a queer paradise without fear or guilt
by Douglas Messerli
James Bolton (screenplay, based on the fiction
by Jim Grimsley, and director) Dream Boy / 2008
James Bolton’s Dream Boy, based on a
fiction by Jim Grimsley, begins in a way that might support the easier
interpretations of its title, suggesting that the backwater territory of
Louisiana to where Nathan Davies (Stephan Bender) and his family has moved
serves as backdrop to yet another tale of a neighbor kid, Roy (Maximillian
Roeg) discovering his gay dreamboat, in this case, the shy Nathan.
But
something about this film doesn’t quite click into the gears of such now almost
predictable gay teen romances, beginning as they generally do with a few
stuttering attempts to demonstrate what their hormones demand followed by a
longer period of angst about the direction in which their sexual drives have
sent them.
Before long they have almost entered a relationship where they feel such
a strong emotional tie that Roy asks, almost out of a sense of possessiveness,
whether or not Nathan has had such homosexual contact previously. Nathan admits
that this is his first time, the fact of with which Roy, without admitting so
much, seems to take solace. That such gay virgins might suddenly find
themselves in the midst of such longing and desire seems a bit
incredible—particularly in an isolated world where, as Roy tells Nathan, hardly
anyone else visits. It might almost be a kind of lost paradise in which neither
boy feels the need for any feelings of fear or guilt.
Yet, when soon after Nathan begins to fuck his friend, Roy suddenly
pulls away, clearly shocked by the younger boy’s skill regarding what he might
imagine is a neophyte’s attempts to please him. He goes so far as to accuse
Nathan of lying about his previous experiences with a male other.
Moreover, the fact that the woods nearby are filled with strange
totemistic locations, a common Christian cemetery, an ancient Indian burial
ground, and an empty mansion from the long ago slave days which is said to be
haunted, all suggest to the viewer that something is slightly amiss in this
movie if we are to imagine it as a youthful portrait of two gay boys coming of
age.
Gradually, the “dream boy” epithet shifts from a notion of Nathan being
a model of Roy’s sexual desires, to the possibility of the entire story working
within or at least beside a kind of fantasy or a presentation of an unreliable
realist narrative somehow intertwined with dreams. In short, the love
relationship between Nathan and Roy begins to take on the shape of a work such
as Andrè Breton’s surrealist fiction Nadja, a mix of the Russian concept
of “hope” and the Spanish “Nadie” or “No one.”
Vivien insists that her now increasingly drunken husband leave their son
alone. And when we observe Nathan, as he prepares to go to sleep, tying a piece
of twine between his chest of drawers and his bed post, we suddenly know that
we are being told something far darker than this tale might have led us to
believe, particularly when the father trips later over the trap, the fact of
which sends Nathan scurrying to the nearby graveyard in order to sleep out the rest
of the night.
We now can comprehend how Nathan has learned to “screw” so
professionally. His father has obviously been abusing the boy for a long while.
In the haunted house, however, Nathan begins to hear what appears to be
his father’s voice, finding comfort only in the arms of his friend as they hide
away in one of the tents which they have erected in the mansion itself. The
next morning, as the other two boys explore the mansion’s upper floors, Nathan
and Roy once more enjoy sex, for the first time Roy performing fellatio on
Nathan. In the middle of their pleasure, however, the other two boys return to
catch them in the act.
A
funeral in the local Baptist Church follows, but as Roy returns to the ranch
hand’s room he has a vision of Nathan, greeting the boy with a smile. Next door
we see Nathan’s mother, suitcase in hand, obviously leaving her abusive husband
forever.
The next morning on his school-day bus route, Roy looks once more into
the rearview mirror to see Nathan’s face reflected in it, the only rational
explanation being that Nathan has either now become a dream from which Roy will
never escape or that he has been a dream-figure all along.*
*I have never read Grimsley’s 1995 novel, but
apparently it ends with a kind of resurrection, with Nathan awakening in the
Mansion to seek out Roy, the two discussing how they might escape the others
who may search them out and agreeing to re-enter the woods and disappear
forever from society. In short, Nathan’s death is still an open issue by the
close of the fiction. Yet clearly, within any realist context, the events which
seem to still partake of the realist conventions of the rest of the book make
sense only if they are perceived as being a part of a dream world or a fantasy.
I
might also mention that Grimsley is also a noted playwright, and I believe is a
friend of one of the playwrights I published on my Sun & Moon Press, either
Mac Wellman or Len Jenkin. In any event, Grimsley sent me a manuscript, if I
recall correctly, of his collected plays Mr. Universe and Other Plays,
which was ultimately published by Algonquin Books of Chapel Hill in 1998, after
I passed on it because of my recognition that I could not continue publishing
books on that imprint, having just begun to produce new titles under my Green
Integer.
Los Angeles, September 20, 2020
Reprinted from World Cinema Review and My
Queer Cinema blog (September 2020).





No comments:
Post a Comment