drawers and doors
by Douglas Messerli
Jan Švankmajer (screenwriter and
director) Něco z Alenky (Alice) / 1988
The great Czech animator’s first
full feature film, Alice, is not so
much a retelling of Lewis Carroll’s beloved Alice
in Wonderland as it is a kind of “riff” on Carroll’s work, or, to
contextualize it more with the academic community, it is a deconstruction of
the original Alice. Indeed, the Czech
title for the film means “Something from Alice,” suggesting that the work is a
product of Alice’s creation as opposed to a hallucinatory tale which occurs to
her. Throughout his film Švankmajer makes sure the viewer perceives that this
is Alice’s tale, as he presents all the film’s dialogue (dubbed in the version
I saw into English) through closeups of Alice’s lips as she speaks the words of
The White Rabbit, The Mad Hatter, etc.
The director’s vision loses something by not more fully playing up the
bizarre narrative of the original, but gains a great deal through its
theatrical reenactment of the basic elements of Carroll’s tale through
stop-motion photography of dolls, puppets and other objects—even a slab of red
meat—and through his reversals of filmed scenes and quick transformations of
the central character as she moves from a large human being to her doll-shaped
imitation and even into another doll-encased self from which she eventually
escapes by cutting away its outer wall, as if she were eating herself away from
her own cocoon.
This director’s Alice, far from being a genteel Victorian child of
Carroll’s fantasies, is a rather bored, rock-throwing girl, determined even
from the very first scenes to get into trouble.
Švankmajer’s Alice (Kristýna Kohoutová), living in a derelict room
filled with the detritus of not only her own childhood, but of the mysterious
family in which she lives, is surrounded by a world that, quite literally, is
falling apart. A bit like Czechoslovakia itself under the Soviet rule, doors
are in bad need of painting, walls veer up more like ancient images of decay,
covered over with peeling wallpaper and layers of yellowing lace, a world far
from of Victorian protection.
The moment the child’s taxidermically stuffed rabbit comes to life,
escaping its glass case, Alice almost passively follows, determined, just like
the always late rabbit, to escape her own role in the suffocating world in
which she is also encased.
Locked away in a room where she almost drowns from her own tears, with a
mouse staking out the territory of her own head, she is freed only to become
again locked away in a children’s playhouse like a giant caught in a
Lilliputian world on the attack. At one point even socks become animated
enemies, boring away holes in the very floor on which she stands. One of the
socks, stealing an eye for itself and a pair of dentures, becomes Carroll’s
famed Caterpillar. But the dance of his kindred brothers is more like a serpent
kingdom which attempts to charm even her own stockings off her feet.
Perhaps the most wonderful scene is Alice’s encounters with two
marvelous puppet-toys, the Mad Hatter and the March Hare, as they move up and
down the tea tables with the Mad Hatter calling out for clean cups while
rewinding his friend back into action so that they might continue their
meaningless conversations.
The Red Queen, who demands their heads, is a playing card—quite
literally, the Queen of a deck of cards and a card acting out her theater in
front of various Victorian-like theater sets. This Alice has no idea what to
say in the short trial which proceeds her own possible beheading.
In short, Švankmajer’s world presents
less of a fantastic pageant than a psychological playing out of the young
girl’s own frustrated limitations, a girl caught in a glass case as surely as
the White Rabbit had been in his. Upon “awakening,” Alice discovers all of her
beloved toys still surrounding her—except the Rabbit, whose case remains
cracked open, the figure missing. So we cannot be certain whether she has
merely had a horrible dream and suffered a “real” nightmare induced by her
culture itself. If you see this film in a theater, leave the children at home.
It’s hard to imagine them pondering the significant differences—and terrorizing
consequences—of these two alternatives.
Los Angeles, September 23, 2012
Reprinted from World Cinema Review (September 2012) and Reading Film: My
International Cinema (Los Angeles: Green Integer, 2012).



No comments:
Post a Comment