love is death
by Douglas Messerli
F. W. Murnau and Robert J. Flaherty
(screenplay), F. W. Murnau (director) Tabu:
A Story of the South Seas / 1931
Watching the great German-American
director F. W. Murnau’s last film yesterday, I suddenly perceived that—despite
its exotic locale of Bora Bora and the fact that numerous film critics note
time and again just how different this film, with its use of natural scenery
and real-life constructions, is from his highly stylized and theatricalized
pairings of costumes and sets of films such as Nosferatu, Faust, and Sunrise—it shares his basic German
sensibility so evident in someone like Wagner: love is death.
For Murnau—an outsider homosexual,
forced to leave Germany because of the strict laws against his sexuality—his
predilections for handsome young men, in fact, were dangerous. Shortly after
filming Tabu and before its
theatrical release, the director died in a fiery car crash driven by a young
Filipino, chosen, so the story goes, because of his beauty more than his
driving skills. Some legends have it that Murnau died while committing fellatio
on his young charge. Love was certainly death for Murnau himself.
But so too, at least spiritually speaking, is it in almost all his
films. In Nosferatu, for example,
Orlok, clearly attracted by the handsome Hutter, spares him to stalk, instead,
Hutter’s wife Ellen, who gives up her life to keep the monster near her until a
beam of sunlight turns him to dust; Gretchen, similarly, must give up her life
for the sexual debauchery of Faust; although the protagonists of Sunrise both survive, they both first
symbolically die, as the husband plots his wife’s death and, ironically, when
he abandons his plans, seemingly drowns.
Yes, Tabu in its use of
natural space and amateur Tahitian actors (Matahi and Anne Chevalier) as the
young lovers, The Boy and The Girl, is superficially different from these
earlier works, but underlying these cinematic shifts is a similar story. The
film, much like Nosferatu descends upon the neck of Hutter, spends much of its
early frames in homoerotic voyeurism of the young native boys at play, the
directors’ camera almost languishing over the shirtless and semi-pantless
Matahi as he spears fish, before wetting all the male characters down in the
surges of the surrounding sea and slides in the flow of a nearby waterfall, the
focus particularly attending to their wet buttocks. It may be some of the most
sensuously sexual filmmaking outside of the porn industry. It is no surprise
that Robert J. Flaherty, more interested in anthropologic specificity, would
come to abandon this project.
The ceremonial dances performed for her leaving them represent, perhaps,
some of the steamiest dancing ever brought to the wide screen, as the young
bare-chested maidens surround Reri while oggling the young men in grass skirts
provocatively swaying their hips. Even in his complete despair, Matahi cannot
resist joining the other boys, drawing the new goddess into an intense dance
that might be seen to break the Tabu even before she departs.
Time passes as the two fall ever deeper in love, but we perceive the
consequences of their illegal rapture. Reri receives a message from Hitu,
demanding that she leave the island and return to him within three days. When
the couple attempt to book passage on another ship that might save their lives,
they discover themselves to be so deeply in debt that they cannot afford to
travel. If this is a safer place, it is far less “civilized” than their
original paradise.
That morning Matahi sneaks out to dive into the Tabu region, and in a
stunningly filmed sequence in which we glimpse, only momentarily, his body
against the shimmering reflections of water, he returns with what is apparently
a black pearl; he has survived. In his absence the shadow of Hitu, like
Nosferatu’s shadow hovering over the innocent Ellen, has come to claim Reri.
She has been taken to his boat. When Matahi discovers the fact he bravely
attempts to swim after, but almost reaching the rope that might help him
recapture his bride, we observe a knife in the hand of Hitu cutting the
connecting line. The boy swims for a short while longer before finally
disappearing into the surrounding waters. Death has taken love one more time.
In short, even if this film seemed ti be recognized as a transformative
shift that might have occurred in Murnau’s great filmmaking, it remains, at
least structurally, apiece with his previous works—all films that, as Alexandre
Astruc has described as a “fatality hidden behind the most harmless elements of
the frame.” Even the paradisiacal sunlit world of Bora Bora contains dark
shadows that sever the lover from the object of his or her love. It is almost
as if Murnau, at a time when he might have most enjoyed the fruits of his
brilliant career, foresaw that love—or at least sex—would inevitably lead to self-destruction.
Los Angeles, December 19, 2012
Reprinted from International Cinema Review (December 2012).




No comments:
Post a Comment