Friday, January 5, 2024

Roy Clements | He Became a Regular Fellow / 1916 [Lost film]

how to make a sissy into a man

by Douglas Messerli

 

Bennett Cohen (scenario), Roy Clements (director) He Became a Regular Fellow / 1916 || lost film


Surely one of the most obnoxious of the early “sissy” films is Roy Clements’ He Became a Regular Fellow, whose central character, J. Percival Bean (Pat Rooney), a sissy extraordinaire, disgusts his father for his effeminate ways. Mr. Bean (Edward Sedgwick) determines to send him off to college to make a man of him.


     Living in a college dormitory seems to be what high school is to most young gay men of today, a miserable place for the young Bean, tortured by the other boys. He writes home about his grievances to his mother, but Bean Sr. intercepts the letter, writing him back that he must “stick it out.”

      At one point he meets a girl named Trixie (Jessie Arnold). Taking a liking to him, she asks him for a picture of his mother, and soon after makes herself up to dress and look like her, taking Percy out of a date.

    Percy comes back very late, ever-so-slightly intoxicated, the Principal feeling, of course, that it is his duty to notify the father. When Bean discovers what really happened, he immediately arranges for the two to be married, proud that his son has finally become a man.

    In short, the plot presumes that the real problem with a gay boy is his relationship with his mother, and imagines that his “female” mannerisms are related to his identification with her. The only way around this is for a girlfriend to replace the mother so that he might marry her and become happy ever after. And in in doing so, of course, he is defined as a man.

     It’s hard to know even where to begin in explaining the absurdity of the film’s comic assertions. Perhaps by pointing out that homosexuality is again laid at the doorstep of the mother, as if it were her influence that had made him into a “sissy” in the first place, yet another thing the patriarchy blames women for.  And, of course, the very idea that being a “sissy” is merely a state of mind that a good girl might easily be able to change has been the wrong-headed logic among thousands of such devouring women, obviously hoping to sweep up a husband from the dregs of his ineffectual masculinity. Do young college girls still believe that?

      And, of course, the idea that marriage is necessary to define oneself as a “regular fellow” is one of the longest shared illusions among humans since they began to walk the earth. Must one presume, moreover, that once he marries Trixie, his effeminate manners will automatically disappear?

      Finally, we might question whether what we call “effeminacy” in males is necessarily a bad thing, or even has anything whatsoever to do with sex. I know several heterosexual married men who might also be described as slightly lisping, softspoken individuals, some of whom also use a great many hand gestures.

      Accordingly, in one short film, it is absurd for a writer and director to imagine that homosexuality might be identified through effeminate behavior, is an abnormal condition created by a young man’s relationship with his mother, and that the way to resolve this is find a woman willing to convert herself into the mother, which will not only attract the boy—who evidently has been desperate all along to commit incest—but will utterly change the way he walks, speaks, and perhaps even thinks. Good luck with that philosophy! I’m taking bets on how long Percy’s and Trixie’s marriage lasts—even if he can waddle over to the altar.

      This film is all a slightly misconceived Freudian myth that has nothing whatsoever to do with reality, although I doubt whether its creator even meant it to.  It is after all a comedy, a movie intended to make one laugh. Thank heaven by the time of Ralph Cedar’s surprising film, The Soilers (1923) we finally realize a sissy may certainly be someone to be reckoned with, but definitely not someone to be cured.

 

Los Angeles, October 1, 2021

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (October 2021).

Louis Myll | Keep Moving (The Mishaps of Musty Suffer #2) / 1915, released 1916

the bully

by Douglas Messerli

 

Louis Myll (director) Keep Moving (The Mishaps of Musty Suffer #2) / 1915, released 1916

 

Although filmed in 1915, Louis Myll’s Keep Moving was not released until 1916, as the first of what eventually became ten one-reel adventures titled collectively as The Mishaps of Musty Suffer, some or perhaps all of which still exist in the Turner Classics Movie archives.

     This first section appears to not have yet established Musty’s royal background, which is summarized by TCM as follows:

 

“Gloom pervades the kingdom of Blunderland because the royal child longs to see the world. After a ceremony in which the king and queen rollerskate to the throne, the fairy tramp appears and sends the royal child into the wicked world. Dippy Mary gives the child, now a tramp known as Musty Suffer, a mansion where he bathes in beer and is cuddled by six beautiful women, but when Mary serenades him with a German band, he throws himself out of the window and lands in a military ambulance. Musty is taken to prison and, because he refuses to drink water, is ordered to be shot; but he stops several cannon balls with his chest and escapes through rubber bars. After the fairy tramp returns Musty to the mansion, Musty is abducted by burglars who force him to fight champion Willie Work. Although Willie beats Musty unmercifully, they set off together in search of adventure. At a barber shop, hair restorer is put on Musty's face. In a saloon, Musty's new beard gets saturated with gasoline and an explosion rids him of his whiskers. After other adventures, Musty wishes to be sent back to the palace. The fairy tramp accomplishes this and Musty becomes the royal child again.”

 

    Others in the series included Keep Moving, Cruel and Unusual, Hold Fast!, Going Up, Look Out Below, The Lightning, Bells and Belles, Just Imagination, and Out of Order. In all of them, everyday world events get mixed up with the fairy world from which Musty comes, creating havoc for him and the everyday world he inhabits.


    Since variations of some of these events occur in Keep Moving according to its Moving Picture World synopsis, perhaps the series was originally conceived differently than the film ultimately became, which would explain the variations in tone and substance in the synopsis provided by Moving Picture World from that of TCM.

    The Moving Picture World makes no mention of a magical kingdom, a royal background or the various other fantastical elements described above. In this first film, we’re simply told that Musty (Harry Watson) gets a job in a grocery store before being fired, in which various events occur, beginning with a female customer who demands that he show her nearly everything in the store before buying only a five-cent package of crackers; he takes revenge by eating the artificial grapes on her hat. When she discovers him in process, she throws a basket at apples at him.

     Then a sissy-boy buys a ball of yarn for his knitting. So disgusted is Musty with the boy’s effeminate manner that he sticks a firecracker into the package which, so the synopsis reports, has “startling results.”

     When a cowboy-desperado enters, Musty is forced to give over half the contents in the store for five cents. And when a salesman happens by, Musty advises the grocer not to buy from him, which results in the drummer throwing a package of smashed crackers in his face. To get even, Musty puts milk in the drummer’s hat.

      When Musty decides to take lunch, he pours Tabasco sauce unto his sandwich by mistake, forcing him to desperately desire water. Attempting to reach a sprinkling can suspended from the ceiling, he pulls down the roof and is fired.

       Other adventures involving a barber, a drink and lunch counter, and a mistake with gasoline which ends up in an explosion follow.

        The important event here, obviously, is Musty’s inability to tolerate the passing sissy, the insignificance of the event compared with all the others, making clear that the character was intended to be introduced only for the few laughs it might evoke and not to carry the plot any further or provide social commentary—although it clearly tells us something of general social values.

 

Los Angeles, October 1, 2022

Thursday, January 4, 2024

Tom Ford | A Single Man / 2009

moment of clarity

by Douglas Messerli

 

Tom Ford and David Scearce (screenplay, based on a novel by Christopher Isherwood), Tom Ford (director) A Single Man / 2009

 

Tom Ford's first feature film, A Single Man, is a beautiful and intentionally serious work, presenting the last day in a literature professor's life. George Falconer (brilliantly played by Colin Firth) is a gay man who has lost his lover, Jim (Matthew Goode), in an accident, and has since that time lost himself to grief, stumbling through the early 1960s society (the Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962 is played in the background a of couple of times during the film's action) like a dead man walking, unable to connect with his neighbor, the Strunks, with three somewhat obnoxious children; with his students, to whom he attempts to teach Aldous Huxley's novel After Many a Summer Dies a Swan, a book, appropriately about death and longevity; or to reconnect with his close woman friend, Charley (Julianne Moore). It is a time when being gay, particularly for a careful and slightly fastidious man like George, is not openly shared; and after having had sixteen apparently happy years with his companion, he is quite frankly all alone in life, a man who at times feels truly singular, if not entirely "single."


    
  

     To increase the drama of his film version of Isherwood's 1964 novel, Ford has slightly altered the plot so that on this particular day, the day we follow his actions from waking up until his death, George has determined that he will kill himself, ending his utter loneliness and, as he wryly describes his New Year's resolution to Charley, to put to rest the things of the past.

     One of the important elements of Isherwood's fiction was, that despite his homosexuality, George was, in fact, an average person, an intelligent ordinary man, whose loss of love had simply led to a great emptiness. And Ford, given the strength of Firth's performance, also attempts to capture that ordinariness. Everything George does during the day, with a couple of exceptions, is set to pattern. As he drives past the play-gun of the neighborhood boy, he cocks his finger and shoots back, he briefly drinks coffee in the faculty lounge before facing his disinterested students, he shops for a bottle of gin Charley has begged him to bring to her party that night, he visits the local bank.

      The trouble is that Ford has so beautifully and precisely framed these events, carefully dressing his characters and sets, stunningly lighting his stylish designs, and choosing some of the most beautiful people to portray his odd assortment of figures that he renders George's great angst nearly meaningless. Accordingly, it is hard for the audience to share that character's desolate state of mind.

      Yes, George's great love of life has disappeared. The homophobia of the period underlining his lover's death is quite clearly established: he is secretly called by a family friend who reports Jim's death, telling him, in no uncertain terms, that the funeral will be a family-only affair, disinviting the most loved "family" member of the deceased.

     And, in her attempt to woo him back (Charley and George once had a temporary fling), Charley reveals the sensibility of the time, characterizing George's and Jim's shared life as "not a real relationship." We certainly understand, accordingly, his isolation with regard to the society of the day. As a gay man, as Jim proclaims, and later, as his student reminds him, George is "invisible."

     Yet George lives in one of the most beautifully moderne houses possible, all windows and sleek lines. He dresses in well-designed suits. He is helped in his daily chores by a maid. He works only a few hours a day teaching the literature that he, if not his students, most loves. He is adored by his friend Charley, who lives only a few houses away. He drives a Mercedes. It is a bit difficult, given his quite luxurious life to fully comprehend his endless languor.


      On the day of his intended suicide, moreover, his student, the radiantly fresh Kenny (played by the photogenic Nicholas Hoult) openly flirts with him. A stunningly handsome Spanish James Dean look-a-like (played by startlingly beautiful model Jon Kortajarena) is ready to jump into his car and bed if he wants. And then there's the sky, the glorious sunset over the city of Los Angeles! We are told, of course, that sometimes the most beautiful things are dangerous; that incredible sunset, after all, is a product of pollution, while in the background is a poster for Hitchcock's Psycho. George is apparently in danger, despite all these lovely trappings.

     Yet it is hard to completely square Ford's carefully choreographed picturesque sets with the despair George seems ready to embrace. Were it not for Firth's intense commitment to the role, we might break out laughing, as the audience almost does—this humor intentionally sought—when George tries to find a comfortable spot and position in which to shoot himself in the mouth. Fortunately, after thrashing about like a just-caught fish in a sleeping blanket, he fails to find the level of comfort necessary for the act.

 

    After a lovely dinner and intense argument with Charley, George returns home, now more than ever determined to end it; but he still cannot get up the courage. Out of liquor, he runs to the local bar, a kind of gay-straight joint on the nearby beach, wherein awaits his student Kenny.

     The two now attempt a game of trying to find just how far the other will go, until they discover themselves swimming naked in the ocean and return home to George's intended house of horrors. Despite the sexual overtones, or even "overtures," no actual sex occurs as George, exhausted by his games, falls asleep after nights of lying awake. He awakens to find Kenny asleep in the other room, guarding the discovered handgun within his blankets to protect the older man. George steals it away from the sleeping angel, locking it up.

     Suddenly, he has come through, as D. H. Lawrence might have put it, he has reconnected with a person—an action which Ford heavy-handedly reiterates time again throughout the film by transforming the color of George's skin from gray to a warm yellow-brown whenever he makes close human contact—bringing him a moment of clarity. As George opens the patio door to look at the stars, an owl flies up. Abandoning wisdom and its attendant reservations, George has been redeemed and saved.

     But life is not like the movies, particularly not Ford's near-perfect universe; as George returns with his newfound happiness to his bedroom, he falls dead of a heart attack, an irony that almost redeems the film.

 

Los Angeles, December 16, 2009

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (December 2009)

Reading Films: My International Cinema (Los Angeles: Green Integer, 2012).

Shobha Nirvan | Slave / 2023

the gift

by Douglas Messerli

 

Shobha Nirvan (screenwriter and director) Slave / 2023 [37 minutes]

 

The loving couple of Indian director Shobha Nirvan’s 2023 film Slave, Adhyan and Avi, enter a “bungalow” in Goa, Adhyan being completely surprised by his lover having hidden the fact that he has such a place in which they can vacation.

 

     For a day or so they enjoy the ocean, make love, and luxuriate in the pleasure of the exotic locale. But it is now Adhyan’s birthday, Avi promising a surprise gift about which he is nervous whether his lover will accept. He blindfolds Adhyan and leads him downstairs to the present, where the startled Adhyan discovers a beautiful man standing before him, as Avi whispers into his ear: “This is your gift.”


      Adhyan is indignant, and immediately leaves, returning to his upstairs room. Avi tries to explain that it is simply his gift, but Adhyan argues that he must have gone mad, he has no intention of turning to have sex with someone else given his love of Avi. What he doesn’t quite realize is that it is a test, as Avi describes the delights of his present: “Is this something to ask? You are getting such a handsome and sexy boy as a gift and you are asking me what will you do with him?”

     Adhyan still doesn’t comprehend, demanding he send the boy away, but Avi arguing that he spent good money and promised to accept his gift. “But he is not a gift,” argues Avi.

    By morning, Adhyan discovers a note on his bedside table, Avi has gone away on business to Mumbai for two days, and that the “gift” is now in his shower. When the stranger attempts to seduce him, all Adhyan can reply is that Avinash “is so crazy.” The beautiful “gift” argues, he’s not crazy but is all his “for two days.”

     “So just leave,” the deserted lover insists. But the “gift” refuses since nothing has happened between them. But again, Adhyan insists that he leave, the stranger refusing since, he claims, he has principles, he does not take money without some results.

     Given no choice, Adhyan himself decides to leave.

    Sitting alone on the beach, he is finally greeted again by his “gift,” who walks towards him before moving off into the ocean before turning back to sit down next to the reluctant birthday boy.

    Don’t you find me sexy? the stranger asks, Adhyan replying, that since his relationship with Avi he has never felt so sexy himself.

    The stranger finally admits why Avi has hired him, the goal being to know whether after spending two days and two nights with another sexy guy he would still be able to love him. But in telling him that, of course, the seduction has begun.

    Adhyan returns to the bungalow, this time watching the sexy boy shower with deep longing. “But what do I do with this because I love Avinash, only Avinash.”

     According, the standoff continues.

     Adhyan invites the new roomer for a drink, almost as a truce.

     The “gift” finally asks Adhyan if he wasn’t in a relationship would he still leave him alone.

     The loyal lover still refuses to answer. But he soon asks the important question, “If anything happens between us tonight, will you still tell Avinash?”



       The prostitute’s answer is evasive, “What do you think?”

        But it seems suitable to the clearly lusting Adhyan, as the two soon kiss and spend the night in bed.

      Now, in this soap-opera, we discover what Adhyan parent’s lost everything, but that he too has a house in Goa, which he shows to his new friend, a place he had to buy back with his own hard-earned money. And soon we realize that the “gift” has fallen in love with Adhyan. And now it slowly comes out how Adhyan himself has felt all along with Avi.

 

     In Mumbai he was feeling lonely, with no job, no place to live. And then it met Avinash “at the bar and my life changed.” Nonetheless, he now admits, he never really maintained a true relationship with his lover, “I used to always depend on Avinash” because of his financial stability.  

Adhyan finally admits he feels he is a slave to Avi, a slave which he no longer wants to be.

       His new friend asks how long he remain in the situation, Adhyan responding that he will be so until he meet someone like him who might make a commitment. The two lovers walk late into the night, discovering as they return to Avi’s bungalow that he has suddenly returned.

       Avi is surprised to see the prostitute still there, but invites him to stay for one more night, the now quite confused “gift” not knowing how to respond: “It is very difficult for me to stay here.”

When Avi inquires what he means, the man declares he has another client meeting him in Goa. But Avi declares he will pay him one more night if he remains.

       He can only agree, but in so doing, of course, sets up the scene we have long expected.

       Avi is certain that Adhyan has done nothing with his lovely temptation because he loves him. But why the extra night, Adhyan wonders?

       Adhyan now feels all the inner terror he has long known lay before him. How to tell Avi, or should he tell Avi? How can he free himself from his sexual slavery?

       Suddenly Krish—the first time we hear his name—enters while Avi takes a shower, hugging Adhyan, and he now demands that his lover stop being afraid of Avinash and tell him the truth.

       Adhyan tells him the truth: he is not yet sure of Krish’s love.

       That evening, Avi taunts Krish, telling him that he heard he was a magician. “You have cast a spell with your sexiness.” Yet Avi wonders how that spell did not work on his own lover.

        Krish can only answer something to the effect of how he knows it spell has not worked?

       But Avi is sure of his control over Adhyan. “True love has power, Krish, in front of which every magic fades.”

        We know, of course, that Avi’s power is money, and money doesn’t win out over love.

     

      Avi finally demands a showdown, demanding Adhyan join them. He demands that Krish kiss Adhyan to prove his powers. As we know already, Krish pleas for Adhyam to love him have their effect, and Avi’s boyfriend quickly shows his true love of the interloper, Avi realizing he’s lost the bet.

        Avi insists that Adhyam has lost, but the outspoken ex-lover admits that he no longer wants to be Avi’s slave and has shared his bed and his heart with Krish.

        This Indian gay soap-opera (starring Akshat Talwar, Ayush Dubey, and Shawn Gupta, no roles listed) joins the many South American works of its kind as well as the numerous Asian boy-love stories that have become popular staples of weekly TV in their various countries, a genre, with the a few exceptions such as Queer As Folk, that has not yet found favor in the US and Europe.

 

Los Angeles, January 4, 2024

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (January 2024).

Damián Szifron | Relatos Salvajes (Wild Tales) / 2014

cold tales

by Douglas Messerli

 

Damián Szifron (writer and director) Relatos Salvajes (Wild Tales) / 2014

 

We follow a young model (María Marull) about to embark on an airplane journey. Striking up a conversation with a man across the aisle, she discovers that he is a music critic, and mentions that she once had a relationship with a musician that ended somewhat badly. When asked his name, she replies, only to discover that the man across from her is the one who savagely reviewed his work, ending the musician’s career. Soon others, overhearing their conversation, begin to reveal that they have been teachers and acquaintances with the same man named Pasternak; indeed everyone on the plane have been involved with this difficult, apparently mentally ill being. His psychiatrist, also on the flight, attempts to pound on the cockpit doors where, we discover, Pasternak is now in control. “It was all your parents’ fault,” declares the psychiatrist, hoping to divert the obvious destruction of all trapped on board. The film cuts to an elderly couple sitting on a terrace in their back yard as the plane appears low on the horizon and dives down toward a couple who are obviously the parents who have raised this sudden mass murderer. The film’s credits begin to roll.


     The stories that follow are all similar in theme, dark tales of strange compulsion, of dark interactions between unknown individuals, and utter frustration with the injustices of everyday life which end in violence and death. In “Las Ratas” (“The Rats”), a waitress (Julieta Zylberberg) in an isolated diner one rainy evening suddenly encounters a customer who previously destroyed her family, having forced the sale of their home—an event that killed her father—and tried to force her mother into a sexual relationship, the reason why they now live in such a clearly isolated spot. In tears, she confesses her situation to the cook (Rita Cortese). 


     An ex-felon, the cook argues that she should put rat poison in his food. Despite her hate, the waitress refuses the offer, but the cook proceeds with her plan. Only after serving the beast his French fries does she realize the cook has conspired to kill him. When the monster, now running for political office, is joined by his son, the waitress rushes to remove the poisoned food, but the belligerent diner refuses to have them “warmed up,” and his son joins him in consuming the fries, soon after, becoming sick to his stomach. In horror, the waitress grabs the plate, spilling its contents to the floor, the ogre rising to threaten her in response. As he moves toward the girl, the cook suddenly appears behind him, stabling him in the back several times, a pool of blood welling where he falls to the floor, trapping the waitress underneath his body. The police arrive; who will be found guilty we can only wonder?


    In “El más fuerte” (“The Strongest”), a driver, Diego (Leonardo Sbaraglia) on an isolated highway, is trapped behind a meandering old and dented car, whose driver, Mario (Walter Donado), refuses to let him pass. As Diego finally gets an opportunity to speed around the other driver, he insults him and gestures a profanity. Further along, Diego’s car gets a flat tire, and he is forced, rather ineffectually, to change it. Soon after Mario catches up with him, proceeding to attempt to smash in his windows, defecating and urinating upon the front windshield. Terrified at the perverse turn of events, Diego finally leaves his car to push Mario and his vehicle into the river nearby; but when he observes that Mario has survived and is about to return to the highway, he attempts to run him down, overshooting his position and ending up on top of the other car. Unable to free himself, Diego is again attacked by Mario, who first tries to choke him on his own seat belt and later beats him. Diego reacts in response, beating Mario over the head with an emergency fire extinguisher. Finally, entering from the car trunk, Mario makes his way back into the automobile, stuffing a lit rag into Diego’s gas tank. As the two attempt to fight it out for escape, the explosion finally consumes everything, leaving a tow truck driver who Diego has earlier called to observe, along with the police, the two charred bodies bound in a ghoulish embrace.

    “Bombita” (“Little Bomb”) is also about explosions, as we observe demolition expert, Simón Fisher (Ricardo Darin) organize and blow up a series of old grain silos. He calls his wife soon after, promising to pick up a cake on his way home for their daughter’s birthday. He pulls into a parking place outside the bakery and picks up and pays for the cake, only to discover that in the interim his car has been towed, even though there seems to be no evidence that he has been located in a no-parking zone. Forced to pay for the towing despite his insistence that he done no wrong, he arrives home late, the party nearly over. His wife (Nancy Dupláa), angered by his numerous excuses of tardiness over the years, demands a divorce.

    At the city parking division, not only does the city employee refuse to hear his plea of innocence, but sarcastically denies the possibility: he has been towed, so he is automatically guilty. Angered by the smug illogic of the employee, Fisher grows violent, security is called, and he is briefly imprisoned. Upon meeting with his company lawyer, he is told that his job has been terminated, the company fearful of the publicity. Without a job, his custody of his daughter is called into question. At a new job interview, a secretary refuses to allow him to see a company head, and when he attempts to return to his car, he discovers it has been towed once again.


    Furious with the marital and bureaucratic injustices of his life, the former demolition expert plants a “little bomb” in his car and, as he dines nearby, watches it being towed away. The bomb goes off in the towing yard, destroying property without killing anyone, proving that the bomb expert knew precisely what he was doing. Now in jail, he has become a public hero, and the last scene shows a visitation by his wife and daughter who bring him a cake which he and the inmates consume in joyful celebration.

    “La Propuesta” (“The Proposal”) concerns a hit-and-run accident that kills a pregnant woman and her unborn child. The rich boy who has been driving has clearly been protected by his family throughout his life, and now that he is involved with a death, they call in their lawyer who suggests a possible solution: together, the lawyer, father (Oscar Martínez), and mother convince their faithful caretaker, Casero (Germán de Silva), to take the blame by insisting that he, after drinking, had borrowed the car and driven throughout the city. In return for his confession, the family will pay him $500,000 and care for his wife and children, assuring him that, at most, he will receive only one year in prison.

    The scheme is undone, however, when the local prosecutor (Diego Veláquez) perceives that the car mirrors are not at the right height and angle for the driver of his small proportions. To put the “proposal” back on track, the lawyer offers the prosecutor one million dollars for his silence. The put-upon father is about to go along with the proposal when the lawyer himself demands another large sum and the caretaker, overhearing some of the bargaining, demands a further payment in the form of a city apartment. A final request for $30,000 just for operating expenses jinxes the entire deal, as the father determines to offer no funding and force his son, for the first time in his life, to own up to his behavior.

     After a great deal of further bickering, the “legal” crooks all agree to split the million dollars up between them, but as the caretaker is led away in handcuffs, the dead woman’s vengeful husband rushes forward to kill the innocent Casero.

    The final long “tale,” Hasta que la muerte nos separe” (“Until Death Do Us Part”) begins as a wedding celebration for a lovely and apparently loving young couple, Romina (Érica Rivas) and Ariel (Diego Gentile). In the midst of the celebrations, however, Romina perceives that a fellow worker whom her husband has invited to the affair is more than a casual friend and discerns, by calling her cell phone, that she has the same number that her new husband had claimed was that of his guitar teacher. Mortified by the discovery and, soon after, by the admission of by her husband of the sexual relationship, Romina rushes from the party, and, in an almost suicidal state of mind, escapes to the hotel roof. A kitchen worker discovers her at the very edge of the edifice in tears and gently attempts to comfort her, reminding her that love must be stronger than a single event.

    His consolations appear to have an effect as she calms down and attempts to kiss him for his help. The kiss, however, suddenly turns into a passionate embrace and, soon after, results in animal sex, which Ariel and his cohorts, rushing after Romina, shockingly encounter. Suddenly the vengeful Romina declares that she will spend the rest of their relationship having sex with every man she meets, torturing Ariel until either he dies of leaves her his entire estate. Sickened by her behavior, he nonetheless, requests that they return to their guests. She has now become almost a new woman, forcefully leading the guests in celebratory dances, and grabbing up the arm of the woman with whom her husband has had the affair, spinning with her in what begins as an almost ritualistic revel which ends, somewhat predictably, with her loosening her hold so that the girl crashes into a mirrored wall.


     Blood is spattered everywhere, doctors are called. Now drunk, Romina takes out her fury on the groom’s mother and others. The mother, in turn, attacks the new bride and other family members join in the melee until each are peeled away, standing as opposing forces in the grand ballroom. Picking up a knife, Ariel seems intent on his own revenge, but simply cuts out a piece of wedding cake, pushing it into his mouth. Approaching his new wife, now sprawled out on the ballroom floor, he offers his hand which, finally, she accepts as they dance slowly across the floor, kissing—at first rather cautiously, but gradually more and more intensely—and falling into an intense passionate session of lovemaking. As the embarrassed guests tiptoe out, the couple proceeds to engage in sex across the table, fragments of the wedding oozing onto the floor.

     Such tales may indeed seem “wild” to U.S. audiences, but, in fact, they belong to a long tradition in Latin American and French literature. Their roots can be traced back to Medieval times, taken up again by 19th century writers such Edgar Allen Poe, through the stories of Petrus Borel, and others. In the late 19th and 20th century numerous writers continued the tradition, one of the most notable of them being the Cuban writer Virgilio Piñera, whose Cuentos fríos (Cold Tales) might suggest a name for the genre.* These tales of hysteria, passion, anger, hate, and murder, presented from an icy cold objective point of view, reveal that in their obsessional perspectives of reality, love and hate can become so intertwined that any warm emotion can suddenly be converted into cold-blooded wrath and freezing anger can boil the blood to such a passionate intensity that everything blows up.

     For years, translator/friend Rick Gilbert has lobbied for me to publish just such an anthology as in this film Argentine director Szifron has quite brilliantly achieved, while contributing another group of works to the genre.

 

*I published one of the tales from Piñera’s Cold Tales, “The Face” in 1001 Great Stories, Volume 1 (2005) on my Green Integer press.

 

Los Angeles, March 14, 2015

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (March 2015).

 

 

Index O-Z

Dave O'Brien Straight Boys / 2005 Nick Oceano El primo ( The Cousin ) / 2008  Ken Ochiai Phoenix / 2006 Carlos Ocho Relación Abierta ...