Saturday, January 24, 2026

Morton DaCosta | Auntie Mame / 1958

room with a view

by Douglas Messerli

 

Betty Comden and Adolph Green (screenplay, based on the novel by Patrick Dennis), Morton DaCosta (director) Auntie Mame / 1958

Almost anyone of a certain age will recognize the 1958 film starring Rosalind Russell, Auntie Mame, as a gay icon. Many have even cited it as the quintessential gay camp work of the 1950s. The original book was written by Edward Everett Tanner III (pseudonym Patrick Dennis) who was openly bisexual, and the play, transformed into the film by the gay-friendly writing team of Betty Comden and Adolph Green, was originally written by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee, Lawrence also a gay man (a personal friend of mine). And the film featured gowns (an important element in this work) by the gay designer Orry-Kelly (incidentally an early lover of Cary Grant) and the set designer—crucial to this film version—was the highly respected George James Hopkins who had had an intimate gay relationship with director William Desmond Taylor who was scandalously murdered in 1922. The later musical version of Mame was helmed by a gay composer Jerry Herman. 


    Although it is not fully documented, some sources have described director Morton DaCosta (born Morton Tecosky) as being a gay man; and others describe Coral Browne, who played Vera Charles, as a lesbian. She married gay actor Vincent Price in 1974, and died shortly before him in 1989.

   For all that, however, Auntie Mame, at least superficially, is not at all an LGBTQ movie. Mame herself (Rosalind Russell), although clearly unconventional—her brother has long resisted leaving his son Patrick (Jan Handzlik) with her for that reason—is clearly heterosexual, first a regular companion of publisher Lindsay Woolsey (Patric Knowles), before escaping the charming arms of her literary collaborator Brian O’Bannion (Robin Hughes), and later marrying the wealthy Southern oil magnate Beauregard Jackson Pickett Burnside (Forrest Tucker).

    True, Mame does seem oddly close to her bosom buddy, stage actress Vera, who stays most nights in Mame’s No. 3 Beekman Place apartment. But it is clear, despite their deep friendship, they do not share a bed. Besides, Vera is far too drunk by the end of each evening to ever engage in sex. Mame hints that she “just loves little boys.”

     The nephew Patrick who is placed in her care is a rather bland heterosexual, growing up (as actor Roger Smith) into a bigoted-babbling-Babcock-like young man ready to marry the empty headed Gloria Upson (Joanna Barnes) until Mame corrects his course, leading him straight to the beautiful, intelligent, and quite clever Pegeen Ryan (Pippa Scott) by the end of the film.

     One her closest friends, teacher Acacius Page (Henry Brandon) appears to be a pedophile, but even he seems to be interested in both sexes since in his co-educational classroom boy and girls, as well as male and female teachers, get naked after yogurt time and play out games of heterosexual “fish” procreation, evidently the males leaving their “sperm” in the imaginary waters of the classroom floor to impregnate the female fish. 


   A dear friend of Mame’s, who we never see, but who is clearly around often enough to teach the young Patrick how to properly mix a martini, is Alexander Woolcott, who appears as a gay man in George S. Kaufman and Moss Hart’s comedy The Man Who Came to Dinner, but may have actually just been impotent (a result of childhood mumps).

     Yet there is one true “fairy” in Mame Dennis’ household, Ito (Yuki Shimoda), the Asian houseboy, who regularly flutters by with dresses in hand and greets the terrified Norah Muldoon (Connie Gilchrist) and her young charge as they intrude upon their first Mame Dennis party. 


    At that very party to which we are voyeurs, we observe several lesbian figures, obvious in their male based attire, and young good-looking gay men in sporty white attire; and the party conversation to which we are not fully privy obviously includes a discussion of the rebellious sapphic work Lysistrata, the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, the political transformer Karl Marx, and the observation that someone is “heterosexual,” since these words, among others, appear on the pages of the notebook Mame has given Patrick to write down what he does not understand. These “words” matched the cornerstones that I would years later consider at the moment of coming out, issues involving religion, politics, and sexuality. For me they came as a package deal, which perhaps Auntie Mame had already implanted in my brain.

 

     And, of course, in her grand operatic gestures, her larger than life presence, and her bohemian attitudes toward living, Mame herself personifies gay life, which is the essence of the work, and why gay men and women have so long been attracted to this movie.

     Jonny Stone, writing in the online magazine Snack sums it up: “There are a handful of LGBTQ+ characters (mostly friends of Mame’s seen at her parties), but remember when the film was made. There were never going to be openly gay, well-rounded queer characters in Auntie Mame. That isn’t to say the film is inherently straight: it tiptoes around otherness sufficiently for a film made in 1958, and Mame actively surrounds herself with people who reject societal norms, pride themselves on being alternative and are, in some cases, clearly queer. A film that does so, in this era, deserves more credit for portraying otherness (or at least embracing a liberal, open-minded lifestyle) and celebrating what makes each of us unique.”

     Paul Roen, author of High Camp expressed it more succinctly: the best way to approach Mame is to think of her as a “disguised, transexualised version of a very hip, urban, sophisticated male homosexual.”

    In fact, Auntie Mame goes much further than most of the other films of the day, in that the straight-laced heterosexual world is the villain of the piece, represented by the “bully” Dwight Babcock (Fred Clark) who pulls Patrick out of Acacius’ “depraved” classroom and sends the boy off to a private school in order to make him a boring and bigoted straight man. Along with the Depression, which sends Mame into a financial spin and off to several jobs—an office telephone operator, a minor secondary actor, and a Macy’s sales clerk—for which she has a far too grandiose personality and behavioral traits to properly engage in simple employment; she and her nephew are not poised to submit to the social order of the day.


    She is saved by the kindly, mamma’s boy Southerner Beauregard Burnside, who finally finds someone in Mame who can stand up both to his dominating mother and the rapacious home-town girl Sally Cato MacDougall (Brook Byron), determined to make him her unhappy husband to what her little brother describes as “the meanest filly in all the South.”

    What Mame evidently sees in Beauregard is both his confusion and sweet-hearted charm, which is enough along with his wealth to make him desirable. But otherwise, Beauregard is mostly an observer of life, a man determined to photograph all he sees, as opposed to a man of assimilated experience, and accordingly, he is whisked away from the story by falling to his death in the alps as soon as possible so that Mame can continue into the next phase of her life, centered on saving her boy from the hands of the Babcocks of the world.


    She does so by pretense, charming her way into their empty, small-minded lives by throwing a pre-wedding party where she serves up e eccentric hors d'oeuvres and an exotic drink, by redecorating her apartment in a moderne manner similar to what made French comic filmmaker Jacques Tati so uncomfortable in Mon Oncle (released the very same year as Auntie Mame the movie), and trotting out first her new assistant, Pegeen to tantalize Patrick of what a woman might be beyond one whose favorite talking point is about how she and her girl friends squashed a ping-pong ball and couldn’t continue their game* and who thinks that books are awfully decorative.

    She then brings on her former seemingly unmarried secretary Agnes Gooch (Peggy Cass), now heavily pregnant with Brian O’Bannion’s child, followed by her long time friends Vera and Lindsay, the latter of whom carries with him the galleys of Mame’s new tell-all autobiography, to which she hands out chapters to Patrick and others, who reading them recall the truly wonderful times they have experienced in her presence. 


     Finally, she announces her action—which totally abrogates all the plans the Upsons have had to buy the next-door property for Patrick and their daughter, creating a kind of patio-to-patio sympatico—of purchasing that property and  dedicating her royalties to a home for refugee Jewish children to be built adjoining the Upson’s home in Mountebank.

     By evening’s end she has so thoroughly reminded Patrick of what his life was like before meeting Dwight Babcock and so totally offended the entire Upson tribe that the marriage is over, leaving the unwanted guests no choice but to grandly exit, utterly offended by the whole affair.

     Once again, Mame has had her way and revenge, breaking through another version of Sinclair Lewis’ Babbitt mentality, and carving out a new world of eccentric difference that can only be compared with the far later Rainbow coalition. Mame is about inclusiveness and diversity, while the Babcock-Upson world is about the straight and narrow world of exclusivity and exclusion signified by the 1950-1954 activities of Joseph McCarthy, his attacks on anyone with even casual leftist (all defined as communism by his followers) ties and torturing the LGBT world with the “lavender scare.”

     It is useful to remember that Edward R. Murrow’s memorable attack on McCarthy which killed McCarthyism occurred in 1954, only two years before the original stage production of Auntie Mame in 1956, also starring Rosalind Russell and featuring Jan Handzlik, Yuki Shimoda, and Peggy Cass. And McCarthy himself died, of undetermined causes but obviously helped along by the diminishment of his powers, only one year before the movie.



    No one in the movie industry could be blind to the fact that Mame Dennis stood against all that McCarthy and those who supported his years of terror stood for. And in that sense, this play/motion picture became almost a symbol of a possible new liberation, certainly for young viewers such as me, who all suddenly wished we had an aunt like Mame. I don’t think my grandmother was perhaps as open-minded as Mame, and she certainly wasn’t as well-do-to or traveled, but in my willful imagination she became for me a kind of Mame Dennis, opening up new worlds never before imagined, as Mame declares she will for Patrick and Pegeen’s son, who she is determined to whisk away on yet another voyage around the world.

    I wanted to believe in someone like Mame, and that was all the play and movie required, a desire to live in an alternative space from the patriarchal and heteronormative world that the late 1950s and early 1960s had become. If I dreamt of a world outside of my already 11-year old sense of despair in facing 4 long years before I might escape to the possibility of college or university offered, Auntie Mame helped to get there by serving as a glimpse into a world the people I knew never talked about.

    How I now wish I could have communicated just how much this work had subliminally affected me to the author, Jerry Lawrence or perhaps even the actor Jan Handzlik who I later met at the Algonquin Hotel party I gave to celebrate Lawrence’s career, at which Jerry Herman also sang and played the piano.

    Not only the character, but the film and play itself offered so many budding queers such as me a room with a view unavailable to most ordinary American citizens.

 

   *Gloria’s entire comment is fascinating in its brilliant recreation of total emptiness: “Bunny Bixler and I were in the semi-finals - the very semi-finals, mind you - of the ping-pong tournament at the club and this ghastly thing happened. We were both playing way over our heads and the score was 29-28. And we had this really terrific volley and I stepped back to get this really terrific shot. And I stepped on the ping-pong ball! I just squashed it to bits. And then Bunny and I ran to the closet of the game room to get another ping-pong ball and the closet was locked! Imagine? We had to call the whole thing off. Well, it was ghastly. Well, it was just ghastly.” From Mame and her gang she gets none of the laughs and sympathy the Upsons readily offer up.

 

Los Angeles, January 24, 2026

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (January 2026).   

 

Friday, January 23, 2026

Unknown filmmaker | Le grand sout d’homme (Bossom Buddies) / c. 1925

giving him what he wants

by Douglas Messerli

 

Unknown filmmaker Le grand sout d’homme (Bossom Buddies) / c. 1925

 

A woman who’s sitting at a bar with a well-dressed gentleman, Adémar, finally grows tired of his lack of attention and pulls over a big-chested sailor and hands him to the gent. Meanwhile she goes off to the bartender and begins to suck his cock.

     Almost immediately the Proustian gentleman begins to joyfully suck the sailor’s cock. They continue for several minutes before the sailor finally turns the tables, beginning to fuck the gentleman, the woman and bartender continuing to get it on as well.


      In a latter cut, the woman is finally sucking her young aesthete while the sailor fucks her. The gentlemen finally fucks her as the film comes to a happy end.

      This film apparently has no title. But at one point the lady describes her Adémar sardonically as being “le grand sout d’homme” for the night.

 

Los Angeles, October 20, 2023

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (October 2023).


Unknown filmmaker | L’heure du thé (Tea Time) / 1925

two for two guests

by Douglas Messerli

 

Unknown filmmaker L’heure du thé (Tea Time) / 1925

 

A woman awaits her tea time visitors, a conservatively dressed man and woman, who she invites to join her on her terrace. Meanwhile, nearby lurks her gardener.

        Meanwhile, host makes no attempt to cover up the fact that under her short dress she is not wearing panties, a “vision” of which the gardener certainly takes notice even if the guests haven’t yet. He’s already got his cock out and is busy masturbating. The host, in turn, takes notice of her employee, offering cigarettes to her guests and moving closer to the gentleman, who soon makes no deal of putting his arm around her and beginning to feel her breast. The woman he came with, meanwhile, pulls out his cock and proceeds to enjoy it.


        As the male goes down on his host’s vagina, his female friend moves over to engage in intense tonguing of her host’s mouth.

       Not to forget the gardener, he suddenly is found to be fucking the female guest, and soon after attends to his male visitor’s cock, while their females join up in their own sucking combination.

        Just as suddenly they change positions, with the women sitting on the lap and cocks of the two gentlemen.

        Finally, it’s time to take tea.

 

Los Angeles, September 20, 2023

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (September 2023).

   

All of these films above and others are available on Polissons et Galipettes (The Good Old Naughty Days) (2002, Micel Reilhac and Cécile Babiole).

Unknown filmmaker | La fessée à l’école (School Spanking) / 1925

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Unknown filmmaker | L'abbé Bitt au couvent (Abbot Bitt at the Convent) / 1925

the blessing

by Douglas Messerli

 

Unknown filmmaker L'abbé Bitt au couvent (Abbot Bitt at the Convent) / 1925

 

It is lunchtime at the convent, and the cook is busy chopping up a garni for the soup of the day while Sister Quiquette and her friend arrive, the Sister telling the cook to bring them their meal and to not disturb them any further.

      Mr. Dupédé does so, as they sit down to hors-d’œuvres and wine. But he is also rather curious and cautiously opens the serving window to spy on them. He observes nothing out of the ordinary. Yet, as the title card alerts us, “After the hors-d’œuvres, another kind of hors-d’œuvres,” one of the two nuns coming to sit beside the other.


      They move closer to kiss quite immediately, and within seconds the first nun has laid the other out upon the table, raised her robe, and begun licking her cunt. Soon they are undressing.

      Meanwhile the Abbot Bitt wandering about the place observes Mr. Dupédé, now busy watching the fun through the service window. The Abbott, without hesitation, pulls down the window so that the cook cannot move, lifts up Dupédé’s robe and begins to fuck him.

      Seeing the position in which the cook is trapped, the women quickly pull their table over closer to the window so that the nun on the table might put her vagina into the caught cook’s face, while the other leans over her friend to get her to get her ass sucked.

      Before long the abbot has joined the women and suffers the pleasures of having his cock sucked. The title card announces that it is time to give his blessing which he does by standing up, laying the woman on her back and fucking her. As in Le Ménage moderne du Madame Butterfly, this little porno has no problem showing us the Abbot’s cum.

 

Los Angeles, October 19, 2023

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (October 2023).

Unknown filmmaker | Atelier Faiminette (Women’s Workshop) / 1921

pins and needles

by Douglas Messerli

 

Unknown filmmaker | Atelier Faiminette (Women’s Workshop) / 1921

 

This film takes place in a garment factory where women are busy working when for a few moments the time out to play. When one girl comes in looking for her pins and needles, the whole group of women stand up on the tables, perfectly happy to show off their legs. A few moments later, they all turn on the interruptive worker, pulling down her pants to give her naked bottom a good slapping.


      A few frames later, two women exit, clearly caught up in lust. They quickly kiss, undress one another, and begin in various positions to suck and lick each other, clearly in bliss. That is until their boss suddenly enters. To distract him or simply make sure that he doesn’t report them, they quickly pull him down between them, pull out his cock and begin masturbating him.


      One of the ladies stands to dance in the nude while the other begins to suck him off. Hardly satisfied with that, the boss begins to lick one of the girl’s ass, while other performs cunnilingus on her friend.

      Soon after, the silly boss not able to even fully get an erection, falls to the floor hoping one of the girls might leap upon him. But the film ends without providing him with any satisfaction. And the women seem clearly to have had more fun with one another.

 

Los Angeles, September 19, 2023

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (September 2023).

Bernard Natan | Le Ménage moderne du Madame Butterfly / 1920

queering the opera

by Douglas Messerli

 

Bernard Natan (scenario, based on the play by David Belasco and the opera by Giacomo Puccini with libretto by Luigi Illica and Giuseppe Giacosa, and director) Le Ménage moderne du Madame Butterfly / 1920

 

Madame Butterfly, in this amazingly odd film from 1920, Le Ménage moderne du Madame Butterfly—lonely and tired of waiting for her lying and philandering husband Pinkerton (this Butterfly has no child)—has developed feelings for her maid Suzuki (here called Soussaki) with whom she has developed a lesbian relationship, not only gesturally expressed as we might have imagined of a 1920s film, but in this case, quite literally shown to us through a pornographic presentation of the two making love, completely naked, with Soussaki licking Butterfly’s vulva.


     Given this film’s pornographic intent, we might imagine a series of rather washed-out frames with a hand-held jittering camera. But this film, credited generally to Romanian Jewish director Bernard Natan,* is well-lit and quite sophisticatedly edited as we cut to the harbor of Nagasaki which reveals the return of Pinkerton’s ship, before the director cuts further to reveal quite crafted scenes of Nagasaki street life and returning us to Madame Butterfly’s mountain home, at which Pinkerton has just arrived with no one there to greet him, his wife obviously still involved with her lovemaking with Soussaki.


     After the handsome Pinkerton rings a small hand-gong for someone to greet him, the servant-boy Pink-hop (played by Nathan) hurries out and, as penance evidently for his inattentiveness, begins unbuttoning Pinkerton’s jacket, the Captain smiling with surprised joy at his attentions.

     Undoing Pinkerton’s white sailor pants, he pulls out his cock and begins to suck it into erection. Pinkerton pulls him around, Pink-hop lifting his robe, and presenting his ass for the Captain to fuck him, which he quickly proceeds to do. Clearly, the sailor feels a great sense of relief and regeneration from the act as the intertitles announce “L’infidèle est enfin revenu...” (“The infidel is finally back.”).


    Pinkerton finally asks to see his wife, to tell her evidently that he has since married an American woman.

      Despite his long absence and the sad news he bears, Butterfly is still highly attracted to him, and quickly begins a long embrace and kiss, as Soussaki begins to unbutton his pants, the two of them pulling him down onto the tatami mat, where he performs cunnilingus on Butterfly as Soussaki sucks him off.


      In the next scene we see him fucking Butterfly while Soussaki keeps his penis in position, Pink-hop masturbating and visually cumming on screen as he watches the sexual act.


     At this point, the film version I was watching, from the Bruce Farrahday Collection available on The Internet Archive through Vimeo, ends. Perhaps there is a second part, however, since the Wikipedia entry describes a continuation of their sexual activities, suggesting that Pinkerton goes on to engage in oral, anal, and vaginal sex with Soussaki before they are joined by US consul Sharpless, who along with Pink-hop engage in an orgy of sexual intercourse with the three others. Later Pink-hop also fellates Pinkerton and Sharpless, the film ending with Pinkerton waving to the audience.

     Bernard Natan acted in at least one other pornographic film prior to this one, and between 1920 and 1927, after emigrating to France the year of this film, Natan produced and directed at least 20 further porn films, many times appearing in them. A number of the films included homosexual and bisexual oral and anal intercourse actions performed by Natan.

     Le Ménage moderne du Madame Butterfly, however, has the distinction of being one of the very first of films, particularly of such high quality, depicting lesbianism, gay sex, and bisexuality all in one work.

     This film and Natan’s other contributions to the genre, however, were far from the first pornographic films produced. The first known example seems to have been made in 1908, with about 2000 hardcore films, about 600 prior to 1960, screened by 1970. Commentators guess that about 10 percent of these mostly “stag films” contained some homosexual activity, from a simple hand on the shoulder, thigh, or hip during hardcore anal or oral sex to more complex LGBT references, but most were presented in the context of heterosexual normality, accordingly rendering them into essentially bisexual acts.

      Not only are scholars impressed with the high quality of the lighting and camera movements of this work, but the costumes and sets are relatively lavish. The fact that Natan, moreover, even felt willing to risk the inclusion of homosexuality activity suggests that he recognized that here was an audience interested in such cinema. It’s even more startling that Natan produced, wrote, directed, and performed in such hardcore films given the fact that only nine years after making Madame Butterfly he would become the owner of Pathé, the largest mainstream film studio in France.

     Except for a few examples such as this remarkable film, I have basically steered away from pornographic movies, although that is increasingly becoming more difficult to do given the blurring of lines between the two aspects of LGBTQ filmmaking and the increasing quality and narrative sophistication of gay and lesbian porno films. The few examples I have included in the My Queer Cinema volumes point to the increasing overlap of what once were thought to be oppositional genres, which given the increasing openness of sexual expression have begun to blend. Of course, at one time all of the thousands of films I speak of in these volumes might have been perceived as pornographic by the heterosexual hegemony.

     Arguably, Natan and his crew had more fun even than the Marx Brothers in queering up serious opera.

 

*Some have argued that this film was not written by Natan, nor was he a performer in it.       

 

Los Angeles, April 12, 2021

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (April 2021).

Index R-Z

Angelo Raaijmakers I, Adonis / 2021 Peeter Rabane Firebird / 2021   Tyler Rabinowitz Catalina / 2022 Tyler Rabinowitz See You Soon / 20...