against sexual
prohibition: a final stand
by Douglas Messerli
Walter DeLeon and Francis Martin (screenplay,
based on a story by Neil Brant and Louis F. Heifetz), A. Edward Sutherland
(director) International House / 1933
Like so many musical films of the late 1920s
and early 1930s, representative of the early talkies, A. Edward Sutherland’s International
House is little more than a roster of vaudeville talents patched up into an
almost impossible to comprehend plot. This work from 1933, has some of the
standard heterosexual and queer tropes of the day, the film containing more
than the usual number of sexual double-entendres of what many describe
as “pre-code” cinema. But what also makes this film of more than passing
interest is the number of first-class comic and musical acts in contains—its
stars include W. C. Fields, Bela Lugosi, George Burns and Gracie Allen, Cab
Calloway, Baby Rose Marie, Rudy Vallee, Sterling Holloway, and performing in a
lead role fussy, frustrated, and effeminate hotel manager Franklin Pangborn—and
that its numerous sexual innuendos actually passed the censors’ wrath.
Despite the common belief that this was “pre-code” Hollywood, the Hays
Committee by the time of this film’s release on May 27, 1933 had truly become
re-activated due to Joseph Breen’s and others’ startled responses to several
films made just before and after this movie. Cecille DeMille’s November 30,
1932 release caused a major outrage with cuts demanded, George Cukor’s Our
Betters of February 23, 1933 provided further fodder for their fury, and
only the month before International House Walter Lang’s The Warrior’s
Husband brought down Breen’s rage as he declared the end of the sissy or
“pansy craze,” the last extant representation of male gay homosexuality in US
filmmaking for years to come.
Accordingly, when the crowd of crooked and crazed entrepreneurs descend
upon Wuhu, China’s International House all hoping to buy the rights for Dr.
Wong’s (Edmund Breese) new invention, a early television described as a
“radioscope,” it is rather amazing that Pangborn stands in place ready to
prissily greet such savages.
Burns and Allen’s several routines are among their best, with Gracie
almost stealing the entire film with her prescriptions of behavior attributed
to her obviously insane family members, which read today almost like the roots
of the theater of the absurd. She admits that she cannot even name the school
she attended since they pay her monthly not to mention it.
Lugosi plays the evil Russian General Nicholas Petronovich, formerly
married to Joyce, who would love to get his hands of the new device, but is
locked out of the hotel by accident just before the quarantine is declared. He
and his goons attempt to ram their way into the hotel at the very moment
authorities have opened up the doors again when they the American
representative of The
When the diners all quickly exit on the announcement of their
quarantine, Quail quickly gathers up any half-filled wine and champagne bottles
he can carry off and, not having a room reservation, he takes cane in hand to
seek out a vacant room, briefly sharing Joyce’s double bed (in this instance,
two beds put side by side) before ending up sleeping in a large single with Dr.
Wong for the rest of the night. His sole purpose for being in this film is to
create general alarm for the hotel manager and his guests, while muttering his
Fieldian witticisms.
Six-year-old Baby Rose Marie (yes, the same Rose Marie Mazzetta who made
us laugh on The Dick Van Dyke Show) sings out a beebop number in
gutteral countertenor more in the manner of Sophie Tucker than Shirley Temple.
Rudy Vallee sings a sweet love song to someone in a nearby bed hidden under
covers, who we later discover is none other than his beloved megaphone. And Cab
Calloway jazzes up his band to sing “Reefer Man”:
"Man, what’s the
matter with that cat there?"
"Must be full of
reefer"
"Full of
reefer?!"
"Yeah man"
"You mean that cat's
high?!"
"Sailing"
"Sailing"
"Sailing lightly"
"Get away from
here"
"Man, is that the
reefer man?"
"That's the reefer
man"
"I believe he's losing
his mind"
"I think he's lost his
mind!"
And that’s just the introduction.
Pangborn in the midst of chaos, as he repeats three times to his rooftop
audience, hopes just to present “pleasure” (“Ladies and gentlemen,” he
announces the next act, “for your pleasure we will present our dancing
girls who will give you pleasure in a novelty number which I hope will
give you pleasure” [italics mine]), but gets little return for all his
fussy attempts to protect order. When near the end of the film chaos erupts
once more in the lobby of the International Hotel, the front desk with walls of
post boxes filled with keys again being threatened to topple, we can only
imagine that he fears that the keys to what goes on behind all those bedroom
doors will become mixed-up and lost forever, the different kinds of pleasures
once available to become longer available to our eyes behind the locked doors.
In near despair, the manager grabs the tottering wall and pulls it over,
standing atop the check-in desk to cry out like a warrior mounting a hilltop
with a flag: “Ahhh, I fooled that time, didn’t I?” having joined up with the
chaos himself.
Perhaps he fooled the censors as well since Pangborn outlived even
Breen’s ban, playing his “Nervous Nellie” shopkeepers, hotel and theater
managers, and salesmen throughout the 1940s and into the 50s, long after the
Hays Committee declared homosexuals to be nonexistent. And in that sense, as
Richard Barrios describes him, he was a kind of gay movie hero who was also,
perhaps unknown to most, a real-life hero as well. As Boyd MacDonald put it in
1985:
It is not faintly surprising
to anyone who knows the truth about the
military, as opposed to the
Pentagon version, that Pangborn
was wounded in the Argonne in
World War I, while such he-men
as John Wayne and Ronnie
Regan performed their heroic
military acts exclusively on
camera.
International
House is by no means a great movie, but its very existence makes clear that
Hollywood writers, directors, and producers put up a good fight until the very
end in the struggle against the Hays board’s censorship in a time which could
no longer be described as “pre-code” since legions of humorless do-gooders were
very actively establishing their code in opposition to the films being shown in
1932 and 1933. 1934 in comparison was a rather dreary year for US movies except
for those films by filmmakers who had already moved on to another kind of code,
a coding of their own creation.
Los Angeles, May 31, 2022
Reprinted from World Cinema Review (May
2022).








No comments:
Post a Comment