career, would-be opera singer Mike (Ollie Marsden) has yet to pass an audition, and he’s recently been dreaming that when he actually goes to perform that he has entirely lost his voice.


     He keeps a journal, which has become his mainstay since he has had sex with only one guy, he claims, and now can’t even recall his name; and apparently on that occasion he has been visited by an apparition of his eccentric grandmother (Eileen Nicholas) with whom he traveled the world has a child, and who infused in him an interest in the arts. But she is not at all approving of his current situation.

     He carefully studies the scores of works which he readies to perform, ignoring even the glances of handsome young men, and being particularly rude to those who might attempt to engage him in more worldly things.



     His only real contact with others, often far from pleasant, are the customers who visit Donlon’s bookstore, where one customer claims that the small store smells of wood.

     An occasion in a coffee-shop stands in for what is apparently the dozens of times he has refused to allow the world entry. Insisting to himself that he must focus on opera and live a monastic life, he misses the glance of a handsome tattooed man (Simon Robins), and rudely dismisses the coffee-shop barista who seems fascinated by serving an opera singer. When the eager young man, Andy (Kyley Winfield) says that he’s never even been to an opera, Mike’s response is simply “You should go some time,” as he puts on his headset to drown the world out.



     That night he again experiences his repeated dream, opening his mouth to sing with nothing coming out, along with another visit from his dead grandmother who expresses worry for her grown grandson, he interrupting it, perhaps, as her disdain for him not more fully preparing for his opera auditions.

      At work the next day, he again encounters the coffee-shop barista who has tracked Mike down to return his journal which he left in the café. But when he queries Andy how he knew where to find him, he also realizes that the young man has also read his journal, and instead of even thanking him for its return, he angrily dismisses him.

      When the young man not only apologizes but chastises Mike for his “stuck up air,” the would-be opera singer suggesting that he might seek something else to do, hinting that Andy has no other interests in life, which further outrages the kind barista.

  As he starts to leave, Andy turns back, responding: “I prefer the you in the journal. No wonder you’re lonely.”


      Even in his isolation, however, Mike continues to check in with his dating app, obviously window-shopping for something which he denies himself. But he has been asked to audition again for what he describes as “the big one.”

      Yet our hero, fearing what might happen, instead answers back to make an appointment with a tattooed tough who goes under the name of “Hackney boy.” His grandmother, again visiting him in his imagination, wonders “what happened to the bold child I used to travel with? This isn’t you.”

      “Well, maybe you don’t know me then,” he argues against the ghost.

      “Stop. Everything can change so quickly,” she advises him.

      Mike returns to the café, apologizing to Andy, who at first treats him coldly, but when Mike explains that he found it embarrassing, that he now knows too much about him, the barista admits that he tried to ignore it but got “sucked in.” And in a surprising move, Mike wonders if he might…his several pauses leading Andy to fill in the invite for a drink.

       Meeting up with Andy, Mike suggests, after having now been rejected from a young opera performers’ program, that he is thinking about giving opera up. “I think I may just not be that talented.”

       Andy assures him that he know he’s talented, “I read your writing. …I couldn’t stop reading. Funny, but beautiful in places.”



       But it’s not a career, is it? “Writing in a journal.”

       Andy, who reveals that he is also a journalist, claims “writing is writing.”

     Clearly they get on, and as in all romantic narratives, their discussions lead to a fascination with each, and that, of course, to something close to love, as finally the apparition of his grandmother looks fondly on.


       This well-done short film is what one might describe as almost a feel-good movie for those of us of the working class, the obviously well-groomed, educated and wealthy Mike (his grandmother has left him money) having fallen for the multi-cultural, working-class, everyday Andy. It’s a bit hard to believe given the still somewhat rigid class-structures of British society wherein which this film emanated.

       The director, Daniele Guerra was born in Rome but now lives in London, and has directed at least three films and several operas in the United Kingdom and throughout Europe.

 

Los Angeles, June 30, 2025

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (June 2025).

     

Fred Niblo | Way Out West / 1930

milking the bull

by Douglas Messerli

 

Alfred Block, Byron Morgan (story and screenplay), Joseph Farnham (dialogue), Fred Niblo (director) Way Out West / 1930

 

Director Fred Niblo’s 1930 film, Way Out West, returns us to the tropes of the 1912 film Algie the Miner, only in this case, instead of the father sending his son “way out west” to become more masculine, the hero of this comic tale, Windy (William Haines), short for Windermere as in Oscar Wilde’s character, is kidnapped by local cowboys who he swindled out of their monthly salaries in a carney sideshow, forcing him to work in the manner of a slave to master relationship on an Arizona ranch.

     Although the arc of the film’s plot is rather predictable—the indentured city slicker suffers the slings and arrows of the angry cowboys, but eventually toughens up enough to catch the eye of the ranch boss, blonde beauty Molly Rankin (Leila Hyams) who, by film’s end, he promises to marry—the real pleasure of this film, such as it is, derives from Haines' and his cowboy captors’ one-liners, most of them stuffed with campy gay references.


      As I’ve noted previously, Haines was openly gay at the time, living with his life-time partner James Shields. It almost appears, accordingly, that by 1930 his writers, in this case Alfred Block, Byron Morgan, and Joseph Farnham felt that Haines’ sexuality was well enough known that they could satirize it in the Way Out West story. Like other gay and lesbian figures such as Cary Grant and Rock Hudson whom I mention later in these pages, the screenwriters intentionally planted sexual double entendres, some of them right out of vaudeville and burlesque skits, which along with the basic set-up of the subtle S&M structure of the plot seemed almost a perfect fit, with most of the campy scenes flitting by the chuckling general audience while serving as a kind of gentle wit to those in the know.

     I don’t intend to provide a list of all of these one-liners, but a few will help to elucidate the tone of the film, in which Haines also spends plenty of time rapidly blinking his eyes in a “come-hither” manner and, at moments, even accompanying his deliveries with limp wrists and bashful leans into the dialogue as if to say “I don’t have a clue what this means.”

     The first of these has received, perhaps, the most attention. Playing opposite comedian Polly Moran, the ranch cook named, quite intentionally, “Pansy,” Haines’ character Windy pretends to flirt with her the moment she drops her name, which would be quickly recognized in 1930 as a reference to the “Pansy Craze” that had recently arisen in nightclubs in Greenwich Village and Harlem, in which effeminate gay men performed openly on stage, and which the Hays Code outlawed in 1933 with the fall of prohibition.

     Asked to serve the meal Pansy has prepared for the boss of the ranch, Windy enters her cabin with tray in hand, the female boss Molly calling out “Pansy?” before, discovering Windy, explaining, “I thought you were Pansy,” to which the Haines character quips “I’m the wildest pansy you ever picked.”

      Almost immediately, as he attempts to hover over her, Molly queries him “Why you acting that way?” Windy’s answer reiterates all the fairy jokes ever associated with James Barrie’s most well-known character: “It’s the Peter Pan in me.”

      When he finally comes to recognize that the “boss” is in fact Molly, the sister of one of the cowboys who has enslaved him, Windy immediately makes a come-back, “The boss don’t have no pants on.”

      Meanwhile the cowboys, out to make Windy’s life a hell, order him to milk the cows. When he accidentally enters the bull-pen where a horned beast comes running in his direction, forcing Windy to dive over the fence, one of the cowboys exclaims “He sure tore into them bulls.”

      Upon Molly’s suggestion, the cowboys order he make the daily deliveries, which consists of loading up a small cart with cow manure mixed into the straw and moving it into a nearby field. Egging him on, the ranchers insist that he must dress in his very best clothes.


     Windy’s untoward response is an outright admission of his sculpted male torso: “I not only have the clothes to wear, but I have the figure.” When, a few moments later, he appears in a dapper suit with hat upon his head, even a cowboy sarcastically admits “You’re beautiful.”

     You get the idea. The writers must have thoroughly enjoyed their writing sessions, quaveringly attempting to keep a tight line between their openly queer-based risqué comments and the cowboy’s more mean-spirited taunts.

     To tamp down what might almost be perceived as homophobic comments, most of the sexual interchanges are between Windy and the cowboy comic dunce of the group. Having just purchased a handsome pair of horse pants the straight-man shows them off to Windy, who attracted to this somewhat bizarre item of apparel, from time-to-time takes out a pocket watch from his vest before returning it. Noticing the shiny object, the not-too-bright cowpoke predictably asks if it’s for sale.

      “Oh no, I couldn’t sell it,” sighs the con-man. “It was given to me by my pater, my father.” After establishing that his father is now dead and the treasure is his last memory of him, Windy again lures in his victim, who blurts out “I’d like to see your pater,” his clumsy pronunciation making the word sound as close to “peter” as possible.


       In the very next scene, Windy appears before his cowboy friends in the horse pants, to which the dunce explains, “He got my horse pants.”

       There is one scene, however, that makes it clearly apparent that the cowboys recognize Windy as representing a being quite different from them. As they plan for a dance in celebration of the roundup which will take the cowboys away for the ranch for a few days, Molly’s brother Buck (Charles Middleton) takes the neophyte aside to warn him from attending the celebration: “The folks that come around here don’t herd with your kind.”

     And we immediately recognize at the moment that the campy patter has come to a stop. The plot—in which Molly is snake-bitten and saved by Windy who drives her to a nearby Indian encampment where the medicine man saves her (Windy’s reply: “Thanks chief, you’re a sweetheart.”); attempts to drive her home through a blinding sand storm; is chased by the cowmen, guns blazing, through a small pueblo village; and, upon their discovery that he was not intending to abscond with their boss, but was heroically trying to save her, celebrates him by accepting Windy into their communal “herd”—slowly winds down to tick away this film’s more traditional conventions.

     The astounding fact that this picture was one of Hollywood’s more successful offerings of 1930 hints that perhaps the audience of the day better understood the campy one-liners than they let on.

 

Los Angeles, September 11, 2020

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (September 2020) and My Queer Cinema blog (September 2020).

Index R-Z

Angelo Raaijmakers I, Adonis / 2021 Peeter Rabane Firebird / 2021   Tyler Rabinowitz Catalina / 2022 Tyler Rabinowitz See You Soon / 20...