Wednesday, August 26, 2026

Mathias Broe | Ung mands dans (Young Man's Dance) / 2014

the last dance

by Douglas Messerli

 

Mathias Broe (screenwriter and director) Ung mands dans (Young Man's Dance) / 2014 [12 minutes]


Mattis (Lior Cohen) is a competition ballroom dancer, and evidently an award-winning boy. As he combs and dries his hair in preparation for the evening’s major contribution, his father enters the bathroom to wash up his hands. When his son asks him if might attend that night’s events, there is no answer as the father leaves the room; apparently he is not happy with Mattis’ involvement with dance.

     There may also be other reasons, we soon discover, why the boy’s father is so opposed to the entire affair. We almost immediately discover that the very handsome young man, of age 17 or 18, is in a sexual relationship with his dancing teacher. How long the affair has been going on, how it started, how involved to the two are, and how it began are all subjects we will never learn in this short film—somewhat to its detriment.


     We do not even learn what has brought the two of them, man and boy to the situation that the movie focuses on. In fact, after a brief encounter between the two, teacher and student just before the dance events, we only sense their involvement, Mattis almost melting to the touch the teacher’s hand as he checks out a mark on his neck. A hickey, we wonder, from a previous moment together?

    But the man quickly pulls away and leaves, as the movie pretends its real focus is on the dance events themselves as in films such as Baz Luhrmann’s Strictly Ballroom (1992).


    It almost immediately becomes clear, however, that despite the pretty scene in which we now are witness to with Mattis and his partner moving in the flowing rhythms of a waltz, Danish director Mathias Broe is not truly interested in their ballroom maneuvers.

    The real dance of this film, more like a dans apache, takes place long after the lights have gone out on the dancefloor, and the true competition begins with the beautiful boy, now half naked, confronting his teacher at his car parked alone in a nearby lot.

     For some reason, the teacher (Niels Bender) has come somewhat to his senses and is attempting to break away from the relationship, but Mattis is not about to let him go, and plays out a wild dramatic scene of seduction, self-abuse, and finally almost saddo-masochist behavior as, refusing to leave the man’s car as ordered to time and again, he becomes determined to maintain control over the elder as the recipient of his love.


    The IMDb and other blurbs for this film suggest that Mattis has turned to his teacher because of his father’s rejection. But that seems far too simplistic of a Freudian argument, which furthermore I feel is no longer a valid analysis of the psychological needs of this young kid. I would argue from the little context that we are provided, that although he seems truly to be seeking gay love and sex perhaps not easily available elsewhere to a young man in his position, the real issue here is power. Who is control of this societally “perverse” love, the man or the child? Surely the man’s guilt over what was probably at first been his sexual advances has led him to now pull away; but Mattis, who has apparently been more than receptive to those approaches, is not about to give him up as a lover. Indeed, he is almost smug in sense of entitlement and, more importantly, in is belief that his youth and beauty will surely win out over any self-control the danselærer is now attempting to maintain.

     And the visual dance between them as they sit in the front seat of the teacher’s car is the true focus of this cinematic work. The worried looks of fear and torture that crosses the elder’s face as he announces that he taking the boy home, and the challenge of Mattis’ denial that he won’t go there is played out in a sudden torrent of rain in a swirl of yellow, red, and blue lights that we feel we have suddenly entered a musical sound stage. When Mattis puts his hand on the teacher’s knee, he pushes it away and slaps his face, drawing blood.

     Mattis’ response is truly masochistic, demanding that the man “hit him,” again, the teacher finally so furious with the out-of-hand situation that he puts his hands around the boy’s neck as if to choke him, which just as quickly becomes a kind of sexual lap-dance, the man moving his hand to the boy’s chin as his body thrusts in the rhythm of the fuck. A moment later they both sit facing forward, the light having changed to yellows and greens that hint at an after-coitus moment of rest.



     Finally, the man pulls over, insisting that it isn’t working out anymore. “You are not well; none of us are,” he argues as if trying to shift the blame upon the younger man, although given the boy’s maniacal behavior, he surely has a point.      

     Mattis only moves over to top him and bends toward a kiss, the other finally getting out of the car and pulling the boy out the other side. He tries to drive off, but even then Mattis keys the car as it attempts to pull away, drawing perhaps his nails across the surface of the auto, the man stops, jumps from the car and wrestles the boy violently to the ground in a manner that as observers we truly do feel worried for the boy’s survival.

   He finally lets up, both standing, the teacher facing the camera as the boy slowly wanders off, apparently having just performed his last dance.


    Given the scene we witness, we can neither entirely blame the man as pedophile, or exempt the young man as a victim in this struggle of release from and desperate attempt to hold on to love—however that word might be defined. And I should point out, the in Denmark, the locations of these events, the boy is of legal age.


      When I first saw this film, I felt it was far too fragmented and incomplete view of the situation to provide much of significance; but watching this over several times, I now realize just how evocative it is in providing us an insight into some aspects of man-boy relationships that usually are overlooked or purposely ignored in the hysteria of societal outrage. Along with French director Jean-François Monette’s Take-out (2000), Australian Jonathan Wald’s What Grown-Ups Know (2004), and fellow-Danish director Christian Tafdrup’s Awakening (2008), this film and several others should force us to rethink such relationships, with an attempt to better comprehend both sides of the equation.

 

Los Angeles, March 21, 2023

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (March 2023).  

No comments:

Post a Comment

Index of Titles (director, title, and date) A-Q

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.